Item-7 C15-2022-0048 GRANTED DS W/APVD DRAWING — original pdf

Backup

CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet Item-7 DATE: Monday August 8, 2022 CASE NUMBER: C15-2022-0048 ___-____Thomas Ates OUT ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___Y____Barbara Mcarthur ___Y____Ryan Nill ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Agustina Rodriguez ___Y____Richard Smith ___-____Michael Von Ohlen OUT ___-____Nicholl Wade OUT ___-____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____Carrie Waller (Alternate) ___Y____Marcel Gutierrez-Garza (Alternate) APPLICANT: Rodney Bennett OWNER: Diana Patterson ADDRESS: 2500 SPRING LN VARIANCE REQUESTED The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-899 (D) (Fences as Accessory Uses) to exceed the average height of six (6) feet or a maximum height of seven (7) feet (required) for a solid fence along the property line in order to construct a ten (10) feet (requested) tall masonry wall/fence along Bowman Avenue in a SF-3-NP”, Single-Family-Neighborhood Plan zoning district (WANG Neighborhood Plan). Note: The Land Development Code 25-2-899 (D) Except as otherwise provided in this section, a solid fence constructed along a property line may not exceed an average height of six feet or a maximum height of seven feet. Homeowner was Granted a fence variance in 2010 from 6 ft. to 8 ft., C15-2010-0034. BOARD’S DECISION: BOA MEETING JULY 11, 2022 POSTPONED TO AUGUST 8, 2022 BY APPLICANT; Aug 8, 2022 The public hearing was closed by Madam Chair Jessica Cohen, Board member Melissa Hawthorne motions to approve with condition that this is tied only to the area highlighted (on Bowman Ave.) as shown in the advance packet drawing Item-7/3, only side of the shopping center; Board member Barbara Mcarthur second on 9-0 vote; GRANTED WITH CONDITION THAT THIS IS TIED ONLY TO THE AREA HIGHLIGHTED (ON BOWMAN AVE.) AS SHOWN IN THE ADVANCE PACKET DRAWING ITEM-7/3, ONLY SIDE OF THE SHOPPING CENTER. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: most residential properties do not adjoin a public Street that has back of shopping center and back end is the delivery portion and truck traffic make it difficult to have a reasonable enjoyment of the property. 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: the obnoxiously loud of semi-trucks making deliveries at all hours of the day make it difficult to deal with commercial delivery and scheduling of dumpster pickup and have enjoyment of the property (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: there are 3 lots along this perimeter roadway and little undersized for traffic that is occurring 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: the wall is existing and a variance was given in 2010 for 8ft wall, not impacting the adjacent neighbors, and tying the variance to the area highlighted as shown on 7/3. ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison Jessica Cohen ____________________________ forLOCATION OF 8' WALL & PROP OSED 10' WALL < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Item-7/3