ITEM06 C15-2023-0048 PP DS 8-12-24 — original pdf

Backup

CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet ITEM06 DATE: Monday January 8, 2023 CASE NUMBER: C15-2023-0048 ___Y___Thomas Ates (D1) ___-____VACANT (D2) ___Y___Jessica Cohen (D3) ___Y___Yung-ju Kim (D4) ___Y___Melissa Hawthorne (D5) ___Y___Jeffery Bowen (D6) ___Y___Janel Venzant (D7) ___Y___Margaret Shahrestani (D8) ___Y___Brian Poteet (D9) ___Y___Michael Von Ohlen (D10) ___Y___Marcel Gutierrez-Garza (M) ___-____Kelly Blume (Alternate) (M) ___-____Suzanne Valentine (Alternate) (M) ___-____VACANT (Alternate) (M) APPLICANT: Stephen Hawkins OWNER: Willow Beach, LLC ADDRESS: 1446 ROCKCLIFF RD VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-1176 (Site Development Regulations for Docks, Marinas, and Other Lakefront Uses) (A) (5) (a) to increase the footprint of a boat dock from 1,200 square feet (maximum allowed) to 2,235 square feet (requested), in order to erect a second boat dock in a “LA”, Lake Austin zoning district. Note: Land Development Code, 25-2-1176 Site Development Regulations for Docks, Marinas, and other Lakefront Uses (A) (5) The footprint of a dock, including the portion of a cut-in slip, attached access structures, or roof overhang, may not exceed: (a) 1,200 square feet for a dock that is accessory to a principal residential use A dock or similar structure must comply with the requirements of this subsection. BOARD’S DECISION: The public hearing was closed by Madam Chair Jessica Cohen, Board member Maggie Shahrestani motions to postpone to January 8, 2024; Board member Jeffery Bowen seconds on 10-0 votes; POSTPONED TO JANUARY 8, 2024, Jan 8, 2024 The public hearing was closed by Madam Chair Jessica Cohen, Board member Maggie Shahrestani motions to Deny; Board member Micheal Von Ohlen seconds on a NO vote; Board member Micheal Von Ohlen pulled his 2nd to Deny and a substitute motion was made by Board member Melissa Hawthorne to postpone to August 12, 2024, Board member Michael Von Ohlen seconds on 10-0 votes; POSTPONED TO AUGUST 12, 2024. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison Jessica Cohen Madam Chair for