20220202-004a: 7715 1/2 W. SH 71, C14-85-288.23(RCA) Staff Report — original pdf

Backup

C14-85-288.23(RCA) 1 RESTRICTIVE COVENANT AMENDMENT CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE: C14-85-288.23(RCA) - 7715 ½ W. SH 71 DISTRICT: 8 EXISTING ZONING: LO-NP ADDRESS: 7715 ½ W. SH 71 SITE AREA: 13.367 acres PROPERTY OWNER: Stephen Simon, John Simon, Barbara Simon Bierner AGENT: Drenner Group (Amanda Swor) CASE MANAGER: Kate Clark (512-974-1237, kate.clark@austintexas.gov) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends amending the Restrictive Covenant as outlined in Exhibit D: RCA Redlines. For a summary of the basis of staff’s recommendation, see page 2. ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION ACTION / RECOMMENDATION: February 2, 2022 Scheduled for Environmental Commission PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION / RECOMMENDATION: February 22, 2022 To be Scheduled for Planning Commission CITY COUNCIL ACTION: To be Scheduled for City Council RESTRICTIVE COVENANT AMENDMENT RECORDING NUMBER: ISSUES Interested parties in the area have raised concerns about the proposed development and increasing the impervious cover currently on the site. This property is located within the Williamson Creek Watershed of the Colorado River Basin, which is classified as a Barton Springs Zone Watershed by Chapter 25-8 of the City’s Land Development Code. Due to the existing Restrictive Covenant, this property has additional permitted entitlements for development than what would be currently allowed under today’s Land Development Code (LDC). C14-85-288.23(RCA) 2 Staff has received comments in opposition of this Restrictive Covenant Amendment (RCA) request. For all written or emailed comments, please see Exhibit C: Correspondence Received. CASE MANAGER COMMENTS: The proposed Restrictive Covenant Amendment (RCA) area is approximately 13.367 acres and is part of a larger tract currenting being requested to be rezoned to GO-MU-NP, please see Zoning Case No. C14-2021-0130. This undeveloped property is located on the south side of W. SH 71 and is zoned LO-NP. Adjacent zoning consists of LR-MU-CO-NP, LO-MU-CO-NP and RR-NP to the east; SF-6-NP to the south and SF-6-NP, CS-NP and RR-NP to the west. To the north is W. SH 71 right-of-way and is not zoned. Please refer to Exhibit A: Zoning Map and Exhibit B: Aerial Map. The applicant is requesting to amend the permitted site development standards, environmental requirements, and transportation requirements. Please see Exhibit D: RCA Redlines for current RC and proposed revisions. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the proposed amendments to the RC because much of it allows for development under a previous code and therefore is not up to date on newer and current standards. While the maximum impervious cover is greater than what would be allowed today with the current zoning, the majority of water quality requirements will be fulfilled under current code instead of the City’s Code of 1981. EXISTING ZONING AND LAND USES: Zoning Land Uses LO-NP Not applicable SF-6-NP Undeveloped W. SH 71 right-of-way Undeveloped Site North South East LR-MU-CO-NP, LO-MU-CO-NP and RR-NP Undeveloped, vehicle storage and bed and breakfast West SF-6-NP, CS-NP and RR-NP Undeveloped and convenience storage NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING AREA: West Oak Hill TIA: Not required at this time. WATERSHED: Williamson Creek Watershed – Barton Springs Zone Watershed C14-85-288.23(RCA) 3 OVERLAYS: Barton Springs Overlay SCHOOLS: Patton Elementary, Small Middle and Bowie High Schools NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS Austin Independent School District Oak Hill Neighborhood Plan Contact Team Austin Lost and Found Pets Oak Hill Trails Association Aviara HOA City Of Rollingwood Ridgeview Save Our Springs Alliance Covered Bridge Property Owners Scenic Brook Neighborhood Association Friends Of Austin Neighborhoods SELTexas Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group Oak Hill Association of Neighborhoods (Ohan) Oak Hill Neighborhood Plan - COA Liaison Thomas Springs / Circleville Alliance TNR BCP - Travis County Natural Resources AREA CASE HISTORIES: Number Request Commission City Council C14-2021-0088 7715 and 7809 Old Bee Caves Rd RR-NP, SF-3-NP and GR-NP to SF- 6-CO-NP Approved SF-6-CO-NP; CO was for a maximum of 25 residential units. RR-NP to SF-3- NP Approved SF-3-NP. C14-2016-0008 Old Bee Cave Rd Subdivision C14-05-0200 ROCKIN Y 7629, 7715 and 7739 W. SH 71 RR to LR-MU- CO Approved LR-MU-CO for Tract 1 and LO-MU-CO for Tract 2; CO includes limiting trips per day to 2,000, a 50- foot vegetative buffer along southeastern property (adjacent to SF-1 zoning) and limited building height to 1-story within 150 feet of SF-1 zoned property. Approved SF-6-CO- NP as Commission recommended (8/26/21). Approved SF-3-NP as Commission recommended (4/14/16). Approved LR-MU- CO for Tract 1 and LO-MU-CO for Tract 2 as Commission recommended with the addition of a set of prohibited uses on Tract 1 (4/27/06). C14-85-288.23(RCA) 4 Number Request Commission City Council C14-85- 288.22(RCA) 7919 W SH 71 To amend an existing RC. Approved amending the RC as follows: Approved RCA as Commission recommended (5/4/2017). 1. Max. IC of 24%; 2. Max. 0.4:1 FAR; 3. Keep previous CWQZ provisions; 4. Allow development in the (WQTZ); 5. Allow access to State Highway 71; 6. One time use of the impervious cover, subsequent redevelopment will be subject to current code. Approved CS-1-CO; CO included prohibition of onsite consumption. C14-99-2123 GR to CS-1-CO Williamson Creek Plaza-Building I RELATED CASES: Approved CS-1-CO as Commission recommended (3/2/00). NPA-2021-0025.02: This is the associated neighborhood plan amendment case that is being considered with this rezoning request. C14-2021-0130: This is the associated rezoning case that is being considered with this restrictive covenant amendment case. For the area that is covered by this RC, the Applicant is requesting to rezone from LO-NP to GO-MU-NP. EXISTING STREET CHARACTERISTICS: Street ROW Pavement Classification Sidewalks Bike Route Capital Metro (within ¼ mile) W SH 71 150’ 77’ Level 5 Yes Wide Shoulder No OTHER STAFF COMMENTS: Comprehensive Planning This restrictive covenant amendment application is to request the existing restrictive covenant be amended to increase the total project square footage from 146,000 square feet to 400,000 square feet or to a maximum FAR of 1:1, whichever is greater. The amendment would also remove the C14-85-288.23(RCA) 5 requirement to construct a “commercial loop” on the Property. A redlined restrictive covenant was included with this application package. Imagine Austin The termination or amending of a Restrictive Covenant is not under the purview of the policies of the Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan, which is broad in scope and therefore, no Imagine Austin compliance review comments are being submitted for this request. Environmental Review EV 1: DSD EV Review staff will support the amendment if the following is provided: • Project will provide SOS non-degradation water quality. • Project will delete 1(c) and 2(d) of the restrictive covenant and be reviewed under current environmental code at the time of site plan. Environmental Office Review EO 1: WPD staff will support the amendment if the following is provided: • Project will provide SOS non-degradation water quality. • Project will delete 1(c) and 2(d) of the restrictive covenant and be reviewed under current environmental code at the time of site plan. PARD Review PR 1: Parkland dedication will be required at the time of subdivision or site plan application for the proposed residential units resulting from the changes to the Restrictive Covenant, per City Code § 25-1-601, as amended. The proposed development meets the criteria for land dedication in City Code Title 25, Article 14. As such, a partial land dedication will be required, as well as any remaining fees in-lieu. The site is currently park deficient, defined as being outside walking distance to existing parks. The development as proposed will require parkland dedication for the new residential units that will serve this neighborhood through the additional park investment. The Parks and Recreation Department (PARD) would consider a pocket park with connections into the surrounding neighborhood toward satisfying the requirement at time of permitting (whether subdivision or site plan). Such a park would improve neighborhood park access, and satisfy a park need for this new development. Should there be any remaining fees in-lieu, those fees shall be used toward park investments in the form of land acquisition and/or park amenities within the surrounding area, per the Parkland Dedication Operating Procedures § 14.3.11 and City Code § 25-1-607 (B)(1) & (2). C14-85-288.23(RCA) 6 Should the applicant wish to discuss parkland dedication requirements in advance of site plan or subdivision applications, please contact this reviewer: thomas.rowlinson@austintexas.gov. At the applicant’s request, PARD has provided an early determination letter of the requirements as stated in this review. SP 1: Site Plan comments will be made at time of site plan submittal. Please note, large retail uses (over 50,000 sf for most retail uses, 100,000 sf for principal food sales use) are not permitted in the Barton Springs Zone per 25-2-651. Site Plan Transportation ATD does not object to the applicant’s proposed restrictive covenant amendment as the site will be required to comply with the Austin Strategic Mobility Plan and all applicable City code and criteria related to transportation design and mitigation. Austin Water Utility No comment for restrictive covenant amendment case. All existing easements must be retained. INDEX OF EXHIBITS TO FOLLOW Exhibit A: Zoning Map Exhibit B: Aerial Map Exhibit C: Correspondence Received Exhibit D: RCA Redlines 20 MF-1-NP 19 18 17 16 7 15 6 5 LO-NP 4 2 3 LO-NP 1 MF-1-NP RR-NP A MF-1-NP 19 20 SF-1-NP 21 22 23 1 CS-NP 14 13 18 12 17 PAX DR 9 SF-1-NP 10 11 14 15 16 13 10 11 9 8 12 13 14 7 15 SF-1-NP 2 3 8 4 12 11 10 9 D N B E L F I R 7 6 5 6 16 5 SF-1-NP SF-1-NP 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 3 2 8 SF-3-NP 4 3 SF-1-NP 5 4 24 25 4 20 21 26 27 19 18 R K D O O HIN C 28 29 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 5 1 6 3 2 7 8 4 14 2 18 15 17 16 7 8 O T PIN V C PIN T 9 10 17 16 15 SF-1-NP 13 9 12 11 10 O PAT 11 H 12-A 18 19 4 14 13 D U N K D R I R 20 21 11 K 12 SCENIC BROOK DR 31 16 1 15 14 37 SF-2-NP RR-NP 12 SF-1-NP 11 42 SF-2-NP 2 3 4 LI T D T L E E E X I N R G 11 18 17 16 5 1 2 3 4 15 14-A 5 6 7 ST E AIL D RV A H TR 8 SF-1-NP 8 R 7 13-A C ALA AIND M R O SIK AR S E LN 10 SF-6-NP 7 A C U R TA N L SF-2-NP 9 1 3 1 2 2 3 5 4 ST LN 42 41 K A O E R FO 40 39 30 32 29 28 33 34 27 26 35 36 25 24 10 S O 37 9 U T 8 H B 38 23 22 R O 39 7 6 O K D 40 R LR-CO-NP 1 2 SF-3-NP RR-NP CS-NP 3 1 2 RR-NP W S H 7 1 3 B20 LO-NP A) C 3(R 8.2 8 5-2 4-8 1 C LR-MU-CO-NP LO-MU-CO-NP 9 8 14 15 7 6 5 16 19 18 17 MH-NP 4 3 2 CS-NP 1 O C L A D V E B E E S R D 1 GR-NP 3 1 RR-NP 2 3 CS-1-CO-NP 2 A 1 2 GO-CO-NP 3 TRACT TWO 1 1 LO-MU-CO-NP 2 3 GO-NP 4 1 LR-CO-NP 51 2A 2B 52 GO-CO-NP 50 49 53 M E 54 48 A H D I L O L 3 55 NO-NP W D L O H I L D A R 2A LR-NP 5 W S H 7 1 LR-NP 3 4 W C I R 46 45 44-A E M 1 2 RR-NP 1 39 40 47 SF-1-NP 41 29 30 31 G R C R O V E E TCIR S I R D G E D R S T I L L 28 27 36 38 37 34 35 17 8 7 14 15 16 R D T S E R C E V O R G 13 12 11 12 4 9 10 11 5 19 20 18 5 SF-1-NP 6 21 22 23 24 5 4 3 2 25 1 2B 6 9 7 8 SCENIC BROOK DR 7 8 9 11 1-A SF-3-NP 10 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 M E A O D A 10 9 7 6 O K W 8 D R 16 17 15 SF-1-NP 14 13 12 WHISPERING CREEK DR 13 14 12 2 3 11 10 SF-1-NP 9 15 16 18 17 19 20 23 8 24 7 25 6 1 37 38 36 35 STONE LEDGE CIR 26 34 33A 30A 31A 32A 28A 27A 24 23 22 26A 25A 24A 23A 22A 21 SCENIC BROOK DR 19 18 17 21 20 PUD-NP 1 41 42 SF-1-NP 43 44 45 4 5 2 SF-1-NP 2 1 16 15 13 14 46 47 48 49 B19 ± 1'' = 400' SUBJECT TRACT ZONING BOUNDARY ! ! ! ! ! ! PENDING CASE CREEK BUFFER SF-1-NP 17 16 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 1 7715 West State Highway 71 ZONING CASE#: LOCATION: SUBJECT AREA: GRID: MANAGER: C14-85-288.23(RCA) 7715 West State Highway 71 13.367 Acres B20 KATE CLARK This map has been produced by the Communications Technology Management Dept. on behalf of the Planning Development Review Dept. for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. 20 MF-1-NP 19 18 17 16 7 15 6 5 LO-NP 4 2 3 LO-NP 1 MF-1-NP RR-NP A MF-1-NP 19 20 SF-1-NP 21 22 23 1 CS-NP 14 13 18 12 17 PAX DR 9 SF-1-NP 10 11 14 15 16 13 10 11 9 8 12 13 14 7 15 SF-1-NP 2 3 8 4 12 11 10 9 D N B E L F I R 7 6 5 6 16 5 SF-1-NP SF-1-NP 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 3 2 8 SF-3-NP 4 3 SF-1-NP 5 4 24 25 4 20 21 26 27 19 18 R K D O O HIN C 28 29 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 5 1 6 3 2 7 8 4 14 2 18 15 17 16 7 8 O T PIN V C PIN T 9 10 17 16 15 SF-1-NP 13 9 12 11 10 O PAT 11 H 12-A 18 19 4 14 13 D U N K D R I R 20 21 11 K 12 SCENIC BROOK DR 31 16 1 15 14 37 SF-2-NP RR-NP 12 SF-1-NP 11 42 SF-2-NP 2 3 4 LI T D T L E E E X I N R G 11 18 17 16 5 1 2 3 4 15 14-A 5 6 7 ST E AIL D RV A H TR 8 SF-1-NP 8 R 7 13-A C ALA AIND M R O SIK AR S E LN 10 SF-6-NP 7 A C U R TA N L SF-2-NP 9 1 3 1 2 2 3 5 4 ST LN 42 41 K A O E R FO 40 39 30 32 29 28 33 34 27 26 35 36 25 24 10 S O 37 9 U T 8 H B 38 23 22 R O 39 7 6 O K D 40 R LR-CO-NP 1 2 SF-3-NP RR-NP CS-NP 3 1 2 RR-NP W S H 7 1 3 B20 LO-NP A) C 3(R 8.2 8 5-2 4-8 1 C LR-MU-CO-NP LO-MU-CO-NP 9 8 14 15 7 6 5 16 19 18 17 MH-NP 4 3 2 CS-NP 1 O C L A D V E B E E S R D 1 GR-NP 3 1 RR-NP 2 3 CS-1-CO-NP 2 A 1 2 GO-CO-NP 3 TRACT TWO 1 1 LO-MU-CO-NP 2 3 GO-NP 4 1 LR-CO-NP 51 2A 2B 52 GO-CO-NP 50 49 53 M E 54 48 A H D I L O L 3 55 NO-NP W D L O H I L D A R 2A LR-NP 5 W S H 7 1 LR-NP 3 4 W C I R 46 45 44-A E M 1 2 RR-NP 1 39 40 47 SF-1-NP 41 29 30 31 G R C R O V E E TCIR S I R D G E D R S T I L L 28 27 36 38 37 34 35 17 8 7 14 15 16 R D T S E R C E V O R G 13 12 11 12 4 9 10 11 5 19 20 18 5 SF-1-NP 6 21 22 23 24 5 4 3 2 25 1 2B 6 9 7 8 SCENIC BROOK DR 7 8 9 11 1-A SF-3-NP 10 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 M E A O D A 10 9 7 6 O K W 8 D R 16 17 15 SF-1-NP 14 13 12 WHISPERING CREEK DR 13 14 12 2 3 11 10 SF-1-NP 9 8 7 15 16 18 17 19 Copyright nearmap 2015 24 25 20 23 6 1 37 38 36 35 STONE LEDGE CIR 26 34 33A 30A 31A 32A 28A 27A 24 23 22 26A 25A 24A 23A 22A 21 SCENIC BROOK DR 19 18 17 21 20 PUD-NP 1 41 42 SF-1-NP 43 44 45 4 5 2 SF-1-NP 2 1 16 15 13 14 46 47 48 49 B19 ± 1'' = 400' SUBJECT TRACT ZONING BOUNDARY ! ! ! ! ! ! PENDING CASE CREEK BUFFER SF-1-NP 17 16 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 1 7715 West State Highway 71 ZONING CASE#: LOCATION: SUBJECT AREA: GRID: MANAGER: C14-85-288.23(RCA) 7715 West State Highway 71 13.367 Acres B20 KATE CLARK This map has been produced by the Communications Technology Management Dept. on behalf of the Planning Development Review Dept. for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Renee Vlahakis Sunday, January 9, 2022 1:14 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department:  As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to  the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF  and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too  tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment  of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards  Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on  that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents.  Please add me on the notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.  Thank You,  Renee Vlahakis  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: michael vlahakis Sunday, January 9, 2022 1:31 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  Not to mention the traffic through 16’ wide county roads in our neighborhood to access from Little Deer and Scenic  Brook.  Will completely destroy the way of life for over 400 homeowners in this area.  Michael Vlahakis  6947 CHINOOK DR  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: DIANNE SUGGS Sunday, January 9, 2022 9:14 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.<BR>Thank You  Sent from my iPhone  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Allie Brotherman Sunday, January 9, 2022 10:13 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  ‐ Allie Brotherman  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: karol goodwin Sunday, January 9, 2022 11:35 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department:  Please don’t allow this, there is no need to create so much density here When there are so many communities willing to  grow outside of Travis county why pack everyone in like sardines.  As a previous resident of Los Angeles California, I beg you not to make the same mistakes as California the dense living  followed by tent cities followed by traffic jams for hours and people living on top of each‐other it doesn’t have to be this  way.  As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to  the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF  and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too  tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment  of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards  Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on  that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the  notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.<BR>Thank You  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Nancy Lanier Sunday, January 9, 2022 11:48 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; Adler, Steve; Harper-Madison, Natasha; Fuentes, Vanessa; Renteria, Sabino; Kitchen, Ann; Kelly, Mackenzie; Pool, Leslie; Ellis, Paige; Tovo, Kathie; Alter, Alison Proposed Apartments on Hwy 71 *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** To Whom It May Concern: I am writing to oppose the following rezoning applications: Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) This is area is a critical Edwards Aquifer contributing zone that currently allows only 25% impervious cover. This sensitive ecological area should NOT allow such dense development with 65% impervious cover. Our neighbors were clear when drafting the Oak Hill Combined Neighborhood Plan. The entire development scheme is in direct contradiction to the Oak Hill Combined Neighborhood Plan and the FLUM (Future Land Use Map). If this proposed plan passes, many of our neighbors will have a massive apartment complex towering over their backyards. This proposed plan will allow for nearly 400 apartment units and 60 feet high on one of the tallest points in Oak Hill. The traffic and environmental impacts to our area will be significant. Oak Hill is one of the most targeted areas for developers in Austin, with over 7% of all apartment development that has taken place in Austin in the last 5 years. We are already being negatively impacted by the massive highway development on both Hwy. 71 and Hwy 290. The additional traffic, and environmental impact of such a massive apartment complex being built in our area is far more than we should be expected to tolerate. I have lived in this area since 1999, and feel as if the City of Austin is doing everything in it's power to take away any rights of the single family homeowners to live here. I moved here to have a safe, quiet place to raise my daughter, in a home I plan to keep. I do not want to be forced to sell and leave this area. Please vote against these rezoning changes, and prevent this apartment complex from being built. Thank you, 1 Nancy Lanier CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   2 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Michael McGhee Monday, January 10, 2022 10:32 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Terri Knox Monday, January 10, 2022 11:12 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department:   I have been a homeowner in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract for over 37 years.  I would like to  strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in  density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft  allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in  the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an  environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what  the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak  Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.  Thank You  Terri Knox   7001 Chinook Drive  Austin, TX 78736  Sent from Mail for Windows  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Terri Knox Monday, January 10, 2022 11:36 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen Ellis, Paige Oppose rezoning case #C14-2021-0130 RCA case#C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  I own a home in close proximity to the proposed development of a massive apartment complex at 7715 W. SH 71.  I  oppose this rezoning request.  It is an environmentally sensitive area located over the Edwards Aquifer contributing zone  and the plan calls for too much impervious cover.  I have owned this home for over 37 years.  This neighborhood has  always been single family residence and a high density apartment complex would significantly alter the feel of this older,  established neighborhood.  Traffic issues are already an issue, and this development would compound the problem.    Houston Developers should not be allowed to contradict the Oak Hill Combined Neighborhood Plan.  I am strongly opposed to this request for a zoning change.  Terri Knox  7001 Chinook Drive  Austin, Texas 78736  Sent from my iPad  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Keely Rizzato Monday, January 10, 2022 1:38 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department:  I strongly oppose this rezoning. I am a licensed landscape architect and very familiar with the development process.  Please do not allow this to go forward. It is not an appropriate land use and not compatible with the adjacent tracts.  As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to  the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF  and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too  tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment  of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards  Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on  that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the  notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.  Thank you for representing my objections to the rezoning.  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Dennis McGregory Monday, January 10, 2022 1:59 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  Sent from my iPhone  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Gary Rizzato  Gary Rizzato Monday, January 10, 2022 4:48 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Wesley Hopkins Monday, January 10, 2022 9:20 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  Wesley Hopkins  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Monday, January 10, 2022 9:22 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***    Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department:   As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to  the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF  and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too  tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment  of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards  Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on  that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the  notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.  Thank You  Shannon Stavinoha    Sent from my iPhone  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Rhonda Hudson Tuesday, January 11, 2022 6:45 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You   Tim & Rhonda Hudson CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Joy Hernandez Tuesday, January 11, 2022 7:45 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; Adler, Steve; Harper-Madison, Natasha; Fuentes, Vanessa; Renteria, Sabino; Casar, Gregorio; Kitchen, Ann; Kelly, Mackenzie; Pool, Leslie; Ellis, Paige; Tovo, Kathie; Alter, Alison Rezoning Case Nos. RCA C14-2021-0130 & C14-85-288.23 *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hello. My name is Joy Hernandez, and I'm a longtime resident of Valley View/Scenic Brook. I STRONGLY oppose rezoning of the small piece of land. THERE IS ENOUGH TRAFFIC IN OAK HILL!!! KB Homes has already come through and destroyed the homes of the local coyotes, foxes, rabbits, roadrunners, opossums, and owls. They've also ruined our neighborhood streets. Please wait until the 290/71 road construction is completed to try to smash more people into tiny boxes. Thank You, Joy Hernandez CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Amy Jackson Tuesday, January 11, 2022 9:19 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; Alter, Alison; Kitchen, Ann; Casar, Gregorio; Tovo, Kathie; Pool, Leslie; Kelly, Mackenzie; Harper-Madison, Natasha; Ellis, Paige; Renteria, Sabino; Adler, Steve; Fuentes, Vanessa Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hi all,     We do not support the rezoning of this property. We do not want high rise apartments in our neighborhood. They are  not an appropriate project for our rural snd single family neighbohood and will increase light pollution, bring more  traffic and create more impervious cover and bring further harm to an ecologically sensitive zone.   This area is quickly becoming inundated by construction and development which is causing a negative impact on the  quality of life as well in this community.   People are moving to Austin to have a good quality of life and live in a sustainable way. This is not a sustainable project  and is not the “Austin” people are moving here for.   Outside developers do not get the say so, the residents directly impacted by their huge and inappropriate projects get  the say so.   Please, support us by not allowing this rezoning to happen,  Amy Jackson  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Rita Berry Tuesday, January 11, 2022 1:56 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You,  Rita Berry  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Dorothy Caldwell Tuesday, January 11, 2022 4:28 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department,  As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to  the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF  and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too  tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment  of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards  Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on  that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the  notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.  Thank You!  ‐ Dorothy G Caldwell  Sent from my tiny handheld computer that also makes calls.  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Crystal Bomer Tuesday, January 11, 2022 8:14 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You ,   Crystal Bomer  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Connie Justice Wednesday, January 12, 2022 6:37 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You‐  I’m a 23 year Scenic Brook home owner. Please stop the destruction.    Connie Justice  8301 Farmington Ct  78836  Sent from my iPhone  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: ML Collins Wednesday, January 12, 2022 8:21 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department:   As a resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract, I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of  7715 ½ W SH 71 to multifamily. I believe it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR,  which is  directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially  considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the  restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer  contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract  and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the  notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.  Thank You,  M Collins  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Cynthia L. Miller Wednesday, January 12, 2022 10:42 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department:  As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to  the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF  and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too  tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment  of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards  Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on  that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the  notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.<BR>Thank You  Cindy L. Miller  512.466.7721  Sent from my iPhone  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Deborah Rich Wednesday, January 12, 2022 12:34 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  Sent from my iPhone  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Rodrigo Solis Wednesday, January 12, 2022 2:41 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Sean D. Johnson Wednesday, January 12, 2022 3:19 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department:    As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to  the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF  and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too  tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment  of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards  Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on  that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the  notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.  Thank You,  Sean Johnson  6929 Scenic Brook Dr.  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Desiree Coleman Wednesday, January 12, 2022 6:07 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You,  Desiree Coleman  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Heidi Juliar Wednesday, January 12, 2022 6:19 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Tatiana Bobbitt Wednesday, January 12, 2022 6:42 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department:   As a resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of  7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is  directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially  considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the  restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer  contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract  and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the  notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.  Thank You  Tatiana Bobbitt  Texas law requires all licensees to provide the information in these links:  Texas Real Estate Commission Information About Brokerage Services  Texas Real Estate Commission Consumer Protection Notice  To help protect y our priv acy , Microsoft Office prev ented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Gauri Iyengar Thursday, January 13, 2022 9:30 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.<BR>Thank You  Sent from my iPhone  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Alejandro Verduzco Friday, January 14, 2022 5:40 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  Alex Verduzco | 512‐913‐7062  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Suzi Lindsay Friday, January 14, 2022 6:36 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  Susan Lindsay  11012 Swelfling Ter.  Austin 78737  Sent from my iPhone  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Robbie Lueth Friday, January 14, 2022 8:15 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  Robbie Lueth  5900 Blanco River Pass  Austin 78749  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Henry Hodes Friday, January 14, 2022 1:15 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  Sent from my iPhone  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Diane Powers Saturday, January 15, 2022 11:23 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.<BR>Thank You  Sent from my iPhone  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Elizabeth Bellanti From: To: Subject: Date: Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) Saturday, January 15, 2022 12:35:47 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** GREETINGS, I come to you as a concerned resident of the Scenic Brooke neighborhood in Oak Hill. 78736. We are already experiencing the destruction of so much natural beauty in our neighborhood due to the new highway flyover construction, and these additional apartment plans and clearings are additionally upsetting, destructive and a betrayal of why we chose to move here in the first place. Thank you for your consideration in helping us preserve what is left. There is a serious collective grief for us. TOO MUCH IMPERVIOUS COVER FOR THE ECOLOGICALLY SENSITIVE EDWARDS AQUIFER CONTRIBUTING ZONE. This is area is a critical Edwards Aquifer contributing zone that currently allows only 25% impervious cover. This sensitive ecological area should NOT allow such dense development with 65% impervious cover. THIS PROPOSAL IS IN DIRECT CONTRADICTION TO THE OAK HILL COMBINED NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN. Our neighbors were clear when drafting the Oak Hill Combined Neighborhood Plan. The entire development scheme is in direct contradiction to the Oak Hill Combined Neighborhood Plan and the FLUM (Future Land Use Map). TOO ABRUPT A CHANGE FOR RURAL AND SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES. If this proposed plan passes, many of our neighbors will have a massive apartment complex towering over their backyards. TOO DENSE AND TOO HIGH. This proposed plan will allow for nearly 400 apartment units and 60 feet high on one of the tallest points in Oak Hill. The traffic and environmental impacts to our area will be significant. Beth Bellanti Tito's Handmade Vodka @bebellanti CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Melissa Garner Saturday, January 15, 2022 2:33 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You,  Melissa Thornell Garner  7121 Silvermine Drive  Austin, Texas 78736‐1758  Sent from Mail for Windows  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Julie Campbell  Julie Campbell Saturday, January 15, 2022 3:42 PM Clark, Kate Oak Hill Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Ms Clark,  I strongly oppose this 400 unit project moving forward.  Do not allow this to impact the recharge zone and place this in  the middle of single family residences.  Please maintain the integrity left to Oak Hill.  Sent from my iPad  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Patty Koeninger Saturday, January 15, 2022 7:17 PM Clark, Kate rezoning *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Please no rezoning for 7715 1/2 W. SH 71  Thanks,  Patty Koeninger  8101 current circle  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Ross Tomlin Saturday, January 15, 2022 7:25 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  Ross Tomlin  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Keri4me Saturday, January 15, 2022 8:52 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Sarah Walters Saturday, January 15, 2022 9:38 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Penny Dedman Saturday, January 15, 2022 11:46 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department:  As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to  the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF  and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too  tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment  of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards  Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on  that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the  notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.  Thank You  Penny Dedman  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Gina Reed Lacey Sunday, January 16, 2022 5:39 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident of the  Oak Hill area for many years, I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think  that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting  to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most of the apartments  would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much  impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and  FLUM are CLEAR on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in  the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.  Thank You  Sent from my iPhone  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Marti Sunday, January 16, 2022 7:30 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Staci Snell Sunday, January 16, 2022 8:16 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You   CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: John Paul Sunday, January 16, 2022 9:44 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen Re: Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** I am a homeowner in 78736 writing to object to the rezoning 77151/2 W. SH 71 and the proposed building of another  massive apartment complex in our neighborhood.   The current 2 year construction on Little Deer is constant noise pollution and shakes my home from 6am to 8pm 5 days  a week.  Respectfully,  John Paul Patterson  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Sunday, January 16, 2022 10:59 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; RE: Ecological and Unethical Destruction of Community ~ Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft. allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates. PLEASE DO NOT ALLOW THIS TO MOVE FORWARD AS PLANNED BY THE DEVELOPERS IN QUESTION. Far too often in our world today, those with enough money and persistence can push forward plans to make even more money by circumventing the wishes of ordinary citizens who have less access than they to authority figures in government. None of us in this part of Austin wants this kind of development in our neighborhood and elected officials such as yourselves are sworn to stand by us and our collective wishes – especially when these wishes greatly impact the future of our lives here in Austin. Please do your duty and make sure we and our sensitive environment are not pushed aside in favor of this toxic business plan. Thank You   Randol Bass 6818 Kenosha Pass Austin, TX 78749 1 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   2 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Saad Altai Sunday, January 16, 2022 12:19 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department:   As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to  the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF  and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too  tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment  of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards  Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on  that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the  notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.  Thank You  Saad Altai  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Mindi Orth Sunday, January 16, 2022 1:20 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department:  As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to  the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF  and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too  tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment  of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards  Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on  that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the  notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.  Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Thank you,  Mindi  Sent from my iPhone  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Hello Team, Thaddeus Zaharas Sunday, January 16, 2022 3:37 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; Adler, Steve; Harper-Madison, Natasha; Fuentes, Vanessa; Renteria, Sabino; Casar, Gregorio; Kitchen, Ann; Kelly, Mackenzie; Pool, Leslie; Ellis, Paige; Tovo, Kathie; Alter, Alison Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** I live in Oak Hill. We've done our part by accepting the 14 lane concrete monstrosity with flyovers that is now under construction. I don't also support this 400 unit apartment complex in my neighborhood. I am all for balanced development, but enough is enough. This project should go somewhere else nearby, but outside of Oak Hill. Thank you for your consideration, Thaddeus Zaharas CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Sue Wendelin Sunday, January 16, 2022 4:49 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  Sent from my iPhone  Sue Wendelin  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Gabrielle Moraes Chueh Sunday, January 16, 2022 5:39 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; Adler, Steve; Harper-Madison, Natasha; Fuentes, Vanessa; Renteria, Sabino; Casar, Gregorio; Kitchen, Ann; Kelly, Mackenzie; Pool, Leslie; Ellis, Paige; Tovo, Kathie; Alter, Alison Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department,  *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract, I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. This change would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR, which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone.  The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract, and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. When the people of this neighborhood chose to purchase property in the Oak Hill suburban area, we did so seeking peace, tranquility and distance from the common issues one faces while living in highly populated areas. Oak Hill is already Austin's biggest sought area for apartment development - unsustainable! This not only elevates density and brings all the kinds of troubles that come with excess population, but forces residents into facing the misery of long-term construction - its nuisances and noises. Rezoning all the outskirts of our beautiful (and once tranquil) neighborhood goes directly against the idea of preserving our areas' identity and character. All of us only purchased expensive property here because we knew it to be a single-family housing zone. Rezoning and seeking apartment building at this stage is extremely unfair to the already established single-family owners who live here. We urge you not to let the profits of big corporations be prioritized in opposition to the environment and to the will of thousands of people who already reside here.   I'd be thankful if you can add me on the notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates about this topic.  Respectfully,  Gabrielle Chueh Thank You  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Ashley Ahlgren Sunday, January 16, 2022 9:07 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  Sent from my iPhone  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Wayne Long Sunday, January 16, 2022 10:07 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department:  As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning  tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily.   PLEASE KEEP it AS SINGLE FAMILY. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is  directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned.     The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most of  the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area.   The amendment of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious  coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone.   The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area  want on that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the  representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any  hearing, meetings and updates.  Thank You,  The Long Family,  S. Austin, 78749  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Priscilla Rossi Monday, January 17, 2022 7:45 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; Adler, Steve; Harper-Madison, Natasha; Fuentes, Vanessa; Renteria, Sabino; Casar, Gregorio; Kitchen, Ann; Kelly, Mackenzie; Pool, Leslie; Ellis, Paige; Tovo, Kathie; Alter, Alison Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department,  *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract, I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. This change would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR, which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone.  The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract, and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. When the people of this neighborhood chose to purchase property in the Oak Hill suburban area, we did so seeking peace, tranquility and distance from the common issues one faces while living in highly populated areas. Oak Hill is already Austin's biggest sought area for apartment development - unsustainable! This not only elevates density and brings all the kinds of troubles that come with excess population, but forces residents into facing the misery of long-term construction - its nuisances and noises. Rezoning all the outskirts of our beautiful (and once tranquil) neighborhood goes directly against the idea of preserving our areas' identity and character. All of us only purchased expensive property here because we knew it to be a single-family housing zone. Rezoning and seeking apartment building at this stage is extremely unfair to the already established single-family owners who live here. We urge you not to let the profits of big corporations be prioritized in opposition to the environment and to the will of thousands of people who already reside here.   I'd be thankful if you can add me on the notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates about this topic.  Respectfully,  Priscilla Rossi   Sent from my iPhone  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Denise Valliant Monday, January 17, 2022 8:18 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  Denise Valliant  512‐923‐4587  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Robin ZumBerge Monday, January 17, 2022 9:34 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  TrDear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in  close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71  to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You,  Robin ZumBerge  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Marsha Hughes Monday, January 17, 2022 11:41 AM Clark, Kate Re: Rezoning case # C14-2021-0130 and RCA case # C14-85-288.23 (RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** This is to let you know that I strongly oppose to the rezoning of 7715 1/2 West SH 71. With the highway development of Hwy 290/Sh 71 giving our community much disruption, this rezoning would add just that much more disruption to our community. After the completion of the highway, we need to have some open land to enjoy on our way down the road. Oak Hill is no longer a "sleepy little community". We are far from it because of developments like this being able to use their money to get cases like this pushed through. Somewhere all of this needs to stop and let us enjoy what scenic views we have left. Marsha Hughes - 8209 Pax Dr. - Austin - 78736 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Eve Wieand Monday, January 17, 2022 5:11 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½  W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates. Thank You   Eve Wieand   CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Mia Dance Monday, January 17, 2022 5:31 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department:  I bought my first home in Oak Hill last year. I loved the quiet and quaint older neighborhood lined with oaks. Building a  massive apartment in the neighborhood will cause too much impervious cover for the ecologically sensitive edward’s  aquifer contribution zone. The apartments would also go against our neighborhood plan and negatively affect many of  my neighbors who would have towering apartments on the hill behind their houses. Lastly, the proposed plan is too  dense and tall. 400 new apartment units will cause significant traffic and negative environmental impacts to our area.  Thank you,  Mia Dance  (7209 Silvermine Drive Austin TX 78736)  Sent from my iPhone  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: John DiGaetano Monday, January 17, 2022 5:37 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  Best regards  John DiGaetano  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Sunny Hunt Tuesday, January 18, 2022 7:52 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; Adler, Steve; Harper-Madison, Natasha; Fuentes, Vanessa; Renteria, Sabino; Casar, Gregorio; Kitchen, Ann; Kelly, Mackenzie; Pool, Leslie; Ellis, Paige; Tovo, Kathie; Alter, Alison Scenic Brook High Density Housing - Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** I live in Scenic Brook and I'm OPPOSED to rezoning this plot of land for the planned high‐density housing project.   This neighborhood was designed to support detached homes with pervious ground cover to protect the area from  flooding and damage.   Even I, as a homeowner, have to ensure that any impervious cover is less than 45% of my lot but this developer gets a  pass for 65% impervious cover? Are you kidding me?  Aren't we done giving a pass to big‐ticket corporations who talk big and leave messes behind for residents to clean up?  Do we need more housing in Austin? Yes. Do we need more luxury, high‐density, high‐rent (unaffordable) apartments  that pose an environmental risk to the rest of the established neighborhood and area? Absolutely not. We already have  enough of that in Scenic Brook.  We've had over 2235 apartment units built in our neighborhood in the past 5 years alone. Enough.  Sonia Hunt  7000 Whispering Creek Drive  Austin, TX 78736  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Gustavo Nieto Tuesday, January 18, 2022 8:20 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department:    As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to  the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF  and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too  tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment  of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards  Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on  that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents.    Please add me on the notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.  Thank You,  Gustavo Nieto  (512) 731 ‐3399 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Tejas Patwa Tuesday, January 18, 2022 9:04 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You ,  Tejas Patwa  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Kathy Morgan Tuesday, January 18, 2022 9:17 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department:  As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to  the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF  and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too  tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment  of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards  Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on  that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the  notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.  Thank You very much for your work on this!  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Forwarding email  Yvonne Davis Tuesday, January 18, 2022 11:01 AM Clark, Kate Fwd: Rezoning Case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA Case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐  From: Yvonne Davis < Date: Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 10:58 AM  Subject: Rezoning Case No. C14‐2021‐0130 and RCA Case No. C14‐85‐288.23(RCA)  To: <kate.clark@austi.texas.gov>, maureen.meredith@austintexas.gov <maureen.meredith@austintexas.gov>  >  We are residents of the Scenic Brook subdivision and we are writing to you to document our strong objection to the  rezoning of 7715 1/2 SH 71 West which we believe will lead to the destruction of our neighborhood and property values.  Scenic Brook does not need or desire another large apartment complex in our area.    Thank you!  James & Yvonne Davis  8108 Red Willow Dr, Austin, TX 78736  ‐‐   Yvonne Massey Davis  ‐‐   Yvonne Massey Davis  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Katie Reissman Tuesday, January 18, 2022 11:08 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department:  As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to  the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF  and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too  tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment  of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards  Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on  that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the  notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.  Thank You,  Katharine Reissman  6909 Grove Crest Dr  Austin, TX 78736  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Jay McArdle Tuesday, January 18, 2022 11:38 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  Sent from Mail for Windows  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Vicki Garcia Tuesday, January 18, 2022 2:00 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily.   In addition to the stated reasons below, the occupants of these multi family units will have entry/exit point only on  the free lanes of the coming Hwy71 toll road and/or Scenic Brook Drive. Such a large increase in traffic on the only  free lanes will increase wait times at the “Y” for current residents who will also use these free lanes.The whole  purpose of the toll road is to reduce congestion at the “Y” but new multi family units with no access to the toll road is  in direct conflict with that purpose and keeps the congestion problem for residents using the free lanes.   I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract  attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most of the  apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would allow far  too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  Vicki Garcia  From my iPhone Vicki Garcia  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Vinod Singh Tuesday, January 18, 2022 3:10 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen I Object Rezoning of 7715 1/2 W. SH 71 *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hi,  I am writing this email regarding the Rezoning case No. C14‐2021‐0130 and RCA Case No . C14‐85‐288.23(RCA). I object  to this rezoning in our neighborhood. We already have enough urbanization and we do not need more building and  construction which destroys the green space, and also affects the climate   around it.   I strongly Oppose this rezoning of 7715 1/2 W. SH 71 and development of another massive apartment complex in our  neighborhood.  Regards   VINOD SINGH  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Maria Ragozina Tuesday, January 18, 2022 3:16 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; Walters, Mark I Object Rezoning of 7715 1/2 W. SH 71, Save Scenic Brook *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hi,  I am writing this email regarding the Rezoning case No. C14‐2021‐0130 and RCA Case No . C14‐85‐288.23(RCA). I object  to this rezoning in our neighborhood. We already have enough urbanization and we do not need more building and  construction which destroys the green space, and also affects the climate around it.   I strongly oppose this rezoning of 7715 1/2 W. SH 71 and the development of another massive apartment complex in our  neighborhood.  Maria Singh  8817 Moccasin Path, Austin, TX 78736  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Karen Galecki Tuesday, January 18, 2022 4:31 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hello Kate and Maureen, West Oak Hill was quiet and peaceful.. now, we have a giant project by KB Homes that has covered our neighborhood in silt, have heard jackhammering 12/hrs day 6 days/week for two months, along with giant construction trucks going up and down Scenic Brook- where people go for walks on their own, with babies/kids, and dogs. Looking at the project it's really sad that no green space was preserved at all- how does this help us, the environment, or wildlife? Now there is a rezoning request for a huge apartment complex near the same area. How much can one area take? What about water run off? More construction trucks destroying the roads? I strongly oppose this.. traffic here will already increase due to the other development project going on (on top of people using it as a cut through due to the 290 project). Our neighborhood wasn't built for this much traffic and capacity. Please consider the residents here and the negative impact it would have on us. Sincerely, -Karen Galecki "The hope for the animals of tomorrow is to be found in a humane culture which learns to feel beyond itself. We must learn empathy, we must learn to see into the eyes of an animal and feel that its life has value because it is alive. Nothing less will do." - Kenneth White CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Olga Nieto Tuesday, January 18, 2022 5:38 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department:   As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to  the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily.   I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract  attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most of the  apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area.  The amendment of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally  sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of  the area want on that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents.   Please add me on the notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.   Thank You ,   Olga Nieto  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 From: To: Subject: Date: k c Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen Save Scenic Brook Wednesday, January 19, 2022 7:25:32 AM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hello, I’m writing to inform you that I am not in favor of the following two cases that have been brought to my attention: Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) This proposed rezoning will allow nearly 400 apartments in over 8 buildings up to 60 feet in height. The Houston apartment developer is attempting to take advantage of a Restrictive covenant placed on the property of the 1980’s which allowed for a maximum 65% impervious coverage for a LO (Limited Office) zoned construction of a maximum of 146,000 square ft. The rezoning request wants to change the use AND increase the maximum square footage by nearly threefold. THIS PROPOSAL IS IN DIRECT CONTRADICTION TO THE OAK HILL COMBINED NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN. Please help speak up for our community by voicing our opposition and supporting our efforts in stopping this project. Thank you, Keri Cardenas Chinook Dr, 78736 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Natalie Galletti Wednesday, January 19, 2022 11:49 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a nearby homeowner (7004 Chinook Drive) and the owner of several nearby rental properties (7002 Chinook Drive, 7003 Chinook Drive, 8103 Little Deer Crossing) I strongly feel that the rezoning of this land in question is inconsistent with the zoning of nearby properties. The adjoining land that is currently being developed that is being used as an example of similar use HAS NOT been approved for multi-family apartment-style buildings and CAN NOT be considered as existing zoning/buildings. I, and many others, worked hard on the FLUP and FLUM to make sure that NONE of this land was developed as office or high-density multi-family use. Single- family, duplex or quadplex multi-family are the only acceptable land uses for these lots. Additionally, the extra impervious cover limits will only contribute to the flooding that already happens downstream along Williamson Creek – specifically at the Oak Hill Youth Sports Association Baseball/ Softball Fields located at 290 & Joe Tanner Lane. Please do not allow this rezoning to be approved. Thank you, Natalie Uzoff Galletti & Joseph Galletti 7004 Chinook Drive, Austin, 78736-1840 512-301-1170 As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.  Thank You   1 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   2 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Natalie Galletti Wednesday, January 19, 2022 11:58 AM Adler, Steve; Harper-Madison, Natasha; Fuentes, Vanessa; Renteria, Sabino; Casar, Gregorio; Kitchen, Ann; Kelly, Mackenzie; Pool, Leslie; Ellis, Paige; Tovo, Kathie; Alter, Alison; HPD; Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen Refuse the Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) Dear Council Members, Mayor, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a long-time nearby homeowners (7004 Chinook Drive since 1995) and the owner of several nearby rental properties (7002 Chinook Drive, 7003 Chinook Drive, 8103 Little Deer Crossing) we strongly feel that the rezoning of this land in question is inconsistent with the zoning of nearby properties. The adjoining land that is currently being developed that is being used by the applicants as an example of similar use HAS NOT been approved for multi-family apartment- style buildings and CAN NOT be considered as existing zoning/buildings. We, and many others, worked hard on the FLUP and FLUM to make sure that NONE of these land parcels would ever be developed as office or high-density multi-family use. Single-family, duplex or quadplex multi- family are the only acceptable land uses for these lots. Additionally, the extra impervious cover limits will only contribute to the flooding that already happens downstream along Williamson Creek – specifically at the Oak Hill Youth Sports Association Baseball/ Softball Fields located at 290 & Joe Tanner Lane. Please do not allow this rezoning to be approved. Thank you, Natalie Uzoff Galletti & Joseph Galletti 7004 Chinook Drive, Austin, 78736-1840 512-301-1170 As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and 1 FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.  Thank You   CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   2 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Alix Vargo Wednesday, January 19, 2022 3:04 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen Rezoning Case No. C14-2021-0130, RCA Case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** To Whom It May Concern, I want to go on record formally opposing the rezoning laws. We rent a home in Oak Hill, and the whole reason we moved to this neighborhood was because of the location relative to the city, and how quiet and beautiful it is with that. We like that there aren't many apartment complexes, and the wildlife component is great. The new proposed apartments will disrupt the wildlife further than it is already being disrupted - driving animals into the streets and people's yards, creating conflict with their pets and even potential dangers for them. For example, since the construction on 290 has started, Coral snakes have been showing up in my yard on a regular basis. The apartments should not be built on such a sensitive aquifer area. They will also majorly disrupt the flow of traffic, which we are already having a problem with, and they will ruin the appeal of the area for many homeowners. Cheers,  Alix  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Peggy Cooper Wednesday, January 19, 2022 4:27 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  Margaret (Peggy) Cooper  Resident on Sage Mountain Trail  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Paul Merryman Wednesday, January 19, 2022 5:51 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen ; Julie Nicole; Adler, Steve; Harper-Madison, Natasha; Fuentes, Vanessa; Renteria, Sabino; Casar, Gregorio; Kitchen, Ann; Kelly, Mackenzie; Pool, Leslie; Ellis, Paige; Tovo, Kathie; Alter, Alison We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department:  As homeowners on Scenic Brook Dr and residents in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract we would  like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. My wife and I just purchased our home here  last summer, particularly because it backs up to a creek and also because of the dense foliage all around. We do not  want our creek to dry up nor have tall apartment buildings in our horizon nor added congestion to the area (we are  already experiencing enough disruption with the Oakhill Parkway project).  We think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract  attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most of the  apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area.  The amendment of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally  sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of  the area want on that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents.  Please add us to the notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.  Thank You,  Paul Merryman and Julie Holtzman  7119 Scenic Brook Dr  Austin, TX 79736  Sent from my iPhone  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: James Cain Wednesday, January 19, 2022 8:31 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; Natasha; Fuentes, Vanessa; Renteria, Sabino; Casar, Gregorio; Kitchen, Ann; Kelly, Mackenzie; Pool, Leslie; Ellis, Paige; Tovo, Kathie; Alter, Alison We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) ; Adler, Steve; Harper-Madison, *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates. Thank You Representative Ellis needs to listen to the folks of district 8 and help the residents vote against this proposal. This complex will be built in my backyard; a single family home neighborhood. I strongly oppose this rezoning of my neighborhood, James Cain 26 year homeowner, Chinook Dr. CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Thursday, January 20, 2022 10:31 AM Meredith, Maureen; Clark, Kate; I oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Pl,    As a homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to  the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily.     The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one  of the tallest hills in the area.     Traffic in this area has reached its peak under current circumstances.  Adding hundreds of people to a small condensed  area would only exasperate the traffic problems.  In addition, construction has begun on the 290/71 Super HWY causing  its own amount of delays.  I don’t see how we can allow more construction to commence in this very tight quadrant.      The amendment of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally  sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone which has already been disturbed by the building of the Super HWY.      The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing  anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any  hearing, meetings and updates.    Thank You,    Susan Shipp Robison  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: jmac Thursday, January 20, 2022 11:21 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Kris Donley Thursday, January 20, 2022 12:04 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Kris Donley Thursday, January 20, 2022 12:04 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Mark Knox Thursday, January 20, 2022 1:45 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You   CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Anne Hawken Thursday, January 20, 2022 2:35 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  Anne Hawken    512‐351‐5008 (cellular‐text only)  Sent from my iPad  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Mary Taylor Thursday, January 20, 2022 4:29 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident since  1976 in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½  W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates. Thank You Sent from Mail for Windows CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: said less Thursday, January 20, 2022 6:29 PM Clark, Kate Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** I am opposed to this development proposal on SH 71.  Thank you,  Rick Jenkins  7311 Oak Meadow Drive  Austin, TX  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Kenneth McMinn Thursday, January 20, 2022 8:12 PM Clark, Kate SAVE SCENIC BROOK & LITTLE DEER CROSSING *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Attention: Kate.clark@austintexas.gov RE: Rezoning case No. C14-2021-03130 Including RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) From: Ken & Fun McMinn Residence: 8008 Little Deer Crossing Oak Hill, TX 78736 Dear Kate, Please add us to the record OPPOSING the rezoning of 7715 1/2 W. SH 71 and the development of another Massive apartment complex in our neighborhood. This project faces Scenic Brook and our neighborhood on Little Deer Crossing, which has been a peaceful, low traffic street of single family home sites. If this high density apartment project goes through we would directly be affected with high traffic on a street only 16' wide. We recommend that our street be blocked with a locked gate and sign saying " For Construction Use Only". Thank you for your support. Ken & Fun Sent from my iPad  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Melinda Kilian Friday, January 21, 2022 4:20 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  Sent from my iPhone  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Alexis Peterson Friday, January 21, 2022 11:55 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: David Gignac Friday, January 21, 2022 11:59 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; re: Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** There are more apartment buildings than hills in Oak Hill.   The current plan will remove the hills from sight and will be  left without a landscape.   Breaks my head and my heart.  I will vote accordingly.   CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Amy Schippers Saturday, January 22, 2022 11:08 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen Rezoning case C14-2021-0130 & RCA case C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** To the attention of  Ms Clark and Ms Meredith:   My name is Amy Schippers and I live at 6943 Chinook Dr., Austin, TX 78736.  Please except this email as my objection  to the rezoning of 7715 1/2 W. SH 71 development.  Many Thanks!   ‐Amy SCHIPPERS  5127867937  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Hi Kate,  Emily Glennon Sunday, January 23, 2022 1:32 PM Clark, Kate Rezoning case No c14-2021-0130 *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  We are residents off 71 and OPPOSE the rezoning of 7715 1/2 of W SH71 and another massive apartment complex.  Please let your voice and not your pockets be heard‐ and oppose it as well  Emily Glennon  ‐‐  813‐390‐4589    CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Bess Long Sunday, January 23, 2022 3:42 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen Re:Rezoning Case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23 (RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** As a resident of the Scenic Brook Neighborhood I oppose the rezoning of 7715 1/2 W. SH 71 and the development of another massive apartment complex in our neighborhood! ‐‐   Elizabeth (Bess) Long  Instructional Materials Development Advisor  Uzbekistan Education for Excellence Program, Based in Austin, Texas  Phone, WhatsApp and Telegram: 512-922-1963  Skype: besslongtx56  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Katie Davies Monday, January 24, 2022 10:21 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Katie Davies Monday, January 24, 2022 10:25 AM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; Natasha; Fuentes, Vanessa; Renteria, Sabino; Casar, Gregorio; Kitchen, Ann; Kelly, Mackenzie; Pool, Leslie; Ellis, Paige; Tovo, Kathie; Alter, Alison Re: We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) ; Adler, Steve; Harper-Madison, *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Austin City Council Members, Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a  homeowner and resident in close proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the  rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and  RR which is directly adjacent to the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall,  especially considering that most of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of  the restrictive covenant would allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards  Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on  that tract and allowing anything else would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on  the notification list of any hearing, meetings and updates.  Thank You  Katie Newell   CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Patrica Lang Monday, January 24, 2022 5:41 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  Pat Lang  Sent from my iPad  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Melida82 Monday, January 24, 2022 7:15 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You  Melida mathews  Sent from my iPhone  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Denise Tucker Monday, January 24, 2022 8:07 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution ***  Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You,    Denise Tucker  Sent from my iPhone  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.  1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Candi Diebel Tuesday, January 25, 2022 5:45 PM Clark, Kate; Meredith, Maureen; We oppose Rezoning case No. C14-2021-0130 and RCA case No. C14-85-288.23(RCA) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Clark, Ms. Meredith, and the Austin Housing and Planning Department: As a homeowner and resident in close  proximity to the above referenced rezoning tract I would like to strongly object to the rezoning of 7715 ½ W. SH 71 to  Multifamily. I think that it would be too abrupt an upgrade in density from the SF and RR which is directly adjacent to  the tract attempting to be rezoned. The proposed 60 ft allowable height is far too tall, especially considering that most  of the apartments would be on one of the tallest hills in the area. The amendment of the restrictive covenant would  allow far too much impervious coverage in an environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer contributing zone. The Oak Hill  combined plan and FLUM are clear on what the residents of the area want on that tract and allowing anything else  would be a failure in the representation of Oak Hill Residents. Please add me on the notification list of any hearing,  meetings and updates.  Thank You   Sent from my LG K92 5G, an AT&T 5G Evolution capable smartphone  CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links  or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to  cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.   1 60 d. Compliance with the Enviornmental Criteria Manual Section 1.6.9 (S.O.S.) is required. e. Cut and fill is limited to a maximum of 8 feet for site work and grading, excluding building footprints, ponds and related wet well basins and underdrain systems. Floor to Area Ratio of 1 to 1. DELETE 3. Upon completion of the construction of any multifamily development on Tract 1, all subsequent development or redevelopment on Tract 1, exclusive of site plan corrections, exemptions, or revisions, shall be subject to current land development code regulations at the time of site development permit application. This restrictive covenant shall not be construed to establish any vested rights on Tract 1.