Board of AdjustmentJuly 13, 2020

C15-2020-0020 DENIED DS — original pdf

Backup
Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet DATE: Monday July 13, 2020 CASE NUMBER: C15-2020-0020 ITEM # G-1 ___-____Brooke Bailey OUT ___N____Jessica Cohen ___-____Ada Corral OUT ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___-____William Hodge ABSTAINED ___Y____Don Leighton-Burwell ___Y____Rahm McDaniel ___N____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Veronica Rivera ___Y____Yasmine Smith ___N____Michael Von Ohlen ___N____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___N____Martha Gonzalez (Alternate) OWNER/APPLICANT: Durham Trading Partners XII, LLC ADDRESS: 1401 3RD ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum interior side setback from 5 feet (required) to 2.77 feet (requested) in order to complete a Single-Family residence in an “SF-3-NP”, Single-Family Residence-Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (East Cesar Chavez Neighborhood Plan) Note: currently under construction, layout error BOARD’S DECISION: BOA meeting April 13, 2020 CANCELLED MEETING; MAY 11 2020 The public hearing was closed by Chair Don Leighton-Burwell, Board Member Michael Von Ohlen motions to postpone to June 8, 2020, Board Member Rahm McDaniel seconds on a 10-1 vote (Board member Darryl Pruett nay, William Hodge abstained); POSTPONED TO JUNE 8, 2020. June 2020 The public hearing was closed by Chair Don Leighton-Burwell, Board Member Don Leighton-Burwell motions to Deny, Board Member Michael Von Ohlen seconds on a 10-1 vote (Board member Veronica Rivera nay and William Hodge abstained); DENIED. RECONSIDERATION REQUEST: July 13, 2020 Board member Melissa Hawthorne motions to reconsider the reconsideration request, Board member Rahm McDaniel seconds on 5-5 votes (Board members Jessica Cohen, Darryl Pruett, Michael Von Ohlen, Kelly Blume and Martha Gonzalez nay); RECONSIDERATION REQUEST DENIED. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: ______________________________ ____________________________ Elanie Ramirez Executive Liaison Don Leighton-Burwell Chairman Diana Ramirez