Board of AdjustmentNov. 14, 2022

ITEM9 C15-2022-0067 DENIED RECONS REQ DS — original pdf

Backup
Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet Item 9 DATE: Monday November 14, 2022 CASE NUMBER: C15-2022-0067 ___Y____Thomas Ates ___N____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___N____Melissa Hawthorne ___N____Barbara Mcarthur ___N____Darryl Pruett ___-____Agustina Rodriguez OUT ___-____Richard Smith OUT ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___-____Nicholl Wade OUT ___N____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___Y____Carrie Waller (Alternate) ___Y____Marcel Gutierrez-Garza (Alternate) OWNER/APPLICANT: Jose Minguell ADDRESS: 2614 CANTERBURY ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum Interior Side Yard Setback from 5 feet (required) to 6 inches (requested), in order to maintain two (2) small sheds - a utility shed and bike shed in a “SF-3- NP”, Single-Family-Neighborhood Plan zoning district (Holly Neighborhood Plan). BOARD’S DECISION: The public hearing was closed by Madam Chair Jessica Cohen, Board member Michael Von Ohlen motions to Approve; Substitute motion by Board member Darryl Pruett to Deny; Board member Brooke Bailey second on 5-4 vote (Board members Jessica Cohen, Michael Von Ohlen, Carrie Waller and Marcel Gutierrez-Garza nay); DENIED. Applicant is requesting a reconsideration. RECONSIDERATION REQUEST: November 14, 2022 Board member Michael Von Ohlen motions to reconsider; Board member Thomas Ates second on 5-5 vote (Board members Brooke Bailey, Melissa Hawthorne, Barbara Mcarthur, Darryl Pruett, Kelly Blume nay); MOTION FAILED TO BE RECONSIDERED. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison ____________________________ Jessica Cohen Madam Chair