ITEM-8 C15-2022-0060 ADV PACKET — original pdf

Backup

CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet D-6 DATE: Monday July 11, 2022 CASE NUMBER: C15-2022-0060 ___Y____Thomas Ates ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___Y____Barbara Mcarthur ___Y____Ryan Nill ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___-____Agustina Rodriguez OUT ___-____Richard Smith OUT ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___Y____Nicholl Wade ___-____Kelly Blume (Alternate) N/A ___Y____Carrie Waller (Alternate) ___Y____Marcel Gutierrez-Garza (Alternate) APPLICANT: Victoria Haase OWNER: CMCBH2 Company; LLC ADDRESS: 1609 MATTHEWS LN VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code: Article 10, Compatibility Standards, Division 2 –Development Standards, Section 25-2- 1063 (Height Limitations and Setbacks for Large Sites) a) (B) (1) from setback requirements to decrease the setback from 25 feet (minimum allowed) to 7 feet (requested) on eastern property line and 13 feet (requested) on southern property line b) and 30 feet (maximum allowed) to three (3) stories and 31 feet (requested) in order to erect a three (3) story Multi-Family/Townhouse style building in a “MF-2-CO”, Multi-Family Residence Low Density-Conditional Overlay zoning district. (C) (1) (a) from height limitations to increase the height limit from two (2) stories Note: Section 25-2-1063 Height Limitations and Setbacks for Large Sites (B) in this section, the term "structure" excludes a rain garden using no concrete that is designed in accordance with the Environmental Criteria Manual. A person may not construct a structure 25 feet or less from property. (1) in an urban family residence (SF-5) or more restrictive zoning district; (C) The height limitations for a structure are: (1) two stories and Item-8/130 feet, if the structure is 50 feet or less from property: (a) in an SF-5 or more restrictive zoning district; BOARD’S DECISION: July 11, 2022 The public hearing was closed by Madam Chair Jessica Cohen, Board member Barbara Mcarthur motions to postpone to August 8, 2022; Board member Nicholl Wade seconds on a 11-0 vote; POSTPONED TO AUGUST 8, 2022. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison ____________________________ Jessica Cohen Madam Chair forItem-8/2 July 21, 2022 City of Austin Board of Adjustments RE: C15-2022-0060 – 1609 Matthews Lane Dear Board Members, This letter is intended to provide answers and information related to the questions brought forth during the hearing on July 11, 2022. Regarding a few matters in need of clarification - 1. Development of 2-story townhomes on this site will NOT release this development from compliance with compatibility requirements. No matter if the units are one-story, two story, or three-story, a variance is still needed to achieve any development that is within 25ft of the eastern and southern property lines, including flatwork, driveways, and stormwater/detention infrastructure. 2. Reducing the compatibility setback does not equate to greater allowances of impervious cover and therefore will not increase the run-off from this site, as stated during public testimony. The site will be permitted, at most, 60% impervious cover per the MF-2 zoning district site development regulations. Thrower Design met with the Matthews Lane Neighborhood Association on more than one occasion during the rezoning process. The Neighborhood Association requested a conditional overlay that would limit density to 6 dwelling units and limit height to 2-stories. The landowner was not agreeable and instead, there was a willingness to decrease the rezoning request from MF-3 to MF-2, which resulted in a decrease in impervious cover from 65% to 60% and a decrease in Item-8/3the average density from 15 units to 12 units. City Council further prescribed a conditional overlay limiting density to 10 units, as it was determined to be the reasonable use of this property. Limiting development to 2-stories was never communicated to the Neighborhood, City Staff, Commission or City Council at any time. In fact, during the Zoning and Platting Commission Public Hearing, there was dialogue regarding lack of agreement for limiting development to 2- stories and dialogue regarding the need for a compatibility setback variance from the Board of Adjustments, based on the commercial and industrial uses adjacent to the site in conjunction with other limiting factors. I encourage all to listen to the video recording of the Zoning & Platting Commission hearing, accessible here: https://austintx.new.swagit.com/videos/122312 Particularly, take note of the following moments in the video: 1. 18:04, mention that the non-compliant, commercial, and industrial use of the adjacent properties warrants consideration of a compatibility variance. 2. 32:20, mention that 3-story development will not be intrusive because there aren’t any single-family homes adjacent to the site, for which compatibility is intended to protect. 3. 44:20, Commissioner mention of Board of Adjustments variance. 4. 1:02:40, Commissioner mention of Board of Adjustments variance. Per requests made by the Board on July 11th, the development team is assessing the impact of reducing the setback along the eastern property line from 7ft to 10ft and is also working on contextual elevations. Further, we will contact the Neighborhood Association and report back on all of these matters at the hearing on August 8th. Thank you for your service and for your consideration of the facts for this case. Sincerely, Victoria Haase Item-8/4BOA GENERAL REVIEW COVERSHEET CASE: C15-2022-0060 BOA DATE: July 11th, 2022 ADDRESS: 1609 Matthews Ln OWNER: CMCBH2 Company LLC COUNCIL DISTRICT: 5 AGENT: Victoria Haase ZONING: MF-2-CO LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 1 RESUB OF PT OF LOT 1 FITZHUGH J G & HENRY SUBD VARIANCE REQUEST: a) decrease the setback from 25 feet to 7 feet on eastern property line and 13 feet on southern property line b) increase the height limit from two (2) stories and 30 feet to three (3) stories and 31 feet SUMMARY: erect multi-family/townhouse dwelling units ISSUES: heritage trees, critical water quality zone and public utility easements ZONING Site North South East West MF-2-CO SF-6-CO; CS DR SF-2 MF-2 LAND USES Multi-Family Single-Family; Commercial Services Development Reserve Single-Family Multi-Family NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District Austin Lost and Found Pets Austin Neighborhoods Council Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Go Austin Vamos Austin 78745 Homeless Neighborhood Association Matthews Lane Neighborhood Assn. Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation Onion Creek HOA Preservation Austin SELTexas Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group South Austin Neighborhood Alliance (SANA) Item-8/5July 1, 2022 Thrower Design, LLC P.O. Box 41957 Austin TX, 78704 Re: C15-2022-0060 Dear Victoria, Property Description: LOT 1 RESUB OF PT OF LOT 1 FITZHUGH J G & HENRY SUBD Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a variance request from LDC Sections 25-2-1063(B)(1) and 25-2-1063(C)(1)(a) at 1609 Matthews Lane. Austin Energy does not oppose the request, provided that any proposed or existing improvements follow Austin Energy’s Clearance & Safety Criteria, the National Electric Safety Code, and OSHA requirements. Any removal or relocation of existing facilities will be at the owner’s/applicant’s expense. Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements which are additional conditions of the above review action: https://library.municode.com/tx/austin/codes/utilities_criteria_manual?nodeId=S1AUENDECR_1 .10.0CLSARE If you require further information or have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact our office. Thank you for contacting Austin Energy. Cody Shook, Planner II Austin Energy Public Involvement | Real Estate Services 2500 Montopolis Drive Austin, TX 78741 (512) 322-6881 Cody.Shook@austinenergy.com Item-8/6CITY OF AUSTIN Development Services Department Board of Adjustment General/Parking Variance Application WARNING: Filing of this appeal stops all affected construction activity. please complete Section as needed. For Office Use Only If more space is required, Section 1: Applicant Statement 1609 Matthews Lane, Austin, TX 78745 LOT 1 RESUB OF PT OF LOT 1 FITZHUGH J G & HENRY SUBD NW 11.99FT AV OF LOT 2 RESUB OF PT LT 1 FITZHUGH J G & HENRY SUBD AND MF-2-CO Thrower Design, LLC CMCBH2 COMPANY LLC May 12 2022 Mulifamily/townhouse form dwelling units Item-8/7Portion of the City of Austin Land Development Code applicant is seeking a variance from: ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ Section 2: Variance Findings The Board must determine the existence of, sufficiency of, and weight of evidence supporting the findings described below. Therefore, you must complete each of the applicable Findings Statements as part of your application. Failure to do so may result in your application being rejected as incomplete. Please attach any additional supporting documents. NOTE: The Board cannot grant a variance that would provide the applicant with a special privilege not enjoyed by others similarly situated or potentially similarly situated. I contend that my entitlement to the requested variance is based on the following findings: Reasonable Use The zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: the compatibilty regulations were intended to buffer single-family uses from commercial uses. ____________________________________________________________________________ The triggering properties to the east and south of the subject tract have longstanding ____________________________________________________________________________ commercial uses that are not in need of the protections that compatiblity buffers were intended ____________________________________________________________________________ to provide. The buildable area lost with adherence to compatibilty requirements, environmental ____________________________________________________________________________ features, and public utility easements, on a lot of this size and dimension undermines ____________________________________________________________________________ reasonable use of property adjacent to commercial and industrial/warehouse uses and a rail-road. ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ Hardship a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: The site has 4 hertiage/protected trees, critical water quality zone and public utility easements ____________________________________________________________________________ that push developable area towards the triggering properties. The location of the trees creates ____________________________________________________________________________ challenge for building placement while also adhereing to compatibility setbacks and height ____________________________________________________________________________ limitaions. ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: This propety is uniquely situated along a rail-road track, adjacent to two properties that have ____________________________________________________________________________ compatibilty-triggering zoning but have long established commercial and industrial/warehouse ____________________________________________________________________________ uses. Restricting development based on the triggering property's zoning rather than established ____________________________________________________________________________ use does not further the purpose of the compatibility standards. ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ City of Austin | Board of Adjustment General/Parking Variance Application 0 / /20 | Page 5 of 8 Item-8/8Area Character The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: the adjacent, compatibility-triggering properties have long-standing commercial and ____________________________________________________________________________ instudrial/warhouses uses that are not intended to be buffered by comatibility regulations. ____________________________________________________________________________ Further, the MF-2 zoning district regulations are classified as "commercial" development that ____________________________________________________________________________ also do not trigger compatibility regulations on adjacent commercial uses and zoning districts. ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ Parking (additional criteria for parking variances only) Request for a parking variance requires the Board to make additional findings. The Board may grant a variance to a regulation prescribed in the City of Austin Land Development Code Chapter 25-6, Appendix A with respect to the number of off-street parking spaces or loading facilities required if it makes findings of fact that the following additional circumstances also apply: 1. Neither present nor anticipated future traffic volumes generated by the use of the site or the uses of sites in the vicinity reasonably require strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specific regulation because: n/a ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ 2. The granting of this variance will not result in the parking or loading of vehicles on public streets in such a manner as to interfere with the free flow of traffic of the streets because: n/a ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ 3. The granting of this variance will not create a safety hazard or any other condition inconsistent with the objectives of this Ordinance because: n/a ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ 4. The variance will run with the use or uses to which it pertains and shall not run with the site because: n/a ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ City of Austin | Board of Adjustment General/Parking Variance Application 0 / /20 | Page 6 of 8 Item-8/9Section 3: Applicant Certificate I affirm that my statements contained in the complete application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Applicant Signature: ____________________________________________ Date: _____________ 06/09/2022 Applicant Name (typed or printed): ___________________________________________________ Thrower Design, LLC Applicant Mailing Address: __________________________________________________________ PO Box 41957 City: ________________________________________ State: ________________ Zip: _______ Austin 78704 TX Phone (will be public information): ____________________________________________________ (512) 476-4456 Email (optional – will be public information): ___ Section 4: Owner Certificate I affirm that my statements contained in the complete application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. contained in the complete Owner Signature: ______________________________________________ Date: _____________ ____________________ 06/09/2022 Owner Name (typed or printed): ______________________________________________________ CMCBH2 COMPANY LLC Owner Mailing Address: ____________________________________________________________ 3625 Bent Ridge Drive City: ________________________________________ State: ________________ Zip: _______ 75074 Plano TX Phone (will be public information): ____________________________________________________ (512) 476-4456 Email (optional – will be public information): ____________________________ Section 5: Agent Information Agent Name: ____________________________________________________________________ Thrower Design, LLC Agent Mailing Address: ____________________________________________________________ PO Box 41957 City: ________________________________________ State: ________________ Zip: _______ Austin 78704 TX Phone (will be public information): ____________________________________________________ (512) 476-4456 Email (optional – will be public information): _ __ Section 6: Additional Space (if applicable) Please use the space below to provide additional information as needed. To ensure the information is referenced to the proper item, include the Section and Field names as well (continued on next page). _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ City of Austin | Board of Adjustment General/Parking Variance Application 0 / /20 | Page 7 of 8 Item-8/10Item-8/11Item-8/1225ft Front Setback Item-8/13Item-8/14Item-8/15Item-8/16Item-8/17Item-8/18Item-8/19Item-8/20Item-8/21Item-8/22Item-8/23Item-8/24Item-8/25Item-8/26Item-8/27Item-8/28From: To: Subject: Date: Attachments: Absolute Stornlok Ramirez, Elaine Re: Question about Case Number C15-2022-0060 Thursday, July 07, 2022 4:05:03 PM image001.png *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hello, my name is Kevin Chrane, I am the owner of the property at 1607 Matthews Lane, which is next door to the property at 1609 Matthews Lane that is the subject of case number C15-2022-0060. I am writing to express my opposition to Variance Request A. This variance is asking to lessen the amount of distance that may be built upon, in relation to the edge of the property lines. The code is currently set at 25 feet. The applicant wants to lessen this distance to only 7 feet from the eastern property line, and 13 feet from the southern one. I fell that the requested distances are too close to the property border for building, especially the one requesting only 7 feet! I would like to express my opposition to those items, am fine with the requests from Variance B. Thank you for taking my opinion as the next door landowner into consideration, On Thursday, July 7, 2022 at 03:25:22 PM CDT, Ramirez, Elaine <elaine.ramirez@austintexas.gov> wrote: Kevin Chrane (512) 694-2046 Yes! Respectfully, Elaine Ramirez Planner Senior / Board of Adjustment Liaison City of Austin Development Services Department 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Dr, Austin, Texas 78752 Office: 512-974-2202 Item-8/29From: To: Subject: Date: Ruth Lauer Ramirez, Elaine Written comments C15-2022-0060 for Board of Adjustment meeting Friday, July 08, 2022 3:26:53 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Ms. Ramirez, Does the Board of Adjustment accept emailed objections? If so, here’s mine. Thanks. Case Number C15-2022-0060. 1609 Matthews Lane, 78745 BoA July 11, 2022 Name. Ruth Lauer Addresses affected. 7309 Forest Wood Rd, 1504A and B Matthews Lane, 78745 Signature Ruth Lauer Date 7/8/22 Daytime telephone 512-228-8523 Comments: I object to the variance requested for 1609 Matthews Lane (C15-20200-00060). Remember as a kid asking for something from your parents but trying to ask them separately? I think CMBH2 is doing that. They didn’t get what they wanted from the ZAP so now they are asking the Board of Adjustment. This property was purchased in March 2021 by CMCBH2 Company LLC. Their initial zoning change request (C14-2021-0056) was opposed by the Matthews Lane Neighborhood Association (MLNA). With the assistance of Ann Kitchen’s office the MF-3 (and 14 homes) request was reduced to MF-2-CO district zoning with the conditional overlay for a maximum of 10 dwelling units, on second and third readings. It was approved at the July 29, 2021 meeting. During the negotiations with the MLNA, CMCBH2 and Ms. Victoria Haase assured Council Member Kitchen’s office and the ZAP that they were excited to build “really nice homes” within the setback and height requirements of MF-2-CO. Nothing was built. Shortly after the July 29, 2021, Council meeting, CMCBH2 put the property (with its new zoning) back on the market along with the building plans. It appears not to have sold and are now a variance is requested on the things they said were just fine a year ago. One of the primary objections to the dense development of this site was the pluvial runoff problem. Decreasing the setbacks will increase this problem on the property, the railroad tracks, and downstream as it drains into Williamson Creek. The current drought makes this hard to imagine but longtime residents in that low lying area have had water in their homes, and the City has bought up many properties along the creek. My other objection is that developers are “playing” the City of Austin and its residents. They have Item-8/30enough money to pay Ron Thrower and Associates twice to mislead Ann Kitchen’s office, neighbors, planning department staff, the ZAP and now the Board of Adjustment. They are now proposing larger 3 story buildings in an area of primarily one story homes. That is essentially the same as the original MF-3 zoning request, which the ZAP etc worked so hard to mitigate. If CMCBH2 had done their due diligence, then they knew the limitations of the property when they purchased it. I request that the Board of Adjustment deny this request in support of the work done by the ZAP, Ann Kitchen’s office, the planning staff and neighbors. Sent from Mail for Windows CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. Item-8/31From: To: Subject: Date: Michael Lubitz Ramirez, Elaine Variance requested for 1609 Matthews Lane Saturday, July 09, 2022 8:53:52 AM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Ms. Ramírez, I live close to 1609 Matthews Lane at 7708 Forest Wood Road. I want to voice my objection to the variance requested for this property. As I remember from about a year ago, this property was granted a zoning change. Their current request seems like a second chance, a way to chip away from the standards the community expressed and agreed to just one year ago. There are ways to increase density without destroying a neighborhood's character. Please hear me and do your best to deny the current request. Best. Michael Lubitz 512 698-4707 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. Item-8/32Carmen King Ramirez, Elaine From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Case Number C15-2022-0060. 1609 Matthews Lane, 78745 BoA July 11, 2022 Monday, July 11, 2022 12:53:47 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Case Number C15-2022-0060. 1609 Matthews Lane, 78745 BoA July 11, 2022 Name: Carmen & Doug Wehmeier Addresses affected. 7400 Albert Rd, 78745 Signature Date 7/10/22 Daytime telephone 415.290.2721 Comments: I object to the variance requested for 1609 Matthews Lane (C15-20200-00060). Remember as a kid asking for something from your parents but trying to ask them separately? I think CMBH2 is doing that. They didn’t get what they wanted from the ZAP so now they are asking the Board of Adjustment. This property was purchased in March 2021 by CMCBH2 Company LLC. Their initial zoning change request (C14-2021-0056) was opposed by the Matthews Lane Neighborhood Association (MLNA). With the assistance of Ann Kitchen’s office the MF-3 (and 14 homes) request was reduced to MF-2-CO district zoning with the conditional overlay for a maximum of 10 dwelling units, on second and third readings. It was approved at the July 29, 2021 meeting. During the negotiations with the MLNA, CMCBH2 and Ms. Victoria Haase assured Council Member Kitchen’s office and the ZAP that they were excited to build “really nice homes” within the setback and height requirements of MF-2-CO. Nothing was built. Shortly after the July 29, 2021, Council meeting, CMCBH2 put the property (with its new zoning) back on the market along with the building plans. It appears not to have sold and are now a variance is requested on the things they said were just fine a year ago. One of the primary objections to the dense development of this site was the pluvial runoff Item-8/33problem. Decreasing the setbacks will increase this problem on the property, the railroad tracks, and downstream as it drains into Williamson Creek. The current drought makes this hard to imagine but longtime residents in that low lying area have had water in their homes, and the City has bought up many properties along the creek. My other objection is that developers are “playing” the City of Austin and its residents. They have enough money to pay Ron Thrower and Associates twice to mislead Ann Kitchen’s office, neighbors, planning department staff, the ZAP and now the Board of Adjustment. They are now proposing larger 3 story buildings in an area of primarily one story homes. That is essentially the same as the original MF-3 zoning request, which the ZAP etc worked so hard to mitigate. If CMCBH2 had done their due diligence, then they knew the limitations of the property when they purchased it. I request that the Board of Adjustment deny this request in support of the work done by the ZAP, Ann Kitchen’s office, the planning staff and neighbors. Thank you, -- Carmen Wehmeier (415) 290-2721 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. Item-8/34Board of Adjustment 1609 Matthews Lane C15-2022-0060 Background to case and discussions between Ms. Haase and the Matthews Lane Neighborhood Association: The parcel was purchased in March 2021 (per TCAD). The Developer requests demolition of single family home and accessory buildings, and a zoning change to MF-3 to build up to 14 condominiums. City staff recommend MF-2 and two-story limit and up to 12 units. The 1609 Matthews Lane Zoning change request (C14-2021-0056) was discussed by the Matthews Lane Neighborhood Association (MLNA) Outreach Group on April 23 and May 14, 2021. The MLNA President, Eugene Sutton, approached Mr. Heimsath to discuss the project and was referred to Ms. Haase. Mr. Sutton contacted Ms. Haase to let her know that the MLNA was requesting a postponement of the case and to invite her to work with us in a non- adversarial way. MLNA began work on a valid petition opposing the zoning change. Ms. Haase joined MLNA Outreach Group meeting on May 21, 2021, via Zoom. She shared images of current zoning and why owner thinks MF-3 is reasonable. MLNA committee stated that we seek a conditional overlay limiting density to 6 single family or duplex units; maximum of two-story; and a sidewalk along Matthews Lane. Our request is consistent with the Imagine Austin plan which puts dense developments along traffic corridors, not in the middle of neighborhoods. Traffic on Matthews Lane is already dangerous for pedestrians, bicycles and vehicles. The property is on low lying ground and subject to flooding (photos attached). The proximity to the railroad and heritage trees also restrict density. There are over 200 new homes going into the MLNA area, many are high-end condominium style homes. This project would not diversify housing options. We are disappointed that the buyer chose not to complete his due diligence and approach the NA before closing on property. Ms. Haase stated that she couldn’t understand the fear behind neighborhoods’ responses to zoning changes. We responded that we weren’t fearful; we believe that the area has unique assets and want to be part of changes that sustain the whole community. June 19, 2021. Eugene Sutton shared the letter from Victoria Haase and his response to her. MLNA is supposed to be meeting with City Watershed people, Victoria and other city staff (see attached PDF with dates of other email and phone contacts). Ken Craig, from Council Member Ann Kitchen’s office, became involved in the back and forth between Ms. Haase, Mr. Heimsath and MLNA in June. The MF-2 CO Zoning change was finally approved by City Council on July 29, 2021. Item-8/35Item-8/36Item-8/37Item-8/38