Environmental CommissionNov. 4, 2020

20201104-003b: Concordia University Campus Residence Hall, SP-2020-0038C Staff Presentation — original pdf

Backup
Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 20 pages

CONCORDIA CAMPUS RESIDENCE HALL 11400 CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY DRIVE AUSTIN, TX 78726 SP-2020-0038C Kristy Nguyen Environmental Review Specialist Senior Development Services Department 1 Concordia Campus Residence Hall SP-2020-0038C Site Location Austin ETJ Austin City Limits Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone Edwards Aquifer Contributing Zone This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the- ground survey and represents only the approximate relative location of property boundaries. This product has been produced by the Watershed Protection Department for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. 0 5 10 Miles[ 2 PROPERTY DATA • Bull Creek, Water Supply Suburban Classification • Drinking Water Protection Zone • Full Purpose Jurisdiction • Located over Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone • Council District 6 • Subject to Schlumberger Planned Development Area, Ordinance No. 20070215-042 (as amended) and Lake Austin Watershed Ordinance No. 840301-F, as stated in the Planned Development Area 3 VICINITY EXHIBIT 4 VARIANCE REQUEST Lake Austin Watershed Ordinance No. 840301-F - Section 9-10-409(a) – for a fill exceeding four feet - Section 9-10-409(b) – for a cut exceeding four feet 5 FINDINGS OF FACT LAKE AUSTIN WATERSHED ORDINANCE, SECTION 9-10-377 TO VARY FROM SECTION 9-10- 409(A) – FOR A FILL EXCEEDING FOUR FEET 6 FINDINGS OF FACT LAKE AUSTIN WATERSHED ORDINANCE SECTION 9-10-377 1. Are there special circumstances applicable to the property involved where strict application deprives such property owner of privileges or safety enjoyed by other similarly situated property with similarly timed development? Staff Determination: Yes In site plan case #SP-2007-0231C, a variance to Lake Austin Ordinance #840301-F, Sections 9-10-409(a) and 9-10-409(b) was granted for a max cut of +/-5.8’ and a max fill of +/- 17.5’ to construct a parking area, baseball field, and fieldhouse. Thereafter, a variance to vary from the same code sections was granted for a max cut of +/-9.25’ and a max fill of +/- 14.85’ to construct a water quality and detention facility, a water quality channel, a softball field, and associated parking in site plan case #SP-2013-0476C. 7 FINDINGS OF FACT LAKE AUSTIN WATERSHED ORDINANCE SECTION 9-10-377 2. Does the project demonstrate minimum departures from the terms of the ordinance necessary to avoid such deprivation of privileges enjoyed by such other property and to facilitate a reasonable use, and which will not create significant probabilities of harmful environmental consequences? Staff Determination: Yes The residence hall and associated improvements are located on a site with subtle topography and encompassed by existing development. The residence hall and associated improvements are positioned at the intersection of Kilian Road and Studtmann Court and are constructed to meet the elevation of the existing driveways and sidewalks for connectivity and access. As such, there is a six foot change in grade between the existing topography at the rear of the building and the finished floor elevation. Ergo, fill between four and eight feet is necessary to prevent a dramatic change in grade from the building to the courtyard and to meet ADA requirements. For the associated residence hall loading and unloading driveway off of Studtmann Court, fill between four and five is necessary to match the existing grade of Studtmann Court. To alleviate the amount of fill, terracing techniques, tree wells, and retaining walls are incorporated in the design of the courtyard and adjacent driveway. Moreover, a portion of the building has been set to a lower finished floor elevation where grades are naturally downslope to further reduce the amount of fill. 8 EXISTING AND PROPOSED CONDITIONS N.T.S. 9 FILL EXHIBIT 0 1 FINDINGS OF FACT LAKE AUSTIN WATERSHED ORDINANCE SECTION 9-10-377 3. The proposal does not provide special privileges not enjoyed by other similarly situated properties with similarly timed development, and is not based on a special or unique condition which was created as a result of the method by which a person voluntarily subdivided land after October 20, 1983. Staff Determination: Yes The Concordia property is currently subdivided into two large lots. Lot 1 being +/- 53 acres and Lot 2 being +/- 383 acres with the proposed development being on Lot 2. A variance to Section 9-10-409(a) for fill exceeding four feet was not necessitated due to the subdivision of the property. 1 1 FINDINGS OF FACT LAKE AUSTIN WATERSHED ORDINANCE, SECTION 9-10-377 TO VARY FROM SECTION 9-10- 409(B) – FOR A CUT EXCEEDING FOUR FEET 2 1 FINDINGS OF FACT LAKE AUSTIN WATERSHED ORDINANCE SECTION 9-10-377 1. Are there special circumstances applicable to the property involved where strict application deprives such property owner of privileges or safety enjoyed by other similarly situated property with similarly timed development? Staff Determination: Yes In site plan case #SP-2007-0231C, a variance to Lake Austin Ordinance #840301-F, Sections 9-10-409(a) and 9-10-409(b) was granted for a max cut of +/-5.8’ and a max fill of +/- 17.5’ to construct a parking area, baseball field, and fieldhouse. Thereafter, a variance to vary from the same code sections was granted for a max cut of +/-9.25’ and a max fill of +/- 14.85’ to construct a water quality and detention facility, a water quality channel, a softball field, and associated parking in site plan case #SP-2013-0476C. 3 1 FINDINGS OF FACT LAKE AUSTIN WATERSHED ORDINANCE SECTION 9-10-377 2. Does the project demonstrate minimum departures from the terms of the ordinance necessary to avoid such deprivation of privileges enjoyed by such other property and to facilitate a reasonable use, and which will not create significant probabilities of harmful environmental consequences? Staff Determination: Yes The proposed parking lot, residence hall, and associated improvements are located on a site with subtle topography and encompassed by existing development. The driveway approach for the parking lot must be constructed to match Kilian Road elevation as the only ingress and egress to the parking lot is off Kilian Road. Moreover, proposed grades follow the natural contours to the best extent possible to maintain the natural drainage patterns for the capturing of runoff into the proposed water quality and detention ponds located at the low point of the parking lot. As a result, cut exceeding the allowable four feet is required for a gentle slope transition for the internal circulation of the parking lot and for drainage and water quality purposes. Additionally, to adequately treat the residence hall and associated improvements, the existing sedimentation and detention ponds require a max cut of six feet for upgrades, including the addition of a bio-filtration pond. 4 1 EXISTING AND PROPOSED CONDITIONS N.T.S. 5 1 CUT EXHIBIT 6 1 FINDINGS OF FACT LAKE AUSTIN WATERSHED ORDINANCE SECTION 9-10-377 3. The proposal does not provide special privileges not enjoyed by other similarly situated properties with similarly timed development, and is not based on a special or unique condition which was created as a result of the method by which a person voluntarily subdivided land after October 20, 1983. Staff Determination: Yes The Concordia property is currently subdivided into two large lots. Lot 1 being +/- 53 acres and Lot 2 being +/- 383 acres with the proposed development being on Lot 2. A variance to Section 9-10-409(a) for cut exceeding four feet was not necessitated due to the subdivision of the property. 7 1 VARIANCE RECOMMENDATION Staff determines that the findings of fact have been met. Staff recommends the following conditions: 1. Subject to the Void and Water Flow Mitigation Rule (City Environmental Criteria Manual 1.12.0 and City Standards Specification Manual No. 658S) provision that all trenching greater than 5 feet deep must be inspected by a qualified Texas Professional Geoscientist or their representative; 2. Preserve the top 10 inches of topsoil to be used onsite; and 3. Increased tree mitigation and landscaping for areas of fill to stabilize erosion as shown on landscape plan submitted in this variance packet (see following landscape plan) 18 LANDSCAPE PLAN 9 1 LANDSCAPE PLAN CONT. 0 2