Board of AdjustmentJuly 11, 2022

D-3 C15-2022-0057 GRANTED DS — original pdf

Backup
Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet D-3 DATE: Monday July 11, 2022 CASE NUMBER: C15-2022-0057 ___Y____Thomas Ates ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___Y____Barbara Mcarthur ___Y____Ryan Nill ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___-____Agustina Rodriguez OUT ___-____Richard Smith OUT ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___Y____Nicholl Wade ___-____Kelly Blume (Alternate) N/A ___Y____Carrie Waller (Alternate) ___Y____Marcel Gutierrez-Garza (Alternate) OWNER/APPLICANT: Aaron Seifert ADDRESS: 8114 CACHE DR VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section(s) 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum street side yard setback from 15 feet (required) to 5 feet (requested) in order to complete a shed in a “SF-3”, Single-Family Residence zoning district. BOARD’S DECISION: July 11, 2022 The public hearing was closed by Madam Chair Jessica Cohen, Board member Michael Von Ohlen motions to approve with condition that the variance only applies to the proposed structure (new shed) Board member Melissa Hawthorne seconds on a 11-0 vote; GRANTED WITH CONDITION THAT THE VARIANCE ONLY APPLIES TO THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE (NEW SHED). FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: other properties have a 5 foot setback on the side of their property, however the street side setback is 15 feet because of homes location which limits the buildable area in this lot, also unique to the property is the 40 foot easement. 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: a 40 foot easement on the back of this property, a tree with a critical root zone that don’t want to infringe upon, a retaining wall that would cause structural issues if built across it, for that reason need to be able to build within 15 foot setback that has been set by the city. (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: the drainage/utility easement is not in every backyard, it is specific to the property. 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: the structure will still be setback 5 feet from out property line, which is 15 feet from the street. ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison ____________________________ Jessica Cohen Madam Chair for