ITEM03 C15-2024-0048 GRANTED DS — original pdf

Backup

CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet ITEM 03 DATE: Monday April 14, 2025 CASE NUMBER: C15-2024-0048 ___Y____Thomas Ates (D1) ___Y____Bianca A Medina-Leal (D2) ___Y____Jessica Cohen (D3) ___Y____Yung-ju Kim (D4) ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne (D5) ___Y____Niccolo A Sacco (D6) ___Y____Sameer S Birring (D7) ___Y____Margaret Shahrestani (D8) ___Y____Brian Poteet (D9) ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen (D10) ___Y____Jeffery L Bowen (M) ____-___Corry L Archer-mcclellan (Alternate) (M) ____-___Suzanne Valentine (Alternate) (M) ____-___VACANT (Alternate) (M) APPLICANT: Maximiliano Martinez OWNER: Shaun Vembutty ADDRESS: 4013 Clawson Road the front lot width from 50 feet (required) to 35 feet (requested), VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from lot width requirements to decrease:  and  rear flag lot width from 50 feet (required) to 49.82 feet (requested) in order to subdivide the existing tract into two SF-3 lots in a “SF-3”, Single-Family zoning district. BOARD’S DECISION: The public hearing was closed by Madam Chair Jessica Cohen, Board member Michael Von Ohlen’s motion to postpone to April 14, 2025; Board member Yung-ju Kim second on 10-0 votes; POSTPONED TO APRIL 14, 2025. April 14, 2025 The public hearing was closed by Madam Chair Jessica Cohen, Board member Michael Von Ohlen’s motion to Approve with friendly amendment that a 10 foot setback for the 2nd story and higher, 5 foot everywhere else and trash screening; Vice Chair Melissa Hawthorne second on 11-0 votes; GRANTED WITH A FRIENDLY AMENDMENT THAT A 10 FOOT SETBACK FOR THE 2ND STORY AND HIGHER, 5 FOOT EVERYWHERE ELSE AND TRASH SCREENING. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: the existing SF-3 lot has 19,907 square feet of land area, there is enough land area to create 2-SF-3 lots above 5,750 square feet to provide more housing in the neighborhood. 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: the subject tract is configured in such a way that it is large enough for two standard SF-3 lots but not wide enough to provide the required 50’ of frontage. (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: the subject tract is narrower and larger than most sites within a 500’ vicinity. 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: the area of Clawson road is primarily filled with single family style developments, there are 7 residential flag lots located across Clawson Road within 500’ of the subject tract. Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison Jessica Cohen Madam Chair Diana Ramirez for