B-11 (SP-2019-0034C - HEB 10, District 8)

Planning Commission – April 14, 2020

B-11 (SP-2019-0034C - HEB 10, District 8) — original pdf

Backup

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF — Page 1 of 58 pages

ITEM FOR ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION AGENDA COMMISSION MEETING DATE: March 4, 2020 NAME & NUMBER OF PROJECT: HEB 10 SP-2019-0034C NAME OF APPLICANT OR ORGANIZATION: Joe Farias Stantec Consulting Services LOCATION: 7901 W US 290 Hwy, Austin, TX 78749 COUNCIL DISTRICT: District 8 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STAFF: WATERSHED: REQUEST: Pamela Abee-Taulli, Environmental Review Specialist Senior, Development Services Department, 512-974-1879 Williamson Creek Watershed, Barton Springs Zone Classification, Edwards Aquifer Contributing Zone, Drinking Water Protection Zone Variance request is as follows: 1. Request to vary from LDC 25-8-341 to allow cut in excess of 4 feet (maximum cut 7 feet) in the Barton Springs Zone. 2. Request to vary from LDC 25-8-342 to allow fill in excess of 4 feet (maximum fill 14 feet) in the Barton Springs Zone. 3. Request to vary from LDC 25-8-302(A)(1) to construct a building on a slope with a gradient of more than 25 percent. 4. Request to vary from LDC 25-8-302(A)(2) to construct a parking area that is not a parking structure on a slope with a gradient of more than 15 percent. 11 of 58Staff recommends this variance, having determined the findings of fact to have been met, with the following conditions: 1. Engineered structural containment for fill exceeding 4 feet; 2. No non-organic mulch (including stone of any size) allowed in the 3. Rainwater harvesting storage tanks shall have a total volume of at least 4. Condensate storage tanks shall have a total volume of at least 3,000 landscaped areas; 3,000 gallons; gallons; 5. Cut shall be limited to a maximum of 7 feet and limited to the areas as generally noted on the site plan; and 6. Fill shall be limited to a maximum of 14 feet and limited to the areas as generally noted on the site plan. Page 2 of 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 22 of 58 Development Services Department Staff Recommendations Concerning Required Findings Project Name: Ordinance Standard: Watershed Protection Ordinance Variance Request: HEB 10 Request to vary from LDC 25-8-341 to allow cut in excess of 4 feet (maximum cut 7 feet) in the Barton Springs Zone. Include an explanation with each applicable finding of fact. A. Land Use Commission variance determinations from Chapter 25-8-41 of the City Code: The site elevation rises briefly and then slopes down, southward from The requirement will deprive the applicant of a privilege available to owners of similarly situated property with approximately contemporaneous development subject to similar code requirements. Yes Hwy. 290 toward an unclassified waterway (draining less than 64 acres). With a gross site area of 30.3 acres, 29.2 acres are relative flat. 1.0 acres have slopes between 15 and 25 percent, 0.1 acres have slopes from 25 to 35 percent, and there are no slopes over 35 percent. The project has a large footprint, comprised of a surface parking lot and grocery store. The proposed cut between 4 and 7 feet is to level the parking area and make it even with the store. Owners of similarly situated properties have been allowed to grade more than 4 feet in the Barton Springs Zone. The variance: a) Is not necessitated by the scale, layout, construction method, or other design decision made by the applicant, unless the design decision provides greater overall environmental protection than is achievable without the variance; Yes The design provides increased environmental protection by building engineered structural containment for fill over 4 feet. This will decrease the development footprint, increase the amount of undisturbed area, and minimize chances for erosion during the construction process. 1. 2. 33 of 58Is the minimum deviation from the code requirement necessary to allow a reasonable use of the property; Yes Development with the variance is the minimum deviation from the code requirement necessary to allow construction of this project. Does not create a significant probability of harmful environmental consequences. b) c) Yes Development with the variance does not create a probability of harmful environmental consequences. Development with the variance will result in water quality that is at least equal to the water quality achievable without the variance. Yes Development with the variance will result in water quality that is at least equal to the water quality achievable without the variance as water quality controls, structural containment of the fill, and erosion and sedimentation controls will be used as required by current code. B. The Land Use Commission may grant a variance from a requirement of Section 25-8-422 (Water Supply Suburban Water Quality Transition Zone), Section 25-8-452 (Water Supply Rural Water Quality Transition Zone), Section 25-8-482 (Barton Springs Zone Water Quality Transition Zone), Section 25-8-368 (Restrictions on Development Impacting Lake Austin, Lady Bird Lake, and Lake Walter E. Long), or Article 7, Division 1 ( Critical Water Quality Zone Restrictions ), after determining that:: The criteria for granting a variance in Subsection (A) are met; NA The requirement for which a variance is requested prevents a reasonable, economic use of the entire property; NA The variance is the minimum deviation from the code requirement necessary to allow a reasonable, economic use of the entire property. NA Staff Determination: Staff determines that the findings of fact have been met. Staff recommends the following conditions: 1. Engineered structural containment for fill exceeding 4 feet; 2. No non-organic mulch (including stone of any size) allowed in the landscaped areas; 3. Rainwater harvesting storage tanks shall have a total volume of at least 3,000 gallons; 4. Condensate storage tanks shall have a total volume of at least 3,000 gallons; 5. Cut shall be limited to a maximum of 7 feet and limited to the areas as generally noted on the 6. Fill shall be limited to a maximum of 14 feet and limited to the areas as generally noted on site plan; and the site plan. 3. 1. 2. 3. 44 of 58 Environmental Reviewer (DSD) Environmental Review Manager (DSD) Environmental Officer (WPD) (Pamela Abee-Taulli) (Mike McDougal) (Chris Herrington) Date: 2/26/20 Date: 2/26/20 Date: 55 of 58 Development Services Department Staff Recommendations Concerning Required Findings Project Name: Ordinance Standard: Watershed Protection Ordinance Variance Request: HEB 10 Request to vary from LDC 25-8-342 to allow fill in excess of 4 feet in the Barton Springs Zone. Include an explanation with each applicable finding of fact. A. Land Use Commission variance determinations from Chapter 25-8-41 of the City Code: 1. The requirement will deprive the applicant of a privilege available to owners of similarly situated property with approximately contemporaneous development subject to similar code requirements. Yes. The site slopes generally southward from Hwy. 290 toward an unclassified waterway (draining less than 64 acres). With a gross site area of 30.3 acres, 29.2 acres are relative flat. 1.0 acres have slopes between 15 and 25 percent, 0.1 acres have slopes from 25 to 35 percent, and there are no slopes over 35 percent. The project has a large footprint, comprised of a surface parking lot and grocery store. The proposed fill between 4 and 14 feet is to provide a single-level parking lot, grocery store, and access for delivery trucks at the back. Owners of similarly situated properties have been allowed to grade more than 4 feet in the Barton Springs Zone. 2. The variance: a) Is not necessitated by the scale, layout, construction method, or other design decision made by the applicant, unless the design decision provides greater overall environmental protection than is achievable without the variance; Yes The design provides increased environmental protection by building engineered structural containment for fill over 4 feet. This will decrease the development footprint, increase the amount of undisturbed area, and minimize chances for erosion during the construction process. 66 of 58Is the minimum deviation from the code requirement necessary to allow a reasonable use of the property; Yes Development with the variance is the minimum deviation from the code requirement necessary to allow construction of this project. Does not create a significant probability of harmful environmental consequences. b) c) Yes Development with the variance does not create a probability of harmful environmental consequences.] Development with the variance will result in water quality that is at least equal to the water quality achievable without the variance. Yes Development with the variance will result in water quality that is at least equal to the water quality achievable without the variance as water quality controls, structural containment of the fill, and erosion and sedimentation controls will be used as required by current code. B. The Land Use Commission may grant a variance from a requirement of Section 25-8-422 (Water Supply Suburban Water Quality Transition Zone), Section 25-8-452 (Water Supply Rural Water Quality Transition Zone), Section 25-8-482 (Barton Springs Zone Water Quality Transition Zone), Section 25-8-368 (Restrictions on Development Impacting Lake Austin, Lady Bird Lake, and Lake Walter E. Long), or Article 7, Division 1 ( Critical Water Quality Zone Restrictions ), after determining that:: The criteria for granting a variance in Subsection (A) are met; NA The requirement for which a variance is requested prevents a reasonable, economic use of the entire property; NA The variance is the minimum deviation from the code requirement necessary to allow a reasonable, economic use of the entire property. NA Staff Determination: Staff determines that the findings of fact have been met. Staff recommends the following conditions: 1. Engineered structural containment for fill exceeding 4 feet; 2. No non-organic mulch (including stone of any size) allowed in the landscaped areas; 3. Rainwater harvesting storage tanks shall have a total volume of at least 3,000 gallons; 4. Condensate storage tanks shall have a total volume of at least 3,000 gallons; 5. Cut shall be limited to a maximum of 7 feet and limited to the areas as generally noted on the 6. Fill shall be limited to a maximum of 14 feet and limited to the areas as generally noted on site plan; and the site plan. 3. 1. 2. 3. 77 of 58 Environmental Reviewer (DSD) (Pamela Abee-Taulli) Environmental Review Manager (DSD) (Mike McDougal) Environmental Officer (WPD) (Chris Herrington) Date: 2/26/20 Date: 2/26/20 Date: 88 of 58 Development Services Department Staff Recommendations Concerning Required Findings Project Name: Ordinance Standard: Watershed Protection Ordinance Variance Request: HEB 10 Request to vary from LDC 25-8-302(A)(1) to construct a building on a slope with a gradient of more than 25 percent. Include an explanation with each applicable finding of fact. A. Land Use Commission variance determinations from Chapter 25-8-41 of the City Code: 1. The applicant proposes to construct a single-story grocery store and a The requirement will deprive the applicant of a privilege available to owners of similarly situated property with approximately contemporaneous development subject to similar code requirements. Yes surface parking lot on a sloped site. Owners of similarly situated properties have been allowed to construct a building on a slope with a gradient of more than 25 percent in the Barton Springs Zone. 2. The variance: a) Is not necessitated by the scale, layout, construction method, or other design decision made by the applicant, unless the design decision provides greater overall environmental protection than is achievable without the variance; Yes The design provides increased environmental protection by building engineered structural containment for fill over 4 feet. This will decrease the development footprint, increase the amount of undisturbed area, and minimize chances for erosion during the construction process. Is the minimum deviation from the code requirement necessary to allow a reasonable use of the property; Yes Development with the variance is the minimum deviation from the code requirement necessary to allow construction of this project. b) 99 of 583. 1. 2. 3. Does not create a significant probability of harmful environmental consequences. c) Yes Development with the variance does not create a probability of harmful environmental consequences. Development with the variance will result in water quality that is at least equal to the water quality achievable without the variance. Yes Development with the variance will result in water quality that is at least equal to the water quality achievable without the variance as water quality controls, structural containment of the fill, and erosion and sedimentation controls will be used as required by current code. B. The Land Use Commission may grant a variance from a requirement of Section 25-8-422 (Water Supply Suburban Water Quality Transition Zone), Section 25-8-452 (Water Supply Rural Water Quality Transition Zone), Section 25-8-482 (Barton Springs Zone Water Quality Transition Zone), Section 25-8-368 (Restrictions on Development Impacting Lake Austin, Lady Bird Lake, and Lake Walter E. Long), or Article 7, Division 1 ( Critical Water Quality Zone Restrictions ), after determining that:: The criteria for granting a variance in Subsection (A) are met; NA The requirement for which a variance is requested prevents a reasonable, economic use of the entire property; NA The variance is the minimum deviation from the code requirement necessary to allow a reasonable, economic use of the entire property. NA Staff Determination: Staff determines that the findings of fact have been met. Staff recommends the following conditions: 1. Engineered structural containment for fill exceeding 4 feet; 2. No non-organic mulch (including stone of any size) allowed in the landscaped areas; 3. Rainwater harvesting storage tanks shall have a total volume of at least 3,000 gallons; 4. Condensate storage tanks shall have a total volume of at least 3,000 gallons; 5. Cut shall be limited to a maximum of 7 feet and limited to the areas as generally noted on the 6. Fill shall be limited to a maximum of 14 feet and limited to the areas as generally noted on site plan; and the site plan. 1010 of 58 Environmental Reviewer (DSD) (Pamela Abee-Taulli) Environmental Review Manager (DSD) (Mike McDougal) Environmental Officer (WPD) (Chris Herrington) Date: 2/26/20 Date: 2/26/20 Date: 1111 of 58 Development Services Department Staff Recommendations Concerning Required Findings Project Name: Ordinance Standard: Watershed Protection Ordinance Variance Request: HEB 10 Request to vary from LDC 25-8-302(A)(2) to construct a parking area that is not a parking structure on a slope with a gradient of more than 15 percent. Include an explanation with each applicable finding of fact. A. Land Use Commission variance determinations from Chapter 25-8-41 of the City Code: 1. The applicant proposes to construct a single-story grocery store and a The requirement will deprive the applicant of a privilege available to owners of similarly situated property with approximately contemporaneous development subject to similar code requirements. Yes surface parking lot on a sloped site. Owners of similarly situated properties have been allowed to construct a building on a slope with a gradient of more than 25 percent in the Barton Springs Zone. 2. The variance: a) Is not necessitated by the scale, layout, construction method, or other design decision made by the applicant, unless the design decision provides greater overall environmental protection than is achievable without the variance; Yes The design provides increased environmental protection by building engineered structural containment for fill over 4 feet. This will decrease the development footprint, increase the amount of undisturbed area, and minimize chances for erosion during the construction process. Is the minimum deviation from the code requirement necessary to allow a reasonable use of the property; Yes Development with the variance is the minimum deviation from the code requirement necessary to allow construction of this project. b) 1212 of 583. 1. 2. 3. c) Does not create a significant probability of harmful environmental consequences. Yes Development with the variance does not create a probability of harmful environmental consequences. Development with the variance will result in water quality that is at least equal to the water quality achievable without the variance. Yes Development with the variance will result in water quality that is at least equal to the water quality achievable without the variance as water quality controls, structural containment of the fill, and erosion and sedimentation controls will be used as required by current code. B. The Land Use Commission may grant a variance from a requirement of Section 25-8-422 (Water Supply Suburban Water Quality Transition Zone), Section 25-8-452 (Water Supply Rural Water Quality Transition Zone), Section 25-8-482 (Barton Springs Zone Water Quality Transition Zone), Section 25-8-368 (Restrictions on Development Impacting Lake Austin, Lady Bird Lake, and Lake Walter E. Long), or Article 7, Division 1 ( Critical Water Quality Zone Restrictions ), after determining that:: The criteria for granting a variance in Subsection (A) are met; NA The requirement for which a variance is requested prevents a reasonable, economic use of the entire property; NA The variance is the minimum deviation from the code requirement necessary to allow a reasonable, economic use of the entire property. NA Staff Determination: Staff determines that the findings of fact have been met. Staff recommends the following conditions: 1. Engineered structural containment for fill exceeding 4 feet; 2. No non-organic mulch (including stone of any size) allowed in the landscaped areas; 3. Rainwater harvesting storage tanks shall have a total volume of at least 3,000 gallons; 4. Condensate storage tanks shall have a total volume of at least 3,000 gallons; 5. Cut shall be limited to a maximum of 7 feet and limited to the areas as generally noted on the 6. Fill shall be limited to a maximum of 14 feet and limited to the areas as generally noted on site plan; and the site plan. 1313 of 58 Environmental Reviewer (DSD) (Pamela Abee-Taulli) Environmental Review Manager (DSD) (Mike McDougal) Environmental Officer (WPD) (Chris Herrington) Date: 2/26/20 Date: 2/26/20 Date: 1414 of 58H-E-B Store #10 Environmental Commission Variance TBPE No. 6324 TBPLS No. 10194230 January 10, 2020 HEB Variance Backup One, p. 115 of 58ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION VARIANCE APPLICATION FORM PROJECT DESCRIPTION Applicant Contact Information Name of Applicant Street Address City State ZIP Code Work Phone E-Mail Address Case Name Case Number Address or Location Environmental Reviewer Name Environmental Resource Management Reviewer Name Applicable Ordinance Watershed Name Watershed Classification Variance Case Information Reece Whitley 1905 Aldrich St, Suite 300 Austin, TX 78723 512-328-0011 Reece.Whitley@stantec.com H-E-B Store #10 SP-2019-0034C 7901 West Highway 290 US Pamela Abee-Taulli Pamela Abee-Taulli Ordinance 920903-D Williamson Creek Watershed ☐Urban ☐ Suburban ☐Water Supply Suburban ☐Water Supply Rural ■ Barton Springs Zone HEB Variance Backup One, p. 216 of 58Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone ☐ Barton Springs Segment ☐ Northern Edwards Segment ■ Not in Edwards Aquifer Zones Edwards Aquifer Contributing Zone Distance to Nearest Classified Waterway ■ Yes ☐ No 5270 feet Water and Waste Water service to be provided by City of Austin Request Impervious cover square footage: acreage: percentage: Provide general description of the property (slope range, elevation range, summary of vegetation / trees, summary of the geology, CWQZ, WQTZ, CEFs, floodplain, heritage trees, any other notable or outstanding characteristics of the property) The variance request is as follows (Cite code references: Existing ___0____ _30.29__ ___0%__ Proposed _322,344_ _30.29__ _25%___ The proposed H-E-B Store #10 located at 7901 West Highway 290 US in the full purpose jurisdiction of City of Austin, Travis County, Texas. A site vicinity map has been provided as Vicinity Map Exhibit. The proposed development will consist of approximately 88,000 square feet of retail grocery store with on-site parking. The Proposed site is a ±30.96 acre tract of undeveloped land with nature vegetation, small and heritage cedar and oak trees, and a gradual slopes of 1% to 12%. The surface elevations range from a low point elevation of ±908 Mean Sea Level (MSL) located at the east end of the tract, to a high point elevation of ±977 MSL located on the west edge of the property along FM 1826. Overall, the property slopes west to east, draining toward the existing channel within the property. According to the US Department of Agriculture’s Web Soil Survey, the property consists of soil classified as Brackett-Rock outcrop complex (BID) and Volente silty clay loam (VoD), and Hydraulic Soils Group C and D. According to the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), soils in these groups have a high runoff potential. There are no critical environmental features on or within 150 feet of the property. An Environmental Resource Inventory by Horizon dated July 27, 2017 is included. The proposed site is classified as Williamson Creek Watershed, Barton Creek Contributing Zone, as Defined by the City of Austin. The site is located in the Edward’s Aquifer Contributing Zone, and no portion of the site is located in the HEB Variance Backup One, p. 317 of 58Edward’s Aquifer Recharged Zone. The proposed H-E-B Store #10 required up to 8 feet of cut and more than 8 feet of fill. Clearly indicate in what way the proposed project does not comply with current Code (include maps and exhibits) FINDINGS OF FACT As required in LDC Section 25-8-41, in order to grant a variance the Land Use Commission must make the following findings of fact: Include an explanation with each applicable finding of fact. Project: H-E-B Store #10 Ordinance: A. 1. Land Use Commission variance determinations from Chapter 25-8-41 of the City Code: The requirement will deprive the applicant of a privilege available to owners of similarly situated property with approximately contemporaneous development subject to similar code requirements. Yes / No The requirement from Chapter 25-8-41 City of Austin code is restricting the proposed H- E-B Store #10 to provide: • Sidewalks within the parking lot that comply with Texas Accessibility Guidelines • Fire Access that complies with IFC throughout the site. • 5% maximum grade within the parking lot which would prevent vehicle doors from swinging and hitting adjacent vehicles. • Provide safe routes for customers from vehicle to store under wet/icy conditions. HEB Variance Backup One, p. 418 of 58 2. The variance: a) Is not necessitated by the scale, layout, construction method, or other design decision made by the applicant, unless the design decision provides greater overall environmental protection than is achievable without the variance; Yes / No The City of Austin standard for parking of 1:270 is considerably higher than most cities in Texas. It’s more common to find parking requirements of 1:200 in central and south Texas. In our years of operating grocery stores in this region, we know that our stores do not perform well with parking lots at a 1:200 ratio. A typical HEB store this size might have 100 employees on an average day, and considerably more during peak times. The more customers we see in a store, the more employees we tend to have as with most retail businesses. We set our standard for parking our stores at 1:150. In order to provides greater overall environmental protection for large scale parking, the proposed H-E-B Store #10 proposed to use all the captured condensate for landscape irrigation. Is the minimum deviation from the code requirement necessary to allow a reasonable use of the property; Yes / No The minimum deviation of the code requirement will allow the proposed H-E-B Store #10 to: reduce the amount of cut for the proposed building and parking lot. reduce the amount of fill for the proposed building and parking lot. • • • Place the proposed building and parking lot near the intersection of HWY • Reduce amount of large tree from being demo from the building and 290 and FM 1826. parking lot layout. Does not create a significant probability of harmful environmental consequences. Yes / No To ensure the proposed H-E-B Store #10 does not create significant probability of harmful environmental consequences, the Retention/Irrigation pond has been designed to treat all proposed impervious cover. b) c) HEB Variance Backup One, p. 519 of 58Development with the variance will result in water quality that is at least equal to the water quality achievable without the variance. Yes / No the Retention/Irrigation pond has been designed to treat all proposed impervious cover without any additional variance. Additional Land Use Commission variance determinations for a requirement of Section 25-8-422 (Water Quality Transition Zone), Section 25-8-452 (Water Quality Transition Zone), Article 7, Division 1 (Critical Water Quality Zone Restrictions), or Section 25-8-368 (Restrictions on Development Impacting Lake Austin, Lady Bird Lake, and Lake Walter E. Long): The criteria for granting a variance in Subsection (A) are met; Yes / No [provide summary of justification for determination] The requirement for which a variance is requested prevents a reasonable, economic use of the entire property; Yes / No The requirement for the 8 feet cut/fill prevents the reasonable development of the property. With the approved variance the following could be achieved: reduce the amount of cut for the proposed building and parking lot. reduce the amount of fill for the proposed building and parking lot. • • • Place the proposed building and parking lot near the intersection of HWY • Reduce amount of large tree from being demo from the building and 290 and FM 1826. parking lot layout. The variance is the minimum deviation from the code requirement necessary to allow a reasonable, economic use of the entire property. Yes / No This variance will allow the proposed H-E-B Store #10 to maximize the allowable impervious cover with the less amount of cut, fill and maintain a maximum of 5% slope for the safety of the public. 3. 1. 2. 3. B. **Variance approval requires all above affirmative findings. HEB Variance Backup One, p. 620 of 58A Exhibits for Commission Variance o Aerial photos of the site o Site photos o Aerial photos of the vicinity o Context Map—A map illustrating the subject property in relation to developments in the vicinity to include nearby major streets and waterways o Topographic Map - A topographic map is recommended if a significant grade change on the subject site exists or if there is a significant difference in grade in relation to adjacent properties. o For cut/fill variances, a plan sheet showing areas and depth of cut/fill with topographic elevations. o Site plan showing existing conditions if development exists currently on the property o Proposed Site Plan- full size electronic or at least legible 11x17 showing proposed development, include tree survey if required as part of site or subdivision plan o Environmental Map – A map that shows pertinent features including Floodplain, CWQZ, WQTZ, CEFs, Setbacks, Recharge Zone, etc. o An Environmental Resource Inventory pursuant to ECM 1.3.0 (if required by 25-8-121) o Applicant’s variance request letter HEB Variance Backup One, p. 721 of 58LIST OF EXHIBITS EXHIBIT 1 AERIAL PHOTOS OF THE SITE .................................................................................... 1 EXHIBIT 2 SITE PHOTOS ............................................................................................................. 2 EXHIBIT 3 AERIAL PHOTOS OF THE VICINITY ........................................................................... 3 EXHIBIT 4 CONTEXT MAP ......................................................................................................... 4 EXHIBIT 5 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ................................................................................................ 5 EXHIBIT 6 FOR CUT/FILL VARIANCES ....................................................................................... 6 EXHIBIT 7 SITE PLAN.................................................................................................................. 7 EXHIBIT 8 PROPOSED SITE PLAN .............................................................................................. 8 EXHIBIT 9 ENVIRONMENTAL MAP ............................................................................................ 9 EXHIBIT 10 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE INVENTORY .......................................................... 10 EXHIBIT 11 VARIANCE REQUEST LETTER ................................................................................. 11 HEB Variance Backup One, p. 822 of 58 EXHIBITS HEB Variance Backup One, p. 923 of 58EXHIBIT 1 AERIAL PHOTOS OF THE SITE HEB Variance Backup One, p. 1024 of 58I . . G W D P A M D A O R A T N E M H C A T T A \ S T I B H X E \ G N W A R D \ L V C \ 1 3 8 0 1 0 2 2 2 \ E V I T C A \ 0 2 2 2 \ V : I I I M P 5 2 : 2 1 0 2 0 2 / 0 1 / 1 PROPOSED SITE TBPE # F-6324 TBPLS # 10194230 Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 1905 Aldrich Street Suite 300 Austin TX 78723-3544 Tel: (512) 328-0011 www.stantec.com The Contractor shall verify and be responsible for all dimensions. DO NOT scale the drawing - any errors or omissions shall be reported to Stantec without delay. The Copyrights to all designs and drawings are the property of Stantec. Reproduction or use for any purpose other than that authorized by Stantec is forbidden. MAY 2019 222010831 Client/Project H-E-B, LP H-E-B STORE #10 AUSTIN, TX Figure No. 1.0 Title EXHIBIT ROAD MAP EXHIBIT HEB Variance Backup One, p. 1125 of 58I . . G W D P A M D A O R A T N E M H C A T T A \ S T I B H X E \ G N W A R D \ L V C \ 1 3 8 0 1 0 2 2 2 \ E V I T C A \ 0 2 2 2 \ V : I I I M P 7 3 : 2 1 0 2 0 2 / 0 1 / 1 TBPE # F-6324 TBPLS # 10194230 Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 1905 Aldrich Street Suite 300 Austin TX 78723-3544 Tel: (512) 328-0011 www.stantec.com The Contractor shall verify and be responsible for all dimensions. DO NOT scale the drawing - any errors or omissions shall be reported to Stantec without delay. The Copyrights to all designs and drawings are the property of Stantec. Reproduction or use for any purpose other than that authorized by Stantec is forbidden. PROPOSED SITE MAY 2019 222010831 Client/Project H-E-B, LP H-E-B STORE #10 AUSTIN, TX Figure No. 1.0 Title EXHIBIT ROAD MAP EXHIBIT HEB Variance Backup One, p. 1226 of 58EXHIBIT 2 SITE PHOTOS HEB Variance Backup One, p. 1327 of 58HEB Variance Backup One, p. 1428 of 58HEB Variance Backup One, p. 1529 of 58EXHIBIT 4 CONTEXT MAP HEB Variance Backup One, p. 1630 of 581 2 3 4 5 N n o i t c u d o p e R r . c e t n a t S f r r o y t r e p o p e h t e a s g n w a d d n a s n g i s e d r i l l a o t s t h g i r y p o C e h T e h t e a c s T l O N O D . s n o i s n e m d i l l a r o f l e b i s n o p s e r e b d n a y f i r e v l l a h s r o t c a r t n o C e h T . y a e d l t u o h t i w c e t n a t S o t d e t r o p e r e b l l a h s s n o i s s i m o r o s r o r r e y n a - i g n w a d r . n e d d b o r i f s i c e t n a t S y b d e z i r o h t u a t a h t n a h t r e h t o e s o p u p y n a r r o f e s u r o 4 2 3 6 - F # E P B T 0 3 2 4 9 1 0 1 # S L P B T . c n i I s e c v r e S g n i t l u s n o C c e t n a t S 0 0 3 e t i u S t e e r t S h c i r l d A 5 0 9 1 4 4 5 3 - 3 2 7 8 7 X T n i t s u A . m o c c e t n a t s . w w w 1 1 0 0 - 8 2 3 ) 2 1 5 ( : l e T . D D M M Y Y Y Y . d p p A y B n o i s i v e R . D D M M Y Y Y Y . d p p A y B 1 1 . 1 0 . 9 1 0 2 I T E S W E V E R % 5 7 d e u s s I Permit/Seal 4 0 2 8 7 X T , I O N O T N A N A S , T E E R T S S E R O L F S 6 4 6 j t c e o r P / t n e C i l P L , B - E - H I 0 9 2 Y A W H G H T S E W 1 0 9 7 0 1 # E R O T S B - E - H 3 0 7 8 7 S A X E T , N I T S U A 222010831 Project No.: File Name: 10831C01_101_SDM Scale: AJM Dwn. Dsgn. TP JF 2020.01.02 Chkd. YYYY.MM.DD Title EXISTING GROUND SLOPE MAP Sheet: 09 of 63 0 Revision: Drawing No. 09 SP-2019-0034C D C B A m d s _ 1 0 1 _ 1 0 c 1 3 8 0 1 \ g n w a d \ r i l i i v c \ 1 3 8 0 1 0 2 2 2 \ e v i t c a \ 0 2 2 2 \ v : : : M A 7 4 7 3 8 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 . . ORIGINAL SHEET - ARCH D HEB Variance Backup One, p. 1731 of 58 30°15'13.36"N W " 1 0 . ' 6 1 6 5 ° 7 9 918 FEET 9 4 0 F E E T T E E F 6 0 9 T E E F 1 0 9 T E E 8 F 9 8 ET 894 FE 9 4 1 F E E T T E E 6 F 5 9 4 4 F T 9 E E F 9 4 9 E E T T E E F 7 7 8 T E E 5 F 7 8 873 F E E T 86 8 F E E T T E E 4 F 6 8 8 6 0 F E E T 857 FE ET T E E F 4 5 8 8 5 4 F E E T T E E F 1 5 8 T E 904 FE T E E 8 F 9 8 T E E 1 F 9 8 T E E F 4 8 8 T E E F 9 6 8 8 6 4 F E E T 8 5 9 F E E T 8 7 4 F E E T 943 FEET 940 FEET ET 928 FE 92 3 F E E T T E E F 2 7 9 T E E 9 6 7 F ET 962 FE 959 FE ET T E E 4 F 5 9 T E E F 2 5 9 T E E F 6 4 9 T E E F 1 4 9 T E E F 6 3 9 T E E 1 F 3 9 9 0 5 F E E T 9 1 6 F E E T 9 1 5 9 1 F E E T 0 F E E T T E E F 6 2 9 T E E 2 F 2 9 T E E 3 F 0 9 T E E F 0 0 9 T E E F 6 9 8 T E E 2 F 9 8 890 FEET T E E 5 F 8 8 T E E T 1 F E E 0 F 88 88 ET 874 FE T E 875 FE 869 FEET 865 FEET ET 862 FE 8 6 2 F E E T T E E 5 F E T 5 E 8 4 F 5 8 T E 858 FE 855 FE T E T E E 4 F 5 8 ET 849 FE ET 848 FE 8 7 2 F E E T T E E 7 F 9 8 T E E F 2 9 8 T E E 9 F 8 9 ET 986 FE ET 982 FE 978 FEET T E E 2 F 97 T E E F 8 6 9 9 6 2 F E E T T E E F 6 5 9 9 5 1 F E E T T E E 6 F 4 9 3 9 T E E 8 F 9 3 4 F E E T 9 F E E T 2 9 2 8 F E E T E 9 T E T E 2 9 E 9 F 0 F 1 9 FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION NOTES TO USERS SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE) Zone A, V, A99 With BFE or Depth Zone AE, AO, AH, VE, AR SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS Regulatory Floodway For information and questions about this Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), available products associated with this FIRM, including historic versions, the current map date for each FIRM panel, how to order products, or the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) in general, please call the FEMA Map Information eXchange at 1-877-FEMA-MAP (1-877-336-2627) or visit the FEMA Flood Map Service Center website at http://msc.fema.gov. Available products may include previously issued Letters of Map Change, a Flood Insurance Study Report, and/or digital versions of this map. Many of these products can beordered or obtained directly from the website. Communities annexing land on adjacent FIRM panels must obtain a current copy of the adjacent panel as well as the current FIRM Index. These may be ordered directly from the Flood Map Service Center at the number listed above. For community and countywide map dates refer to the Flood Insurance Study Report for this jurisdiction. SCALE "# N Map Projection: GCS, Geodetic Reference System 1980; Vertical Datum: NAVD88 For information about the specific vertical datum for elevation features, datum conversions, or vertical monuments used to create this map please see the Flood Insurance Study(FIS) Report for your community at https://msc.fema.gov 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas of 1% annual chance flood with average depth less than one foot or with drainage areas of less than one square mile Zone X Future Conditions 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard Zone X Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to Levee See Notes. Zone X Area with Flood Risk due to Levee Zone D To determine if flood insurance is available in this community, contact your Insurance agent or call the National Flood Insurance Program at 1-800-638-6620. 1 inch = 1,000 feet 1:12,000 Basemap information shown on this FIRM was provided in digital format by USDA, Farm Service Agency (FSA). This information was derived from NAIP, dated April 11, 2018. 0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000 This map was exported from FEMA's National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) on 11/28/2018 2:41:28 PM and does not reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and time. The NFHL and effective information may change or become superseded by new data over time. For additional information, please see the Flood Hazard Mapping Updates Overview Fact Sheet at https://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/118418 0 105 210 420 630 840 4,000 Feet Meters OTHER AREAS OF FLOOD HAZARD NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard Zone X Effective LOMRs OTHER AREAS Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard Zone D This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of digital flood maps if it is not void as described below. The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap accuracy standards This map image is void if the one or more of the following map elements do not appear: basemap imagery, flood zone labels, legend, scale bar, map creation date, community identifiers, FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. GENERAL STRUCTURES Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer Levee, Dike, or Floodwall 20.2 Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance 17.5 Water Surface Elevation B 8 Coastal Transect Coastal Transect Baseline Profile Baseline Hydrographic Feature Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE) Limit of Study Jurisdiction Boundary OTHER FEATURES 847 F E E T T E E 7 F 3 8 T E E 5 F 3 8 8 3 3 F E E T 846 F E E T T E E F 8 2 8 USGS The National Map: Orthoimagery. Data refreshed October 2017. 30°11'1.73"N ' 9 7 ° 5 2 2 9 . 0 5 " W NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS AND INCORPORATED AREAS PANEL 560 OF 730 Panel Contains: COMMUNITY TRAVIS COUNTY TEXAS CITY OF AUSTIN TEXAS VILLAGE OF BEAR CREEK TEXAS NUMBER 481026 PANEL 0560 480624 481679 0560 0560 MAP NUMBER 48453C0560H EFFECTIVE DATE 09/26/2008 HEB Variance Backup One, p. 1832 of 58HEB Variance Backup Two, p. 133 of 58H-E-B STORE #10 Exhibit 5 Topographic Map January 10, 2020 EXHIBIT 5 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP C:\Users\tpho\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\405YLYUD\20200110_env_comm_variance.docx/sg 5 HEB Variance Backup Two, p. 234 of 581 2 3 4 5 N n o i t c u d o p e R r . c e t n a t S f r r o y t r e p o p e h t e a s g n w a d d n a s n g i s e d r i l l a o t s t h g i r y p o C e h T e h t e a c s T l O N O D . s n o i s n e m d i l l a r o f l e b i s n o p s e r e b d n a y f i r e v l l a h s r o t c a r t n o C e h T . y a e d l t u o h t i w c e t n a t S o t d e t r o p e r e b l l a h s s n o i s s i m o r o s r o r r e y n a - i g n w a d r . n e d d b o r i f s i c e t n a t S y b d e z i r o h t u a t a h t n a h t r e h t o e s o p u p y n a r r o f e s u r o 4 2 3 6 - F # E P B T 0 3 2 4 9 1 0 1 # S L P B T . c n i I s e c v r e S g n i t l u s n o C c e t n a t S 0 0 3 e t i u S t e e r t S h c i r l d A 5 0 9 1 4 4 5 3 - 3 2 7 8 7 X T n i t s u A . m o c c e t n a t s . w w w 1 1 0 0 - 8 2 3 ) 2 1 5 ( : l e T . D D M M Y Y Y Y . d p p A y B n o i s i v e R . D D M M Y Y Y Y . d p p A y B 1 1 . 1 0 . 9 1 0 2 I T E S W E V E R % 5 7 d e u s s I Permit/Seal 4 0 2 8 7 X T , I O N O T N A N A S , T E E R T S S E R O L F S 6 4 6 j t c e o r P / t n e C i l P L , B - E - H I 0 9 2 Y A W H G H T S E W 1 0 9 7 0 1 # E R O T S B - E - H 3 0 7 8 7 S A X E T , N I T S U A 222010831 Project No.: File Name: 10831C01_101_SDM Scale: AJM Dwn. Dsgn. TP JF 2020.01.02 Chkd. YYYY.MM.DD Title EXISTING GROUND SLOPE MAP Sheet: 09 of 63 0 Revision: Drawing No. 09 SP-2019-0034C D C B A m d s _ 1 0 1 _ 1 0 c 1 3 8 0 1 \ g n w a d \ r i l i i v c \ 1 3 8 0 1 0 2 2 2 \ e v i t c a \ 0 2 2 2 \ v : : : M A 7 4 7 3 8 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 . . ORIGINAL SHEET - ARCH D HEB Variance Backup Two, p. 335 of 58H-E-B STORE #10 Exhibit 6 For Cut/Fill Variances January 10, 2020 EXHIBIT 6 FOR CUT/FILL VARIANCES C:\Users\tpho\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\405YLYUD\20200110_env_comm_variance.docx/sg 6 HEB Variance Backup Two, p. 436 of 581 2 3 4 5 N BUILDING 88,556 SF FFE=964.00 N n o i t c u d o p e R r . c e t n a t S f r r o y t r e p o p e h t e a s g n w a d d n a s n g i s e d r i l l a o t s t h g i r y p o C e h T e h t e a c s T l O N O D . s n o i s n e m d i l l a r o f l e b i s n o p s e r e b d n a y f i r e v l l a h s r o t c a r t n o C e h T . y a e d l t u o h t i w c e t n a t S o t d e t r o p e r e b l l a h s s n o i s s i m o r o s r o r r e y n a - i g n w a d r . n e d d b o r i f s i c e t n a t S y b d e z i r o h t u a t a h t n a h t r e h t o e s o p u p y n a r r o f e s u r o 4 2 3 6 - F # E P B T 0 3 2 4 9 1 0 1 # S L P B T . c n i I s e c v r e S g n i t l u s n o C c e t n a t S 0 0 3 e t i u S t e e r t S h c i r l d A 5 0 9 1 4 4 5 3 - 3 2 7 8 7 X T n i t s u A . m o c c e t n a t s . w w w 1 1 0 0 - 8 2 3 ) 2 1 5 ( : l e T . D D M M Y Y Y Y . d p p A y B n o i s i v e R . D D M M Y Y Y Y . d p p A y B 1 1 . 1 0 . 9 1 0 2 I T E S W E V E R % 5 7 d e u s s I Permit/Seal 4 0 2 8 7 X T , I O N O T N A N A S , T E E R T S S E R O L F S 6 4 6 j t c e o r P / t n e C i l P L , B - E - H I 0 9 2 Y A W H G H T S E W 1 0 9 7 0 1 # E R O T S B - E - H 3 0 7 8 7 S A X E T , N I T S U A 222010831 Project No.: File Name: 2019-06-13_CUT FILL EXH Scale: DWN AJM Dwn. DSGN CHKD TP SCALE Dsgn. JF 2020.01.03 Chkd. YYYY.MM.DD Title CUT/FILL EXHIBIT Sheet: 1 of 63 1 Revision: Drawing No. EXH ORIGINAL SHEET - ARCH D SP-2019-0034C D C B A h x e l l i f t u c _ 3 1 - 6 0 - 9 1 0 2 \ h x e l l i f t u c _ 9 1 - 4 0 - 9 1 0 2 \ s t i i b h x e \ g n w a d \ r i l i i v c \ 1 3 8 0 1 0 2 2 2 \ e v i t c a \ 0 2 2 2 \ p u o g k r o w \ 1 0 f - 5 6 5 1 s u \ \ r : : M P 7 2 1 2 2 1 3 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 . . HEB Variance Backup Two, p. 537 of 58H-E-B STORE #10 Exhibit 7 Site Plan January 10, 2020 EXHIBIT 7 SITE PLAN C:\Users\tpho\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\405YLYUD\20200110_env_comm_variance.docx/sg 7 HEB Variance Backup Two, p. 638 of 581 2 3 4 5 N N Permit/Seal n o i t c u d o p e R r . c e t n a t S f r r o y t r e p o p e h t e a s g n w a d d n a s n g i s e d r i l l a o t s t h g i r y p o C e h T e h t e a c s T l O N O D . s n o i s n e m d i l l a r o f l e b i s n o p s e r e b d n a y f i r e v l l a h s r o t c a r t n o C e h T . y a e d l t u o h t i w c e t n a t S o t d e t r o p e r e b l l a h s s n o i s s i m o r o s r o r r e y n a - i g n w a d r . n e d d b o r i f s i c e t n a t S y b d e z i r o h t u a t a h t n a h t r e h t o e s o p u p y n a r r o f e s u r o 4 2 3 6 - F # E P B T 0 3 2 4 9 1 0 1 # S L P B T . c n i I s e c v r e S g n i t l u s n o C c e t n a t S 0 0 3 e t i u S t e e r t S h c i r l d A 5 0 9 1 4 4 5 3 - 3 2 7 8 7 X T n i t s u A . m o c c e t n a t s . w w w 1 1 0 0 - 8 2 3 ) 2 1 5 ( : l e T . D D M M Y Y Y Y . d p p A y B n o i s i v e R . D D M M Y Y Y Y . d p p A y B 1 1 . 1 0 . 9 1 0 2 I T E S W E V E R % 5 7 d e u s s I 4 0 2 8 7 X T , I O N O T N A N A S , T E E R T S S E R O L F S 6 4 6 j t c e o r P / t n e C i l P L , B - E - H I 0 9 2 Y A W H G H T S E W 1 0 9 7 0 1 # E R O T S B - E - H 3 0 7 8 7 S A X E T , N I T S U A 222010831 Project No.: File Name: 10831C01_101_TTP Scale: AJM Dwn. Dsgn. TP JF 2020.01.02 Chkd. YYYY.MM.DD Title EXISTING CONDITIONS, TRE PLAN, DEMOLITION PLAN Sheet: 07 of 63 0 Revision: Drawing No. 07 SP-2019-0034C D C B A p t t _ 1 0 1 _ 1 0 c 1 3 8 0 1 \ g n w a d \ r i l i i v c \ 1 3 8 0 1 0 2 2 2 \ e v i t c a \ 0 2 2 2 \ v : : : M A 5 2 7 3 8 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 . . ORIGINAL SHEET - ARCH D HEB Variance Backup Two, p. 739 of 58H-E-B STORE #10 Exhibit 8 Proposed Site Plan January 10, 2020 EXHIBIT 8 PROPOSED SITE PLAN C:\Users\tpho\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\405YLYUD\20200110_env_comm_variance.docx/sg 8 HEB Variance Backup Two, p. 840 of 581 2 3 4 5 N BUILDING 88,556 SF FFE=964.00 D C B A p s m _ 1 0 1 _ 1 0 c 1 3 8 0 1 \ g n w a d \ r i l i i v c \ 1 3 8 0 1 0 2 2 2 \ e v i t c a \ 0 2 2 2 \ v : : : M A 0 5 0 4 8 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 . . ORIGINAL SHEET - ARCH D PHASE II ROAD n o i t c u d o p e R r . c e t n a t S f r r o y t r e p o p e h t e a s g n w a d d n a s n g i s e d r i l l a o t s t h g i r y p o C e h T e h t e a c s T l O N O D . s n o i s n e m d i l l a r o f l e b i s n o p s e r e b d n a y f i r e v l l a h s r o t c a r t n o C e h T . y a e d l t u o h t i w c e t n a t S o t d e t r o p e r e b l l a h s s n o i s s i m o r o s r o r r e y n a - i g n w a d r . n e d d b o r i f s i c e t n a t S y b d e z i r o h t u a t a h t n a h t r e h t o e s o p u p y n a r r o f e s u r o 4 2 3 6 - F # E P B T 0 3 2 4 9 1 0 1 # S L P B T . c n i I s e c v r e S g n i t l u s n o C c e t n a t S 0 0 3 e t i u S t e e r t S h c i r l d A 5 0 9 1 4 4 5 3 - 3 2 7 8 7 X T n i t s u A . m o c c e t n a t s . w w w 1 1 0 0 - 8 2 3 ) 2 1 5 ( : l e T . D D M M Y Y Y Y . d p p A y B n o i s i v e R . D D M M Y Y Y Y . d p p A y B 1 1 . 1 0 . 9 1 0 2 I T E S W E V E R % 5 7 d e u s s I Permit/Seal 4 0 2 8 7 X T , I O N O T N A N A S , T E E R T S S E R O L F S 6 4 6 j t c e o r P / t n e C i l P L , B - E - H I 0 9 2 Y A W H G H T S E W 1 0 9 7 0 1 # E R O T S B - E - H 3 0 7 8 7 S A X E T , N I T S U A 222010831 Project No.: File Name: 10831C01_101_MSP Scale: AJM Dwn. Dsgn. TP JF 2020.01.02 Chkd. YYYY.MM.DD Title OVERALL SITE PLAN Sheet: 17 of 63 0 Revision: Drawing No. 17 SP-2019-0034C HEB Variance Backup Two, p. 941 of 58H-E-B STORE #10 Exhibit 9 Environmental Map January 10, 2020 EXHIBIT 9 ENVIRONMENTAL MAP C:\Users\tpho\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\405YLYUD\20200110_env_comm_variance.docx/sg 9 HEB Variance Backup Two, p. 1042 of 58HEB Variance Backup Two, p. 1143 of 58H-E-B STORE #10 Exhibit 10 Environmental Resource Inventory January 10, 2020 EXHIBIT 10 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE INVENTORY C:\Users\tpho\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\405YLYUD\20200110_env_comm_variance.docx/sg 10 HEB Variance Backup Two, p. 1244 of 58 Case No.: (City use only) Environmental Resource Inventory For the City of Austin Related to LDC 25-8-121, City Code 30-5-121, ECM 1.3.0 & 1.10.0 The ERI is required for projects that meet one or more of the criteria listed in LDC 25-8-121(A), City Code 30-5-121(A). 1. SITE/PROJECT NAME: HEB Austin # 10 2. COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT PROPERTY ID (#’s): 315313 & 511018 3. ADDRESS/LOCATION OF PROJECT: 7909 FM 1826 4. WATERSHED: Williamson Creek 5. THIS SITE IS WITHIN THE (Check all that apply) Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone* (See note below) .................. (cid:133)YES (cid:133)No Edwards Aquifer Contributing Zone*.................................. (cid:133)YES (cid:133)No Edwards Aquifer 1500 ft Verification Zone* ....................... (cid:133)YES (cid:133)No Barton Spring Zone* .......................................................... (cid:133)YES (cid:133)No *(as defined by the City of Austin – LDC 25-8-2 or City Code 30-5-2) ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ Note: If the property is over the Edwards Aquifer Recharge zone, the Hydrogeologic Report and karst surveys must be completed and signed by a Professional Geoscientist Licensed in the State of Texas. 6. DOES THIS PROJECT PROPOSE FLOODPLAIN MODIFICATION?.......(cid:133)YES** (cid:133)NO ✔ If yes, then check all that apply: (cid:13) (1) The floodplain modifications proposed are necessary to protect the public health and safety; (cid:13) (2) The floodplain modifications proposed would provide a significant, demonstrable environmental benefit, as determined by a functional assessment of floodplain health as prescribed by the Environmental Criteria Manual (ECM), or (cid:13) (3) The floodplain modifications proposed are necessary for development allowed in the critical water quality zone under LDC 25-8-261 or 25-8-262, City Code 30-5-261 or 30-5-262. (cid:13) (4) The floodplain modifications proposed are outside of the Critical Water Quality Zone in an area determined to be in poor or fair condition by a functional assessment of floodplain health. ** If yes, then a functional assessment must be completed and attached to the ERI (see ECM 1.7 and Appendix X for forms and guidance) unless conditions 1 or 3 above apply. 7. IF THE SITE IS WITHIN AN URBAN OR SUBURBAN WATERSHED, DOES THIS PROJECT PROPOSE A UTILITY LINE PARALLEL TO AND WITHIN THE CRITICAL WATER QUALITY ZONE? ......................................................... (cid:133)YES*** (cid:133)NO ✔ ***If yes, then riparian restoration is required by LDC 25-8-261(E) or City Code 30-5-261(E) and a functional assessment must be completed and attached to the ERI (see ECM1.5 and Appendix X for forms and guidance). 0 8. There is a total of (#’s) Critical Environmental Feature(s)(CEFs) on or within150 feet of the project site. If CEF(s) are present, attach a detailed DESCRIPTION of the CEF(s), color PHOTOGRAPHS, the CEF WORKSHEET and provide DESCRIPTIONS of the proposed CEF buffer(s) and/or wetland mitigation. Provide the number of each type of CEFs on or within 150 feet of the site (Please provide the number of CEFs ): HEB Variance Backup Two, p. 1345 of 58 (#’s) Spring(s)/Seep(s) (#’s) Point Recharge Feature(s) 0 (#’s) Bluff(s) 0 0 0 0 (#’s) Canyon Rimrock(s) (#’s) Wetland(s) Note: Standard buffers for CEFs are 150 feet, with a maximum of 300 feet for point recharge features. Except for wetlands, if the standard buffer is not provided, you must provide a written request for an administrative variance from LDC 25-8-281(C)(1) and provide written findings of fact to support your request. Request forms for administrative variances from requirements stated in LDC 25-8-281 are available from Watershed Protection Department. 9. The following site maps are attached at the end of this report (Check all that apply and provide): All ERI reports must include: ✔ ✔ (cid:13) Site Specific Geologic Map with 2-ft Topography (cid:13) Historic Aerial Photo of the Site (cid:13) Site Soil Map (cid:13) Critical Environmental Features and Well Location Map on current ✔ Aerial Photo with 2-ft Topography Only if present on site (Maps can be combined): (cid:13) Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone with the 1500-ft Verification Zone(cid:3) (cid:3) (cid:3) (Only if site is over or within 1500 feet the recharge zone) ✔ (cid:13) Edwards Aquifer Contributing Zone(cid:3) (cid:13) Water Quality Transition Zone (WQTZ) (cid:13) Critical Water Quality Zone (CWQZ)(cid:3) (cid:13) City of Austin Fully Developed Floodplains for all water courses with (cid:3) (cid:3) (cid:3) (cid:3) (cid:3) (cid:3) (cid:3) (cid:3) (cid:3) (cid:3) up to 64-acres of drainage 10. HYDROGEOLOGIC REPORT – Provide a description of site soils, topography, and site specific geology below (Attach additional sheets if needed): Surface Soils on the project site is summarized in the table below and uses the SCS Hydrologic Soil Groups*. If there is more than one soil unit on the project site, show each soil unit on the site soils map. Soil Series Unit Names, Infiltration Characteristics & Thickness *Soil Hydrologic Groups Definitions (Abbreviated) Soil Series Unit Name & Subgroup** Group* Thickness Brackett-Rock outcrop complex, 1-12% slopes (BlD) Volente silty clay loam, 1-8% slopes (VoD) D C (feet) 2.5 4.5 A. Soils having a high infiltration rate when thoroughly wetted. B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wetted. C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wetted. D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wetted. **Subgroup Classification – See Classification of Soil Series Table in County Soil Survey. WPD ERM ERI-2014-01 Page 2 of 6 HEB Variance Backup Two, p. 1446 of 58Description of Site Topography and Drainage (Attach additional sheets if needed): The subject site is located within the Edwards Plateau ecoregion (Gould, 1975) and the Live Oak-Ashe Juniper Parks vegetational area of Texas (McMahan et al., 1984). Elevation on the site ranges from 994 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) to 904 feet AMSL, with surface water flowing west to east towards the Wheeler Branch of Williamson Creek. List surface geologic units below: Group Trinity Geologic Units Exposed at Surface Formation Member Upper Glen Rose Limestone Brief description of site geology (Attach additional sheets if needed): The upper member of the Glen Rose Limestone is relatively impermeable and described as the lower confining unit of the Edwards Aquifer. It has a maximum thickness of about 350 to 500 feet. Stair-step topography is characteristic of the upper member of the Glen Rose Limestone. The Upper Glen Rose Limestone is described as yellowish-tan, thinly bedded limestone and marl (Garner and Young, 1976). The upper member of the Glen Rose Limestone is relatively more thinly bedded, more dolomitic, and less fossiliferous than the lower member of the Glen Rose Limestone. The top of the upper member of the Glen Rose Limestone is red-stained, lumpy, irregular, and bored, with oysters cemented onto the surface (Rose, 1972). Wells – Identify all recorded and unrecorded wells on site (test holes, monitoring, water, oil, unplugged, capped and/or abandoned wells, etc.): There are 0 (#) wells present on the project site and the locations are shown and labeled (#’s)The wells are not in use and have been properly abandoned. (#’s)The wells are not in use and will be properly abandoned. (#’s)The wells are in use and comply with 16 TAC Chapter 76. 0 There are (#’s) wells that are off-site and within 150 feet of this site. WPD ERM ERI-2014-01 Page 3 of 6 HEB Variance Backup Two, p. 1547 of 5811. THE VEGETATION REPORT – Provide the information requested below: Brief description of site plant communities (Attach additional sheets if needed): Vegetation observed on the Property includes Ashe juniper (Juniperus ashei), plateau live oak (Quercus fusiformis), cedar elm (Ulmus crassifolia), elbow bush (Forestiera angustifolia), (agarita (Berberis trifoliolata), Texas prickly pear (Opuntia engelmannii var. lindheimeri), hackberry (Celtis laevigata), chinaberry (Melia azedarach), evergreen sumac (Rhus virens), various forbs and grasses There is woodland community on site …………………….(cid:133)YES (cid:133) NO (Check one). If yes, list the dominant species below: ✔ Woodland species Common Name Ashe juniper Plateau live oak Cedar elm Scientific Name Juniperus ashei Quercus fusiformis Ulmus crassifolia There is grassland/prairie/savanna on site……………..(cid:133)YES (cid:133) NO (Check one). If yes, list the dominant species below: ✔ Grassland/prairie/savanna species Common Name Scientific Name There is hydrophytic vegetation on site ………………..(cid:133)YES (cid:133) NO (Check one). If yes, list the dominant species in table below (next page): ✔ WPD ERM ERI-2014-01 Page 4 of 6 HEB Variance Backup Two, p. 1648 of 58 Hydrophytic plant species Common Name Scientific Name Wetland Indicator Status A tree survey of all trees with a diameter of at least eight inches measured four and one- half feet above natural grade level has been completed on the site. ✔ (cid:3) (cid:133)YES (cid:133) NO (Check one). 12. WASTEWATER REPORT – Provide the information requested below. Wastewater for the site will be treated by (Check of that Apply): (cid:13) On-site system(s) (cid:13) City of Austin Centralized sewage collection system ✔ (cid:13) Other Centralized collection system Note: All sites that receive water or wastewater service from the Austin Water Utility must comply with City Code Chapter 15-12 and wells must be registered with the City of Austin The site sewage collection system is designed and will be constructed to in accordance to all State, County and City standard specifications. ✔ (cid:3) (cid:133)YES (cid:133) NO (Check one). Calculations of the size of the drainfield or wastewater irrigation area(s) are attached at the end of this report or shown on the site plan. (cid:133)YES (cid:133) NO (cid:133) Not Applicable (Check one). Wastewater lines are proposed within the Critical Water Quality Zone? (cid:3) (cid:133)YES (cid:133) NO (Check one). If yes, then provide justification below: ✔ WPD ERM ERI-2014-01 Page 5 of 6 HEB Variance Backup Two, p. 1749 of 58 Is the project site is over the Edwards Aquifer? (cid:133)YES (cid:133) NO (Check one). ✔ If yes, then describe the wastewater disposal systems proposed for the site, its treatment level and effects on receiving watercourses or the Edwards Aquifer. 13. One (1) hard copy and one (1) electronic copy of the completed assessment have been provided. Date(s) ERI Field Assessment was performed: 27 July 2017 Date(s) My signature certifies that to the best of my knowledge, the responses on this form accurately reflect all information requested. Jeremy Mantooth Print Name Signature Horizon Environmental Services, Inc. Name of Company 512-328-2430 Telephone jeremy_mantooth@hroizon-esi.com Email Address 23 August 2017 Date For project sites within the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone, my signature and seal also certifies that I am a licensed Professional Geoscientist in the State of Texas as defined by ECM 1.12.3(A). P.G. Seal WPD ERM ERI-2014-01 Page 6 of 6 HEB Variance Backup Two, p. 1850 of 58 170141 ERI Attachments ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE INVENTORY ATTACHMENTS HEB AUSTIN # 10 7909 FM 1826 HJN 170141 HEB Variance Backup Two, p. 1951 of 58 DATA RESOURCES USED IN COMPLETING THIS ERI (COA) City of Austin. GIS Data Sets, Year 2003 2-foot contours of the City of Austin and ETJ only, <ftp://ftp.ci.austin.tx.us/GIS-Data/Regional/coa_gis.html>. Updated by City of Austin 2012. ______. GIS Data Sets, Recharge Zone, Contributing Zone, and Edwards Contributing Zone 1500' Buffer, <ftp://ftp.ci.austin.tx.us/GIS-Data/Regional/ coa_gis.html>. Updated by City of Austin 2007. ______. Development Web Map, <http://www.austintexas.gov/GIS/developmentwebmap/ Viewer.aspx>. Accessed 26 July 2017. Gould, F.W. Texas Plants – A Checklist and Ecological Summary. College Station: Texas A&M University. 1975. McMahan, Craig A., Roy G. Frye, and Kirby L. Brown. The Vegetation Types of Texas – Including Cropland. Austin: Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. 1984. (NRCS) Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service), US Department of Agriculture. Web Soil Survey, <http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov /app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx>. Accessed 26 July 2017. Rose, P.R. Edwards Group, Surface and Subsurface, Central Texas. Report of Investigations 86. The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology. 1972. (TWDB) Texas Water Development Board. Water Information Integration and Dissemination System. TWDB Groundwater Database (ArcIMS), <http://wiid.twdb.state.tx.us/ ims/wwm_drl/viewer.htm?>. Accessed 26 July 2017. (USDA) US Department of Agriculture. National Agriculture Imagery Program, Farm Service Agency, Aerial Photography Field Office. Travis County, Texas. 2016. (USGS) US Geological Survey. Digital Orthophoto Quarter-Quadrangle, Signal Hill NE, Texas. 1995. (UT-BEG) University of Texas Bureau of Economic Geology, C.V. Proctor, Jr., T.E. Brown, J.H. McGowen, N.B. Waechter, and V.E. Barnes. Geologic Atlas of Texas, Austin Sheet, Francis Luther Whitney Memorial Edition. 1974; reprinted 1995. 170141 ERI Attachments HEB Variance Backup Two, p. 2052 of 58 170141 ERI Attachments ERI WORKSHEET SECTION 9: SITE MAPS Figure 1. Site-Specific Geologic Map Figure 2. Historical Aerial Photo Figure 3. Site Soil Map Figure 4. Edwards Aquifer Map HEB Variance Backup Two, p. 2153 of 589 6 4 9 6 8 9 6 2 95 6 962 9 5 4 950 954 974 9 8 2 976 9 7 8 8 7 9 2 97 8 97 974 9 7 6 970 9 7 6 974 9 7 2 944 942 954 8 6 9 9 7 2 9 6 6 966 9 6 6 976 968 9 4 6 934 4 3 9 930 9 3 6 9 3 0 934 9 3 2 932 936 938 9 2 8 9 2 8 942 9 8 8 9 9 2 9 9 2 990 0 8 9 4 8 9 980 988 9 7 8 9 8 4 9 9 4 6 9 9 8 9 9 0 9 9 0 7 9 966 4 6 9 968 966 968 8 96 9 7 6 9 6 4 2 9 9 9 8 2 986 9 6 0 9 5 6 9 5 8 950 9 4 0 2-Foot Contours 9 3 6 Subject Site Legend Upper Glen Rose (Kgru) 9 5 2 948 Kgru 940 4 3 9 0 3 9 6 6 9 0 5 9 9 5 2 8 9 5 6 5 9 938 9 2 8 924 Date: Drawn: HJN NO: Source: 07/26/2017 JM 170141 COA, 2012; UT-BEG, 1981; USDA, 2016 Figure 1 Site Specific Geologic Map HEB Austin # 10 7909 FM 1826 Austin, Travis County, Texas 170141 - HEB Austin 10 ERI HA\Graphics\170141ERI_01A_Geo 9 3 0 2 2 9 2 2 9 6 2 9 926 932 9 3 0 9 2 8 9 2 0 0 2 9 4 2 9 9 1 6 9 1 4 914 916 914 2 1 9 91 0 908 9 1 6 9 1 4 2 1 9 9 1 8 9 1 6 9 1 6 0 2 9 9 2 6 930 932 9 3 4 9 2 2 9 2 8 9 1 0 912 9 1 8 9 2 4 936 942 6 4 9 8 4 9 8 3 9 0 4 9 I 200 Feet 0 400 HEB Variance Backup Two, p. 2254 of 58Legend Subject Site 170141 - HEB Austin 10 ERI HA\Graphics\170141ERI_02A_1995 Date: Drawn: HJN NO: Source: 07/28/2017 JM 170141 USGS, 1995 Figure 2 1995 Historical Aerial Photo HEB Austin # 10 7909 FM 1826 Austin, Travis County, Texas I 200 Feet 0 400 HEB Variance Backup Two, p. 2355 of 58VoD BlD Legend Brackett-Rock outcrop complex (BlD) Volente silty clay loam (VoD) Subject Site Date: Drawn: HJN NO: Source: 07/28/2017 JM 170141 NRCS, 2017; USDA, 2016 Figure 3 Site Soil Map HEB Austin # 10 7909 FM 1826 Austin, Travis County, Texas I 200 Feet 0 400 170141 - HEB Austin 10 ERI HA\Graphics\170141ERI_03A_soil HEB Variance Backup Two, p. 2456 of 58Edwards Aquifer Contributing Zone Legend Edwards Aquifer Contributing Zone Subject Site Date: Drawn: HJN NO: Source: 07/28/2017 JM 170141 COA, 2007; USDA, 2016 Figure 4 Edwards Aquifer Contributing Zone Map HEB Austin # 10 7909 FM 1826 Austin, Travis County, Texas I 200 Feet 0 400 170141 - HEB Austin 10 ERI HA\Graphics\170141ERI_04A_Edwards HEB Variance Backup Two, p. 2557 of 58H-E-B STORE #10 Exhibit 11 Variance Request Letter January 10, 2020 EXHIBIT 11 VARIANCE REQUEST LETTER C:\Users\tpho\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\405YLYUD\20200110_env_comm_variance.docx/sg 11 HEB Variance Backup Two, p. 2658 of 58