Community Police Review CommissionMarch 20, 2026

Item 7: CPRC Workflow/Working Group — original pdf

Backup
Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

Review Structure & Workflow: Operational Review Pipeline Step 1: Simultaneous Transfer of IA Cases • All completed IA-reviewed cases that are forwarded to OPO will also be transmitted concurrently to CPRC. (§ 2-15-3 D.1) • CPRC will receive access to case summaries, timelines, and investigative status for every case to assess the effectiveness of the OPO and suggest improvements (§ 2-15-3 D.6) Step 2: Preliminary Assessment by Working Group • The Case Review Working Group will identify priority level of cases as: “high”, “medium”, or “low” based on: • Cases approaching the 12-month statute of review limitation • High-visibility or community-sensitive cases • Cases undergoing active adjudication or requiring rapid analysis • CPRC will track review timeliness, case aging trends, and disposition equity to evaluate impact. • • Every Monday a batch of up to 10 identified cases will be submitted to the CPRC Identified cases will be submitted to Chair and Vice-Chair Chair and Vice-Chair. • Within 48 hours, these cases will be assigned and accessible to the full commission staff for formal review, preparation, and deliberation. Step 3: Full Commission Review • CPRC will review no more than 25 cases per month • If a Commission Review Working Group does not meet a consensus on any given case then another Commission Review Working Group will also review it until a consensus is met based on the majority. Community Police Review Commission (CPRC) 2025 Case Review Working Group PURPOSE: CPRC Working Group Establish Case Review Working Group composed of 3 to 5 CPRC to complete a preliminary review and priority identi�ication of cases as “high”, “medium”, or “low” submitted to the Chair & Vice- Chair every Monday for 48-hour full commission review assignments. 1 Community Police Review Commission (CPRC) 2025 Commission Review PURPOSE: CPRC Working Group Establish Working Groups to fully review the cases as identi�ied by the Case Review Working group. Each commissioner will serve in at least 1 Commission Review Working Group with a minimum of 3 commissioners per group. If a Working Group does not meet a consensus on a recommended course of action after reviewing a case, then the case will also be reviewed by the remaining groups until a consensus is reached. 1