B2: A-Presentation — original pdf

Backup

EAST PARKE LIFT STATION Application for AW Infrastructure Within Parkland SER-3986 In Sponsorship by Austin Water VICINITY MAP 5324 ½ Loyola Lane 2 LOCATION 5324 ½ Loyola Lane 3 APPROVED SER-3986-Phase I SER-3986 Phase I & II approved by Council on 5/21/20 Two proposed route options: • North of Loyola Ln (per approved SER) • South of Loyola Ln 4 Only Feasible Path: North Alignment • As shown on approved SER-3986-Phase I • Concurred by AW and PARD • 462 LF of gravity line improvements through Parkland, 365 LF of those will be bored (79% of total length) 5 North Route Option 6 Photo Map 1 3 2 4 7 1 8 2 9 3 10 South Route Option 11 4 12 Conclusion: North Alignment South gravity line alignment is not feasible because: • It does not have access for maintenance/repair due to the grade drop • The gravity line would be in the 100- year floodplain • Would cause the LS wet well to be deeper • $2,592,765.80 North gravity line alignment is feasible because: • The majority of the improvements within Parkland will be installed via boring and not open trench therefore minimizing impact on Parkland & Watershed • Restoration includes native grassland seeding & planting per CoA Standard Specification 609S.6 (including topsoil & seed bed prep, temp irrigation & weed maintenance). • $2,308,919.80 13 Community & Economic Impact Bottle neck: • The existing system is “bottle necked” and cannot support more development • Construction of this gravity line and LS will eliminate this problem Future Development: • The improvements allow for future development of the surrounding area currently undeveloped • Increases the tax value of the area. 14 Easements and Staging Area 15 Easements and Staging Area 16 Austin Water Statement Chapter 26 of the Parks and Wildlife Code (PWC) Due Diligence for Utility Assignment Section 26.001 A department may not approve any project that requires the use of any public land designated as a park unless the department, acting through its duly authorized governing body or officer, determines that: 1) There is no feasible and prudent alternative to the use or taking of such land – CONFIRMED 2) The program or project includes all reasonable planning to minimize harm to the land, as a park, recreation area, scientific area, wildlife refuge, or historic site, resulting from the use or taking – CONFIRMED 17 QUESTIONS? 18