Board of AdjustmentFeb. 14, 2022

E-8 C15-2022-0017 GRANTED DS — original pdf

Backup
Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet E-8 DATE: Monday February 14, 2022 CASE NUMBER: C15-2022-0017 __Y_____Thomas Ates __Y_____Brooke Bailey __Y_____Jessica Cohen __Y_____Melissa Hawthorne __Y_____Barbara Mcarthur __-_____Rahm McDaniel OUT __Y_____Darryl Pruett __Y_____Agustina Rodriguez __Y_____Richard Smith __Y_____Michael Von Ohlen __-_____Nicholl Wade OUT __Y_____Kelly Blume (Alternate) __Y_____Carrie Waller (Alternate) __-_____Marcel Gutierrez-Garza (Alternate) APPLICANT: Sanjiv Kumar OWNER: Sanjiv Kumar ADDRESS: 1210 ANGELINA ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations)(D) to decrease the minimum lot size requirement from 5,750 square feet (required) to 1,129 square feet (requested) in order to erect a Single-Family residence in a “SF- 3-NP”, Single-Family-Neighborhood Plan zoning district (Central East Austin Neighborhood Plan). BOARD’S DECISION: The public hearing was closed by Madam Chair Jessica Cohen, Board Member Michael Von Ohlen motions to approve with a condition no STR-Short-term rental in ADU; Board Member Melissa Hawthorne seconds on a 11-0 vote; GRANTED WITH A CONDITION NO STR-SHORT-TERM RENTAL IN ADU. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: the minimum lot size (with small lot amnesty applied) is 2500 sqft more than twice this lot’s size and the lot has no value without the ability to construct a dwelling, it’s designated use is for a single family dwelling. 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: this is the smallest such tract in the vicinity (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: this is the smallest such tract in the vicinity 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: there are dwellings to the north and south of this proposed development the proposed front setbacks is in line with the setbacks of adjacent properties. ______________________________ ____________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison Jessica Cohen Chair for