E-2 C15-2021-0100 PRESENTATION

Board of Adjustment – Dec. 13, 2021

E-2 C15-2021-0100 PRESENTATION — original pdf

Backup

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF — Page 1 of 27 pages

Owner and development team is seeking a variance request to allow for a new construction build on a substandard lot located at 1003 Kinney Ave. Austin, TX 78704. Current lot size is 5,461 SF and minimum allowable site to build on per current SF-3 zoning is 5,750 SF. The hardship is the original full lot size of 10,928 SF when split into halves of 5,461 SF for our lot, and 5,468 for the adjacent ½ lot, does not meet the minimum site area required by current SF-3 Zoning. This hardship would not be able to be overcome without the approval of the BOA in our variance request. Without the variance request this lot would remain vacant as we have confirmed through our research and the option of obtaining a portion of the adjacent city owned alley was rejected by the COA. Original plat and our most current site plat are from 1896. However, our lot was split into two separate tax parcels with no updated plat in 1947. The deeds in our following presentation packet document this transfer of ownership from legal lot to substandard lot status with no plat update. This was also confirmed through the Travis County Tax Accessor’s Office. The Tax Parcel map and deed documents indicate this split. In addition to the conflicting lot history that split the lots without updating the plat, there was construction allowed on the adjacent 1/2 lot last approved by the COA in 2007. This new construction had a previous residence which was demolished with no variance required to build new on the lot. Subsequent building permit was obtained for 2007 and was confirmed with our COA contact Eric Thomas. In seeking our variance, we have researched two avenues in how to be able to build on our lot. One being the recommended avenue of seeking a 1995 plat exemption to apply for legal lot status and therefore not require a variance, and second requesting a variance through the BOA. There was a previous land status determination that was approved on our lot through the 1995 Rule Platting Exception that was granted on February 25, 2019 and included in our Advanced packet. We presented this information to our permit reviewers/supervisors for an E-2/1-PRESENTATIONavenue forward to build on our site, however the city of Austin planning department would not allow us to build on our lot with only that as documentation and requested we seek BOA approval through a variance to build on our lot. In addition to seeking formal approvals to build on our lot through the COA Planning and Zoning department, we have also corresponded with surrounding neighbors both supporters of our proposal as well as those in opposition despite the Zilker Neighborhood Association’s refusal to meet with us prior to our BOA hearing December 13. We contacted Lorraine, who was the opposing constituent at our BOA to coordinate a meeting with the Neighborhood Association, and there was no response given in setting a meeting, but a letter restating we seek adding to our lot to enlarge its size by absorbing a portion of the alley or seeking the land status determination as recommend by the BOA at our last meeting. As we’ve outlined above, we have explored the viable options to build on our lot and are requesting a variance from the BOA to approve building on our substandard lot. The design we have proposed is compliant with current COA planning and zoning codes with the one exception of the lot size. We have no open comments with the COA Planning and zoning department, and only require an approval from the BOA to build on our lot to have our permit approval. We value the time and consideration that the BOA has put into reviewing our case, and we humbly request the approval of this variance. Thank you, Ian M. Ellis, AIA, NCARB, RID (Owner/Developer) Ingrid Gonzalez Featherston, AIA, NOMA (Architect) E-2/2-PRESENTATIONADVANCED PACKET TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. VARIANCE REQUEST 1.1 EXISTING VACANT SUBSTANDARD LOT DEFINITION 1.2 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 1.3 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT RENDER PG 2-3 PG 4 PG 5 2. HARDSHIP 2.1 1003 KINNEY AVE LOT HISTORY DOCUMENTATION PG 6-13 3. RECOMMENDATIONS PURSUED 3.1 BOA - SEEKING A 1995 PLAT EXEMPTION COA CORRESPONDENCE DURING EXPEDITED REVIEW COA CORRESPONDENCE POST EXPEDITED REVIEW COA CORRESPONDENCE REGARDING ZONING INFORMATION PG 18 PG 14-15 PG 16-17 3.2 NA - PURCHASING ALLEY NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION CORRESPONDANCE COA CORRESPONDENCE REGARDING ALLEY ACCESS 4. SUPPLEMENT INFORMATION PG 19-20 PG 21 PG 22-25 KINNEY AVE BOA Advanced Packet Case Number 2021-000085 BA December 6, 2021 E-2/3-PRESENTATIONVARIANCE REQUESTED Owner and development team is seeking a variance request to allow for a new construction build on a substandard lot located at 1003 Kinney Ave. Austin, TX 78704. Current lot size is 5,461 SF and minimum allowable site to build is 5,750 SF. 2 PRESENTERS: DEVELOPER- IAN M. ELLIS, AIA, NCARB, RID KINNEY AVE BOA VARIANCE- CASE NUMBER 2021-000085 BA - December 06, 2021 E-2/4-PRESENTATIONEXISTING VACANT SUBSTANDARD LOT PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT (cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:8)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:8)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:8)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:8)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:8)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5) (cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5) (cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5) (cid:4)(cid:18) (cid:7)(cid:19) (cid:1)(cid:20)(cid:21) (cid:2)(cid:2)(cid:22) (cid:4)(cid:18) (cid:7)(cid:19) (cid:1)(cid:20)(cid:21) (cid:2)(cid:2)(cid:22) (cid:4)(cid:18) (cid:7)(cid:19) (cid:1)(cid:20)(cid:21) (cid:2)(cid:2)(cid:22) (cid:4)(cid:18) (cid:7)(cid:19) (cid:1)(cid:20)(cid:21) (cid:2)(cid:2)(cid:22) (cid:4)(cid:18)(cid:9)(cid:7)(cid:19)(cid:12)(cid:1)(cid:20)(cid:21)(cid:10)(cid:2)(cid:2)(cid:22) (62’) S 29°08’18”W 62.19’ 10’ SETBACK K C A B T E S ’ 5 ) ’ 8 8 ( ’ 8 6 . 7 8 E ” 8 4 ’ 8 2 ° 8 5 S BUILDABLE AREA 2,761 SF (cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:8)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:8)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:8)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:8)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5) (cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5) (cid:6)(cid:6) (cid:7)(cid:7)(cid:1) (cid:11) (cid:2)(cid:7) (cid:14) (cid:6)(cid:6)(cid:9)(cid:7)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:10)(cid:11)(cid:12)(cid:2)(cid:7)(cid:10)(cid:13)(cid:14) K C A B T E S ’ 5 ) ’ 8 8 ( ’ 3 6 . 8 8 W ” 6 5 ’ 3 1 ° 8 5 N 25’ FRONT YARD SETBACK (cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:8)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:8)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:8)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:8)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:8)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:8)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5) (cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5) (cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5) (cid:4)(cid:15) (cid:7)(cid:16) (cid:1)(cid:12)(cid:17) (cid:4)(cid:15)(cid:9)(cid:7)(cid:16)(cid:10)(cid:1)(cid:12)(cid:17) (62’) N 30°00’00”E 61.78’ EUCLID AVENUE SECTION B.2.A MIN. LOT SIZE= 5,750 SF EXISTING LOT SIZE= 5,461 SF HARDSHIP DEMONSTRATED IN LOT SIZE NOT BEING MIN. LOT SIZE REQUIRED FOR DEVELOPMENT. NEIGHBORING PROPER- TY OF SAME SIZE WAS LAST DEVELOPED IN 2007. REFERENCE SITE ORIGINAL DEED AND SUBSEQUENT DEED UPDATES. (cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:8)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:8)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:8)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:8)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:8)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5) (cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5) (cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5) (cid:4)(cid:20)(cid:12)(cid:7)(cid:21)(cid:14)(cid:1)(cid:22)(cid:23)(cid:10)(cid:2)(cid:2)(cid:24) (cid:4)(cid:20) (cid:7)(cid:21)(cid:14)(cid:1)(cid:22)(cid:23) (cid:2)(cid:2)(cid:24) (62’) S 29°08’18”W 62.19’ (cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11) (cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11) (cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11) (cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11) (cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11) (cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11) (cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11) (cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11) (cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11) (cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11) (cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11) (cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11) ) ’ 8 8 ( ’ 3 6 . 8 8 W ” 6 5 ’ 3 1 ° 8 5 N (cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3) (cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:8)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:8)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:8)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5) (cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:8)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5) (cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:5) (cid:6)(cid:6) (cid:7)(cid:7)(cid:1) (cid:14)(cid:2)(cid:7) (cid:15)(cid:16) (cid:6)(cid:6)(cid:12)(cid:7)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:10)(cid:13)(cid:14)(cid:2)(cid:7)(cid:10)(cid:15)(cid:16) (cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11) (cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11) (cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11) (cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11) (cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11) (cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11) (cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11) (cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11) (cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11) (cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11) (cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11) (cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11) (cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11) (cid:9) (cid:10)(cid:10) (cid:9)(cid:9) (cid:10)(cid:10) (cid:9)(cid:9) (cid:10)(cid:10)(cid:10) (cid:9)(cid:9) ) ’ 8 8 ( ’ 8 6 . 7 8 E ” 8 4 ’ 8 2 ° 8 5 S (cid:10)(cid:10) (cid:9)(cid:9) (cid:10)(cid:10) (cid:9)(cid:9) (cid:10)(cid:10)(cid:10) (cid:9)(cid:9) (cid:10)(cid:10) (cid:9)(cid:9) (cid:10)(cid:10) (cid:9)(cid:9) N (cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:2) EUCLID AVENUE N (62’) N 30°00’00”E 61.78’ SECTION B.2.A. MIN. LOT SIZE= 5,750 SF EXISTING LOT SIZE= 5,461 SF 3 PRESENTERS: DEVELOPER- IAN M. ELLIS, AIA, NCARB, RID KINNEY AVE BOA VARIANCE- CASE NUMBER 2021-000085 BA - December 06, 2021 E-2/5-PRESENTATIONPROPOSED DEVELOPMENT VARIANCE REQUEST Proposed development of a two story residence with single car garage and a 4 bedroom 3 bathroom home is designed to maintain the neighborhood scale. The design does not push the limits of the McMansion tent like neighborhing properties, and rather sets a lower datum by having lower floor to floor heights in order to reduce to overall scale of the home. The home design also does not infringe on the protected tree in the alley, and was designed to maximize the preservation of this tree canopy and view. Design as proposed meets all code standards and during expedited review did not require additional comment responses or clarifications. This urban infill home is providing much needed density within the Central Austin core fabric. As one supportive neighbor com- ments, the design does not propose an ADU nor does it try to utlize attic exemptions to increase the overall SF of the home and scale of the home so that if fits in better as a Single Family Residence on this street. Below are the applicable zoning codes that are design is compliant with. SETBACKS & HEIGHT* *** TOTALS AND PERCENTAGES LISTED APPLY TO OUR EXISTING SUBSTANDARD LOT AREA MAXIMUM HEIGHT MINIMUM SETBACKS FRONT YARD INTERIOR SIDE YARD REAR YARD 35’ 25’ 5’ 10’ ZONING SUBSTANDARD LOT- § 25-2-943 B.2 SECTION B.2. A MINIMUM LOT SIZE 5,750 SQ FT - EXISTING 5,461 SF VARIANCE REQUESTED SECTION B.2. B MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 50 FT - EXISTING 61’-7” COMPLIANT RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS - SF-3-NP SETBACK PLANES SIDE - 15’ ABOVE GRADE AT 45º REAR - 15’ ABOVE GRADE AT 45º SIDE WALL ARTICULATION MAX 36’ LENGTH COMPLIANT COMPLIANT COMPLIANT BUILDABLE AREA TOTAL LOT AREA IMPERVIOUS COVER - 45% 5,461 SF 2,394 SF (43.8%) COMPLIANT COMPLIANT FAR (ZONING 25-2 § 2.1) ** CALCULATION BASED ON GREATER OF .4:1 OR 2,300 SF 2,297 SF (> 2300 SF) 1ST FLOOR CONDITIONED 2ND FLOOR CONDITIONED 1,014 SF 1,262 SF GARAGE PORCH TOTAL 221 SF ( EXEMPT -200 SF) 105 SF ( EXEMPT) 2,297 SF COMPLIANT OWNER TEAM IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE REQUEST TO BUILD ON A SUBSTANDARD LOT. OUR EXISTING LOT SQUARE FOOTAGE DOES NOT CURRENTLY ALLOW FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE RE- QUEST. PROPOSED DESIGN AS INDICATED ON LEFT IS COMPLIANT WITH ALL COA ZONING AND BUILDING CODE AND COA STAFF IS READY TO APPROVE PERMIT PENDING BOA APPROVAL. SUPPLEMENT INFORMATION IS GIVEN THROUGHOUT PRESENTATION OUTLINING NEIGHBORHING PROPERTY THAT WAS CONSTRUCTED ON IN PREVIOUS YEARS IN ADDITION TO OUR LOT TECHNICALLY MEETING LAND STATUS DETERMINATION EXEMPTIONS. PROPOSED NEW AC PAD PROPOSED NEW AC PAD PROPOSED NEW POOL PAD PROPOSED NEW POOL PAD NEW FRENCH DRAIN NEW FRENCH DRAIN PROPOSED WOOD PROPOSED WOOD FENCE FENCE LINE OF UNDERGROUND LINE OF UNDERGROUND PIPED DOWNSPOUT PIPED DOWNSPOUT CONNECTION TO DAYLIGHT CONNECTION TO DAYLIGHT PROPOSED NEW PROPOSED NEW PROPOSED NEW ELECTRIC METER ELECTRIC METER PROPOSED NEW PROPOSED NEW PROPOSED NEW BUILDING FOOTPRINT BUILDING FOOTPRINT EXISTING WOOD FENCE EXISTING WOOD FENCE EXISTING WOOD FENCE TO BE REMOVED TO BE REMOVED PROPOSED WOOD PROPOSED WOOD FENCE FENCE CRZ CRZ 1/2 CRZ 1/2 CRZ 1/4 CRZ 1/4 CRZ 531' 531' A.A.G LOW PT A.A.G LOW PT A.A.G LOW PT 531'-0" 531'-0" X X X XX X XX X XX X XX X XX ' ' 8 8 6 6 . . 7 7 8 8 E E " " 88 8 44 4 8 8 2 2 ° ° 8 8 5 5 S S ' ' I I E E N N L L Y Y T T R RR E E P P O O R R P P X XX X XX X XX X XX X XX CCCCCCCCCLLLLLLLLCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC CL X XX DS DS DS DS K K C C A A B B T T E E S S D D R R A A Y Y R R O O R R E E T T N NN I I I I ' ' 5 5 E E O O E E O O E E O O SETBACK SETBACK 5’ 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 7' - 2 1/2" 7' - 2 1/2" E E O O E E O O E E O O E E O O 532' 532' " " 0 0 - - ' ' 5 5 2 2 E E O O 531.90 531.90 E E O O E E O E O EXISTING SIDEWALK TO REMAIN 9' - 3" 9' - 3" " 0 - ' 4 530.91 530.91 18" HACKBERRY 18" HACKBERRY PROPOSED WOOD FENCE PROPOSED WOOD FENCE X X X X S 29°08'18" W 62.19' S 29°08'18" W 62.19' S 29°08'18" W 62.19' S 29°08'18" W 62.19' S 29°08'18" W 62.19' S 29°08'18" W 62.19' X XX X PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE X X X X X X X X CONC SITE WALL CONC SITE WALL ’ 0 1 ROOF OVERHANG PROJECTION ROOF OVERHANG PROJECTION SECOND LEVEL PROJECTION SECOND LEVEL PROJECTION 10' REAR YARD SETBACK 10' REAR YARD SETBACK 10' REAR YARD SETBACK 10' REAR YARD SETBACK 10' REAR YARD SETBACK 12' - 9 7/8" 12' - 9 7/8" 532' 532' 12' - 0 1/8" 12' - 0 1/8" 532.32 532.32 X X CL CCLLLCCC K K C C A A B B T T E E S S 1 1 0 0 ' ' - - 0 0 " " X X X XXX X XXX EXISTING GRASS EXISTING GRASS ALLEY ALLEY ALLEY PROPOSED WOOD FENCE PROPOSED WOOD FENCE OPEN TRELLIS OPEN TRELLIS OPEN TRELLIS ABOVE ABOVE ABOVE NEIGHBORING PROPERTY LINE NEIGHBORING PROPERTY LINE " " 4 4 / / 1 1 4 4 - - ' ' 4 4 1 1 POOL POOL 2 STORY RESIDENCE 2 STORY RESIDENCE PROPOSED FFE = 533.16' FFE = 533.16' 2 STORY A.A.G = 531.72' A.A.G = 531.72' A.A.G = 531.72' RESIDENCE COA REQUIRED COA REQUIRED WD FENCE WD FENCE GATE GATE COVERED COVERED PLAY AREA PLAY AREA G G GRASS GRASS CONC SITE WALL CONC SITE WALL (cid:42) (cid:42) 5’ SETBACK SETBACK 5' - 0" 5' - 0" EXISTING GAS METER TO EXISTING GAS METER TO REMAIN REMAIN EXISTING GRASS EXISTING GRASS ALLEY ALLEY ALLEY DUMPSTER DUMPSTER PORTABLE PORTABLE TOILET TOILET 533' 533' " " 0 0 - - ' ' 5 5 2 2 K K C C A A B B T T E E S S STAGING LOCATIONS STAGING LOCATIONS PROPOSED WOOD FENCE PROPOSED WOOD FENCE 1/2 CRZ 1/2 CRZ 1/4 CRZ 1/4 CRZ 15" PECAN 15" PECAN 533.16 533.16 " " 2 2 / / 1 1 6 6 - - ' ' 0 0 1 1 PROPOSED CEMENT PAVERS WITH PROPOSED CEMENT PAVERS WITH GRAVEL INFILL, NOT TO EXTEND GRAVEL INFILL, NOT TO EXTEND BEYOND PROPERTY LINE BEYOND PROPERTY LINE ’ 5 2 N 30°00'00" E 61.78' N 30°00'00" E 61.78' N 30°00'00" E 61.78' N 30°00'00" E 61.78' N 30°00'00" E 61.78' PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE NEW CONCRETE NEW CONCRETE NEW CONCRETE LANDSCAPE WALL LANDSCAPE WALL 28' - 6 1/2" (cid:58)(cid:48) CRZ CRZ 1/4 CRZ 1/4 CRZ 1/4 CRZ 1/4 CRZ 22" ELM 22" ELM PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVERS WITH PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVERS WITH PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVERS WITH GRAVEL INFILL GRAVEL INFILL LINE OF UNDERGROUND LINE OF UNDERGROUND PIPED DOWNSPOUT CONNECTION TO DAYLIGHT PIPED DOWNSPOUT CONNECTION TO DAYLIGHT 1/2 CRZ 1/2 CRZ NEW FRENCH DRAIN NEW FRENCH DRAIN PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVERS WITH PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVERS WITH GRAVEL INFILL, NOT TO EXTEND GRAVEL INFILL, NOT TO EXTEND BEYOND SETBACK LINE BEYOND SETBACK LINE NEW FRENCH DRAIN NEW FRENCH DRAIN LINE OF UNDERGROUND LINE OF UNDERGROUND PIPED DOWNSPOUT CONNECTION TO DAYLIGHT PIPED DOWNSPOUT CONNECTION TO DAYLIGHT NEIGHBORING PROPERTY LINE NEIGHBORING PROPERTY LINE E O NEW DRIVEWAY APPROACH WITH CURB CUT TO MEET COA TYPE 1 DRIVEWAY STANDARD KINNEY AVENUE EXISTING WATER METER TO REMAIN 4 PRESENTERS: DEVELOPER- IAN M. ELLIS, AIA, NCARB, RID KINNEY AVE BOA VARIANCE- CASE NUMBER 2021-000085 BA - December 06, 2021 (cid:49)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:87)(cid:75) E-2/6-PRESENTATIONPROPOSED DESIGN 4BED 3 BATH 1 CAR GARAGE EXTERIOR RENDERINGS 5 PRESENTERS: DEVELOPER- IAN M. ELLIS, AIA, NCARB, RID KINNEY AVE BOA VARIANCE- CASE NUMBER 2021-000085 BA - December 06, 2021 E-2/7-PRESENTATIONHARDSHIP Conﬂ icting code regulations and plat documentation Due to conﬂ icting information, nothing can be built on 1003 Kinney Ave. 6 PRESENTERS: DEVELOPER- IAN M. ELLIS, AIA, NCARB, RID KINNEY AVE BOA VARIANCE- CASE NUMBER 2021-000085 BA - December 06, 2021 E-2/8-PRESENTATION1003 KINNEY AVE LOT HISTORY Owner team requested information via email on the orgiinal deed plat for the property from the Travis County Clerk Office. Original plat is dated from 1896 anc can be seen below. Highlighted lot in question can be seen below. Travis County Clerk’s Office and contact Servando Hernandez were able to confirm that the property has never been replatted or amended and that the deed and subsequent deed updates still reference the lot as the original plat. This finding is in conflict with the survey, as the survey only shows the property as a 1/2 lot. APPROXIMATE LOT LOCATION TO ORIGINAL PLAT RE: [CAUTION EXTERNAL] 1003 Kinney Ave: Plat Record History Request 1 message Ian Ellis Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 12:07 PM *+&$",&$+-&.(+&$/"’0+&1-2"’3$4",&$5&"5+&64$-6$7889$:(’’+4$-0+’,+$;-0+$’"6$<++’$&+5.-6+#$"&$-%+’#+#=$>",& #++#?5&+0(",1$#++#1$-’#$-$#++#$@.+#$(’$0".,%+AB8BC$5-)+A7DE$(’F7GE7H$12..$&+I+’/+$6;+$5&"5+&64$(’$-1$6;+ /,&&+’6$#++#=$J’$6;+$"&()(’-.$5.-6$&+/"&#+#$(’$0".,%+A7$5-)+A7K8$"I$6;+$5.-61$&+/"&#(’)$(’$L&-0(1$M",’64= Servando Hernandez < To: !""#$%"&’(’) Servando Hernandez N+1+-&/;$O+5-&6%+’6 L&-0(1$M",’64$M.+&PQ1$RS/+ 5501 Airport Blvd. Ste. B100 Austin, TX 78751 D7KACDBAG7CC$+T6=$9K88D !"#$%$U+&0-’#"$V+&’-’#+W$ &’()%$L,+1#-43$X"0+%<+&$G3$K8K7$78Y8C$Z[ *#%$ &+,-’.)%$N\Y$]MZ^LJRX$\_L\NXZ‘a$1003 Kinney AveY$*.-6$N+/"&#$V(16"&4$N+b,+16 !""#$["&’(’) L;-’P$4",$I"&$&+-/;(’)$",6$6"$6;+$L&-0(1$M",’64$M.+&PQ1$RS/+=$J$-%$’"6$1,&+$c;-6$4",$%+-’6$<4$5.-6$;(16"&43 ,1,-..4$5.-61$16-4$6;+$1-%+$&+)-&#.+11$(I$4",$/,6$6;+$."6$(’$;-.I$"&$-$0-&(-2"’$"I=$L;+$"’.4$c-4$6;-6$6;+$5.-6 /;-’)+1$-&+$(I$6;+$."6$c-1$F&+5.-6+#?-%+’#+#H=$JI$6;+$#++#$12..$&+I+&+’/+1$6;+$"&()(’-.$0".,%+?5-)+$Fd".,%+A7 *-)+A7K8$H$6;+’$(6$c-1$’+0+&$&+5.-6+#$"&$-%+’#+#=$JI$4",$;-0+$-’4$b,+12"’$5.+-1+$/"’6-/6$,1$-6$D7KACDBAG7CC= L;-’P1 Servando Hernandez N+1+-&/;$O+5-&6%+’6 7 PRESENTERS: DEVELOPER- IAN M. ELLIS, AIA, NCARB, RID KINNEY AVE BOA VARIANCE- CASE NUMBER 2021-000085 BA - December 06, 2021 E-2/9-PRESENTATION2019 COA APPROVED LAND STATUS DETERMINATION 8 PRESENTERS: DEVELOPER- IAN M. ELLIS, AIA, NCARB, RID KINNEY AVE BOA VARIANCE- CASE NUMBER 2021-000085 BA - December 06, 2021 E-2/10-PRESENTATION2019 COA APPROVED LAND STATUS DETERMINATION 9 PRESENTERS: DEVELOPER- IAN M. ELLIS, AIA, NCARB, RID KINNEY AVE BOA VARIANCE- CASE NUMBER 2021-000085 BA - December 06, 2021 E-2/11-PRESENTATION2019 COA APPROVED LAND STATUS DETERMINATION 10 PRESENTERS: DEVELOPER- IAN M. ELLIS, AIA, NCARB, RID KINNEY AVE BOA VARIANCE- CASE NUMBER 2021-000085 BA - December 06, 2021 E-2/12-PRESENTATIONFEBRUARY 1991 DEED 11 PRESENTERS: DEVELOPER- IAN M. ELLIS, AIA, NCARB, RID KINNEY AVE BOA VARIANCE- CASE NUMBER 2021-000085 BA - December 06, 2021 E-2/13-PRESENTATION1962 HALF LOT SALE 12 PRESENTERS: DEVELOPER- IAN M. ELLIS, AIA, NCARB, RID KINNEY AVE BOA VARIANCE- CASE NUMBER 2021-000085 BA - December 06, 2021 E-2/14-PRESENTATION1947 PARCELS DOCUMENTATION 13 PRESENTERS: DEVELOPER- IAN M. ELLIS, AIA, NCARB, RID KINNEY AVE BOA VARIANCE- CASE NUMBER 2021-000085 BA - December 06, 2021 E-2/15-PRESENTATIONRECCOMENDATIONS PURSUED 1. SEEKING A 1995 PLAT EXEMPTION 2. SEEKING ALLEY ACCESS 14 PRESENTERS: DEVELOPER- IAN M. ELLIS, AIA, NCARB, RID KINNEY AVE BOA VARIANCE- CASE NUMBER 2021-000085 BA - December 06, 2021 E-2/16-PRESENTATIONCOA CORRESPONDENCE DURING EXPEDITED REVIEW The Owner Team was able to locate a land status determination for the property that was submitted and ap- proved for the 1995 Rule Platting Exception submission dated February 25, 2019. Reference next page for Land Status Determination documentation. Owner Team confirmed with new COA reviewer that although we have documentation of a previous land status determination on the lot, they are still requiring us to request a variance through the BOA. Reference email. RE: 1003 Kinney Ave_attached COA Correspondence 1 message <Eric.Thomas@austintexas.gov>, Andrea Alvarez McVea, Jhermaine To: Ingrid Gonzalez !""#$%&’()"")* Ian Ellis Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 1:19 PM Jhermaine, "Thomas, Eric" +$,")-(.’#$/012$.3$4")0)5$678’(90:"($;(0,$<2".%:$12%1$%$9%(0%),’$0)#’’#$/0==$>’$(’?70(’#$@"($120:$="1A$<2’$="1 /%:$,")-57(’#$0)$BCDEA $ !"#$%$+)5(0#$!")F%=’F$G’%12’(:1")$H.%0=1"I &’()%$K’#)’:#%3*$L,1">’($MD*$EMEB$BBIEC$NO *#%$O,P’%*$Q2’(.%0)’$ +,%$+%)$OA$;==0:$ R &-./’,)%$1003 Kinney AveU%V%,2’#$WLN$W"((’:8")#’),’ %2$Q"2):")$ N)#(’%$N=9%(’F *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Attached you will find the correspondence we had with Anthony McBryde regarding our lot requirements for a substandard lot. We wanted to clarify with him any applicable codes and zoning regulations that would apply in addition to setbacks, FAR requirements, and subchapter F requirements. During this correspondence it was not mentioned to us that a BOA variance would be required to develop the lot. In addition to the correspondence we've also attached the original plat that was reviewed at our meeting this morning. We do not have any further updated plats from the property on hand. We'd like to clear this comment internally as we are in compliance with our proposed building design with the small updates that were shared at today's expedited review meeting. Please let us know the next steps after you meet internally with your team. Looking forward to hearing from you. Thank you, Ingrid Jhermaine McVea Zoning Plans Examiner, Expedited Plan Review City of Austin Development Services Department 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Dr, Austin, Texas 78752 Office: 512-974-2314 Please contact my direct supervisor with any kudos or concerns at$Adam.Smith@austintexas.gov. Senior Design Architect Ingrid Gonzalez Featherston, AIA, NOMA, RID PER CITY ORDINANCE: All individuals scheduling or accepting a meeting invitation with a City Official are requested to provide responses to the questions at the following link: DSD Visitor Log. Please note that all information provided is subject to public disclosure via DSD’s open data portal. For more information please visit: City of Austin Ordinance 2016-0922-005 | City Clerk’s website | City Clerk’s FAQ’s Matt Fajkus Architecture 512.432.5137 15 PRESENTERS: DEVELOPER- IAN M. ELLIS, AIA, NCARB, RID KINNEY AVE BOA VARIANCE- CASE NUMBER 2021-000085 BA - December 06, 2021 E-2/17-PRESENTATIONCOA CORRESPONDENCE POST EXPEDITED REVIEW Owner Team confirmed with new COA reviewer that although we have documentation of a previous land sta- tus determination on the lot approved from February 25, 1995, they are still requiring us to request a variance through the BOA. Reference email. RE: 1003 Kinney Avenue 1 message Thom Eric < To: Ian Ellis Cc: "Barr, Susan" Hi Ian, > > Ian Ellis <i Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 10:55 AM From: Ian Ellis Sent: Wednesday, Subject: Re: 1003 Kinney Avenue *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Yes, the email sent this morning may serve as a written explanation/letter that you can reference at the next Board of Adjustment meeting. Eric, You are correct in reading the email to mean that a single family residence cannot be built on the property without a variance. It is possible that a neighbor could purchase the lot and use a Unified Development Agreement to develop the new parcel as a single site, but I do not see any way the lot could be developed as a single site without a variance. Thanks for taking a look at this and for explaining the logic. Does your email satisfy the requested Code Interpretation Letter from the Zilker Neighborhood Association? Also, as we discussed during our phone call last week, could you please confirm that a variance is required to build anything on this property currently? Without a variance, the lot would remain vacant - currently due to the variance requirement, there is no possible way to have a reasonable use of the property, or to build a single family home, without the Board of Adjustment's approval of the minimum lot size variance. Thank you, Eric Thomas Residential Zoning Plans Examiner Supervisor, Residential Review City of Austin Development Services Department 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Dr, Austin, Texas 78752 Office: 512-974-7940 Ian M. Ellis, AIA, NCARB, RID Architect + Project Manager / Interior Designer / R&D 210.606.7880 Please contact my direct supervisor with any kudos or concerns at susan.barr@austintexas.gov PER CITY ORDINANCE: All individuals scheduling or accepting a meeting invitation with a City Official are requested to provide responses to the questions at the following link: DSD Visitor Log. Please note that all information provided is subject to public disclosure via DSD’s open data portal. For more information please visit: City of Austin Ordinance 2016-0922-005 | City Clerk’s website | City Clerk’s FAQ’s On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 10:12 AM Thomas, Eric <Eric.Thomas@austintexas.gov> wrote: Good morning Ian, This email is in regards to your Residential Plan Review application #21-144210 for 1003 Kinney Avenue. At the Board of Adjustment meeting on November 8, 2021, it was suggested that a “legal tract” determination, also 16 PRESENTERS: DEVELOPER- IAN M. ELLIS, AIA, NCARB, RID KINNEY AVE BOA VARIANCE- CASE NUMBER 2021-000085 BA - December 06, 2021 E-2/18-PRESENTATIONknown as a Land Status Determination, could negate the need for a variance from the requirements of the City of Austin’s Land Development Code (LDC) section 25-2-943 Substandard Lot. All a Land Status Determination does is exempt a particular tract from the requirement to submit a plat; it does not attest to the legality of existing or future development on the property. The current lot contains roughly 5,450 square feet of area. 5,750 square feet is the minimum lot area for the zoning classification per LDC section 25-2-492 Site Development Regulations. Since this lot does not meet the minimum lot size requirements of 25-2-492, Residential Plan Review looks at section 25-2-943 Substandard Lot to see if the lot qualifies for the 4,000 minimum lot size. The original plat shows two lots with a total area of 10,912 square feet. The earliest deed on record, showing the two current small lots, is from September of 1947. The date a substandard lot needs to be recorded with the County, so that it qualifies under the provisions of LDC section 25-2-943 (B)(1), is March 15, 1946. Since the earliest deed record is from September of 1947, the minimum lot area requirement is 5,750 square feet per item (B) (2) of 25-2-943. Because of this, a variance to minimum lot size is required in order to develop the property for a single family use. Thank you, Eric Thomas Residential Zoning Plans Examiner Supervisor, Residential Review City of Austin Development Services Department 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Dr, Austin, Texas 78752 Office: 512-974-7940 Please contact my direct supervisor with any kudos or concerns at susan.barr@austintexas.gov PER CITY ORDINANCE: All individuals scheduling or accepting a meeting invitation with a City Official are requested to provide responses to the questions at the following link: DSD Visitor Log. Please note that all information provided is subject to public disclosure via DSD’s open data portal. For more information please visit: City of Austin Ordinance 2016-0922-005 | City Clerk’s website | City Clerk’s FAQ’s !"#$%&’()This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to 17 PRESENTERS: DEVELOPER- IAN M. ELLIS, AIA, NCARB, RID KINNEY AVE BOA VARIANCE- CASE NUMBER 2021-000085 BA - December 06, 2021 E-2/19-PRESENTATIONCOA CORRESPONDENCE REQUESTING ZONING INFORMATION Owner and Architect Team originally contacted the city of Austin to research applicable zoning information to the property. COA contact Anthony McBryde provided information on small lot amnesty and substandard lot, but no additional information on how to move forward if the lot were to be developed. Owner and Architect team also provided original plat to COA for further clarification of lot requirements, but no clarificaiton was provided. Cor- respondence included in email below. 18 PRESENTERS: DEVELOPER- IAN M. ELLIS, AIA, NCARB, RID KINNEY AVE BOA VARIANCE- CASE NUMBER 2021-000085 BA - December 06, 2021 E-2/20-PRESENTATIONNEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION CORRESPONDENCE Owner team has corresponded with Neighborhood Association and requested their formal comments regarding next steps as it is related to developing the property. See provided email. Neighborhood Association recommends that our team follow the BOA recommendation to explore the route of seeking a land status determination. The Neighborhood Association also provided additional information to the other half of our original whole lot. Information for adjacent property also included development of that substandard lot in 2007. Adjacent lot is of the same size and dimension as 1003 Kinney Avenue. One of the neighborhood recommendations in addition to seek- ing a land status determination was reviewing the potential of aquiring the alley. This was denied by the COA. See COA correspondence. On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 4:27 PM Lorraine Atherton : !"#$%&&’() *+,-"+$.+$(+/$01$2$3++456)$1&+2(+$62/7+"$/7+$’5,-"324-5$"+80+(/+9$:;$<’=+$>72’"$?2./7-"5$259$/7+$-/7+" :-2"9$3+3:+"(# @-"$;-0"$=-5A+5’+5=+)$.+$72A+$2B2=7+9$/7+$(+=4-5$-,$=-9+$/72/$<>$?2./7-"5$"+,+"+5=+9)$(+=4-5$CDECEF) 2&-56$.’/7$/7+$CGHI$&259$(/2/0($9+/+"3’524-5$,-"$;-0"$1"-1+"/;$J’5=&09’56$/7+$HIKC$.2/+"$(+"A’=+$1+"3’/L) 259$/7+$CGGK$"+(’9+542&$1+"3’/$211&’=24-5$211"-A+9$,-"$HGGH$M’55+;# N7+$HIKC$.2/+"$(+"A’=+$1+"3’/$=-5O"3($/72/$:-/7$1"-1+"4+()$HGGH$259$HGGP$M’55+;)$.+"+$’5$/7+’"$=0""+5/ =-5O60"24-5$JD)FDK$(,$+2=7L$’5$HIKC)$3++456$/7+$"+80’"+3+5/($-,$CDECEFJ>L)$259$/72/$/7+;$30(/$72A+$:++5 (0:9’A’9+9$(’30&/25+-0(&;#$N7+$9+3-&’4-5$259$:0’&9’56$1+"3’/($211"-A+9$,-"$HGGH$M’55+;$’5$CGGK$"2’(+$/7+ 80+(4-5()$Q7;$9’9$/7+$>’/;$211"-A+$/7+$5+.$=-5(/"0=4-5$2/$HGGH$M’55+;$.’/7-0/$2$A2"’25=+)$259$.7;$’($2 A2"’25=+$5-.$"+80’"+9$’5$2112"+5/&;$’9+54=2&$=’"=03(/25=+($2/$HGGP$M’55+;R S’A+5$/7’($+A’9+5=+)$.+$2"+$’5=&’5+9$/-$26"++$.’/7$<>$?2./7-"5$/72/$2$A2"’25=+$1"-:2:&;$(7-0&9$5-/$:+ "+80’"+9# T&+2(+$:"’56$/7’($01$.’/7$;-0"$=2(+$32526+"$259$2(U$,-"$2$."’B+5$+V1&2524-5$J=-9+$’5/+"1"+/24-5$&+B+"L$/72/ ;-0$=25$(0:3’/$/-$/7+$*-2"9$-,$W9X0(/3+5/#$Y,$/7+$=2(+$32526+"$9+=’9+($/72/$HGGP$M’55+;$9-+($5-/$5++9$2 A2"’25=+)$/7+5$/7+"+$’($5-$"+2(-5$,-"$0($/-$3++/#$Y,$/7+$=2(+$32526+"$(4=U($.’/7$/7+$A2"’25=+$"+80’"+3+5/) /7+$Z[W$\-5’56$=-33’B++$J5-/$/-$3+54-5$/7+$*-WL$.’&&$.25/$/-$059+"(/259$.7;# N725U() ]-""2’5+$W/7+"/-5 @-"$/7+$Z[W$Z-5’56$>-33’B++ $ Re: 1003 Kinney Avenue 1 message Ian Ellis Lorraine, Thanks for the response and documents! Feel free to call me Ian, and please let me know if you have a preference as to how I may address you. To begin, I want to say we truly weren't aware a meeting with ZNA would be customary or required, so our apologies for missing out on that. We did however sincerely introduce ourselves to some of the neighbors, and I have personally contacted those that provided support and opposition letters for our hearing. We're definitely not trying to sneak anything past anyone - our team's reputation in Austin is simply too good to tarnish. As for 1001 Kinney, we already had those documents and confirmed with COA that their home's construction was indeed not subject to a BOA variance as you have noted. Oddly enough, if you add 1001 and 1003's property areas, you don't get back to the original amount of the whole lot. Property is funny that way... Similarly, we already had the Land Status Determination for our property, which COA has already seen. So the question of why do we need a variance vs why did 1001 not need one has already been posed to the COA review staff. One particular thing to note is that the property was never subdivided after the original 1896 plat - we confirmed this with the Country Records department, and with doing deed transaction and title searches back to the original sale of the land. The property was however sold as 2 separate tax parcels, which does not trigger re-plat, does not constitute a resubdivision, nor is it an amendment to the original plat. All of this information COA has as well. Tax parcel map is attached here for your reference, showing the only resubdivided lots of Block 1. You had also asked specifically if the City would vacate, abandon, or sell the alley. They will not, and attached is the email from their department detailing that. Similarly, even if they could vacate, abandon, or sell a portion of the alley to us, we would not be able to build or use it for access, due to the protected tree, and I am certain we would be met with significant opposition from other neighbors that want to preserve the alley as it currently is. It's really nice, I totally understand how pleasant it is to be able to walk from a back yard through there at any time. Our Building Permit Reviewer is unfortunately no longer working in that role, so I have already escalated these questions from the Board to his supervisors, Eric Thomas and Susan Barr. They have already watched the BOA hearing and were pretty confused themselves as to what the board was suggesting, so they will be meeting Tuesday to discuss whether or not they still believe a Variance is required. I will provide you with an update of their conversation once it's available. Thanks again for your time and the considerate email. Ian M. Ellis, AIA, NCARB, RID Architect + Project Manager / Interior Designer / R&D 210.606.7880 19 PRESENTERS: DEVELOPER- IAN M. ELLIS, AIA, NCARB, RID KINNEY AVE BOA VARIANCE- CASE NUMBER 2021-000085 BA - December 06, 2021 E-2/21-PRESENTATIONNEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION CORRESPONDENCE From: Ian Ellis Sent: Tuesday, November 9, 2021 12:11 PM To: Cc: Ingrid Gonzalez Featherston; Sarah Johnson; Andrea Alvarez; Matt Fajkus; Mark harries; Wes Wigginton Subject: 1003 Kinney Avenue Lorraine, Thank you for participating in the hearing regarding our proposed variance to construct a new home at 1003 Kinney. As encouraged by your testimony and the Board, we would be happy to meet with you and the association to discuss our project, hear you out, and answer any questions you may have. I was hoping we would have time to meet and talk after the hearing but we missed you on your way out - if this is not the best contact information, please let us know where to send communications. CC'd here is the team for this project including the architect, builder, and co-owners. Are there any days/times that are already scheduled that we could join to meet, or would you prefer to schedule a special time? We are happy to chat in person, or over zoom if that's preferred. We understand the next ZNA executive committee meeting is December 6, and we could attend and chat then as well if you prefer. Please let us know how you would like to proceed. Thanks very much, Ian and team. Ian M. Ellis, AIA, NCARB, RID Architect + Project Manager / Interior Designer / R&D 210.606.7880 2 attachments Tax Parcel Map.pdf 769K EMAIL 1 Alley Vacate Denial.pdf 126K 20 PRESENTERS: DEVELOPER- IAN M. ELLIS, AIA, NCARB, RID KINNEY AVE BOA VARIANCE- CASE NUMBER 2021-000085 BA - December 06, 2021 E-2/22-PRESENTATIONCOA CORRESPONDENCE REQUESTING ALLEY ACCESS Owner team originally requested for the COA to vacate the alley and allow for our property to use it as vehicle access to the property. This was denied per the email to the right. They also requested the removal of a protected tree within the alley to allow for vehicular access and use of the alley, but this too was denied. See email corre- spondence below. One of the neighborhood recommendations in addition to seeking a land status determination was reviewing the potential of aquiring the alley. This was denied by the COA. See COA correspondence. RE: 1003 Kinney 1 message Olsen, Dillon To: !"#$%&’( RE: 1003 Kinney Ave - Grass Alley Question. 1 message > Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 2:08 PM West, Samuel To: Ian Ellis !"#$ !%&’%()%*#+,-’."#+&#/%&0%"%1"2"34#%40%-&/5.%40%6")%&’%-,7*,’.,+%,1,-)4#,%654%.4*25,’%.5,%-&/5.%40%6")%5"’%"%’") &#%.5,%-,7*,’.8 Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 4:43 PM 95,%:*;<&2%=4->’%?,@"-.(,#.%&’%"’>,+%&0%6,%%64*<+%1"2".,%.5,%-&/5.%40%6")8%!#%.5&’%2"’,%6,%64*<+%4;A,2.%.4%.5, -&/5.%40%6")%;,&#/%1"2".,+%;,2"*’,%&.%%&’%*’,%04-%"22,’’8 95,%:*;<&2%=4->’%?,@"-.(,#.%5"’%#4%@<"#’%.4%&(@-41,%.5,%"<<,)8 !%54@,%.5&’%"#’6,-’%)4*-%7*,’34#’8 )*&’+$#,-$.,/$#,-/$0&1"’2"$345*$5*46$7$%$8462-66"8$5*"$0,5"’1&9$&99"#$-0:/&8"$345*$&$."3$2,3,/+"/6; 95"#>%)4* %5$&00"&/6$5*&5$64’2"$5*"/"$46$&9/"&8#$&$2-/<=2-5$&’8$8/4>"3&#$345*4’$5*"$0/4>&5"$0/,0"/5#($/"?,>&9$,.$& @/,5"25"8$)/""$A<#$4?0&25B$4’$&$2-//"’59#$’&5-/&9$&/"&$345*4’$5*"$C45#$DEF$2&’’,5$<"$2,’648"/"8$’"2"66&/#$5, -6"G&22"66$5*"$0/,0"/5#; )*"$0/,0,6"8$/"?,>&9$3,-98$94+"9#$<"$/"H"25"8$4’$/">4"3($&6$/"&6,’&<9"$-6"G&22"66$46’I5$4’*4<45"8$<#$5*" @/,5"25"8$)/""; %$*,0"$5*46$*"906($&’8$09"&6"$9"5$?"$+’,3$4.$#,-$*&>"$J-"61,’6$:,4’:$.,/3&/8; )*&’+$#,-( Dillon Olsen | Environmental Review Specialist Sr City Arborist Program, Community Tree Preservation Division City of Austin Development Services Department 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Dr, Austin, Texas 78752 Office: (512)974-2515 B"(*,<%=,’. C&.)%40%D*’3# :*;<&2%=4->’%?,@"-.(,#. EF2,%40%C&.)%G#/&#,,- :-4A,2.%C44-+&#".4- HIJKLMNKOMMH % % % Sam, !"#$%%!"#%G<<&’%P("&< &’()%%S4#+")$%T,;-*"-)%UI$%JUJI%LQVO%DS *#%%=,’.$%B"(*,<% &+,-’.)%%Y,Q%1003 Kinney Ave%K%Z-"’’%D<<,)%[*,’34#8 Thanks again for the call and discussion on this alley Friday. 21 PRESENTERS: DEVELOPER- IAN M. ELLIS, AIA, NCARB, RID KINNEY AVE BOA VARIANCE- CASE NUMBER 2021-000085 BA - December 06, 2021 E-2/23-PRESENTATIONSUPPLEMENT INFORMATION 22 PRESENTERS: DEVELOPER- IAN M. ELLIS, AIA, NCARB, RID KINNEY AVE BOA VARIANCE- CASE NUMBER 2021-000085 BA - December 06, 2021 E-2/24-PRESENTATION• VIEWS LOOKING TOWARDS E SIDE OF KINNEY AVENUE • 2-STORY AND 1-STORY HOMES ARE THE STANDARD • MIXTURE OF NEW CONSTRUCTION AND EXISTING ORIGINAL HOMES SITE NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT 23 PRESENTERS: DEVELOPER- IAN M. ELLIS, AIA, NCARB, RID KINNEY AVE BOA VARIANCE- CASE NUMBER 2021-000085 BA - December 06, 2021 E-2/25-PRESENTATION• VIEWS LOOKING TOWARDS E SIDE OF KINNEY AVENUE (TO ROW) & W SIDE OF KINNEY (BOTTOM ROW) • SOME VACANT LOTS ON KINNEY AVE • MULTI-FAMILY ON KINNEY AVE TOWARDS INTERSECTION OF MARGARET ST & KINNEY AVE NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT 24 PRESENTERS: DEVELOPER- IAN M. ELLIS, AIA, NCARB, RID KINNEY AVE BOA VARIANCE- CASE NUMBER 2021-000085 BA - December 06, 2021 E-2/26-PRESENTATION• DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED AT 1003 KINNEY AVE IS ADJACENT TO NEARBY S LAMAR UNION • MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT CAN BE FOUND AT S LAMAR UNION AS WELL AS ON THE S END OF KINNEY AVENUE AT THE MARGA- • PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 1003 KINNEY AVE WOULD MAINTAIN CURRENT NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT AND SCALE IN TERMS RET ST. INTERSECTION OF BUILDING HT AND SCALE SITE N KINNEY AVE SITE ALLEY N KINNEY AVE N T R E A D W ELL ST S KINNEY AVE S LAMAR BLVD S KINNEY AVE SF RESIDENTIAL MF RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL SF RESIDENTIAL PROPOSED RESIDENCE MF RESIDENTIAL EXISTING COA GRASS ALLEY COMMERCIAL SITE MAPPING 25 PRESENTERS: DEVELOPER- IAN M. ELLIS, AIA, NCARB, RID KINNEY AVE BOA VARIANCE- CASE NUMBER 2021-000085 BA - December 06, 2021 E-2/27-PRESENTATION