ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE: C14-2020-0089 Twelfth and Springdale Residences DISTRICT: 1 ZONING FROM: GR-MU-NP ADDRESS: 1200, 1202 and 1208 Springdale Road SITE AREA: 1.47acres (64,033.20 square feet) TO: GR-MU-V-NP (as amended 02/01/2021) PROPERTY OWNER: JJ&B Investments, LLC (Brent Ellinger, Janet Ellinger, Joseph Malone) AGENT: Alice Glasco Consulting (Alice Glasco) CASE MANAGER: Heather Chaffin (512-974-2122, heather.chaffin@austintexas.gov) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff supports the Applicant’s request for rezoning to GR-MU-V-NP. For a summary of the basis of staff’s recommendation, see case manager comments on page 2. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION / RECOMMENDATION: April 27, 2021: April 13, 2021: To grant postponement to April 27, 2021 as requested by Neighborhood. (12-0) [Commissioner Thompson- 1st, Commissioner Hempel- 2nd; Commissioner Shieh- Absent] CITY COUNCIL ACTION: May 6, 2021: ORDINANCE NUMBER: 1 of 194B-1 C14-2020-0089 2 ISSUES: This rezoning request is distinct from requests submitted in January and February of 2020 (C14-2020-0003 and C14-2020-0014). The prospective developers involved in those requests withdrew their applications prior to public hearing because they decided not to pursue the purchase of the property because the site did not meet their development needs. The current rezoning request previously included two tracts, requesting a change from SF-3- NP to MF-6-NP for Tract 1 and from GR-MU-NP to GR-MU-V-NP for Tract 2. On February 1, 2021 the applicant removed Tract 1 from the rezoning request. Please see Exhibit C- Original Zoning Request. A petition has been filed in response to the proposed rezoning. The petition is currently being reviewed by staff to determine if it meets the criteria of a Valid Petition. Please see Exhibit D- Valid Petition Request. The rezoning tract is immediately adjacent to a historic cemetery that dates to the 1800s. Neighbors have expressed concerned about the possibility of graves being located outside the property lines of the cemetery and possibly located on the rezoning tract. The rezoning tract is not located on an existing or future core transit corridor. Springdale Road is designated as an Activity Corridor in the Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan. CASE MANAGER COMMENTS: The rezoning tract is located northwest of the intersection of East 12th Street and Springdale Road; the undeveloped property is zoned GR-MU-NP. Immediately south of the property is a small retail center that is also zoned GR-MU-NP and contains general restaurant-limited and personal services land uses. Immediately west of the rezoning tract is undeveloped SF-3-NP property that is under the same ownership as the rezoning …
Planning Commission: April 27, 2021 DATE FILED: July 31, 2020 (In-cycle) NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN AMENDMENT REVIEW SHEET 712, 714 Pedernales Street and 2409 Coronado Street NEIGHORHOOD PLAN: Govalle/Johnston Terrace Combined (Govalle) CASE#: NPA-2020-0016.04 PROJECT NAME: 712, 714 Pedernales St. and 2409 Coronado St. PC DATE: April 27, 2021 ADDRESSES: DISTRICT AREA: 3 SITE AREA: 0.344 acres OWNER/APPLICANT: AGENT: Husch Blackwell, LLP (Nikelle Meade) CASE MANAGER: Maureen Meredith STAFF EMAIL: Maureen.Meredith@austintexas.gov TYPE OF AMENDMENT: Change in Future Land Use Designation Jose Soto From: Single Family Base District Zoning Change To: Mixed Use PHONE: (512) 974-2695 Related Zoning Case: C14-2021-0011 From: SF-3-NP To: CS-MU-NP NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN ADOPTION DATE: March 27, 2003 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: April 27, 2021 – (pending) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To grant the applicant’s request for Mixed Use land use. 1 1 of 33B-2 BASIS FOR STAFF’S RECOMMENDATION: Staff supports the applicant’s request for Mixed Use land use because the property is located within 150 feet of E. 7th Street, which is an Activity Corridor and within the Plaza Saltillo Activity Center where Mixed Use land use is supported. The property is on the far western edge of the Govalle Neighborhood Planning area with Commercial land use to the south and southeast with Single Family land use to the north and west. Further west of the property on the opposite side of the railroad tracks is Mixed Use land use. To the north of the property is newly developed single family homes with a mixed of uses to the east along Pedernales Street running south of the property. The Govalle/Johnston Terrace Neighborhood Plan supports a mix of land uses and zoning where people can live and work and a balanced and varied pattern of land uses. Below are sections of the neighborhood plan that supports the applicant’s request. 2 2 of 33B-2 LAND USE DESCRIPTIONS EXISTING LAND USE ON THE PROPERTY Single family - Detached or two family residential uses at typical urban and/or suburban densities. Purpose 1. Preserve the land use pattern and future viability of existing neighborhoods; 2. Encourage new infill development that continues existing neighborhood patterns of development; and 3. Protect residential neighborhoods from incompatible business or industry and the loss of existing housing. Application 1. Existing single‐family areas should generally be designated as single family to preserve established neighborhoods; and 2. May include small lot options (Cottage, Urban Home, Small Lot Single Family) and two‐family residential options (Duplex, …
ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET DISTRICT: 3 TO: CS-MU-NP CASE: C14-2021-0011 712 & 714 Pedernales St. and 2409 Coronado St. ZONING FROM: SF-3-NP ADDRESS: 712 & 714 Pedernales Street and 2409 Coronado Street SITE AREA: 0.3444 acres (15,003.06 square feet) PROPERTY OWNER: Jose Soto CASE MANAGER: Heather Chaffin (512-974-2122, heather.chaffin@austintexas.gov) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff does not support the Applicant’s request for rezoning to CS-MU-NP. Staff supports an alternate recommendation of LR-MU-NP. AGENT: Husch Blackwell LLP (Nikelle Meade) For a summary of the basis of staff’s recommendation, see case manager comments on page 2. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION / RECOMMENDATION: April 27, 2021: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: May 20, 2021: ORDINANCE NUMBER: 1 of 11B-3 C14-2021-0011 2 ISSUES: The property was previously zoned LI and was rezoned to SF-3-NP in 2003 as part of the Govalle neighborhood plan process (Ordinance No. 030327-lla). Many other properties in the neighborhood plan area were downzoned from LI to less intense zoning categories at that time. CASE MANAGER COMMENTS: The subject property is located at the southwest corner of Pedernales Street and Coronado Street. The SF-3-NP zoned property was previously occupied by automotive repair services, office, and single-family residential land uses. These structures remain on the property but are all vacant. Immediately west of the subject property are two single family residential homes zoned SF-3-NP. West of those homes is the Capital Metro Red Line railroad right-of- way (ROW). Across Coronado Street to the north are duplex and single family homes that are also zoned SF-3-NP. Northeast of the property, across the intersection of Coronado and Pedernales, is Parque Zaragoza Neighborhood Park, which is zoned P-NP. Across Pedernales Street to the east are single family residences zoned SF-3-NP and a self-serve car wash zoned CS-CO-NP. Across an alley to the south of the property is vacant CS-CO-NP zoned property that was previously used for automotive sales. Southwest across the alley is an alternative financial services business also zoned CS-CO-NP. These CS-CO-NP properties have frontage on East 7th Street which is a Core Transit Corridor. Like the subject property, these lots were downzoned during the Govalle neighborhood plan process in 2003. These properties were downzoned from LI to CS-CO-NP, with limitations on certain land uses. The following land uses are prohibited: Adult oriented businesses, Campground, Kennels, Pawn shop services, Residential treatment, and Vehicle storage. The following land uses are conditional: Agricultural sales and services, Construction sales and services, Limited warehousing …
ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET DISTRICT: 3 AGENT: Land Use Solutions, LLC (Michele Haussmann) CASE: C14-2021-0030 – Aloft Hotel ZONING FROM / TO: LI-PDA-NP, to allow cocktail lounge as a permitted use ADDRESS: 4108 South IH 35 Service Road Southbound SITE AREA: 1.986 acres PROPERTY OWNER: Savancer Land LLC (Trushyap Patel) CASE MANAGER: Wendy Rhoades (512-974-7719, wendy.rhoades@austintexas.gov) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Staff recommendation is to grant an amendment to limited industrial services – planned development area – neighborhood plan (LI-PDA-NP) combining district zoning. The amendment would allow cocktail lounge to be a permitted use of the Property, up to 5,700 square feet. The basis of Staff’s recommendation is provided on page 2. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION / RECOMMENDATION: April 27, 2021: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: May 20, 2021: ORDINANCE NUMBER: ISSUES: The Applicant has met with the South Congress Combined Neighborhood Plan Contact Team. CASE MANAGER COMMENTS: The subject property consists of a platted lot located at the southwest corner of the southbound IH -35 frontage road and East Ben White Boulevard, that is under construction for a hotel. The property has had limited industrial services – planned development area – neighborhood plan (LI-PDA-NP) district zoning since Council approved the East Congress Neighborhood Plan Rezonings in August 2005. The adjacent properties fronting East Ben White to the northwest contain two restaurants (limited), along the southbound IH 35 frontage road there are two hotels and a vacant commercial structure, and along Santiago B41 of 26 Street to the west there are commercial services uses (all LI-PDA-NP). Please refer to Exhibits A (Zoning Map) and A-1 (Aerial View). As set forth in Land Development Code Section 25-2-441, the regulations of a planned development area (PDA) may modify: 1) permitted or conditional uses authorized by the base zoning district, 2) site development regulations except for compatibility standards, and 3) off-street parking or loading regulations, sign regulations or screening regulations applicable in the base zoning district. LI-PDA-NP zoning applies to properties along the IH 35 frontage road between East Ben White Boulevard and East St. Elmo Road (Tract 104), and includes the proposed rezoning area. The PDA allows for mixed use development including certain residential uses, and establishes conditional uses, prohibited uses, and site development regulations. A cocktail lounge is established as a conditional use for Tract 104. Please refer to Exhibit B (2005 East Congress NP Rezoning Ordinance). The Applicant’s request is to amend the PDA to …
C14-2021-0029 1 ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE: C14-2021-0029 – Acton Site DISTRICT: 9 East Riverside Corridor (ERC) district - Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) subdistrict ZONING FROM: ZONING TO: East Riverside Corridor (ERC) district - Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) subdistrict, to provide eligibility for the density bonus program ADDRESS: 1404 E. Riverside Drive SITE AREA: 2.6 acres PROPERTY OWNER: Acton School of Business (Jeff Sandefer) AGENT: Armbrust & Brown, PLLC (Michael Whellan) CASE MANAGER: Kate Clark (512-974-1237, kate.clark@austintexas.gov) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends East Riverside Corridor (ERC) district zoning, to provide eligibility for the density bonus program by amending Figure 1-6 (East Riverside Corridor Hub Map) to include the subject property within a Hub Boundary and Figure 1-8 (East Riverside Corridor Development Bonus Height Map) to allow for a maximum height of 120 feet. For a summary of the basis of staff’s recommendation, see page 2 and 3. SMALL AREA PLANNING JOINT COMMITTEE April 14, 2021 Approved staff’s recommendation to grant ERC district zoning to ERC district zoning, to provide eligibility for the density bonus program. Vote: 5-0. [Commissioner King abstained; Commissioner Bray was absent]. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION / RECOMMENDATION: April 27, 2021 Scheduled for Planning Commission CITY COUNCIL ACTION: May 20, 2021 Scheduled for City Council ORDINANCE NUMBER: 1 of 15B-5 C14-2021-0029 2 ISSUES There are no known issues at this time and staff has not received any written or emailed comments in favor of or in opposition to this rezoning case. CASE MANAGER COMMENTS: This site currently contains the Acton School of Business and is zoned ERC with a subdistrict designation of CMU and is permitted to construct buildings up to 60 feet in height. It is approximately 2.6 acres and is located on the north side of E. Riverside Drive. It is adjacent to existing ERC zoned properties to the west, east and across E. Riverside Drive to the south. Adjacent properties to the west and east are also designated as CMU subdistricts and the property to the south is designated as a Neighborhood Mixed Use (NMU) subdistrict. Adjacent to the north is the Lady Bird Lake and is not zoned. Please see Exhibit A: Zoning Map, Exhibit B: Aerial Map and Exhibit C: ERC Maps. The applicant is not requesting to rezone their subdistrict or change any of the base entitlements currently allowed. They are requesting to amend Figure 1-6 (East Riverside Corridor Hub Map) to include the …
MEMORANDUM ************************************************************************ TO: Todd Shaw, Chair Planning Commission Members FROM: DATE: RE: Jerry Rusthoven, Assistant Director Housing and Planning Department April 21, 2021 C814-2020-0132 – Central Health PUD Request for Postponement by Staff ************************************************************************ Staff requests a postponement of the above-referenced PUD rezoning case to May 11, 2021 so that it has the opportunity to be reviewed by the Environmental Commission on Wednesday, May 5th. Attachment: Map of Property 1 of 2B-6 MF-5 TEXAS BLDG. T S S O Z A R B STATE OF CS TEXAS BLDG. STATE OF TEXAS BLDG. STATE BLDG. MF-5 CS E 18TH ST MF-4 OFFICE PARKING CS SERVICE CS-1 CENTER SERVICE MF-4 CS MF-4 CS CS CS MF-4 UNZ E 18TH ST UNZ E MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD CS UNZ SF-3 B 5 N N IH 3 P M A B R D N 5 U O IH 3 B T 5 N N IH 3 P M A B R 5 S O IH 3 B T D S 5 U N IH 3 P-H-NP C14-2009-0041 CH-V-CO-NP 95-0113 95-0113 CH-CO-NP SP96-0117C ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! NPA-2007-0009.03 ! SF-3-NP ! ! MF-3-NP O L A N D E R S T N A V A S O T A S T 7 E 1 6 T H S T ( LR-H-MU-NP MF-2-NP 2 7 ! ( - 1 9 0 ( LR-MU-NP 1 - 2 0 6 ( SF-3-NP ( ( ( ( E 1 5 T H S T ( ( ( ( ( SF-3-NP LO-MU-CO-NP ( C14-04-0091 ( ( ( SF-3-NP LO-MU-NP 8 4 - 0 6 O L A N D E R S T MF-4-NP ( ( S W E D I S H H I L L SF-3-NP ( ( ( NPA-2007-0009.02 MF-6-NP C14-04-0108 S P - 0 5 - 1 2 0 5 C U N D E V 8 5 - 1 1 6 ( ( MF-4-H-NP ( MF-4-NP ( H I S T O R I C D I S T. SF-3-NP P A R K ( SF-3-NP ( ( E 1 3 T H S T ( ( R 8 5 - 0 1 1 ( SF-3-H-NP ( ( E 1 4 T H S T ( ( ( ( SF-3-NP ( ( ( ( ( SF-3-NP 7 1 - 7 1 1 W A L L E R …
ITEM FOR PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA COMMISSION DATE REQUESTED: (cid:36)(cid:83)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:79)(cid:3)27(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:20) ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: (cid:21)(cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:24)(cid:3)(cid:49)(cid:88)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:24)(cid:19)(cid:23)(cid:3)(cid:58)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:23)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:3)(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:87) (cid:38)(cid:36)(cid:54)(cid:40)(cid:3) (cid:41)(cid:50)(cid:47)(cid:39)(cid:40)(cid:53)(cid:29) (cid:55)(cid:51)(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:27)(cid:21)(cid:21)(cid:23)(cid:20) NAME OF APPLICANT: (cid:39)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:42)(cid:85)(cid:82)(cid:88)(cid:83) CITY ARBORIST: (cid:49)(cid:68)(cid:82)(cid:80)(cid:76)(cid:3)(cid:53)(cid:82)(cid:87)(cid:85)(cid:68)(cid:80)(cid:72)(cid:79)(cid:3)(cid:11)(cid:24)(cid:20)(cid:21)(cid:12)(cid:3)(cid:28)(cid:26)(cid:23)(cid:16)(cid:28)(cid:20)(cid:22)(cid:24) (cid:81)(cid:68)(cid:82)(cid:80)(cid:76)(cid:17)(cid:85)(cid:82)(cid:87)(cid:85)(cid:68)(cid:80)(cid:72)(cid:79)(cid:35)(cid:68)(cid:88)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:91)(cid:68)(cid:86)(cid:17)(cid:74)(cid:82)(cid:89) ORDINANCE: (cid:43)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:74)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:55)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:50)(cid:85)(cid:71)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:11)(cid:47)(cid:39)(cid:38)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:24)(cid:16)(cid:27)(cid:16)(cid:25)(cid:23)(cid:20)(cid:12)(cid:3) REQUEST: (cid:55)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:83)(cid:83)(cid:79)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:86)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:78)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:80)(cid:82)(cid:89)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:90)(cid:82)(cid:3)(cid:11)(cid:21)(cid:12)(cid:3)(cid:43)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:74)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:15)(cid:3) (cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:90)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:3)(cid:86)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:79)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:80)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:89)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:22)(cid:19)(cid:180)(cid:3)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:71)(cid:76)(cid:68)(cid:80)(cid:72)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:17) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: (cid:55)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:84)(cid:88)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:80)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:87)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:36)(cid:85)(cid:69)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:83)(cid:83)(cid:85)(cid:82)(cid:89)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:3)(cid:70)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:68)(cid:3)(cid:86)(cid:72)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:73)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:3)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:3) (cid:47)(cid:39)(cid:38)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:24)(cid:16)(cid:27)(cid:16)(cid:25)(cid:21)(cid:23)(cid:11)(cid:36)(cid:12)(cid:11)(cid:21)(cid:12)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:88)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:89)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:82)(cid:80)(cid:80)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:17) 2 1 of 40B-7 MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Todd Shaw, Chair (cid:38)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:36)(cid:88)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:3)Planning Commission FROM: (cid:49)(cid:68)(cid:82)(cid:80)(cid:76)(cid:3)(cid:53)(cid:82)(cid:87)(cid:85)(cid:68)(cid:80)(cid:72)(cid:79), City Arborist Program Development Services Department DATE: April 15(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:20) (cid:38)(cid:36)(cid:54)(cid:40)(cid:3)(cid:41)(cid:50)(cid:47)(cid:39)(cid:40)(cid:53): (cid:55)(cid:51) (cid:6)(cid:20)(cid:27)(cid:21)(cid:21)(cid:23)(cid:20) REQUEST: The applicant is requesting to remove two heritage trees, (cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:72) with a single-stem greater than 30 inches as allowed under LDC 25-8-643(cid:17) Project Description The subject property is located at (cid:24)(cid:19)(cid:23)(cid:3)(cid:58)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:23)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:3)(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:24)(cid:3)(cid:49)(cid:88)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:87).Thelot size is (cid:17)(cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:3)acres (cid:11)(cid:20)(cid:27)(cid:15)(cid:28)(cid:23)(cid:23)(cid:3)(cid:54)(cid:41)(cid:12)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:93)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:54)(cid:16)(cid:49)(cid:51)(cid:3)(cid:11)(cid:38)(cid:82)(cid:80)(cid:80)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:70)(cid:76)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:3)(cid:54)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:89)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:177)(cid:3)(cid:49)(cid:72)(cid:76)(cid:74)(cid:75)(cid:69)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:75)(cid:82)(cid:82)(cid:71)(cid:3) (cid:51)(cid:79)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:12)(cid:17)(cid:3) (cid:55)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:3) (cid:83)(cid:85)(cid:82)(cid:83)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:87)(cid:92)(cid:3) (cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:3) (cid:79)(cid:82)(cid:70)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3) (cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:3) (cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:3) (cid:56)(cid:81)(cid:76)(cid:89)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:86)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:92)(cid:3) (cid:49)(cid:72)(cid:76)(cid:74)(cid:75)(cid:69)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:75)(cid:82)(cid:82)(cid:71)(cid:3) (cid:50)(cid:89)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:79)(cid:68)(cid:92)(cid:3) (cid:11)(cid:56)(cid:49)(cid:50)(cid:12)(cid:3) (cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:3) (cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:3) (cid:44)(cid:81)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:3) (cid:58)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:3) (cid:38)(cid:68)(cid:80)(cid:83)(cid:88)(cid:86)(cid:3) (cid:86)(cid:88)(cid:69)(cid:71)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:17) (cid:55)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:3) (cid:83)(cid:85)(cid:82)(cid:83)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:87)(cid:92)(cid:3) (cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:3) (cid:79)(cid:82)(cid:70)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3) (cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:3) (cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:3) (cid:47)(cid:68)(cid:71)(cid:92)(cid:3) (cid:37)(cid:76)(cid:85)(cid:71)(cid:3) (cid:47)(cid:68)(cid:78)(cid:72)(cid:3) (cid:90)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:86)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:15)(cid:3) (cid:70)(cid:79)(cid:68)(cid:86)(cid:86)(cid:76)(cid:73)(cid:76)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:88)(cid:85)(cid:69)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:90)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:86)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3) (cid:55)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:86)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:70)(cid:88)(cid:85)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:79)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:69)(cid:72)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:83)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:3)(cid:80)(cid:88)(cid:79)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:16)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:76)(cid:79)(cid:3)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:90)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:3)(cid:86)(cid:88)(cid:85)(cid:73)(cid:68)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:83)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:78)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:17)(cid:3) (cid:55)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:86)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:70)(cid:88)(cid:85)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:79)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:27)(cid:19)(cid:8)(cid:3)(cid:76)(cid:80)(cid:83)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:89)(cid:76)(cid:82)(cid:88)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:70)(cid:82)(cid:89)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:17)(cid:3) (cid:55)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:70)(cid:88)(cid:85)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:3)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:89)(cid:72)(cid:79)(cid:82)(cid:83)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:3)(cid:22)(cid:19)(cid:26)(cid:16)(cid:88)(cid:81)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:3) (cid:75)(cid:82)(cid:88)(cid:86)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:90)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:90)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:3)(cid:23)(cid:15)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:3)(cid:86)(cid:84)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:73)(cid:87)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:74)(cid:85)(cid:82)(cid:88)(cid:81)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:73)(cid:79)(cid:82)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:76)(cid:79)(cid:17) (cid:55)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:3) (cid:68)(cid:83)(cid:83)(cid:79)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:3) (cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:84)(cid:88)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3) (cid:68)(cid:3) (cid:83)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:16)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:89)(cid:72)(cid:79)(cid:82)(cid:83)(cid:80)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:3) (cid:70)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:88)(cid:79)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:3) (cid:90)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:3) (cid:38)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:92)(cid:3) (cid:36)(cid:85)(cid:69)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:3) (cid:83)(cid:85)(cid:82)(cid:74)(cid:85)(cid:68)(cid:80)(cid:3) (cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:89)(cid:76)(cid:72)(cid:90)(cid:3) (cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:73)(cid:73)(cid:17)(cid:3) (cid:36)(cid:79)(cid:79)(cid:3) (cid:87)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:3) (cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:3) (cid:86)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:3) (cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:3) (cid:83)(cid:85)(cid:82)(cid:83)(cid:82)(cid:86)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3) (cid:73)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:3) (cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:80)(cid:82)(cid:89)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:17)(cid:3) (cid:55)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:3) (cid:86)(cid:70)(cid:82)(cid:83)(cid:72)(cid:3) (cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:3) (cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:3) (cid:70)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:88)(cid:79)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:3) (cid:73)(cid:82)(cid:70)(cid:88)(cid:86)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3) (cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:3) (cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:3) (cid:86)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:3) (cid:87)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:29)(cid:3) (cid:68)(cid:3) (cid:51)(cid:85)(cid:82)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3) (cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3) (cid:82)(cid:68)(cid:78)(cid:15)(cid:3) (cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:71)(cid:3) (cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:3) (cid:87)(cid:90)(cid:82)(cid:3) (cid:43)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:74)(cid:72)(cid:3) (cid:87)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:3) (cid:68)(cid:86)(cid:86)(cid:82)(cid:70)(cid:76)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3) (cid:90)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:89)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:84)(cid:88)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:17) requested for removal (cid:36)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:24)(cid:5)(cid:3) (cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:74)(cid:72)(cid:3) (cid:83)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:3) (cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:71)(cid:3) (cid:68)(cid:3)(cid:86)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:79)(cid:72)(cid:16)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:80)(cid:3)(cid:22)(cid:21)(cid:5)(cid:3)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:74)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:68)(cid:78)(cid:3)are that, and per the Land Development Code, necessitate a Land Use Commission variance. Tree Evaluation Tree #913 - 32" red oak (Quercus shumardii) Canopy Conditions Major asymmetry, unbalanced crown, and an overextended limb (Exhibit 1). 3 2 of 40B-7 Structure/Trunk Multiple attachments – all the leaders (scaffold branches) are connected at one place on the trunk. This is inherently a weakness with this tree’s main union due to lack of branch taper (Exhibit 2). Included bark was observed between two unions where stems grow closely together causing weak, under-supported branch angles which may cause branch or total tree failure (Exhibit 3). Root System Root system is almost entirely covered with impacted impervious cover. Tree has been buried to an unknown depth as the root flare is not visible. Soil, mulch, or fill packed against the bark is harmful to the tree and can lead to long term decay, decline, and instability of the tree. Overall Condition Tree #913 is in fair condition due to structure and poor attachments. Tree #911 - 25" pecan (Carya illinoinensis) Canopy Conditions Displays a heightened loading on the stems as a result of the length and excessive end weight of the branches and lack of inner branches. A large cavity was identified in one of the main leaders and hypoxylon canker was observed on live tissue (Exhibits 4 & …
SUBDIVISION REVIEW SHEET CASE NO.: C8J-2020-0013 SUBDIVISION NAME: West Bella Fortuna Preliminary Plan AREA: 93.28 acres OWNER/APPLICANT: Clayton Properties Group, Inc. Brohn Homes (Tyler LOT(S): 346 LUC DATE: 4/27/21 Gatewood) AGENT: Doucet & Associates (Davood Salek) ADDRESS OF SUBDIVISION: Approx. 13300 Bradshaw Rd GRIDS: G-10 WATERSHED: Onion Creek and Rinard Creek COUNTY: Travis JURISDICTION: 2-Mile ETJ MUD: N/A EXISTING ZONING: N/A PROPOSED LAND USE: Single Family, Drainage, Landscape, Park ADMINISTRATIVE WAIVERS: N/A VARIANCES: None SIDEWALKS: Sidewalks will be provided on all internal streets. DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The request is for approval of the West Bella Fortuna Preliminary Plan consisting of 346 lots on 93.28 acres. Water and wastewater will be provided by the City of Austin. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends approval of this preliminary plan. This plan meets all applicable County, State and City of Austin LDC requirements. ZONING AND PLATTING COMMISSION ACTION: CASE MANAGER: Sarah Sumner Email address: sarah.sumner@traviscountytx.gov PHONE: 512-854-7687 1 1 of 5B-8 i g n p p a M / g n y e v r u S - s t i n e m e l t i t n E - g n i r i e e n g n E l i i v C 0 6 1 e t i u S , W 1 7 y a w h g H i . B 1 0 4 7 0 0 6 2 - 3 8 5 - ) 2 1 5 ( : e n o h P , 5 3 7 8 7 s a x e T , n i t s u A m o c . s r i t e e n g n e e c u o d w w w . 7 3 9 3 : r e b m u N n o i t a r t s i g e R m r i F PHASE 2 IS NOT PART OF THIS PRELIMINARY PLAN AND IS ALREADY PLATTED WITH BELLA FORTUNA SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAN CASE# C8J-2017-0235 (cid:120) (cid:120) 4/08/212 of 5B-8 i i g n p p a M / g n y e v r u S - s t n e m e l t i t n E - g n i r e e n g n E l i i i v C 0 6 1 e t i u S , W 1 …
SUBDIVISION REVIEW SHEET CASE NO.: C8-2020-0160.0A COMMISSION DATE: April 27, 2021 SUBDIVISION NAME: Sand Beach Overlook Subdivision ADDRESS: 1505 W 3rd Street APPLICANT: Steve Ogden AGENT: LandDev (Nick Brown) ZONING: LI-CO-NP NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Old West Austin AREA: 0.947 acres (41,251 sf) LOTS: 1 COUNTY: Travis DISTRICT: 9 WATERSHED: Lady Bird Lake JURISDICTION: Full Purpose SIDEWALKS: Sidewalks will be constructed on site. VARIANCES: A variance from LDC § 25-4-171, which requires each lot in a subdivision abut a dedicated public street. DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The request is for the approval of Sand Beach Overlook Subdivision, consisting of one lot on 0.947 acres, and a variance from LDC § 25-4-171, which requires each lot in a subdivision abut a dedicated public street. Staff supports approval of the variance; however, additional information is required for the plat. Because of this, staff recommends both items be disapproved for the reasons listed in the staff report. The applicant’s variance request is attached as Exhibit D. Austin Transportation Department’s (ATD) support for the variance request is attached as Exhibit E. The plat does not comply with the criteria for approval in LDC 25-4-84(B) and staff recommends disapproval for the reasons listed in the attached comment report. An application that has been disapproved with reasons may be updated to address those reasons until the application expires. If the applicant submits an update to address the reasons for disapproval, that update will be presented to the Land Use Commission within fifteen days of submittal. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends disapproval of the plat and variance for the reasons listed in the comment report dated April 22, 2021, and attached as Exhibit C. CASE MANAGER: Jennifer Bennett-Reumuth PHONE: 512-974-9002 E-mail: jennifer.bennett-reumuth@austintexas.gov ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A: Vicinity map Exhibit B: Proposed plat Exhibit C: Comment report dated April 22, 2021 Exhibit D: LDC § 25-4-171 variance request from applicant Exhibit E: ATD staff support for LDC § 25-4-171 variance request 1 of 43B-9 N56°24'31"W 1.32' (N54°44'W 1.30') BM #2 L30 L19 8 2 L 4.73' W. 5TH STREET S65°42'15"E 98.10' 93.37' L29 1908 7 2 L R E T N E K C E E R C N 7 7 ° 0 0 ' 4 7 " E 1 4 2 . 9 6 ' ( N 7 9 ° 3 5 ' E 1 4 2 . 7 5 ' ) S65°44'13"E 62.34' (S63°10'E 62.25') 3/8" L13 5/8" MWM S66°15'13"E 192.18' (S63°41'E …
APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISISON PARKLAND REQUIREMENT REVIEW SHEET 3 CS-MU-CO-NP 4802 South Congress Avenue Wilder Planning Commission: February 9, 2021 postponed Mike McHone Rivera Engineering (Michael Rivera) 4802 LLC (Mitch Ely) March 9, 2021, postponed March 23, 2021, postponed April 13, 2021, postponed April 27, 2021 CASE NUMBER: SP-2019-0600C Parks Board: January 26, 2021 CASE NAME: DISTRICT: ADDRESS: ZONING: APPELLANT: APPLICANT: OWNER: NEIGHBOR- -HOOD PLAN: PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD ACTION: January 26, 2021: Board Member Mason-Murphy made a motion to recommend to the Planning Commission to deny the applicant's request to pay fee in lieu of land dedication for 4802 S. Congress (SP-2019-0600C) and uphold staff’s recommendation for the dedication of parkland; Board Morgan seconded the motion. The motion passed on a vote of 9-1 with Board Member Luca voting nay and Vice Chair Farasat absent. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: February 9, 2021: Commissioner Seeger made the motion to postpone the item to March 9, 2021 at the request of the neighborhood; Commissioner Azar seconded the motion. The motion passed on a vote of 11 – 0. March 9, 2021: Commissioner Howard made the motion to postpone the item to March 23, 2021 at the request of the applicant; Commissioner Seeger seconded the motion. The motion passed on a vote of 10 – 0. March 23, 2021: Commissioner Azar made the motion to postpone the item to March 23, 2021 at the request of the applicant; Commissioner Shieh seconded the motion. The motion passed on a vote of 11 – 0. April 13, 2021: Commissioner Azar made the motion to postpone the item to April 27, 2021 at South Congress Combined (West Congress Neighborhood) 1 of 26B-11 SP-2019-0600C Wilder 2 the request of the neighborhood; Commissioner Schneider seconded the motion. The motion passed on a vote of 12 – 0. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: The applicant is proposing to construct 125 multifamily units in a multi-story building with an underground multi-level parking garage, driveway to South Congress Avenue, on-site storm water quality and detention pond, and site utilities. APPEAL REQUEST: The Appellant filed an appeal of the Parks and Recreation Department (PARD) decision to require land for this site plan, and requested to pay fee in lieu. This action is described in Land Development Code 25-1-605 (F); the appeal is to the Planning Commission, who will make the final decision. The case has already been heard by Park and Recreation Board, and a …
1 of 9B-11 2 of 9B-11 Grantham, Scott From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Importance: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Katerina Dittemore <> Monday, February 1, 2021 11:06 AM Grantham, Scott Norman Rice; 'Faye Beck' Case SP-2019-0600C Appeal denied Appeal denied 4802.pdf High Follow up Flagged *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Goo morning Mr Grantham I am responding to the Notice of Public Hearing Site Plan Appeal Case SP-2019-0600C Please record in the official public hearing comments that I object to the appeal. Specifically, I agree with the recommendation of the Parks Commission to dedicate parkland as part of this development project. We badly need more greenspace in this area of town. Please contact me with any questions. 512/707-0455 Thank you Katerina R Dittemore 4081 S Congress Ave Unit R-4 Austin, TX 78745 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1 3 of 9B-11 Grantham, Scott From: Sent: To: Subject: Pam Lynn <> Monday, February 1, 2021 1:03 PM Grantham, Scott Exemption Case #SP-2019-0600C OBJECTION Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Mr. Grantham, In the matter of Exemption Case #SP-2019-0600C, I wish to let you know that I OBJECT to the exemption. I live opposite (across the greenbelt) of the proposed development at 4802 South Congress. As the Congress corridor continues to grow in density, I think park land near the development is necessary to the health and wellbeing of nearby citizens. Thank You, Pamela Lynn 4605 Goliad Ln. Austin TX CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1 4 of 9B-11 Grantham, Scott From: Sent: To: Subject: Hi Scott, *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Jacob Noack <> Monday, February 1, 2021 7:30 PM Grantham, Scott 4802 Congress Ave Objection I object to the exemption application for 4802 Congress Ave (case # SP-2019-0600C). As a homeowner in the West Congress (Fairview) neighborhood and a native Austinite, I strongly believe the greenbelts should be open and inclusive of everyone. Jacob Noack jacobnoack@me.com …
Grantham, Scott From: Sent: To: Subject: Clare Branson <> Wednesday, February 3, 2021 8:48 AM Grantham, Scott 4802 Congress Ave Development *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** I object to the developer’s application for exemption to provide park land in the project for Case # SP-2019-0600C. Clare Branson 215 Lareina Austin, TX 78749 NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). This email may contain privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the message. When sending email via the Internet, please be sure NOT to include sensitive information such as account numbers, social security numbers, birthdates, etc. Confidential information may be sent to us securely via our free online banking service available at www.AmericanBank.com. You may contact us with questions or concerns at (361) 992-9911 or email to info@AmericanBank.com. CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1 1 of 15B-11 Grantham, Scott From: Sent: To: Subject: Hi Scott, Daniel <> Wednesday, February 3, 2021 9:01 AM Grantham, Scott SP-2019-0600C *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** My name is Daniel Sullivan, and I'm a resident of the East Congress neighborhood in South Austin (812 Sheraton Ave). I'm writing to you today to urge the city to reject the developer's appeal to forego the requirement for a public easement leading to the Williamson Creek Greenbelt. The requirement for a public easement is hardly onerous, and would ensure that this part of the city progresses in its development towards being more vibrant and pedestrian friendly. Thanks for your time. I hope you take this into consideration. Best, Daniel Sullivan CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1 2 of 15B-11 Grantham, Scott From: Sent: To: Subject: John Flowers <> Tuesday, February 2, 2021 7:45 PM Grantham, Scott Objection to The Bend Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** I …
Grantham, Scott From: Sent: To: Subject: Larry Petrowski <> Friday, February 26, 2021 9:26 AM Grantham, Scott Fwd: Case Number: SP-2019-0600C *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Larry Petrowski <> Date: February 26, 2021 at 8:05:10 AM MST To: scott.grantham@austintexas Cc: Paula Petrowski <> Subject: Case Number: SP-2019-0600C Good morning. Under Petrowski Family Trust, my wife and I own a condo unit at Bel Air, 4801 S. Congress. We did not receive the notice showing a mailing date of Jan. 22, 2021 until February 25, 2021. However, we support the dedication of land as part of the site plan, and not payment of a fee in lieu of parkland dedication. Please let me know if this email is sufficient to reflect our position if a final decision has not already been made. Lawrence C. Petrowski 602.909.9707 Sent from my iPhone CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1 1 of 4B-11 Grantham, Scott From: Sent: To: Subject: Stuart Frazier <> Monday, March 29, 2021 3:55 PM Grantham, Scott SP-2019-0600C *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** I live in the Battle Bend Neighborhood and have explored this area in great detail. I'm not sure if this has been decided but please deny this request to prevent the general public from accessing the williamson greenbelt in this location. We as a city have to grow, and I'm fine with that! But we also need to take this opportunity to have the developers and businesses that are re-developing Austin help keep the greenspace evolving and growing at the same pace. To restrict access to any of this space seems like it goes against every fiber of what makes Austin, Austin. Just my thoughts. I appreciate you taking them into consideration. Thanks, Stuart Frazier 512.913.7073 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1 2 of 4B-11 March 21, 2021 City of Austin Planning Commissioners South Congress Combined Neighborhood Plan Contact Team – SCCNPCT Case Number SP-2019-0600C - 4802 …
Meeting of the Planning Commission April 27, 2021 Planning Commission to be held April 27, 2021 with Social Distancing Modifications Public comment will be allowed via telephone; no in-person input will be allowed. All speakers, including applicants and representatives, must register in advance (Day before the scheduled meeting, April 26, 2021 by noon). To speak remotely at the April 27, 2021 Planning Commission Meeting, residents must: Preferably email the board liaison at andrew.rivera@austintexas.gov or call 512-974-6508 the day before the meeting. The following information is required: 1. The speaker name. 2. Item number(s) they wish to speak on. 3. Whether they are for/against/neutral. 4. Mailing address. 5. Telephone number. Must be the number that will be used to call-in. Failure to provide the required information by noon April 26, 2021 shall render a request null and void. A registered speaker may not sign up another speaker. Previous registration on an item does not automatically roll over. •Once a request to register to speak has been called in or emailed to the board liaison, residents will receive either an email or phone call with additional information regarding the call in process. •Handouts or other information must be emailed to andrew.rivera@austintexas.gov by 1:00 PM Tuesday, April 27, 2021 This information will be provided to Commission members in advance of the meeting. •Residents may watch the meeting here: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Postponement requests must be submitted to the case manager and Andrew Rivera by 5PM Monday, April 26, 2021 Reunión de la Comisión de Planificación Fecha 27 de abril de 2021 La Comisión de Planificación se reunirá el 27 de abril de 2021 con modificaciones de distanciamiento social. Se permitirán comentarios públicos por teléfono; no se permitirá ninguna entrada en persona. Llame o envíe un correo electrónico al enlace de la junta en 512-974-6508 andrew.rivera@austintexas.gov a más tardar al mediodía (el día antes de la reunion, 26 de abril de 2021). 1. El nombre del orador. 2. Número (s) de artículo sobre el que desean hablar. 3. Si están a favor / en contra / neutrales. 4. Dirección postal. 5. Número de teléfono. Debe ser el número que se utilizará para llamar a la persona que desea hablar. Si la información solicitada no se envía antes del mediodía del 26 de abril de 2021, la solicitud será nula y sin efecto. Un orador registrado no puede registrar a otro orador. El registro anterior de un …
SUBDIVISION REVIEW SHEET CASE NO.: C8-2020-0021.0A COMMISSION DATE: April 27, 2021 SUBDIVISION NAME: Fort Branch Subdivision ADDRESS: 5016 E. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. APPLICANT: Robert Penta AGENT: Jerome Perales (Perales Land Development LLC) ZONING: SF-3-NP (single family residence) NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: MLK-183 AREA: 2.9 acre (30,642 sf) LOTS: 6 COUNTY: Travis DISTRICT: 1 WATERSHED: Fort Branch JURISDICTION: Full Purpose VARIANCES: none DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The request is for the approval of the Fort Branch Subdivision composed of 6 lots on 2.9 acres. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends disapproval of the plat for the reasons listed in the comment report dated April 22, 2021, and attached as Exhibit C. The plat does not comply with the criteria for approval in LDC 25-4-84(B) and staff recommends disapproval for the reasons listed in the attached comment report. An application that has been disapproved with reasons may be updated to address those reasons until the application expires. If the applicant submits an update to address the reasons for disapproval, that update will be presented to the Land Use Commission within fifteen days of submittal. CASE MANAGER: Cesar Zavala E-mail: cesar.zavala@austintexas.gov PHONE: 512-974-3404 ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A: Vicinity map Exhibit B: Proposed plat Exhibit C: Comment report dated February 6, 2020 B-091 of 12 Legend Street Labels Jurisdiction FULL PURPOSE LIMITED PURPOSE OTHER CITY LIMITS OTHER CITIES ETJ Jurisdiction FULL PURPOSE LIMITED PURPOSE EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION 2 MILE ETJ AGRICULTURAL AGREEMENT EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION 2 MILE ETJ AGRICULTURAL AGREEMENT OTHER CITY LIMITS OTHER CITIES ETJ 0.3 0 0.14 0.3 Miles NAD_1983_StatePlane_Texas_Central_FIPS_4203_Feet Date Printed: This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey. This product has been produced by the City of Austin for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. 1: 8,785 Notes SUBDIVISION NAME: Fort Branch Subdivision ADDRESS: 5016 E. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. B-092 of 12 NW NE W SCALE 1" = 60' E SW SE N S 60 0 120 BEARING BASIS: BEARINGS ARE GRID NORTH BASED ON THE TEXAS COORDINATE SYSTEM CENTRAL TEXAS ZONE (4203) NAD83 HARN HORIZONTAL CONTROL. LEGEND 1/2" ROD FOUND 1/2" ROD SET M MAG NAIL FOUND SSE WWE P.O.B. CALCULATED POINT SANITARY SEWER ESMT WATER/WASTEWATER ESMT POINT OF BEGINNING SIDEWALK FORT BRANCH CREEK SUBDIVISION 500 YR FLOOD PLAIN …
SUBDIVISION REVIEW SHEET CASE NO.: C8-2020-0021.0A COMMISSION DATE: April 27, 2021 SUBDIVISION NAME: Fort Branch Subdivision ADDRESS: 5016 E. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. APPLICANT: Robert Penta AGENT: Jerome Perales (Perales Land Development LLC) ZONING: SF-3-NP (single family residence) NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: MLK-183 AREA: 2.9 acre (30,642 sf) LOTS: 6 COUNTY: Travis DISTRICT: 1 WATERSHED: Fort Branch JURISDICTION: Full Purpose VARIANCES: none DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The request is for the approval of the Fort Branch Subdivision composed of 6 lots on 2.9 acres. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends disapproval of the plat for the reasons listed in the comment report dated April 22, 2021, and attached as Exhibit C. The plat does not comply with the criteria for approval in LDC 25-4-84(B) and staff recommends disapproval for the reasons listed in the attached comment report. An application that has been disapproved with reasons may be updated to address those reasons until the application expires. If the applicant submits an update to address the reasons for disapproval, that update will be presented to the Land Use Commission within fifteen days of submittal. CASE MANAGER: Cesar Zavala E-mail: cesar.zavala@austintexas.gov PHONE: 512-974-3404 ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A: Vicinity map Exhibit B: Proposed plat Exhibit C: Comment report dated February 6, 2020 B-101 of 12 Legend Street Labels Jurisdiction FULL PURPOSE LIMITED PURPOSE OTHER CITY LIMITS OTHER CITIES ETJ Jurisdiction FULL PURPOSE LIMITED PURPOSE EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION 2 MILE ETJ AGRICULTURAL AGREEMENT EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION 2 MILE ETJ AGRICULTURAL AGREEMENT OTHER CITY LIMITS OTHER CITIES ETJ 0.3 0 0.14 0.3 Miles NAD_1983_StatePlane_Texas_Central_FIPS_4203_Feet Date Printed: This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey. This product has been produced by the City of Austin for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. 1: 8,785 Notes SUBDIVISION NAME: Fort Branch Subdivision ADDRESS: 5016 E. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. B-102 of 12 NW NE W SCALE 1" = 60' E SW SE N S 60 0 120 BEARING BASIS: BEARINGS ARE GRID NORTH BASED ON THE TEXAS COORDINATE SYSTEM CENTRAL TEXAS ZONE (4203) NAD83 HARN HORIZONTAL CONTROL. LEGEND 1/2" ROD FOUND 1/2" ROD SET M MAG NAIL FOUND SSE WWE P.O.B. CALCULATED POINT SANITARY SEWER ESMT WATER/WASTEWATER ESMT POINT OF BEGINNING SIDEWALK FORT BRANCH CREEK SUBDIVISION 500 YR FLOOD PLAIN …
URBAN RENEWAL PLAN MODIFICATION # 12 Beginning in late 2018 the Urban Renewal Board of the City of Austin (URB) began working on updating the Urban Renewal Plan for the East 11th and12th Street Urban Renewal Area (URP) and associated Neighborhood Conservation Combining Districts (NCCDs). The purpose of their efforts was to update the URP and streamline the URP and NCCDs and to bring them into alignment. Attached is the proposed URP as recommended by the Urban Renewal Board at their January 19, 2021 and February 8, 2021 meetings. Major proposed changes include: • Replacing the existing definitions section which largely pertain to land uses with a Land Use section that mirrors the draft NCCDs. • Moving most of the existing “project controls” for 22 distinct areas in the URP to the NCCD documents to ensure that the site development standards are in one document. • Update the process to modify the URP to align with the rezoning process. • Reorganization of sections that are outdated and adding information about changes to the area since the URP’s adoption in 1999. The URP does adopt the subdistrict boundaries and site development standards of the East 11th and East 12th Street NCCD. For the East 11th Street NCCD, staff’s recommendation differs from the URB’s only outside of the boundaries of the URP. Therefore, staff suggests no changes to this recommendation. B-121 of 19 DRAFT Recommended by the Urban Renewal Board January 19, 2021 URBAN RENEWAL PLAN FOR THE EAST 11TH AND 12TH STREETS URBAN RENEWAL PLAN AREA B-122 of 19 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Boundary Description 2. History 2.1 Accomplishments 3. Vision, Purpose, Authority and Scope 4. Redevelopment Strategy 5. Applicability of NCCD Controls 6. Land Use 7. Relocation of Persons, Businesses (including individuals and families, business concerns, and others displaced by the project) 8. Duration and Modification Procedures of URP Appendices: Appendix A: East 11th and 12th Street Urban Renewal Plan; Amendments Appendix B: East 11th Street and East 12th Street Neighborhood Conservation Combining District (NCCDs); Amendments Abbreviations commonly used in the document: URP – Urban Renewal Plan URA-Urban Renewal Agency ARA – Austin Revitalization Authority Note: Some of the tables and figures from the original 1999 Urban Renewal Plan have been deleted or modified, as they were no longer accurate or relevant. The original plan is available at this website: http://www.austintexas.gov/department/urban-renewal-plan B-123 of 19 EAST 11 TH & 12TH STREETS …
ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE: C14-2021-0033 – East 11th Street Neighborhood Conservation Combining District (NCCD) Amendment (City Council-Initiated) DISTRICT: 1 ZONING FROM: Current East 11th Street NCCD development standards TO: Revised development regulations and land uses (no base zoning district changes) ADDRESS: IH-35 Northbound frontage road between East 12th Street and the northern alley of East 7th Street; East 11th Street from IH-35 to Navasota Street; Juniper Street between Branch Street and Navasota Street; Rosewood Avenue between Navasota Street and the eastern property line of 1314 Rosewood Avenue; and a segment of San Bernard Street SITE AREA: 28.15 acres PROPERTY OWNER: NA AGENT: City of Austin, Housing and Planning Department CASE MANAGER: Mark Walters (512-974-7695, mark.walters@austintexas.gov) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommendation is to support the recommendations made by the Urban Renewal Board except for the creation of a new Subdistrict 4 and associated regulations for that subdistrict. For an overview of the recommended changes and specific recommendations see Exhibit C: Proposed Changes to The East 11th Street Neighborhood Conservation Combining District (NCCD) beginning on page 6. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION / RECOMMENDATION: Pending CITY COUNCIL ACTION: May 20, 2021 ORDINANCE NUMBER: NA ISSUES: Staff has an alternative recommendation to the Urban Renewal Board’s regarding the creation of a new Subdistrict 4 and related subdistrict regulations. Due to the pandemic, the public’s participation in the development of these recommendations has been limited. Staff held a virtual public information meeting on April 20, 2021 to provide general information and to answer questions. 23 people attended. The questions and responses are attached in Exhibit D. B131 of 19 BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION: • The proposed amendments to the NCCD support the goals of the Urban Renewal Plan for the East 11th and12th Street Urban Renewal Area, “Champion sustainable revitalization reflecting diversity, achieving equity, and preserving East Austin’s cultural history.” • The segment of East 11th Street between IH-35 and Navasota Street is designated as an Imagine Austin Activity Corridor. “Corridors are also characterized by a variety of activities and types of buildings located along the roadway — shopping, restaurants and cafés, parks, schools, single-family houses, apartments, public buildings, houses of worship, mixed-use buildings, and offices.” The proposed changes to the NCCD will support East 11th Street’s evolution into a more complete Activity Corridor. • Allowing denser mixed use development along East 11th Street and denser residential development along Juniper Street supports the Austin Strategic Housing …
ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE: C14-2021-0037 – East 12th Street Neighborhood Conservation Combining District (NCCD) Amendment (City Council-Initiated) DISTRICT: 1 ZONING FROM: Current East 12h Street NCCD development standards and land uses TO: Revised development regulations and land uses (no base zoning district changes) ADDRESS: North side of East 12th Street between the IH-35 North frontage road and Poquito Street and the south side of East 12th Street between Branch Street and Poquito Street SITE AREA: 22.91 acres PROPERTY OWNER: NA AGENT: City of Austin, Housing and Planning Department CASE MANAGER: Mark Walters (512-974-7695, mark.walters@austintexas.gov) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommendation is to support the recommendations made by the Urban Renewal Board For an overview of the recommended changes and specific recommendations see Exhibit C: Proposed Changes to The East 12th Street Neighborhood Conservation Combining District (NCCD) beginning on page 6. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION / RECOMMENDATION: Pending CITY COUNCIL ACTION: May 20, 2021 ORDINANCE NUMBER: NA ISSUES: Due to the pandemic, the public’s participation in the development of these recommendations has been limited. Staff held a virtual public information meeting on April 20, 2021 to provide general information and to answer questions. 23 people attended. Their questions and comments are included in Exhibit D. B-141 of 12 BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION: • The proposed amendments to the NCCD support the goals of the Urban Renewal Plan for the East 11th and12th Street Urban Renewal Area, “Champion sustainable revitalization reflecting diversity, achieving equity, and preserving East Austin’s cultural history.” • The segment of East 12th Street between IH-35 and Poquito Street is designated as an Imagine Austin Activity Corridor. “Corridors are also characterized by a variety of activities and types of buildings located along the roadway — shopping, restaurants and cafés, parks, schools, single-family houses, apartments, public buildings, houses of worship, mixed-use buildings, and offices.” The proposed changes to the NCCD will support East 12th Street’s evolution into a more complete Activity Corridor. • Allowing denser mixed use development along East 12th Street and denser residential development supports the Austin Strategic Housing Blueprint’s goal of locating 75% of all new housing within ½ mile of an Activity Corridor. WATERSHED: Lady Bird Lake, Waller Creek – Urban SCENIC ROADWAY: No EXISTING ZONING AND LAND USES: Varied NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING AREA: Central East Austin TIA: Is not required Blackshear Elementary School CAPITOL VIEW CORRIDOR: No SCHOOLS: Kealing Middle School COMMUNITY REGISTRY LIST: ID 1092 1528 1550 …
From: Daniel Llanes Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 9:26 AM To: Meredith, Maureen <Maureen.Meredith@austintexas.gov> Cc: Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov>; Hudson Baird < >; John mistrot < King, Micah < >; Rivera, Andrew <Andrew.Rivera@austintexas.gov> Subject: Re: Objecting to NPA-2020-0016.04 Maureen and Heather, The G/JTNP sub-committee and the applicant have reached an agreement, but we need to have final approval from the Contact Team which can be done within the next 2 weeks. As a follow up to this previous email below, please accept this email as a formal request from the G/JTNP Contact Team for a postponement on case # NPA-2020-0016.04 in order to finalize the compromise. Please confirm receipt of this request and that you will include it in the file and convey this to the commissioners. Thank you for your assistance, Daniel Llanes, Chair G/JTNP Contact Team 512-431-9665
PAUL T. MORIN A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ATTORNEY AT LAW 911 Ranch Rd. 620, Ste. 204 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78734 Paul T. Morin: BOARD CERTIFIED – Civil Trial Law TELEPHONE (512) 499-8200 FAX (512) 499-8203 February 8, 2021 Mike McHone Applicant for Congress 4802, LLC via email: RE: 4802 S. Congress, SP-2019-0600C PARD Public Access Easement Liability analysis of a Public Access Easement on a 225 ft. long, 25 ft. wide Driveway/Fire Lane in a 125 unit condo project—The Wilder Dear Mr. McHone: In connection with your work for the land/project owner, Congress 4802, LLC, for The Wilder condominium project (new construction) located at 4802 S. Congress, Austin, Texas, you have asked for an analysis of the landowner’s liability arising from the use by the general public of a public access easement that the City of Austin Parks and Recreation Department is requiring the landowner to grant on this 125 unit condo project’s 225 ft. long, 25 ft. wide Driveway/Fire Lane in order to give the general public access to the Williamson Creek Greenbelt. It is my understanding that you will share this analysis with the City of Austin Planning Commission. It is my understanding that in your meeting with the Parks and Recreation Board on January 26, 2021, the Board (and/or staff and/or City legal staff), in response to your concerns about the public access easement creating liability for the landowner to the general public, mentioned that the Texas Recreational Use Statute would protect the landowner. Consequently, on behalf of the landowner, you have asked me for this analysis. The Texas Recreational Use Statute and the case law: Texas Civil Practice Remedies Code Chapter 75 discusses limitations on a landowner’s liability arising from a third party’s recreational use of the landowner’s property (the Texas Recreational Use Statute or “RUS”). Specific to this discussion, sections 75.002 and 75.003 pertain to the private, non-agricultural land that is used for recreational purposes. The RUS defines recreational activity broadly, including hunting, fishing, swimming, boating, camping, hiking, exploring, bicycling, dog-walking, and “pleasure driving”, among other activities. Additionally, Mike McHone February 8, 2021 Page 2 soccer,1 diving,2 and playing on playground equipment3 have been held to be recreation within the meaning of the statute. Under the Texas RUS, a landowner who gives permission for others to enter their property for recreational purposes does not assure that the property is safe and does not owe their guest any …
Vision & Goals 1. 1.1.0 (b): why is the language, “Use green infrastructure to protect environmentally sensitive areas and integrate nature into the city,” different from the language in Imagine Austin? Staff response: This is the language in the current TCM from rule adoption in 2014, staff is open to suggestions to better match Imagine Austin. Pedestrian Facilities 1. 4.1.1 (B): Is 80” sufficient for a vertical clearance considering standard male heights in the US? Staff response: 80 inches is the vertical clearance in ADA and PROWAG and TAS, however we did update this vertical clearance to 8 feet in the latest draft. 2. 4.1.1 (C): Does this ensure that there are no windy/circuitous sidewalks unless unavoidable? Staff response: Additional criteria and language has been added to Section 4.1.3 in latest draft: "Meandering paths should avoid sharp turns or transitions and gradually transition no more than 1 ft. off path per 5 ft. of sidewalk length and maintain a straight section no less than the width of the sidewalk between transitions, where able". 3. 4.1.3: Any approval of flexible design standards must ensure that accessibility for users with mobility impairments is prioritized. Can this be added to provide clarity? Staff response: This is covered by PROWAG and TAS standard requirements, of which the TCM requires users to follow. 4. 4.1.6: Can staff clarify what “depending on site conditions” means here? Staff response: This language was removed in the latest draft and section 4.1.6 changed to reflect director approval in addition to sidewalk ordinance and LDC requirements. 5. 4.2.2 Table 4-1: Is 1200’ appropriate for Level 2 and 3 streets that are not on the Transit Priority Network? This includes streets such as E 6th and E 12th. Staff response: This has been changed in the latest draft to reflect 600 feet. 6. 4.2.2 (A): Can staff explain how this applies to crossings? Staff response: This can be used as justification to require a crossing if the distance between crossings exceeds Table 4-1. 7. General: Where are the guidelines for locating bus stops and shelters, including the cross-sections for such facilities with pedestrian facilities. Staff response: These are located in Section 6 and are included in the pedestrian zone. Comprehensive Transportation Review 1. 10.2.0 (D) Why are other strategies to reduce VMT or automobile usage not included in this, such as parking reductions combined with other strategies, locating developments in proximity …
April 27, 2021 Planning Commission Q & A Report B-12 / B-14: Question Commissioner Connolly I'm reviewing items 12-14, and find it would be helpful if staff could provide us with more information about the Capitol View Corridor overlap with 11th and 12th st. Specifically, I think it would be immensely helpful in our discussion if we could know what the height determinations are for the parcels in the Urban Renewal Plan area that fall within the CVC. Please let me know if you need any clarification around this. Staff Response: There are two CVCs that affect portions of the East 11th Street NCCD and Urban Renewal Plan (URP). The first and most prominent is the “East Seventh Street Bridge over the Texas-New Orleans Railroad” which covers the north side of East 11th Street from Branch to Navasota Streets within the boundaries of the URP. It does not affect Rosewood Avenue. The second is the “11th Street Threshold” corridor which end at Branch Street. See map below. I cannot tell you how the CVCs may or may not affect development along 11th Street. What I can say, is that two approximately four-story buildings that are 50’-60’ tall (Street-Jones and Snell Buildings) were constructed along that corridor, I believe in the 1990s or early 2000s. Question Commissioner Connolly: Is there any way we can find more precise information, or calculations about the high allowances for the areas indicated under those two CVCs? It seems that we may be granting a significant increase in entitlements in the area, but it would be helpful to understand what the effective size and where the precise locations of that increase will be. Staff Response: Calculating the CVC requires calculations that I don’t know how to do and would not be available by this evening. What I was able to find is existing building heights which can serve as proxy measurements of what is allowed under the CVC affecting E. 11th St. I did some research and reached out to colleagues and this is what I was able to find for three buildings along the north side of the street. • Street-Jones Building (55’-59’) • Snell Building (45’) The sloping topography on the site where these were built likely accounts to their differing heights. • East Village Lofts (white building with orange panels) (50’) I am not an expert in CVCs, but it is my understanding …
