Versión en español a continuación. Board of Adjustment MINUTES January 11, 2021 Board of Adjustment to be held January 11, 2021 with Social Distancing Modifications Public comment will be allowed via telephone; no in-person input will be allowed. All speakers must register in advance (January 10, 2021 by noon). All public comment will occur at the beginning of the meeting. To speak remotely at the January 11, 2021 Board of Adjustment Meeting, members of the public must: •Call or email the board liaison at 512-974-2202 or elaine.ramirez@austintexas.gov no later than noon, (January 10, 2021 the day before the meeting). The following information is required: speaker name, item number(s) they wish to speak on, whether they are for/against/neutral, email address and telephone number (must be the same number that will be used to call into the meeting). •Once a request to speak has been made to the board liaison, the information to call on the day of the scheduled meeting will be provided either by email or phone call. •Speakers must call in at least 15 minutes prior to meeting start time in order to speak, late callers will not be accepted and will not be able to speak. •Speakers will be placed in a queue until their time to speak. •Handouts or other information may be emailed to elaine.ramirez@austintexas.gov by noon the day before the scheduled meeting. This information will be provided to Board and Commission members in advance of the meeting. •If the meeting is broadcast live, it may be viewed here: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live A-1/1 Minutos del Board of Adjustment FECHA de la reunion (January 11, 2021) La junta se llevará con modificaciones de distanciamiento social Se permitirán comentarios públicos por teléfono; no se permitirá ninguna entrada en persona. Todos los oradores deben registrarse con anticipación (January 10, 2021 antes del mediodía). Todos los comentarios públicos se producirán al comienzo de la reunión. Para hablar de forma remota en la reunión, los miembros del público deben: • Llame o envíe un correo electrónico al enlace de junta en 512-974-2202 o elaine.ramirez@austintexas.gov a más tardar al mediodía (January 10, 2021 el día antes de la reunión). Se requiere la siguiente información: nombre del orador, número (s) de artículo sobre el que desean hablar, si están a favor / en contra / neutral, dirección de correo electrónico (opcional) y un número de teléfono (debe ser el número que se utilizará para llamar …
Versión en español a continuación. Board of Adjustment Meeting February 8, 2021 Board of Adjustment to be held February 8, 2021 with Social Distancing Modifications Public comment will be allowed via telephone; no in-person input will be allowed. All speakers must register in advance (February 7, 2021 by noon). All public comment will occur at the beginning of the meeting. To speak remotely at the February 8, 2021 Board of Adjustment Meeting, members of the public must: •Call or email the board liaison at 512-974-2202 or elaine.ramirez@austintexas.gov no later than noon, (February 7, 2021 the day before the meeting). The following information is required: speaker name, item number(s) they wish to speak on, whether they are for/against/neutral, email address and telephone number (must be the same number that will be used to call into the meeting). •Once a request to speak has been made to the board liaison, the information to call on the day of the scheduled meeting will be provided either by email or phone call. •Speakers must call in at least 15 minutes prior to meeting start time in order to speak, late callers will not be accepted and will not be able to speak. •Speakers will be placed in a queue until their time to speak. •Handouts or other information may be emailed to elaine.ramirez@austintexas.gov by noon the day before the scheduled meeting. This information will be provided to Board and Commission members in advance of the meeting. •If the meeting is broadcast live, it may be viewed here: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Reunión del Board of Adjustment la FECHA de la reunion (February 8, 2021) La junta se llevará con modificaciones de distanciamiento social Se permitirán comentarios públicos por teléfono; no se permitirá ninguna entrada en persona. Todos los oradores deben registrarse con anticipación (February 7, 2021 antes del mediodía). Todos los comentarios públicos se producirán al comienzo de la reunión. Para hablar de forma remota en la reunion February 8, 2021, los miembros del público deben: junta en 512-974-2202 o • Llame o envíe un correo electrónico al enlace de elaine.ramirez@austintexas.gov a más tardar al mediodía (February 7, 2021 el día antes de la reunión). Se requiere la siguiente información: nombre del orador, número (s) de artículo sobre el que desean hablar, si están a favor / en contra / neutral, dirección de correo electrónico (opcional) y un número de teléfono (debe ser el número que se …
BOA INTERPRETATION APPEAL COVERSHEET CASE: C15-2021-0009 BOA DATE: February 8th, 2021 ADDRESS: 314 & 316 W 34th St APPELLANT: Mary Ingle COUNCIL DISTRICT: 9 AGENT: Robert Levinski ZONING: SF-3-NCCD-NP (NUNA) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 8 BLK 5 OLT 77 DIV D BUDDINGTON SUBD APPEAL REQUEST: an appeal challenging staff decision in regards to the number of parking spaces. SUMMARY: any proposed development must comply with the provisions of the NCCD ISSUES: misapplication of the zoning requirements for the properties. ZONING LAND USES Site North South East West SF-3-NCCD-NP SF-3-NCCD-NP SF-3-NCCD-NP SF-3-NCCD-NP SF-3-NCCD-NP Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District Austin Lost and Found Pets Austin Neighborhoods Council Bike Austin CANPAC (Central Austin Neigh Plan Area Committee) Central Austin Community Development Corporation Central Austin Urbanists Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Homeless Neighborhood Association Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation North University Neighborhood Association North University Neighborhood Association Development Review Committee Preservation Austin SELTexas Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group C-1/1 M AID E N E P U L A D A U G 33R D W H E E L E R 38T H 37T H 35T H 35T H E M O H R A D E C 34T H B M O C S LIP 33RD AY W D E E P S 33R D H T U R F L HIL P M E H H E M P HILL 32ND ! ! ± SUBJECT TRACT PENDING CASE ! ! ! ! ZONING BOUNDARY NOTIFICATIONS CASE#: LOCATION: C15-2021-0009 314 & 316 W 34TH STREET This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and represents only the approximate relative location of property boundaries. 1 " = 208 ' This product has been produced by CTM for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. C-1/2 Board of Adjustment Interpretations Application Appeal of an Administrative Decision - - - For Office Use Only Case # __________________ ROW # ___________________ Tax # ____________________ Section 1: Applicant Statement Street Address: __________________________________________________________________ 314 & 316 W 34th Street ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________ _____________________________ _________________________________ _____________________________ SF-3-NCCD-NP ___________________________________________________________________ Robert Levinski ________________________________________________ Mary Ingle, Mark Feist, et al. (see attached letter) ________________________________________________ January 22 2021 | Board of Adjustment Interpretations Application 6/24/20 | Page 2 …
APPEAL OF BUILDING PERMITS 2 0 1 9 - 2 2 8 1 0 4 & 2 0 2 0 - 0 3 6 2 2 9 ( 3 1 4 & 3 1 6 W 3 4 T H S T R E E T ) Board of Adjustment, February 8, 2021 Presentation by Appellant Appellants Mary Ingle, Mark Feist, et al. Represented by Bobby Levinski, Attorney C-1/PRESENTATION-1 PROPOSED BUILDINGS • Subject properties are located within boundaries of NUNA NCCD • NCCDs are zoning overlays that modify the use and site development regulations of the Land Development Code • Two permits (314 & 316 W 34th Street) are mirror images of each other • Two-Family Residential Uses • Demolition of Front Units for New Primary Residences • Maintaining/Remodeling Back Units (each 2 beds; 2 baths) • Each new primary residence will have 4 bedrooms & 7 bathrooms (as well as habitable attic space) • Total of 6 bedrooms & 9 bathrooms (per site) • Four parking spaces provided (per site) C-1/PRESENTATION-2 APPLICABLE ZONING PROVISION there are at “This section applies to a duplex or two-family five residential use if bathrooms in all buildings in which the use is located. An additional parking space is required for each new full bathroom constructed on the property.” least - NUNA NCCD, Part 6, Sec. 7(j) C-1/PRESENTATION-3 PERMIT HISTORY • Original Permit Application: Applicant intended to construct 5 full bathrooms and 2 half bathrooms in primary residence • 10/9/20: • 11/3/20: Neighbors pointed out to City staff that the proposed building permits were under-parked, pursuant to NUNA NCCD After consulting with City legal, City staff agreed that NUNA NCCD should apply and permits were under-parked • Revised Permit: Applicant revised permit by deleting (literally crossing out) two showers from plans “Converting” two of the new full baths into half baths But, space for showers (and all else) remains on plans C-1/PRESENTATION-4 PERMIT HISTORY • 12/15/20: • 12/28/20: • 1/8/21: • 1/17/21: Staff approves revised plans but again with only 4 parking spaces, citing Urban Core Parking Reduction Neighborhood appeals permit based on wrongful application of Urban Core Parking Reduction Neighborhood meets with staff, including Development Officer Brent Lloyd to discuss appeal Development Officer writes e-mail agreeing with Neighborhood that Urban Core Parking Reduction wrongfully applied—yet, doesn’t repeal building permits City staff comes up with a new interpretation C-1/PRESENTATION-5 CITY STAFF’S 4 TH INTERPRETATION …
To: From: Chair Leighton-Burwell Board of Adjustment Members Brent Lloyd Development Services Department Development Officer Date: February 1, 2021 Subject: Appeal of Building Plans Approved for Two-Family Residential Use at: 314 & 316 West 34th Street [Permit Nos. 2019-228104 & 2020-036229] The matter before the Board of Adjustment (“BOA”) is an administrative appeal challenging approval of revised building plans approved by the Development Services Department (“DSD”) on December 15, 2020, for a two-family residential use within the area covered by the North University Neighborhood Conservation Combining District (“NCCD”) (click here for ordinance text). The revised plans approved for both structures are attached for reference. Procedural Requirements for Appeal The appeal was timely filed by the Appellants on January 4, 2021, and is properly before the BOA for consideration. In acting on the appeal, the BOA may uphold, modify, or reverse the decision approving the revised building plans, as provided in City Code Sec. 25-1-192, based on whether they comply with applicable zoning regulations. While the appeal remains pending, building permits are suspended per City Code Sec. 25-1-187 and further action is stayed. Following resolution of the appeal, DSD will abide by the BOA’s interpretation of the applicable regulations both for the two applications at issue in this case and future applications involving the North University NCCD parking requirements. Summary of Issues & NCCD Provisions The primary issue before the Board can be summarized as follows: Under the North University NCCD, if an existing single-family use is converted into a two- family residential use by adding a second structure, how many onsite parking spaces are required where the existing structure has two bathrooms and the new structure includes three bathrooms? C-1/PRESENTATON-STAFF REP-1 As explained in more detail below, DSD staff approved the application with a total of four onsite parking spaces: The two spaces required by Chapter 25-6, Appendix A, of the Land Development Code, plus an additional two spaces. The appellants argue that five spaces were required and, therefore, that the permits were approved in error. The issue hinges on the following parking requirements imposed under Paragraphs J & K of the North University NCCD, at page 22: j. This section applies to a duplex or two-family residential use if there are at least five bathrooms in all buildings in which the use is located. An additional parking space is required for each new full bathroom constructed on the property. …
BOA SIGN REVIEW COVERSHEET CASE: C16-2021-0005 BOA DATE: February 8th, 2021 ADDRESS: 2237 W. Braker Ln OWNER: Michael Mahoney COUNCIL DISTRICT: 4 AGENT: Shana Downs ZONING: NBG-NP (North Burnet/Gateway) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 0.2538AC OF LOT 2 BLK B KRAMER LANE 65 SEC 1 RESUB OF LOT 10 THE (PRORATE 1/1/19 TO 9/12/19) VARIANCE REQUEST: allow for all four (4) signs, one (1) monument sign, one (1) wall sign on each of the on the north, south, and west sides, to all be illuminated and increase the sign height from 6 feet to 10 feet SUMMARY: signage for TownePlace Suites ISSUES: with no illumination and size restriction it will make it unsafe and difficult to find ZONING LAND USES Site NBG-NP North NBG-NP NBG-NP South NBG-NP East NBG-NP West Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial Commercial NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District Austin Lost and Found Pets Austin Neighborhoods Council Bike Austin Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Homeless Neighborhood Association Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation North Burnet/Gateway Neighborhood Plan Staff Liaison North Growth Corridor Alliance SELTexas Shoal Creek Conservancy Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group D-1/1 ! ! ± SUBJECT TRACT PENDING CASE ! ! ZONING BOUNDARY NOTIFICATIONS CASE#: LOCATION: C16-2021-0005 2237 W BRAKER LANE This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and represents only the approximate relative location of property boundaries. 1 " = 208 ' This product has been produced by CTM for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. D-1/2 D-1/3 D-1/4 D-1/5 D-1/6 D-1/7 D-1/8 D-1/9 D-1/10 D-1/11 D-1/12 D-1/13 7'-0" 6'-4" 10" 6" FACE SEAM A1 D/F MONUMENT SIGN TPS MON 7' x 7' @ 10'-0" - RED ( 1 ) REQUIRED - MFR. & INSTALL SCALE: ½" = 1'-0" END VIEW FABRICATED ALUMINUM CABINET SIGN - ALUMINUM SQUARE TUBE FRAME w/ .090" ALUMINUM FACES / .063 FILLERS - PAINTED TO MATCH PMS 1795c RED (SATIN FINISH) - INSIDE TO BE PAINTED w/ L.E.P. FACE TO HAVE ROUTED-OUT OPENINGS BACKED UP w/ 7328 WHITE ACRYLIC SHOW-THRU GRAPHICS INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED w/ WHITE HANLEY LED’s .063" ALUMINUM FABRICATED SUPPORT COVER PAINTED TO MATCH PMS COOL GRAY 11c (SATIN FINISH) STEEL SIGN SUPPORT (AS REQUIRED) INSIDE ALUMINUM BASE COVER & SIGN CABINET - SET IN CONCRETE PIER TYPE FOUNDATION - SIZES …
7'-0" 6'-4" 10" 6" FACE SEAM A1 D/F MONUMENT SIGN TPS MON 7' x 7' @ 10'-0" - RED ( 1 ) REQUIRED - MFR. & INSTALL SCALE: ½" = 1'-0" END VIEW FABRICATED ALUMINUM CABINET SIGN - ALUMINUM SQUARE TUBE FRAME w/ .090" ALUMINUM FACES / .063 FILLERS - PAINTED TO MATCH PMS 1795c RED (SATIN FINISH) - INSIDE TO BE PAINTED w/ L.E.P. FACE TO HAVE ROUTED-OUT OPENINGS BACKED UP w/ 7328 WHITE ACRYLIC SHOW-THRU GRAPHICS INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED w/ WHITE HANLEY LED’s .063" ALUMINUM FABRICATED SUPPORT COVER PAINTED TO MATCH PMS COOL GRAY 11c (SATIN FINISH) STEEL SIGN SUPPORT (AS REQUIRED) INSIDE ALUMINUM BASE COVER & SIGN CABINET - SET IN CONCRETE PIER TYPE FOUNDATION - SIZES & DEPTH TO BE DETERMINED BY ENGINEERING, LOCAL CODES & CONDITIONS UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL PRIMARY SERVICE PROVIDED TO SIGN BY CUSTOMER'S ELECTRICIAN (VERIFY VOLTAGE & COORDINATE w/ CHANDLER SIGNS) 0403077Ar3 Sheet 1 8 TOWNEPLACE SUITES Address 2237 W. BRAKER LN. AUSTIN, TEXAS MIKE D. CJR 06/18/19 Approval / Date R1 JMC 06/20/19: DELETE C2 AND C4 R2 ES 9/29 remove A2 R3 KMc 1/22/21: revised site plan FINAL ELECTRICAL CONNECTION BY CUSTOMER D-1/PRESENTATION-1 272'-0"± 31'-9" B1 PROPOSED NEW SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0" C3 C1 0403077Ar3 Sheet 2 8 TOWNEPLACE SUITES Address 2237 W. BRAKER LN. AUSTIN, TEXAS MIKE D. CJR 06/18/19 Approval / Date R1 JMC 06/20/19: DELETE C2 AND C4 R2 ES 9/29 remove A2 R3 KMc 1/22/21: revised site plan FINAL ELECTRICAL CONNECTION BY CUSTOMER D-1/PRESENTATION-2 89'-0"± 26'-6" B3 PROPOSED NEW WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0" 272'-0"± 31'-9" B2 PROPOSED NEW NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0" 0403077Ar3 Sheet 3 8 TOWNEPLACE SUITES Address 2237 W. BRAKER LN. AUSTIN, TEXAS MIKE D. CJR 06/18/19 Approval / Date R1 JMC 06/20/19: DELETE C2 AND C4 R2 ES 9/29 remove A2 R3 KMc 1/22/21: revised site plan FINAL ELECTRICAL CONNECTION BY CUSTOMER D-1/PRESENTATION-3 31'-9⅝" 15'-3¾" PRE-FORMED ALUMINUM RETURNS - PRE-FINISHED LIGHT-ENHANCING WHITE INSIDE 1" JEWELITE RETAINERS ACRYLIC FACES PAIGE "WALL BUSTER" PLASTIC PASS-THRU PAIGE BOX GALVANIZED METAL POWER SUPPLY ENCLOSURE HANLEY LED ILLUMINATION FLUSH MOUNTED TO WALL SURFACE WITH RIVNUT ANCHORS AS REQUIRED 1/4" DIA. WEEP HOLES IN LOW POINTS w/ ALUMINUM LIGHT SCREENS @ EACH WEEP HOLE TO PREVENT LIGHT LEAKS LETTER SECTION DETAIL B1 B2 FACE-LIT CHANNEL LETTERS - TPS CL24 WHITE - 2 LINE ( 2 ) SETS REQUIRED - MANUFACTURE & INSTALL SCALE: ⅜" = …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet C-1 CASE NUMBER: C16-2021-0001 DATE: January 11, 2021 ___-____Brooke Bailey OUT ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Ada Corral ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ____-___VACANT ___Y____Don Leighton-Burwell ___Y____Rahm McDaniel ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___-____Veronica Rivera OUT ___Y____Yasmine Smith ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___Y____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____Vacant (Alternate) ___-____Donny Hamilton (Alternate) NOT AVAIL APPLICANT: Claudia Salguero OWNER: Kate Ontes ADDRESS: 2402 GUADALUPE ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a sign variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs) (H) to allow for illumination of two (2) wall signs and two (2) projecting signs in order to provide signage for CVS in a “CS-CO-NP”, General Commercial Services- Conditional Overlay Combining District– Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (West University Neighborhood Plan) Note: The Land Development Code sign regulations 25-10-133 University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning Districts Signs (H) states a sign may not be illuminated or contain electronic images or moving parts. BOARD’S DECISION: BOA Jan 11, 2021 Board Member Jessica Cohen motions to postpone to February 8, 2021 due to technical difficulties, Board member Michael Von Ohlen seconds on a 9-0 vote; POSTPONED TO February 8, 2021 DUE TO TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES. FINDING: 1. The variance is necessary because strict enforcement of the Article prohibits and reasonable opportunity to provide adequate signs on the site, considering the unique features of a site such as its dimensions, landscape, or topography, because: E-1/1 OR, 2. The granting of this variance will not have a substantially adverse impact upon neighboring properties, because: OR, 3. The granting of this variance will not substantially conflict with the stated purposes of this sign ordinance, because: AND, 4. Granting a variance would not provide the applicant with a special privilege not enjoyed by others similarly situated or potentially similarly situated, because: ______________________________ ____________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison Don Leighton-Burwell Chairman Diana Ramirez forE-1/2 2402 Guadalupe St. Aus n, TX SO 110031 Created: 03.28.2020 Revised: 09.10.2020 E-1/3 Guadalupe St. Aus n, TX - Night me Rendering Proposed Existing ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... Night View A.Q EVS 03/28/2020 2402 Guadalupe St. Aus n, TX SO 110031-2 E-1/4 24th St. Aus n, TX - Night me Rendering Existing Proposed ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... Night View A.Q EVS 03/28/2020 2402 Guadalupe St. Aus n, TX SO 110031-3 E-1/5 Site Plan 7 6 5 4 15 1 2 3 15 Proposed Signs Sign # Proposed QTY …
CVS Pharmacy 2402 Guadalupe St E-1/PRESENTATION-1 Night Time View at Guadalupe St E-1/PRESENTATION-2 E-1/PRESENTATION-3 E-1/PRESENTATION-4 E-1/PRESENTATION-5 E-1/PRESENTATION-6
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet C-2 CASE NUMBER: C16-2021-0003 DATE: January 11, 2021 _______Brooke Bailey OUT _______Jessica Cohen _______Ada Corral _______Melissa Hawthorne ____-___VACANT _______Don Leighton-Burwell _______Rahm McDaniel _______Darryl Pruett _______Veronica Rivera OUT _______Yasmine Smith _______Michael Von Ohlen _______Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____Vacant (Alternate) _______Donny Hamilton (Alternate) NOT AVAIL APPLICANT: Michael Gaudini OWNER: Timothy Finley ADDRESS: 2552 GUADALUPE ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a sign variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs), requesting a total of 12 signs on the property: a) (F) to allow three (3) wall signs above the second floor, one on each the northern, southern and eastern sides. b) (G) (1) one projecting sign for each building façade (allowed) to two (2) projecting signs (requested) on the eastern side c) (H) to allow for all twelve (12) signs, nine (9) on the northern, one (1)on the southern, one (1) on the eastern and one (1) on the western sides, to all be illuminated in order to provide signage for the Moxy Hotel in a “CS-CO-NP”, General Commercial Services- Conditional Overlay Combining District– Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (West University Neighborhood Plan) Note: The Land Development Code sign regulations 25-10-133 University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning Districts Signs (F) No signs may be placed above the second floor of a building, except for a non-electric sign that is engraved, cut into the building surface, or otherwise inlaid to become part of the building.(G) A wall sign is permitted if the sign complies with this subsection. (1) One projecting E-2/1 sign for each building façade is permitted (H) A sign may not be illuminated or contain electronic images or moving parts. BOARD’S DECISION: Jan 11, 2021 POSTPONED TO FEBRUARY 8, 2021 (Board member Melissa Hawthorne abstaining) FINDING: 1. The variance is necessary because strict enforcement of the Article prohibits and reasonable opportunity to provide adequate signs on the site, considering the unique features of a site such as its dimensions, landscape, or topography, because: OR, 2. The granting of this variance will not have a substantially adverse impact upon neighboring properties, because: OR, 3. The granting of this variance will not substantially conflict with the stated purposes of this sign ordinance, because: AND, 4. Granting a variance would not provide the applicant with a special privilege not enjoyed by others similarly situated or potentially similarly situated, because: ______________________________ ____________________________ Elaine Ramirez …
Austin Moxy Hotel 2552 Guadalupe Street Austin, Texas Exterior Building Signage City Presentation Babendure Design Group 8140 Walnut Hill Ln. #950 Dallas, Texas 75231 214.265.1960 214.265.5552 (fax) www.babendure.com Signage & Wayfinding Design Specialists 1 E-2/PRESENTATION-1 F E A B C D 5 4 1 3.2 3.1 1 OVERALL SITE PLAN Scale: 1/16"=1'-0" Sign Location Plan 2 7 Existing single story building on adjacent lot (Owned by another party) Existing single story building on adjacent lot (Owned by another party) Existing single story building on adjacent lot (Owned by another party) Babendure Design Group8140 Walnut Hill Ln. #950Dallas, Texas 75231214.265.1960214.265.5552 (fax)www.babendure.comAustin Moxy HotelAustin, TexasExterior Building SignageNovember 18, 2020E-2/PRESENTATION-2 1 RESTAURANT IDENTITY Projecting Sign Box with push-through Restaurant Logo Top of Sign = 12’-8” above grade 3.1 MENU DISPLAY Located to left of windows. Top of Sign = 6’-0”above grade. 3.2 MENU DISPLAY Located to left of windows. Top of Sign = 6’-0”above grade. 4 5 PICK UP WINDOW IDENTITY Box sign with white push-through graphics. Top of Sign = 8’-0” above grade. ORDER WINDOW IDENTITY Box sign with white push-through graphics. Top of Sign = 8’-0” above grade. BILLBOARD (Owned By Another Party) 1 A B 3.1 4 3.2 5 EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16” = 1’-0” 18'-3 1/2" (High Logo) 16'-3" (Low Logo) " 2 / 1 8 - ' 2 A Dimensional Letters to be Moxy pink. Top of Sign - 58’-8” above grade. " 6 - ' 1 " 2 / 1 4 - ' 2 B Dimensional Letters to be Moxy pink. Top of Sign - 14’-8” above grade. D C Dimensional Letters mounted on the canopy ledge. Color to be Moxy pink. Top of Sign - 14’-2” above grade. Projecting Sign Box with push-through graphics. Logo to be Moxy pink day. Top of Sign - 22’-8” above grade. East Elevation High and Low Level Signs 3 Babendure Design Group8140 Walnut Hill Ln. #950Dallas, Texas 75231214.265.1960214.265.5552 (fax)www.babendure.comAustin Moxy HotelAustin, TexasExterior Building SignageNovember 18, 2020E-2/PRESENTATION-3 18'-3 1/2" 16'-3 1/2" " 8 / 1 8 - ' 2 " 2 / 1 7 - ' 3 A " 8 / 5 9 " 2 / 1 2 " 1 1 - ' 1 " 4 - ' 2 LOCATION A HIGH LEVEL WALL IDENTITY FRONT ELEVATION • AREA CALCULATION: 60 SQFT Top of Sign = 58’-8” above grade. SCALE: 1/4” = 1’-0” 2 1/2" 6'-0" 5'-7" 1 3/4"Stroke Width 1" …
BOA GENERAL REVIEW COVERSHEET CASE: C15-2021-0001 BOA DATE: February 8th, 2021 COUNCIL DISTRICT: 9 AGENT: John Meyer ADDRESS: 703 Fletcher St OWNER: Rooster Res 1 LP ZONING: SF-3-NP (Bouldin Creek) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: CEN 35FT OF E205FT BLK 3 BAWCOM SUBD VARIANCE REQUEST: decrease the minimum lot width from 50 feet to 34 feet 9 inches, decrease 45 degree angle side setback plane to 0 degrees on west side and remove the sidewall articulation on west side. SUMMARY: erect a new Single-Family Residence ISSUES: substandard lot width ZONING LAND USES Site North South East West SF-3-NP SF-3-NP SF-3-NP SF-3-NP SF-3-NP Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District Austin Lost and Found Pets Austin Neighborhoods Council Bike Austin Bouldin Creek Neighborhood Association Bouldin Creek Neighborhood Planning Team Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Homeless Neighborhood Association Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation Perry Grid 614 Preservation Austin SELTexas Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group South Central Coalition F-1/1 D R 3 LIVE OAK FLETCHER D 2N T S E R K C A O T 1 S OLT O RF ! ! ± SUBJECT TRACT PENDING CASE ! ! ! ! ZONING BOUNDARY NOTIFICATIONS CASE#: LOCATION: C15-2021-0001 703 FLETCHER STREET This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and represents only the approximate relative location of property boundaries. 1 " = 170 ' This product has been produced by CTM for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. F-1/2 BOA GENERAL REVIEW COVERSHEET VARIANCE REQUEST: decrease the minimum lot width from 50 feet to 34 feet 9 inches and decrease 45 degree angle side setback plane to 0 degrees on west side. CASE: C15-2021-0001 BOA DATE: January 11th, 2021 ADDRESS: 703 Fletcher St OWNER: Rooster Res 1 LP COUNCIL DISTRICT: 9 AGENT: John Meyer ZONING: SF-3-NP (Bouldin Creek) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: CEN 35FT OF E205FT BLK 3 BAWCOM SUBD SUMMARY: erect a new Single-Family Residence ISSUES: substandard lot width ZONING LAND USES Site North South East West SF-3-NP SF-3-NP SF-3-NP SF-3-NP SF-3-NP Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District Austin Lost and Found Pets Austin Neighborhoods Council Bike Austin Bouldin Creek Neighborhood Association Bouldin Creek Neighborhood Planning Team Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Homeless Neighborhood Association Neighborhood Empowerment …
F-1/42 F-1/43 F-1/44 From: To: Subject: Date: maria lucchese Ramirez, Elaine 703 and 705 Fletcher 78704 Sunday, January 10, 2021 2:27:46 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** I am in favor of the requested variance for the builder. I am writing to allow the builder the variance they are requesting for their builds. Hello, I am a neighbor of the proposed two builds at 703 and 705 fletcher Ave 78704 Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Maria Lucchese 2309 S 2ND ST 78704 Get Outlook for iOS CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. F-1/45 F-1/46 F-1/47 F-1/48 F-1/49 F-1/50 F-1/51 F-1/52 F-1/53 From: Ruth Framel Subject: Case C15-2021-0001 and 0002 Date: January 10, 2021 at 4:15 PM To: elaine.ramirez@austintexas.gov Cc: Brett Framel Good morning Elaine, As a courtesy for our neighbors, I am forwarding 4 responses to the variance requested for Case Numbers C15-2021- 0001 and C15-201-0002. Others will be emailing their thoughts to you directly. To my knowledge, the neighbors on this street are in favor or granting the request. Some felt they had made their preference known to the developer John Meyer, when he walked the neighborhood, and that was enough. However, when I looked at the official responses online at the COA website today, I noticed that only neighbors who are not affected by the building because they live on another street, had responded in the negative. And the BCNA, without bringing it to the membership or asking neighbors, decided to oppose. As neighbors to the lots, we have lived with truly terrible houses and poorly maintained lots for many years. We look forward to the improvement and look of homes that can be built, especially if the variance is approved. I would like to point out that in general I have been in favor of and appreciative of the general protections the McMansion Envelope has provided to neighbors and neighborhoods around Austin. However, especially in this neighborhood, we see way too many builders circumvent this ordinance by building 3 story skinny houses that are not nearly as livable as wider homes, and this type of build is particularly not in keeping with the surrounding homes. …
BOA GENERAL REVIEW COVERSHEET CASE: C15-2021-0002 BOA DATE: February 8th, 2021 COUNCIL DISTRICT: 9 AGENT: John Meyer ADDRESS: 705 Fletcher St OWNER: Rooster Res 1 LP ZONING: SF-3-NP (Bouldin Creek) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: W35FT OF E205FT BLK 3 BAWCOM SUBD VARIANCE REQUEST: decrease the minimum lot width from 50 feet to 34 feet 9 inches, decrease 45 degree angle side setback plane to 0 degrees on east side and remove sidewall articulation on east side. SUMMARY: erect a new Single-Family Residence ISSUES: substandard lot width ZONING LAND USES Site North South East West SF-3-NP SF-3-NP SF-3-NP SF-3-NP SF-3-NP Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District Austin Lost and Found Pets Austin Neighborhoods Council Bike Austin Bouldin Creek Neighborhood Association Bouldin Creek Neighborhood Planning Team Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Homeless Neighborhood Association Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation Perry Grid 614 Preservation Austin SELTexas Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group South Central Coalition F-2/1 January 7, 2021 John Meyer 705 Fletcher St Austin TX, 78704 Re: C15-2021-0002 Property Description: W35FT OF E205FT BLK 3 BAWCOM SUBD Dear John, Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a variance(s) from the following sections of the Land Development Code; Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) (a); to decrease the minimum lot width from 50 feet (required) to 34 feet 9 inches (requested); and Section 25-2 (Subchapter F, Residential Design and Compatibility Standards, Article 2, Development Standards, 2.6 Setback Planes; to decrease the 45 degree angle side setback plane (required) to 0 degrees (requested) on the west side of lot. In order to erect a Single-Family Residence in a SF-3”, Single-Family Residence zoning district. Austin Energy does not oppose the above variance request provided any proposed and existing improvements follow Austin Energy’s clearance criteria requirements, the National Electric Safety Code and OSHA. Any removal or relocation of existing electric facilities will be at owners /applicants’ expense. Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements which are additional conditions of review action: https://austinenergy.com/wcm/connect/8bb4699c-7691-4a74-98e7- 56059e9be364/Design+Criteria+Manual+Oct+2015.pdf?MOD=AJPERES the above If you require further information or have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact our office. Thank you for contacting Austin Energy. Eben Kellogg, Property Agent Austin Energy Public Involvement | Real Estate Services 2500 Montopolis Drive Austin, TX 78741 (512) 322-6050 F-2/2 LIVE OAK D N 2 T 1 S FLETCHER D R …
F-2/38 F-2/39 F-2/40 From: To: Subject: Date: maria lucchese Ramirez, Elaine 703 and 705 Fletcher 78704 Sunday, January 10, 2021 2:27:46 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** I am in favor of the requested variance for the builder. I am writing to allow the builder the variance they are requesting for their builds. Hello, I am a neighbor of the proposed two builds at 703 and 705 fletcher Ave 78704 Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Maria Lucchese 2309 S 2ND ST 78704 Get Outlook for iOS CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. F-2/41 F-2/42 F-2/43 F-2/44 F-2/45 F-2/46 From: Ruth Framel Subject: Case C15-2021-0001 and 0002 Date: January 10, 2021 at 4:15 PM To: elaine.ramirez@austintexas.gov Cc: Brett Framel Good morning Elaine, As a courtesy for our neighbors, I am forwarding 4 responses to the variance requested for Case Numbers C15-2021- 0001 and C15-201-0002. Others will be emailing their thoughts to you directly. To my knowledge, the neighbors on this street are in favor or granting the request. Some felt they had made their preference known to the developer John Meyer, when he walked the neighborhood, and that was enough. However, when I looked at the official responses online at the COA website today, I noticed that only neighbors who are not affected by the building because they live on another street, had responded in the negative. And the BCNA, without bringing it to the membership or asking neighbors, decided to oppose. As neighbors to the lots, we have lived with truly terrible houses and poorly maintained lots for many years. We look forward to the improvement and look of homes that can be built, especially if the variance is approved. I would like to point out that in general I have been in favor of and appreciative of the general protections the McMansion Envelope has provided to neighbors and neighborhoods around Austin. However, especially in this neighborhood, we see way too many builders circumvent this ordinance by building 3 story skinny houses that are not nearly as livable as wider homes, and this type of build is particularly not in keeping with the surrounding homes. This builder is …
VARIANCE REQUEST: decrease the minimum street side yard setback from 15 feet (required) to 2 feet (requested) BOA GENERAL REVIEW COVERSHEET CASE: C15-2021-0018 BOA DATE: February 8th, 2021 ADDRESS: 3805 Eton Ln OWNER: Gary & Nancy Langdon COUNCIL DISTRICT: 7 AGENT: N/A ZONING: SF-2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 16 BLK N MILWOOD SEC 3 SUMMARY: complete a shed ISSUES: easements and underground utilities ZONING LAND USES Site North South East West SF-2 SF-2 SF-2 SF-2 SF-2 Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District Austin Lost and Found Pets Bike Austin Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Homeless Neighborhood Association Milwood Neighborhood Assn. Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation North Growth Corridor Alliance SELTexas Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group F-3/1 S KIPTO N H A W K S H E A D TA R R A G O N A I O D R D A L E L A D N E P S A N O N RIA T D O R S ETT ETO N T S R E H M A DUVAL ! ! ± SUBJECT TRACT PENDING CASE ! ! ! ! ZONING BOUNDARY NOTIFICATIONS CASE#: LOCATION: C15-2021-0018 3805 ETON LANE This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and represents only the approximate relative location of property boundaries. 1 " = 166 ' This product has been produced by CTM for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. F-3/2 CITY OF AUSTIN Development Services Department Board of Adjustment General/Parking Variance Application WARNING: Filing of this appeal stops all affected construction activity. please complete Section as needed. For Office Use Only If more space is required, Section 1: Applicant Statement 3805 Eton Ln Austin, Texas 78727 16 SF-2 N Milwood Section 3 Gary and Nancy Langdon ourselves January 8 2021 10'x12'x13' wood frame,hardibacker siding,steel roof, rollup steel garage door F-3/3 Portion of the City of Austin Land Development Code applicant is seeking a variance from: ____________________________________________________________________________ 25-2-492 - street side setback from 15' to 2' ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ Section 2: Variance Findings The Board must determine the existence of, sufficiency of, and weight of evidence supporting the findings described below. Therefore, you must complete each of the applicable Findings Statements as part of your …
Variance Request Gary & Nancy Langdon Residence 3805 Eton Ln C15‐2021‐0018 Board Of Adjustment February 8th, 2021 F-3/PRESENTATION-1 Overview • To allow Accessory Structure to remain in Setback • To reduce street side setback from 15' to 2‘ • The placement of utility cables and zoning regulations applicable to the property cause a hardship as it does not allow for reasonable use due to the fact that every underground utility runs through our small back yard leaving us no other location to place the accessory structure than where we have placed it. F-3/PRESENTATION-2 Property Survey with Accessory Structure Placement Drawn In X F-3/PRESENTATION-3 Drawing of Electric, Gas, Cable and Phone Utility Placement in the Backyard F-3/PRESENTATION-4 Photo of Accessory Structure in Current State of Completion and Placement From beyond the gas meter on the right is the only place in the yard where there are no underground utility cables or pipes located. Under the blue tarp on the left is the roll up garage door waiting to be installed. F-3/PRESENTATION-5 Area where Gas Line Comes into the Backyard from the Street F-3/PRESENTATION-6 Photo along the back fenceline where the Electric wire runs from the street to the Transformer F-3/PRESENTATION-7 Photo of the area where the Cables run from the Cable, Phone and Electric Transformer Boxes to the Electric Meter, Phone, and Cable Boxes on the House. F-3/PRESENTATION-8 Neighborhood Accessory Structure Examples As you can see from this areal photo – there are other accessory structures, beyond what you see in the photo, in the neighborhood sitting on property lines, in easements and setbacks. In our online research and observing numerous other accessory structures in the neighborhood we had no reason to believe our structure would not be in compliance. F-3/PRESENTATION-9 Safety and Security • Gates ‐ We have purchased custom accessory locking gates to fit between the accessory structure and the fence, the accessory structure and the house – allowing no access behind the accessory structure, between the accessory structure and the sides or front yard fence line. • Locks ‐ for safety and security ‐ the steel, roll up garage door we purchased has a locking mechanism as well. F-3/PRESENTATION-10 Reasonable Use Hardship • This hardship is unique to our property because of the placement of utilities on the property. • Further hardship unique to this property is due to the placement of the house on the property – …
BOA GENERAL REVIEW COVERSHEET CASE: C15-2021-0019 BOA DATE: February 8th, 2021 ADDRESS: 5909 Bull Creek Rd OWNER: Lawrence Graham COUNCIL DISTRICT: 7 AGENT: N/A ZONING: SF-2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 22 ALLANDALE SEC 3 VARIANCE REQUEST: decrease the minimum rear yard setback from 10 feet (required) to 6 feet 7 inches (requested) SUMMARY: construct a guest house ISSUES: lot size Site North South East West SF-2 SF-2 SF-2 SF-2 SF-2 ZONING LAND USES Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Allandale Neighborhood Association Austin Independent School District Austin Lost and Found Pets Austin Neighborhoods Council Bike Austin Central Austin Urbanists Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Homeless Neighborhood Association Lower District 7 Green NW Austin Neighbors Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation North Austin Neighborhood Alliance SELTexas Shoal Creek Conservancy Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group F-4/1 Y R A C W HITE R O C K O C S A N K E E R C L L U B ALLANDALE W E I V D O O W D O O W L A O H S ! ! ± SUBJECT TRACT PENDING CASE ! ! ! ! ZONING BOUNDARY NOTIFICATIONS CASE#: LOCATION: C15-2021-0019 5909 BULL CREEK ROAD This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and represents only the approximate relative location of property boundaries. 1 " = 169 ' This product has been produced by CTM for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. F-4/2 CITY OF AUSTIN Development Services Department One Texas Center | Phone: 512.978.4000 505 Barton Springs Road, Austin, Texas 78704 Board of Adjustment General/Parking Variance Application WARNING: Filing of this appeal stops all affected construction activity. This application is a fillable PDF that can be completed electronically. To ensure your information is saved, click here to Save the form to your computer, then open your copy and continue. The Tab key may be used to navigate to each field; Shift + Tab moves to the previous field. The Enter key activates links, emails, and buttons. Use the Up & Down Arrow keys to scroll through drop-down lists and check boxes, and hit Enter to make a selection. The application must be complete and accurate prior to submittal. If more space is required, please complete Section …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet D-1 DATE: Monday January 11, 2021 CASE NUMBER: C15-2020-0025 ___-____Brooke Bailey OUT ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Ada Corral ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ____-___VACANT ___Y____Don Leighton-Burwell ___Y____Rahm McDaniel ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___-____Veronica Rivera OUT ___Y____Yasmine Smith ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___Y____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____Vacant (Alternate) ___-____Donny Hamilton (Alternate) NOT AVAIL APPLICANT: David Cancialosi OWNER: John A Riley ADDRESS: 3707 RIVERCREST DR VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting variance(s) from the Land Development Code: (a) 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum front yard setback from 40 feet (required) to 10 feet 5 inches (requested for stairs), and 20 feet (requested for new garage). No structure currently existing. (b) Section 25-2-551 (Lake Austin District Regulations) (E) (2) to increase maximum impervious cover on a slope gradient more than 35 percent from 0 (zero) percent (not allowed) to 11.5 percent (requested) in order to erect a Single- Family Residence in a "LA", Lake Austin zoning district. Note: LDC Section 25-2-551 (E) (2) On a slope with a gradient of more than 35 percent, development is prohibited except for the construction of a fence, driveway, road or utility that cannot be reasonably placed elsewhere, or a non- mechanized pedestrian facility, such as a foot path, sidewalk, or stairs. BOARD’S DECISION: Jan 11, 2021 Board Member Jessica Cohen motions to postpone to February 8, 2021 due to technical difficulties, Board member Michael Von G-1/1 Ohlen seconds on a 9-0 vote; POSTPONED TO February 8, 2021 DUE TO TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: ______________________________ ____________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison Don Leighton-Burwell Chairman Diana Ramirez for G-1/2 BOA GENERAL REVIEW COVERSHEET CASE: C15-2020-0025 BOA DATE: January 11th, 2021 ADDRESS: 3707 Rivercrest Dr OWNER: John Riley COUNCIL DISTRICT: 10 AGENT: David Cancialosi ZONING: LA LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 21A BLK D * RESUB OF LT 66 BLK A & LT 21 BLK …
3707 RIVERCREST DRIVE AUSTIN, TX 78746 Case # 2020-000022 BA G-1/PRESENTATION-1 VARIANCE REQUEST I. Seeking BoA Variance for a single-family structure and associated improvements including pool and decking from: 1) LDC 25-2-551-E-2 requiring prohibiting certain development on a slope category greater than 35% in order to erect a single family residence and associated improvements to allow 11.5% impervious coverage in the 35%+ slope. 2) LDC 25/-2-492-D requiring a 40’ front setback in a Lake Austin zoning category to allow a 10’5” front setback for a portion of proposed home’s front façade (stairs). Remainder of front façade proposed at 20’ setback for new garage and 40’ front setback for remainder of proposed façade. Existing structure’s current front setback is 0’ and building is located within the electrical easement. G-1/PRESENTATION-2 AERIAL G-1/PRESENTATION-3 MAP AERIAL G-1/PRESENTATION-4 STREET VIEW G-1/PRESENTATION-5 Represents property line in relation to the deck and house. G-1/PRESENTATION-6 G-1/PRESENTATION-7 G-1/PRESENTATION-8 G-1/PRESENTATION-9 G-1/PRESENTATION-10 MARINA ACROSS STREET G-1/PRESENTATION-11 G-1/PRESENTATION-12 G-1/PRESENTATION-13 CUL DE SAC ADJACENT TO VAC ANT LOT G-1/PRESENTATION-14 G-1/PRESENTATION-15 G-1/PRESENTATION-16 G-1/PRESENTATION-17 G-1/PRESENTATION-18 G-1/PRESENTATION-19 ADJACENT HOUSE LOC ATED ON SLOPE G-1/PRESENTATION-20 NEIGHBORHOOD HOMES WITH REDUCED FRONT SETB ACKS BUILT ON SLOPES G-1/PRESENTATION-21 NEIGHBORHOOD HOMES WITH REDUCED FRONT SETB ACKS BUILT ON SLOPES G-1/PRESENTATION-22 NEIGHBORHOOD HOMES WITH REDUCED FRONT SETB ACKS BUILT ON SLOPES G-1/PRESENTATION-23 NEIGHBORHOOD HOMES WITH REDUCED FRONT SETB ACKS BUILT ON SLOPES G-1/PRESENTATION-24 NEIGHBORHOOD HOMES WITH REDUCED FRONT SETB ACKS BUILT ON SLOPES G-1/PRESENTATION-25 PROPOSED IN KEEPING WITH HOMES IN NEIGHBORHOOD G-1/PRESENTATION-26 APPROVED BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT VARIANCE C ASES NEARBY Approved BoA Cases Nearby Permit/Case No Address Requested Varience Granted Date of Approval 1 2019-000023 BA 2800 Rivercrest Dr 25-2-551(C)(3)(a) 2 2017-000047 BA 3602 Rivercrest Dr 25-2-1176(a)(1) 2015-069435 BA 6706 Elfland Dr Bldg BD 2018-000006 BA 6705 Pixie Cove 7 2010-000118 BA 6706 Troll Haven 25-2-551(D)(1)(B) 2008-000074 BA 6702 Troll Haven 10 2013-000027 BA 6703 Leprechaun Dr 25-2-551(D)(3)(a) 25-2-1176(a)((A)(5) 25-2-893(G)(4) 25-2-551(C)(3)(a) 25-2-551 (B)(1)(b) 25-2-551(D)(3)(a) 25-2-551(2) 3 4 5 6 8 9 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5/13/2019 5/13/2019 11/9/2015 11/9/2015 7/9/2018 7/9/2018 11/8/2010 6/9/2008 6/9/2008 5/13/2013 G-1/PRESENTATION-27 REASONABLE USE The zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: • The LA zoning category was created via ordinance No. 840913-S and effectively amended zoning Chapter 13- 2 by capturing all land 500’ landward of the 504.9’ contour line. The Ordinance either newly zoned or rezoned most parcels to Lake Austin (LA) …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet D-2 DATE: Monday January 11, 2021 CASE NUMBER: C15-2020-0067 _______Brooke Bailey OUT _______Jessica Cohen _______Ada Corral _______Melissa Hawthorne ____-___VACANT _______Don Leighton-Burwell _______Rahm McDaniel _______Darryl Pruett _______Veronica Rivera OUT _______Yasmine Smith _______Michael Von Ohlen _______Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____Vacant (Alternate) _______Donny Hamilton (Alternate) NOT AVAIL APPLICANT: Linda Sullivan OWNER: Micheal and Jeanette Abbink ADDRESS: 1112 HARVARD ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-6-472 (Parking Facility Standards) Appendix A (Tables of Off-Street parking and Loading Requirements) to reduce the number of required parking spaces from 2 spaces (required) to 0 spaces (requested) in order to erect a Single-Family residence in a “SF-3-NP”, Single-Family Residence- Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (Central East Austin Neighborhood Plan) BOARD’S DECISION: Jan 11, 2021 POSTPONED TO FEBRUARY 8, 2021 FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: G-2/1 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: ______________________________ ____________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison Don Leighton-Burwell Chairman Diana Ramirez for G-2/2 BOA GENERAL REVIEW COVERSHEET CASE: C15-2020-0067 BOA DATE: January 11th, 2021 ADDRESS: 1112 Harvard St OWNER: Michael Abbink COUNCIL DISTRICT: 1 AGENT: Linda Sullivan ZONING: SF-3-NP (Central East Austin NP) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 8 BLK 4 GRANDVIEW PLACE VARIANCE REQUEST: reduce number of parking spaces from 2 to 0 SUMMARY: maintain no off-street parking ISSUES: does not have reasonable access, no alternative access via Bryan St ZONING LAND USES Site North South East West SF-3-NP SF-3-NP SF-3-NP SF-3-NP SF-3-NP Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District Austin Lost and Found Pets Austin Neighborhoods Council Bike Austin Blackshear-Prospect Hill Del Valle Community Coalition East Austin Conservancy Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Homeless Neighborhood Association Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation Neighbors United for Progress Organization of Central East Austin Neighborhoods Preservation Austin SELTexas Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group G-2/3 January 7, 2021 Linda Sullivan 1112 Harvard St Austin TX, 78702 Property Description: LOT 8 BLK 4 …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet E-2 DATE: Monday January 11, 2021 CASE NUMBER: C15-2020-0069 _______Brooke Bailey OUT _______Jessica Cohen _______Ada Corral _______Melissa Hawthorne ____-___VACANT _______Don Leighton-Burwell _______Rahm McDaniel _______Darryl Pruett _______Veronica Rivera OUT _______Yasmine Smith _______Michael Von Ohlen _______Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____Vacant (Alternate) _______Donny Hamilton (Alternate) NOT AVAIL APPLICANT: Courntey Mogonye-McWhorter OWNER: Malia Muir ADDRESS: 1230 ROCKCLIFF RD VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-551 (Lake Austin (LA) District Regulations) (B) (1) (b) from shoreline setback requirements to reduce the shoreline setback from 25 feet (required) to 10 feet (requested) (canal only) in order to erect a Single- Family Residence in an “LA”, Lake Austin zoning district. BOARD’S DECISION: The public hearing was closed by Chair Don Leighton- Burwell, Board Member Melissa Hawthorne motions to Postpone to December 14, 2020, Board Member Brooke Bailey seconds on a 9-2 vote (Board members Jessica Cohen and Donny Hamilton nay); POSTPONED TO DECEMBER 14, 2020. DEC 14, 2020 The public hearing was closed by Chair Don Leighton-Burwell, Board Member Michael Von Ohlen motions to Postpone to January 11, 2021, and Board Member Melissa Hawthorne seconds on a 10-0 vote; POSTPONED TO JANURARY 11, 2021. Jan 11, 2021 POSTPONED TO FEBRUARY 8, 2021 FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: G-3/1 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: ______________________________ ____________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison Don Leighton-Burwell Chairman Diana Ramirez for G-3/2 Advanced Packet For 1230 Rockcliff Road C15-2020-0069 February 8, 2021 Board of Adjustments G-3/3 G-3/4 G-3/5 1 Exhibit 1 and Exhibit 2 Plan Exhibits G-3/6 MAN MADE CANAL ROCKCLIFF RD 5 0 ' - 0 " PROPERTY LINE 4 0 ' - 0 " SEPTIC FIELD AREA: 2138 SF 40' B.L. SETBACK 11446 SF LOT SIZE: 4595 SF NET SITE DEDUCT: NET SITE AREA: 6851 SF SEPTIC FIELD AREA: 2138 SF NET SITE AREA - SEPTIC FIELD AREA = 4713 SF 1ST …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet D-3 DATE: Monday January 11, 2021 CASE NUMBER: C15-2020-0083 ___-____Brooke Bailey OUT ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Ada Corral ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ____-___VACANT ___Y____Don Leighton-Burwell ___Y____Rahm McDaniel ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___-____Veronica Rivera OUT ___Y____Yasmine Smith ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___Y____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____Vacant (Alternate) ___-____Donny Hamilton (Alternate) NOT AVAIL APPLICANT: Daniel Salazar OWNER: Enez Salinas ADDRESS: 2810 GONZALES ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-774 (Two-Family Residential Use) (C) (2) (a) for a Two-Family Residential use location at least 10 feet to the rear or side of the principal structure (required) to 5 feet (requested) in order to erect a Secondary Dwelling Unit in an “SF-3-NP”, Single-Family Residence-Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (Govalle Neighborhood Plan) Note: Per LDC the second Dwelling Unit must be contained in a structure other than the principal structure and must be located at least 10 feet to the rear or side of the principal structure BOARD’S DECISION: BOA MEETING JAN 11, 2021 Board Member Jessica Cohen motions to postpone to February 8, 2021 due to technical difficulties, Board member Michael Von Ohlen seconds on a 9-0 vote; POSTPONED TO February 8, 2021 DUE TO TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: G-4/1 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: ______________________________ ____________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison Don Leighton-Burwell Chairman Diana Ramirez for G-4/2 Members of the Board of Adjustment I would like to take this opportunity to speak on behalf of Daniel Salazar. I hope this can shed some light on why this variance is being sought. For those of you that are unfamiliar with the building inspection process I would like to briefly explain the layout inspection. The layout inspection is the initial inspection for most projects and is when we verify site conditions are consistent with the approved plans. This is by far one of the most important inspections we do, and in …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet D-6 DATE: Monday January 11, 2021 CASE NUMBER: C15-2021-0008 ___-____Brooke Bailey OUT ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Ada Corral ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ____-___VACANT ___Y____Don Leighton-Burwell ___Y____Rahm McDaniel ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___-____Veronica Rivera OUT ___Y____Yasmine Smith ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___Y____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____Vacant (Alternate) ___-____Donny Hamilton (Alternate) NOT AVAIL APPLICANT: Joel Nolan OWNER: Sarah Haynie ADDRESS: 3708 ROBINSON AVE VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) to amend existing Granted variance C15-2020-0065, to remove the condition related to STR’s BOARD’S DECISION: BOA MEETING JAN 11, 2021 Board Member Jessica Cohen motions to postpone to February 8, 2021 due to technical difficulties, Board member Michael Von Ohlen seconds on a 9-0 vote; POSTPONED TO February 8, 2021 DUE TO TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES. FINDING: because: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: G-5/1 ______________________________ ____________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison Don Leighton-Burwell Chairman Diana Ramirez for G-5/2 BOA GENERAL REVIEW COVERSHEET CASE: C15-2021-0008 BOA DATE: January 11th, 2021 ADDRESS: 3708 Robinson Ave OWNER: Sarah Haynie COUNCIL DISTRICT: 9 AGENT: Joel Nolan ZONING: SF-3-NP (Upper Boggy Creek NP) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 26 BLK 2 OLT 29 DIV C UNIVERSITY PARK SUBD VARIANCE REQUEST: amend existing Granted variance C15-2020-0065, to remove the condition related to STR’s SUMMARY: erect an Accessory Dwelling Unit ISSUES: properties in neighborhood have STR’s ZONING LAND USES Site North South East West SF-3-NP SF-3-NP SF-3-NP SF-3-NP CS-MU-V-CO-NP Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family General Commercial Services-Vertical Mixed Use NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District Austin Lost and Found Pets Austin Neighborhoods Council Bike Austin Cherrywood Neighborhood Association Del Valle Community Coalition Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Homeless Neighborhood Association Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation Neighbors United for Progress Preservation Austin SELTexas Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group Upper Boggy Creek Neighborhood Planning Team G-5/3 January 7, 2021 Joel Nolan 3708 Robinson Ave Austin TX, 78722 Re: C15-2021-0008 Property Description: LOT 26 BLK 2 OLT 29 DIV C UNIVERSITY PARK SUBD …
Address: 3708 Robinson Avenue, Austin Texas 78722 Applicant: Joel Nolan OVERVIEW OF REQUEST Land Development Code 25-2-774 Two Family Residential Use C2a. The second dwelling unit must be located at least 10’ to the rear or side of the principal structure C2b. The second dwelling unit must be above a detached garage Approval of this request would allow for the remodel & addition of an existing detached storage building: 1. To remain in its current location, closer than the required 10’ offset from the principal structure 2. Allow for the new ADU to be built on the ground floor, not above a detached garage as required by the code above. 3. Seeking to remove Short Term Rental Limitation set on previous approval. 4. Seeking to remove build-able area limitation set on previous approval. •Existing Lot Size: 6,471 sf •Existing Impervious Cover: 42% •Proposed Impervious Cover: 40% •Maximum size of new Accessory Dwelling Unit: 970 sf. The maximum size of an ADU to 1,100 square feet or 0.15 FAR whichever is smaller •Proposed size of new Accessory Dwelling Unit: +/- 800 sf 512.330.4243 / NOLAN-ARCHITECT.COM / 708 RIO GRANDE ST. AUSTIN TEXAS 78701BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT DIAGRAMS 3708 Robinson Avenue Austin Texas 78722CASE NO. C15-2021-0008G-5/PRESENTATION-1 N 29°50'00" E 50.00' 610' 10' REAR YARD SETBACK 18'-0" FULL CRZ 9'-0" 1/2 CRZ 4'-6" 1/4 CRZ EXISTING PECAN TREE EXISTING WOOD DECK EXISTING DETACHED GARAGE 240 SF 12'-1 3/4" " 8 / 5 1 - ' 0 1 " 0 - ' 0 1 3'-4 3/8" 6'-7 5/8" 8'-8 3/4" 10'-0" 10' OFFSET FROM MAIN RESIDENCE " 6 7 . 9 2 1 W " 9 0 1 1 ° 0 6 N ' K C A B T E S D R A Y E D S I ' 5 EXISTING COVERED PORCH & STEPS TO GRADE EXISTING WOOD FENCE & GATE 608' EXISTING WOOD FENCE PORTION OF EXISTING DRIVEWAY TO BE REMOVED TO STAY UNDER THE IMPERVIOUS COVER LIMITATIONS 278 SF EXISTING SINGLE STORY RESIDENCE 1,675 SF " 0 0 . 0 3 1 E " 0 0 0 1 ° 0 6 S ' K C A B T E S D R A Y E D S I ' 5 A/C GM M E U U 25' FRONT YARD SETBACK EXISTING COVERED PORCH & STEPS TO GRADE EXISTING CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PARKING U U U U U U PARKING U U U …
Granted PP Cases 0 9 BOA Monthly Report July 2020-June 2021 Jan 11, 2021 Due to technical difficulties – 9 cases were postponed and 1 withdrawn 1) 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs) (H) to allow for illumination of two (2) wall signs and two (2) projecting signs 2) 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs), (F) to allow wall signs above the second floor, (G) (1) projecting sign for each building façade and (H) to allow for all signs to all be illuminated 3) 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum front yard setback and 25-2-551 (Lake Austin District Regulations) (E) (2) to increase maximum impervious cover on a slope 4) 25-6-472 (Parking Facility Standards) Appendix A (Tables of Off- Street parking and Loading Requirements) to reduce the number of required parking spaces 5) 25-2-774 (Two-Family Residential Use) (C) (2) (a) for a Two-Family Residential use location at least 10 feet to the rear or side of the principal structure 6) 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) decrease the minimum lot width and 25-2 (Subchapter F, Residential Design and Compatibility Standards, Article 2, Development Standards, 2.6 Setback Planes) to decrease the 45 degree angle side setback plane 7) 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) decrease the minimum lot width and 25-2 (Subchapter F, Residential Design and Compatibility Standards, Article 2, Development Standards, 2.6 Setback Planes) to decrease the 45 degree angle side setback plane 8) to amend existing Granted variance C15-2020-0065, to remove the condition related to STR’s 9) 25-2-551 (Lake Austin (LA) District Regulations) (B) (1) (b) from shoreline setback requirements to reduce the shoreline setback Withdrawn 1 1) 25- 2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum front yard and 25-2 Subchapter F, Residential Design and Compatibility Standards, Article 3, 3.3 to increase the finished floor elevation of the first story Denied Discussion Items Jan 2021. interpretations 0 8 0 new inquiries (Added dec# 2020) The deposition of the case items: 24 A. Granted 20 B. Postponed 1 C. Withdrawn D. Denied 7 E. Discussion Items 59 H-1/1 Granted 10 December 14, 2020 1) 25-10-131 (Additional Freestanding Signs permitted) (C) to increase the total number of freestanding signs 2) Subchapter F: Residential Design and Compatibility Standards, Article 2, Development Standards Section 2.1 (Maximum Development Permitted) to increase the F.A.R 3) 25- 2-515 (Rear Yard of a Through Lot) from setback requirements to decrease …
Board of Adjustment Training & Staff Support Workgroup 2020-07-02 (Leighton-Burwell, Hawthorne, Von Ohlen & Bailey) -- UPDATED Results /Action Items Proposed by the Workgroup (for discussion and possible action by the whole Board at upcoming BOA Meeting): 1. We want to start BOA trainings ASAP (thanks to our Liaison, this is already underway). 2. We want to have knowledgeable staff available at our hearings to answer questions regarding issues outside of BOA Liaison’s expertise (residential zoning), such was Lake Austin, Signage, Waterfront Overlay, etc. 3. We want to find out status of GIS mapping efforts showing history of BOA cases (location, type, etc.). 4. We want to build new bridges with City Staff and repair relationships from past situations. In addition, we want to be able to increase staff accountability without it appearing as a personal attack. 5. We want to know what the Department Supervisors need / want from BOA to better support each other and our joint processes. 6. We want to temper our deliberations to be focused on the facts of the cases before us and be less inflammatory or confrontational towards applicants and staff. 7. We want to hold ourselves accountable and our BOA colleagues in a civil and respectful manner. 8. We want to create processes for transitions in BOA leadership and for additions of new members to our Board. 9. We want to include training on the role the legislature plays in the BOA. Specifically how we are governed by both City and State mandates and what that means in how we operate. H-2/1
MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jerry Rusthoven, Assistant Director/Interim Lead Planning and Zoning Department DATE: May 22, 2020 SUBJECT: UNO Sign Regulations The Planning and Zoning Department is requesting the Commission initiate an amendment to the UNO ordinance to correct an inadvertent change made to the sign regulations in the ordinance. In November 2019 the City Council approved changes to the UNO ordinance. One of those changes was intended to address signs above the second story of a building. Those signs were required to be cut in or engraved into the structure of the building. If the name of a building were placed on the facade this made it physically difficult to change the name in the future. It was agreed by the stakeholders to remove this requirement. In making this change to the ordinance a mistake was made and the result is all illuminated signs were prohibited in the UNO area. This is not what was intended or agreed to by the stakeholders. Also, because the UNO sign regulations are also used in TODs and the North Burnet/Gateway Plan this mistake carries over to other areas. Staff is asking for the opportunity to correct the ordinance. We will be working with the same stakeholders involved in the November revisions. If you need additional information, please contact me by email or 512-974-3207. Cc: Andy Linseisen, Assistant Director, DSD H-3/1
C-1/1 LATE BACKUP From: To: Subject: Date: Tanner Blair Ramirez, Elaine Appeal for 314 and 316 W. 34th Street #C15-2021-0009 Tuesday, February 02, 2021 1:52:25 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hello Elaine, As the chair of Central Austin Urbanists, I am writing to inform you that our organization would encourage Board of Adjustment to interpret the NUNA NCCD in the narrowest way possible. Climate change is real. This housing would be in walking distance to transit, the university, and more amenities than we can list here. This is one of the few locations in the city that can truly support a car-free lifestyle and insisting that new housing continue to reinforce and promote automotive- centric living is a threat to the long-term health of our community. Additionally, we take exception to the tone and content of Mr. Levinski’s application, especially the continued use of the term “stealth dorms”. At a time when housing costs are at an all-time high, it is very telling the character and substance of their argument that so much emphasis is placed on making sure that families and groups people that don’t meet their platonic ideal are denigrated and relegated to the status of nuisance. This segregationist attitude is anathema to the spirit of radical inclusion that we believe is the actual foundation of a community, and we ask that the city reject the argument that there is a right way and a wrong way for families to look. Given the dubious merits of requiring parking, the very real climate crisis, and the very real housing crisis, we ask that the Board of Adjustment stand by staff’s judgement and not require more parking spaces than absolutely necessary. Regards, Tanner Blair Central Austin Urbanists CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. C-1/2 LATE BACKUP To: Board of Adjustment - Interpretation Appeal Unfortunately, I will not be in town to speak for the appeal of 314 & 316 W. 34th St. on February 8th so I’m writing you now. I live on 34th Street within 200 ft of this development. As a neighborhood, we worked very hard to come up with a NCCD to protect ourselves from stealth dorm developments that violate …
0 1 T E E R T S h t 4 3 T S E W 4 1 3 BOREN 1910 City of AustinREVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCEC-1/1 REVISED PLANS - LATE BACKUP 0 1 4 8 0 4 6 0 4 4 0 4 2 0 4 0 0 4 6 1 3 4 1 3 2 1 3 0 1 3 8 0 3 6 0 3 4 0 3 2 0 3 0 0 3 T E E R T S H T U R F WEST 34th STREET E N A L E N R O H T E E R T S h t 4 3 T S E W 4 1 3 BOREN A0-1 City of AustinREVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCEC-1/2 REVISED PLANS - LATE BACKUP 2 1 T E E R T S h t 4 3 T S E W 4 1 3 BOREN A1-1 City of AustinREVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCEC-1/3 REVISED PLANS - LATE BACKUP R 3 T E E R T S h t 4 3 T S E W 4 1 3 BOREN A1-2 City of AustinREVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCEC-1/4 REVISED PLANS - LATE BACKUP S T E E R T S h t 4 3 T S E W 4 1 3 BOREN W A1-3 City of AustinREVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCEC-1/5 REVISED PLANS - LATE BACKUP N T E E R T S h t 4 3 T S E W 4 1 3 BOREN E A1-4 City of AustinREVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCEC-1/6 REVISED PLANS - LATE BACKUP S2 S1 T E E R T S h t 4 3 T S E W 4 1 3 BOREN A1-5 City of AustinREVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCEC-1/7 REVISED PLANS - LATE BACKUP E3 E2 T E E R T S h t 4 3 T S E W 4 1 3 BOREN E1 A1-6 City of AustinREVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCEC-1/8 REVISED PLANS - LATE BACKUP 2D 1D 2 1 T E E R T S h t 4 3 T S E W 4 1 3 BOREN A2-1 City of AustinREVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCEC-1/9 REVISED PLANS - LATE BACKUP DS S N DE E W T E E R T S h t 4 3 T S E W 4 1 3 BOREN A2-2 City of AustinREVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCEC-1/10 REVISED PLANS - LATE BACKUP 2E T E E R T S …
0 1 T E E R T S h t 4 3 T S E W 6 1 3 BOREN 1910 City of AustinREVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCEC-1/1-REVISED PLANS - LATE BACKUP 0 1 4 8 0 4 6 0 4 4 0 4 2 0 4 0 0 4 6 1 3 4 1 3 2 1 3 0 1 3 8 0 3 6 0 3 4 0 3 2 0 3 0 0 3 T E E R T S H T U R F WEST 34th STREET E N A L E N R O H T E E R T S h t 4 3 T S E W 6 1 3 BOREN A0-1 City of AustinREVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCEC-1/2-REVISED PLANS - LATE BACKUP 2 1 T E E R T S h t 4 3 T S E W 6 1 3 BOREN A1-1 City of AustinREVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCEC-1/3-REVISED PLANS - LATE BACKUP R 3 T E E R T S h t 4 3 T S E W 6 1 3 BOREN A1-2 City of AustinREVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCEC-1/4-REVISED PLANS - LATE BACKUP S T E E R T S h t 4 3 T S E W 6 1 3 BOREN E A1-3 City of AustinREVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCEC-1/5-REVISED PLANS - LATE BACKUP N T E E R T S h t 4 3 T S E W 6 1 3 BOREN W A1-4 City of AustinREVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCEC-1/6-REVISED PLANS - LATE BACKUP S2 S1 T E E R T S h t 4 3 T S E W 6 1 3 BOREN A1-5 City of AustinREVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCEC-1/7-REVISED PLANS - LATE BACKUP E3 E2 T E E R T S h t 4 3 T S E W 6 1 3 BOREN E1 A1-6 City of AustinREVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCEC-1/8-REVISED PLANS - LATE BACKUP 2D 1D 2 1 T E E R T S h t 4 3 T S E W 6 1 3 BOREN A2-1 City of AustinREVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCEC-1/9-REVISED PLANS - LATE BACKUP DS S N DE E W T E E R T S h t 4 3 T S E W 6 1 3 BOREN A2-2 City of AustinREVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCEC-1/10-REVISED PLANS - LATE BACKUP 2E T E E R T S h t 4 3 T S E W 6 1 …
February 2, 2021 Jennifer Garcia 2237 W Braker Ln Austin TX, 78758 Re: C16-2021-0005 Property Description: 0.2538AC OF LOT 2 BLK B KRAMER LANE 65 SEC 1 RESUB OF LOT 10 THE (PRORATE 1/1/19 TO 9/12/19) Dear Jennifer, Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a variance(s) from the following sections of the Land Development Code; Section 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs) (H) to allow for all four (4) signs, one (1) monument sign, one (1) wall sign on each of the on the north, south, and west sides; to all be illuminated and the NBG Ordinance no. 20180412-051: to increase the sign height from 6 feet to 10 feet in order to provide signage for the TownePlace Suites Hotel being in the a “NBG-NP”, North Burnet Gateway - Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (North Burnet Neighborhood Plan); Austin Energy does not oppose the above sign variance requests, provided any proposed and existing improvements follow Austin Energy’s clearance criteria requirements, the National Electric Safety Code and OSHA. Any removal or relocation of existing electric facilities will be at owners /applicants’ expense. Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements which are additional conditions of review action: https://austinenergy.com/wcm/connect/8bb4699c-7691-4a74-98e7- 56059e9be364/Design+Criteria+Manual+Oct+2015.pdf?MOD=AJPERES the above If you require further information or have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact our office. Thank you for contacting Austin Energy. Eben Kellogg, Property Agent Austin Energy Public Involvement | Real Estate Services 2500 Montopolis Drive Austin, TX 78741 (512) 322-6050
January 25, 2021 John Meyer 703 Fletcher St Austin TX, 78704 Re: C15-2021-0001 Property Description: CEN 35FT OF E205FT BLK 3 BAWCOM SUBD Dear John, Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your revised application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a variance(s) from the following sections of the Land Development Code; Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) (a); to decrease the minimum lot width from 50 feet (required) to 34 feet 9 inches (requested); and Section 25-2 (Subchapter F, Residential Design and Compatibility Standards, Article 2, Development Standards, 2.6 Setback Planes; to decrease the 45 degree angle side setback plane (required) to 0 degrees (requested) on the west side of lot. In order to erect a Single-Family Residence in a SF-3”, Single-Family Residence zoning district. Austin Energy does not oppose the above variances requested, with the adjustments made to the proposed building figures, provided the proposed and existing improvements follow Austin Energy’s clearance criteria requirements, the National Electric Safety Code and OSHA. Any removal or relocation of existing electric facilities will be at owners /applicants’ expense. It is noted that the existing service drop for both 703 and 705 Fletcher Street is covered multi-plex secondary conductors. Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements which are additional conditions review action: https://austinenergy.com/wcm/connect/8bb4699c-7691-4a74-98e7- of 56059e9be364/Design+Criteria+Manual+Oct+2015.pdf?MOD=AJPERES the above If you require further information or have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact our office. Thank you for contacting Austin Energy. Eben Kellogg, Property Agent Austin Energy Public Involvement | Real Estate Services 2500 Montopolis Drive Austin, TX 78741 (512) 322-6050
From: To: Subject: Date: Jeremy Blackman Ramirez, Elaine Case Number: C15-2021-0001 Saturday, January 30, 2021 3:05:56 PM Fully support *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. F-1/1 LATE BACKUP From: To: Subject: Date: Attachments: Ramirez, Elaine 703 & 705 Fletcher / C15-2021-0001/ C15-2021-0002 Thursday, February 04, 2021 3:53:35 PM image001.png Hi Elaine, As I am a neighbor, I have received the Public Hearing Information in the mail. I was hoping that I could just email you rather then mailing the paperwork in. This applicant has purchased both properties, knowing the limitations and is now requesting rather significant variances on both properties so that he can construct larger homes for the purposes of greater profit. I think that this type of reasoning is what has ruined my neighborhood with the extreme number of demolitions and the resulting McMansions becoming the norm. What was an average neighborhood is now exclusively filled with million dollar homes. That said, I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF EITHER PROPOSAL. Let me know if this is sufficient. Hope all is well with you. Thank you. Jan Adler Plans Examiner Supervisor/ Commercial Plan Review City of Austin Development Services Department 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Dr. Austin, Tx. 78752 Office: 512-974-6377 Commercial Plan Review website: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/commercial-plan-review Please contact my direct supervisor with any kudos or concerns at Mitchell.Tolbert@austintexas.gov PER CITY ORDINANCE: All individuals scheduling or accepting a meeting invitation with a City Official are requested to provide responses to the questions at the following link: DSD Visitor Log. Please note that all information provided is subject to public disclosure via DSD’s open data portal. For more information please visit: City of Austin Ordinance 2016-0922-005 | City Clerk’s website | City Clerk’s FAQ’s F-1/2 LATE BACKUP F-1/3 LATE BACKUP p r o c e s s , v i s i t o u r w e b s i t e : w w w . a u s t i n t ~ x ~ s . g o v / d e v $ e r v i c e s . F o r a d d i t i o n a l i n f …
January 7, 2021 John Meyer 705 Fletcher St Austin TX, 78704 Re: C15-2021-0002 Property Description: W35FT OF E205FT BLK 3 BAWCOM SUBD Dear John, Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a variance(s) from the following sections of the Land Development Code; Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) (a); to decrease the minimum lot width from 50 feet (required) to 34 feet 9 inches (requested); and Section 25-2 (Subchapter F, Residential Design and Compatibility Standards, Article 2, Development Standards, 2.6 Setback Planes; to decrease the 45 degree angle side setback plane (required) to 0 degrees (requested) on the west side of lot. In order to erect a Single-Family Residence in a SF-3”, Single-Family Residence zoning district. Austin Energy does not oppose the above variance request provided any proposed and existing improvements follow Austin Energy’s clearance criteria requirements, the National Electric Safety Code and OSHA. Any removal or relocation of existing electric facilities will be at owners /applicants’ expense. Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements which are additional conditions of review action: https://austinenergy.com/wcm/connect/8bb4699c-7691-4a74-98e7- 56059e9be364/Design+Criteria+Manual+Oct+2015.pdf?MOD=AJPERES the above If you require further information or have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact our office. Thank you for contacting Austin Energy. Eben Kellogg, Property Agent Austin Energy Public Involvement | Real Estate Services 2500 Montopolis Drive Austin, TX 78741 (512) 322-6050
From: To: Subject: Date: Attachments: Ramirez, Elaine 703 & 705 Fletcher / C15-2021-0001/ C15-2021-0002 Thursday, February 04, 2021 3:53:35 PM image001.png Hi Elaine, As I am a neighbor, I have received the Public Hearing Information in the mail. I was hoping that I could just email you rather then mailing the paperwork in. This applicant has purchased both properties, knowing the limitations and is now requesting rather significant variances on both properties so that he can construct larger homes for the purposes of greater profit. I think that this type of reasoning is what has ruined my neighborhood with the extreme number of demolitions and the resulting McMansions becoming the norm. What was an average neighborhood is now exclusively filled with million dollar homes. That said, I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF EITHER PROPOSAL. Let me know if this is sufficient. Hope all is well with you. Thank you. Jan Adler Plans Examiner Supervisor/ Commercial Plan Review City of Austin Development Services Department 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Dr. Austin, Tx. 78752 Office: 512-974-6377 Commercial Plan Review website: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/commercial-plan-review Please contact my direct supervisor with any kudos or concerns at Mitchell.Tolbert@austintexas.gov PER CITY ORDINANCE: All individuals scheduling or accepting a meeting invitation with a City Official are requested to provide responses to the questions at the following link: DSD Visitor Log. Please note that all information provided is subject to public disclosure via DSD’s open data portal. For more information please visit: City of Austin Ordinance 2016-0922-005 | City Clerk’s website | City Clerk’s FAQ’s F-2/1 - LATE BACKUP F-2/2 - LATE BACKUP From: To: Subject: Date: Brent Ramirez, Elaine Case C15-2021-0002 Monday, February 01, 2021 9:48:03 AM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. F-2/3 - LATE BACKUP Brent F-2/4 - LATE BACKUP
February 2, 2021 Nancy Langdon 3805 Eton Ln Austin TX, 78727 Property Description: LOT 16 BLK N MILWOOD SEC 3 Re: C15-2021-0018 Dear Nancy, Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a variance(s) from the following sections of the Land Development Code; 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements; To decrease the minimum street side yard setback from 15 feet (required) to become 2 feet (requested); In order to complete a shed in a SF-2”, Single-Family Residence zoning district. Austin Energy does not oppose the above setback variance request, provided any proposed and existing improvements follow Austin Energy’s clearance criteria requirements, the National Electric Safety Code and OSHA. Any removal or relocation of existing electric facilities will be at owners /applicants’ expense. Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements which are additional conditions review action: https://austinenergy.com/wcm/connect/8bb4699c-7691-4a74-98e7- of 56059e9be364/Design+Criteria+Manual+Oct+2015.pdf?MOD=AJPERES the above If you require further information or have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact our office. Thank you for contacting Austin Energy. Eben Kellogg, Property Agent Austin Energy Public Involvement | Real Estate Services 2500 Montopolis Drive Austin, TX 78741 (512) 322-6050
From: To: Subject: Date: NANCY LANGDON Ramirez, Elaine Langdon BoA hearing comment Friday, January 29, 2021 11:11:04 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** She is at 3701 Hawkshead Dr 512-836-2485 If you’d like to verify. Elaine - this is Nancy Langdon - Kathryn Slagel is elderly - she was sure she had my mail. So I came to explain this to her - she has no email but wanted to comment so she filled out the paperwork & I’m emailing for her. CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. Nancy Langdon F-3/1 - LATE BACKUP From: To: Subject: Date: KRAIG HEINZEL Ramirez, Elaine Case # C15-2021-0018 Saturday, January 30, 2021 10:21:30 AM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. Sent from my iPhone F-3/2 - LATE BACKUP F-3/3 - LATE BACKUP F-3/4 - LATE BACKUP From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Katherine Daly Ramirez, Elaine Case number: C 15-2021-0018 Monday, February 01, 2021 1:38:20 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** My name is Katherine Daly Stratemann and I am the owner of 3806 Eton Lane, Austin, TX, 78727. My home, which I purchased in the fall of 2007, is across the street from 3805 Eton Lane, owned by Gary and Nancy Langdon. As a resident of the neighborhood, I do not oppose the shed that the Langdons are building. They are conscientious, respectful property owners, their home has lovely street appeal, and the structure will complement their main home. Please feel free to call me with any questions you may have. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, Katherine Daly Stratemann 512-837-8966 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. F-3/5 - LATE BACKUP Written comments must be submitted to the contact person listed on the notice before or at …
February 4, 2021 Lawrence Graham 5909 Bull Creek Rd Austin TX, 78757 Property Description: LOT 22 ALLANDALE SEC 3 Re: C15-2021-0019 Dear Lawrence, Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a variance(s) from the following sections of the Land Development Code; Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) rear setback requirements; to decrease the minimum rear yard setback from 10 feet (required) to 6 feet 7 inches (requested) in order to erect a Guest House in a SF-2”, Single-Family Residence zoning district. The proposed guest house was not shown or dimensioned within the application. DENIED BY AUSTIN ENERGY (AE), due to the proposal having written conflict with Austin Energy's clearance requirements. The Customer's existing facilities/installations shall maintain a minimum horizontal clearance of 7 feet-6 inches from primary and neutral overhead AE distribution conductors, which reside in the rear portion of the property above, requesting a variance from rear lot line setback requirements. Owner/applicant must obtain written approval of conflict resolution from AE prior to BOA approval. Please contact Eben Kellogg with AE Public Involvement and Real Estate Services at 322-6050. Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements which are additional conditions review action: https://austinenergy.com/wcm/connect/8bb4699c-7691-4a74-98e7- of 56059e9be364/Design+Criteria+Manual+Oct+2015.pdf?MOD=AJPERES the above If you require further information or have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact our office. Thank you for contacting Austin Energy. Eben Kellogg, Property Agent Austin Energy Public Involvement | Real Estate Services 2500 Montopolis Drive Austin, TX 78741 (512) 322-6050
Sent from my iPhone CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. Please see attached. We are in favor. *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Friday, January 29, 2021 1:40:59 PM C15-2021-0019 Ramirez, Elaine Allison Enderle Bassetti Date: Subject: To: From: F-4/1-LATE BACKUP F-4/2-LATE BACKUP From: To: Subject: Date: Attachments: 34th Street Cafe Ramirez, Elaine Fw: zoning 5909 Bull Creek Saturday, January 30, 2021 4:58:37 PM Scan.pdf *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Subject: zoning Hello Elaine, I am scanning my response to you but also wanted to add to it. Besides the fact that the goal here is not to block the building , because i know it will occur, but to look at it in a different capacity. First, my concern is that next door ( South ) they are building a very large two story home, once a one story bungalow. Then on the North side of my property, they are adding a 2 story structure obviously in the back yard. So what i will experience is something that i would like to ask to re-consider giving the variance to basically constrict a breeze in my back yard because of two new large structures. Not to mention no sun light for grass, landscaping, gardening, etc. How about just sun bathing to capture Vitamin D , especially during COVID. I also am interested in knowing if the home requesting the variance, ever pull permits for some of the past remodels, enclosing a garage, adding a large carport, adding sq footage, and now adding this structure. Also on the property is a portable building next door to me. (unsightly). I am sure the city is looking at the impervious coverage , because it sure does seem tight on this property. There is also a creek on the North side of the property. That would be a better location for this structure, because it's not really bothering anyone on that side, because of a small creek. The accesses is also better to put a walk way to the back to accesses , rather than walking all the way around the property to accesses during rain? i really think the architect and the home owner could improve …
Blackshear Prospect Hill Neighborhood Association President: Alex Finnell – – 512.773.3379 February 3rd, 2021 To: City of Austin Board of Adjustment RE: C15-2020-0067 Address: 1112 Harvard Street Owner: Michael & Jeanette Abbink From: Blackshear Prospect Hill Neighborhood Association Subject: Letter of Support for Variance from LDC to reduce required on-site parking spaces to zero. Please note that on January 28th, 2021, the Blackshear Prospect Hill Neighborhood Association voted unanimously in favor of supporting Michael & Jeanette’s variance request from the Land Development Code to reduce the number of required on-site parking spaces to zero. Michael & Jeanette Abbink and their architect Ernesto Cragnolino of Alterstudio presented their intent to use the property at 1112 Harvard Street as an accessory studio to their planned home on the adjacent lot at 2414 East 11th Street. With the assurance that there would be no vehicular access to this subject property and that all visitor access would be from the adjacent property, the neighborhood’s concerns about removing on-site parking were adequately addressed. As Harvard Street is quite narrow, curved, and bound by extreme topography, in this particular and unique case removing on-site parking and removing access from the street should actually improve safety conditions. Sincerely, Alex Finnell President, Blackshear Prospect Hill Neighborhood Association 512.773.3379 G-2/1-LATE BACKUP
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Interpretation Appeal Decision Sheet C-1 CASE NUMBER: C15-2021-0009 DATE: February 8, 2021 ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Ada Corral ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___-____VACANT ___Y____Don Leighton-Burwell ___Y____Rahm McDaniel ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Veronica Rivera ___Y____Yasmine Smith ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___-____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____Vacant (Alternate) ___-____Donny Hamilton (Alternate) APPLICANT: Robert Levinski OWNER/APPELLANT: Mary Ingle ADDRESS: 314 and 316 W 34TH ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The appellant has filed an appeal challenging staff decision in regards to the number of parking spaces. Base requirements is 2 parking spaces + 3 for the 3 new total bathrooms being added, which is then reduced to 4 parking spaces because of Urban Roadways Parking Reduction, Section 25-6- 478 (A). The appellant disagrees and argues that these two properties lack the requisite number of parking spaces, based on application of Part 6, Section 7 (J) of the NCCD ordinance in an “SF-3-NCCD-NP”, Single-Family-Neighborhood Conservation Combining District- Neighborhood Plan zoning district. Note: Please reference North University Neighborhood Conservation Combining District, Ordinance No. 040826-58, PART 6 (7) Appellant is referring to (J) and Staff is referring to (K), page 22 of 46. BOARD’S DECISION: Feb 8, 2021 BOA meeting The public hearing was closed by Chair Don Leighton-Burwell, Board Member Rahm McDaniel motions to Grant the appellant’s appeal; Board Member Jessica Cohen seconds on a 10-0 vote; GRANTED APPELLANT’S APPEAL - The Board finds that the correct Interpretation is that the 20% Urban Core parking reduction applies only to those parking spaces required by 25-6 Appendix A and the additional parking requirement imposed under paragraph J of the NCCD applies if a Two-Family or Duplex Residential Use contains at least 5 bathrooms even if one (1) or both of the buildings comprising the Use contains fewer than 5 bathrooms-City Staff has only required 2 additional parking spaces in violation of the NCCD and City Staff has misapplied the Urban Core parking reduction to a zoning requirement and the initial interpretation is the correct one. FINDING: 1. There is a reasonable doubt of difference of interpretation as to the specific intent of the regulations or map in that: City Staff has only required two additional parking spaces in violation on the NCCD, city staff has misapplied the Urban Core parking reduction in granting parking reduction to zoning requirement. 2. An appeal of use provisions could clearly permit a use which is in character with the uses enumerated for the …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet D-1 CASE NUMBER: C16-2021-0005 DATE: February 8, 2021 ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Ada Corral ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___-____VACANT ___Y____Don Leighton-Burwell ___Y____Rahm McDaniel ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Veronica Rivera ___Y____Yasmine Smith ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___-____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____Vacant (Alternate) ___-____Donny Hamilton (Alternate) APPLICANT: Jennifer Garcia OWNER: Michael Mahoney ADDRESS: 2237 W BRAKER LN VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a sign variance(s), a total of 4 signs on the property from the Land Development Code, Section 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs) a) (H) to allow for all four (4) signs, one (1) monument sign, one (1) wall sign on each of the on the north, south, and west sides, to all be illuminated and NBG Ordinance no. 20180412-051: b) to increase the sign height from 6 feet to 10 feet in order to provide signage for the TownePlace Suites Hotel in a “NBG-NP”, North Burnet Gateway– Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (North Burnet Neighborhood Plan) Note: The Land Development Code sign regulations 25-10-133 University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning Districts Signs: (H) A sign may not be illuminated or contain electronic images or moving parts. North Burnet/Gateway Ordinance No. 20180412-051 (4.8.2 Sign Regulations) (B) For all development located on a NBG Core Transit Corridor, one freestanding monument sign is permitted on a lot. The height of this sign should not exceed 6 feet and the sign area may not exceed 100 square feet. BOARD’S DECISION: BOA meeting Feb 8, 2021 The public hearing was closed by Chair Don Leighton-Burwell, Board Member Michael Von Ohlen motions to Grant with conditions that a) all four (4) signs, one (1) monument sign, one (1) wall sign on each of the on the north, south, and west sides, may all be illuminated and b) Maximum height of sign D-1/Presentation-1 to be eight (8) feet maximum height; Board Member Veronica Rivera seconds on a 10-0 vote; GRANT WITH CONDITIONS A) ALL FOUR (4) SIGNS, ONE (1) MONUMENT SIGN, ONE (1) WALL SIGN ON EACH OF THE ON THE NORTH, SOUTH, AND WESTSIDES, MAY ALL BE ILLUMINATED AND B) MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF SIGN D-1/PRESENTATION-1 TO BE EIGHT (8) FEET MAXIMUM HEIGHT. FINDING: 1. The variance is necessary because strict enforcement of the Article prohibits and reasonable opportunity to provide adequate signs on the site, considering the unique features of a site such as its dimensions, landscape, or topography, because: the proposed sign’s size …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet E-1 CASE NUMBER: C16-2021-0001 DATE: February 8, 2021 ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___N____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Ada Corral ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___-____VACANT ___Y____Don Leighton-Burwell ___Y____Rahm McDaniel ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Veronica Rivera ___Y____Yasmine Smith ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___-____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____Vacant (Alternate) ___-____Donny Hamilton (Alternate) APPLICANT: Claudia Salguero OWNER: Kate Ontes ADDRESS: 2402 GUADALUPE ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a sign variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs) (H) to allow for illumination of two (2) wall signs and two (2) projecting signs in order to provide signage for CVS in a “CS-CO-NP”, General Commercial Services- Conditional Overlay Combining District– Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (West University Neighborhood Plan) Note: The Land Development Code sign regulations 25-10-133 University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning Districts Signs (H) states a sign may not be illuminated or contain electronic images or moving parts. BOARD’S DECISION: BOA Jan 11, 2021 Board Member Jessica Cohen motions to postpone to February 8, 2021 due to technical difficulties, Board member Michael Von Ohlen seconds on a 9-0 vote; POSTPONED TO February 8, 2021 DUE TO TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES. FEB 8, 2021 The public hearing was closed by Chair Don Leighton-Burwell, Board Member Rahm McDaniel motions to postpone to March 8, 2021; Board Member Brooke Bailey seconds on a 9- 1 vote (Board member Jessisca Cohen nay); POSTPONED TO MARCH 8, 2021. FINDING: 1. The variance is necessary because strict enforcement of the Article prohibits and reasonable opportunity to provide adequate signs on the site, considering the unique features of a site such as its dimensions, landscape, or topography, because: OR, 2. The granting of this variance will not have a substantially adverse impact upon neighboring properties, because: OR, 3. The granting of this variance will not substantially conflict with the stated purposes of this sign ordinance, because: AND, 4. Granting a variance would not provide the applicant with a special privilege not enjoyed by others similarly situated or potentially similarly situated, because: ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison ____________________________ Don Leighton-Burwell Chairman Diana Ramirez for
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet E-2 CASE NUMBER: C16-2021-0003 DATE: February 8, 2021 _______Brooke Bailey _______Jessica Cohen _______Ada Corral _______Melissa Hawthorne _______VACANT _______Don Leighton-Burwell _______Rahm McDaniel _______Darryl Pruett _______Veronica Rivera _______Yasmine Smith _______Michael Von Ohlen _______Kelly Blume (Alternate) _______Vacant (Alternate) _______Donny Hamilton (Alternate) APPLICANT: Michael Gaudini OWNER: Timothy Finley ADDRESS: 2552 GUADALUPE ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a sign variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs), requesting a total of 12 signs on the property: (F) to allow three (3) wall signs above the second floor, one on each the northern, southern and eastern sides. (G) (1) one projecting sign for each building façade (allowed) to two (2) projecting signs (requested) on the eastern side (H) to allow for all twelve (12) signs, nine (9) on the northern, one (1)on the southern, one (1) on the eastern and one (1) on the western sides, to all be illuminated in order to provide signage for the Moxy Hotel in a “CS-CO-NP”, General Commercial Services- Conditional Overlay Combining District– Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (West University Neighborhood Plan) Note: The Land Development Code sign regulations 25-10-133 University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning Districts Signs (F) No signs may be placed above the second floor of a building, except for a non-electric sign that is engraved, cut into the building surface, or otherwise inlaid to become part of the building.(G) A wall sign is permitted if the sign complies with this subsection. (1) One projecting sign for each building façade is permitted (H) A sign may not be illuminated or contain electronic images or moving parts. BOARD’S DECISION: Jan 11, 2021 POSTPONED TO FEBRUARY 8, 2021 (Board member Melissa Hawthorne abstaining); Feb 8, 2021 POSTPONED TO MARCH 8, 2021 FINDING: 1. The variance is necessary because strict enforcement of the Article prohibits and reasonable opportunity to provide adequate signs on the site, considering the unique features of a site such as its dimensions, landscape, or topography, because: OR, 2. The granting of this variance will not have a substantially adverse impact upon neighboring properties, because: OR, 3. The granting of this variance will not substantially conflict with the stated purposes of this sign ordinance, because: AND, 4. Granting a variance would not provide the applicant with a special privilege not enjoyed by others similarly situated or potentially similarly situated, because: ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet F-1 CASE NUMBER: C15-2021-0001 DATE: Monday February 8, 2021 ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Ada Corral ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___-____VACANT ___Y____Don Leighton-Burwell ___Y____Rahm McDaniel ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Veronica Rivera ___Y____Yasmine Smith ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___-____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____Vacant (Alternate) ___-____Donny Hamilton (Alternate) OWNER/APPLICANT: John Meyer ADDRESS: 703 FLETCHER ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, a) 50 feet (required) to 34 feet 9 inches (requested) b) Section 25-2 (Subchapter F, Residential Design and Compatibility Standards, Article 2, Development Standards, 2.6 Setback Planes) to decrease the 45 degree angle side setback plane (required) to 0 degrees (requested) c) Section 25-2 (Subchapter F, Residential Design and Compatibility Standards, Article 2, Development Standards, 2.7 Sidewall Articulation) to remove the requirement for articulation on the interior side (west) (requested) in order to erect a Single Family Residence in a SF-3”, Single-Family Residence zoning district. BOARD’S DECISION: BOA MEETING Feb 8,2021 The public hearing was closed by Chair Don Leighton-Burwell, Board Member Michael Von Ohlen motions to postpone to March 8, 2021; Board Member Jessica Cohen seconds on a 10-0 vote; POSTPONED TO MARCH 8, 2021. Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) decrease the minimum lot width from FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison ____________________________ Don Leighton-Burwell Chairman Diana Ramirez for
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet F-2 CASE NUMBER: C15-2021-0002 DATE: Monday February 8, 2021 ____Y___Brooke Bailey ____Y___Jessica Cohen ____Y___Ada Corral ____Y___Melissa Hawthorne ____-___VACANT ____Y___Don Leighton-Burwell ____Y___Rahm McDaniel ____Y___Darryl Pruett ____Y___Veronica Rivera ____Y___Yasmine Smith ____Y___Michael Von Ohlen ____-___Kelly Blume (Alternate) ____-___Vacant (Alternate) ____-___Donny Hamilton (Alternate) OWNER/APPLICANT: John Meyer ADDRESS: 705 FLETCHER ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, a) Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) decrease the minimum lot width from 50 feet (required) to 34 feet 9 inches (requested) b) Section 25-2 (Subchapter F, Residential Design and Compatibility Standards, Article 2, Development Standards, 2.6 Setback Planes) to decrease the 45 degree angle side setback plane (required) to 0 degrees (requested) c) Section 25-2 (Subchapter F, Residential Design and Compatibility Standards, Article 2, Development Standards, 2.7 Sidewall Articulation) to remove the requirement for articulation on the interior side (east) (requested) in order to erect a Single Family Residence in a SF-3”, Single- Family Residence zoning district. BOARD’S DECISION: BOA MEETING February 8, 2021 The public hearing was closed by Chair Don Leighton-Burwell, Board Member Michael Von Ohlen motions to postpone to March 8, 2021; Board Member Jessica Cohen seconds on a 10-0 vote; POSTPONED TO MARCH 8, 2021. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison Don Leighton-Burwell ____________________________ Chairman Diana Ramirez for
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet F-3 CASE NUMBER: C15-2021-0018 DATE: Monday February 08, 2021 ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Ada Corral ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___-____VACANT ___Y____Don Leighton-Burwell ___Y____Rahm McDaniel ___N____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Veronica Rivera ___Y____Yasmine Smith ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___-____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____Vacant (Alternate) ___-____Donny Hamilton (Alternate) OWNER/APPLICANT: Nancy M Langdon ADDRESS: 3805 ETON LN VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance-(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum street side yard setback from 15 feet (required) to 2 feet (requested) in order to complete a Shed in a SF-2”, Single-Family Residence zoning district. BOARD’S DECISION: BOA MEETING FEB 8, 2021 The public hearing was closed by Chair Don Leighton-Burwell, Board Member Michael Von Ohlen motions to Grant; Board Member Melissa Hawthorne seconds on a 9-1 vote (Board member Darryl Pruett nay); GRANTED. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: of the underground utility running through the small back yard leaving no other location to place the shed then there it’s at. 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: the house is built up to the setbacks on all 3 sides front, east west sides leaving a small backyard which is where all the underground utilities are located (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: due to the location and utility easements there is no other place on the property to place the shed 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: the adjacent property is street. ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison ____________________________ Don Leighton-Burwell Chairman Diana Ramirez for
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet F-4 CASE NUMBER: C15-2021-0019 DATE: Monday February 08, 2021 _______Brooke Bailey _______Jessica Cohen _______Ada Corral _______Melissa Hawthorne _______VACANT _______Don Leighton-Burwell _______Rahm McDaniel _______Darryl Pruett _______Veronica Rivera _______Yasmine Smith _______Michael Von Ohlen _______Kelly Blume (Alternate) _______Vacant (Alternate) _______Donny Hamilton (Alternate) OWNER/APPLICANT: Lawrence Graham ADDRESS: 5909 BULL CREEK RD VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum rear yard setback from 10 feet (required) to 6 feet 7 inches (requested) in order to erect a Guest House in a SF-2”, Single-Family Residence zoning district. BOARD’S DECISION: BOA Meeting Feb 8, 2021 POSTPONED TO MARCH 8, 2021 FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: _____________________________ ____________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison Don Leighton-Burwell Chairman Diana Ramirez for
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet G-1 CASE NUMBER: C15-2020-0025 DATE: Monday February 8, 2021 ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Ada Corral ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___-____VACANT ___Y____Don Leighton-Burwell ___Y____Rahm McDaniel ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Veronica Rivera ___Y____Yasmine Smith ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___-____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____Vacant (Alternate) ___-____Donny Hamilton (Alternate) APPLICANT: David Cancialosi OWNER: John A Riley ADDRESS: 3707 RIVERCREST DR VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting variance(s) from the Land Development Code: (a) 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum front yard setback from 40 feet (required) to 10 feet 5 inches (requested for stairs), and 20 feet (requested for new garage). No structure currently existing. (b) Section 25-2-551 (Lake Austin District Regulations) (E) (2) to increase maximum impervious cover on a slope gradient more than 35 percent from 0 (zero) percent (not allowed) to 11.5 percent (requested) in order to erect a Single-Family Residence in a "LA", Lake Austin zoning district. Note: LDC Section 25-2-551 (E) (2) On a slope with a gradient of more than 35 percent, development is prohibited except for the construction of a fence, driveway, road or utility that cannot be reasonably placed elsewhere, or a non-mechanized pedestrian facility, such as a foot path, sidewalk, or stairs. BOARD’S DECISION: Jan 11, 2021 Board Member Jessica Cohen motions to postpone to February 8, 2021 due to technical difficulties, Board member Michael Von Ohlen seconds on a 9-0 vote; POSTPONED TO February 8, 2021 DUE TO TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES. Feb 8, 2021 The public hearing was closed by Chair Don Leighton-Burwell, Board Member Darryl Pruett motions to Grant with conditions including the creation of a Stormwater Management Plan (including Construction Mitigation Plan/Run-off Protection), Erosion Control and Rainwater Capture (for impervious cover in excess of that allowed without the variance) for review and approval by city staff; Board Member Michael Von Ohlen seconds on a 10-0 vote; GRANT WITH CONDITIONS INCLUDING THE CREATION OF A STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (INCLUDING CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION PLAN/RUN-OFF PROTECTION), EROSION CONTROL AND RAINWATER CAPTURE (FOR IMPERVIOUS COVER IN EXCESS OF THAT ALLOWED WITHOUT THE VARIANCE) FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY CITY STAFF. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: the LA zoning category was created capturing all land 500’landward of the 504.9’ contour line, newly zoned or rezoned most parcels to LA zoning category, parcel has a small residences which needs to be …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet G-2 CASE NUMBER: C15-2020-0067 DATE: Monday February 8, 2021 ____Y___Brooke Bailey ____Y___Jessica Cohen ____Y___Ada Corral ____Y___Melissa Hawthorne ____-___VACANT ____Y___Don Leighton-Burwell ____Y___Rahm McDaniel ____Y___Darryl Pruett ____Y___Veronica Rivera ____Y___Yasmine Smith ____Y___Michael Von Ohlen ____-___Kelly Blume (Alternate) ____-___Vacant (Alternate) ____-___Donny Hamilton (Alternate) APPLICANT: Linda Sullivan OWNER: Micheal and Jeanette Abbink ADDRESS: 1112 HARVARD ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-6-472 (Parking Facility Standards) Appendix A (Tables of Off- Street parking and Loading Requirements) to reduce the number of required parking spaces from 2 spaces (required) to 0 spaces (requested) in order to erect a Single-Family residence in a “SF-3- NP”, Single-Family Residence-Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (Central East Austin Neighborhood Plan) BOARD’S DECISION: Jan 11, 2021 POSTPONED TO FEBRUARY 8, 2021; Feb 8, 2021 The public hearing was closed by Chair Don Leighton-Burwell, Board Member Veronica Rivera motions to postpone to March 8, 2021; Board Member Melissa Hawthorne seconds on a 10-0 vote; POSTPONED TO MARCH 8, 2021. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison Don Leighton-Burwell ____________________________ Chairman Diana Ramirez for
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet G-3 CASE NUMBER: C15-2020-0069 DATE: Monday February 8, 2021 ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Ada Corral ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___-____VACANT ___Y____Don Leighton-Burwell ___Y____Rahm McDaniel ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Veronica Rivera ___Y____Yasmine Smith ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___-____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____Vacant (Alternate) ___-____Donny Hamilton (Alternate) APPLICANT: Courntey Mogonye-McWhorter OWNER: Malia Muir ADDRESS: 1230 ROCKCLIFF RD VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-551 (Lake Austin (LA) District Regulations) (B) (1) (b) from shoreline setback requirements to reduce the shoreline setback from 25 feet (required) to 10 feet (requested) (canal only) in order to erect a Single-Family Residence in an “LA”, Lake Austin zoning district. BOARD’S DECISION: The public hearing was closed by Chair Don Leighton-Burwell, Board Member Melissa Hawthorne motions to Postpone to December 14, 2020, Board Member Brooke Bailey seconds on a 9-2 vote (Board members Jessica Cohen and Donny Hamilton nay); POSTPONED TO DECEMBER 14, 2020. DEC 14, 2020 The public hearing was closed by Chair Don Leighton-Burwell, Board Member Michael Von Ohlen motions to Postpone to January 11, 2021, and Board Member Melissa Hawthorne seconds on a 10-0 vote; POSTPONED TO JANURARY 11, 2021. Jan 11, 2021 POSTPONED TO FEBRUARY 8, 2021; February 8, 2021 The public hearing was closed by Chair Don Leighton-Burwell, Board Member Darryl Pruett motions to Grant with conditions that the setback is reduced to seventeen (17) feet along Canal only and including the creation of a Stormwater Management Plan (including Construction Mitigation Plan/Run-off Protection), Erosion Control and Rainwater Capture (for impervious cover in excess of that allowed without the variance) for review and approved by city staff; Board Member Melissa Hawthorne seconds on a 10-0 vote; GRANT WITH CONDITIONS THAT THE SETBACK IS REDUCED TO SEVENTEEN (17) FEET ALONG CANAL ONLY AND INCLUDING THE CREATION OF A STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (INCLUDING CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION PLAN/RUN-OFF PROTECTION), EROSION CONTROL AND RAINWATER CAPTURE (FOR IMPERVIOUS COVER IN EXCESS OF THAT ALLOWED WITHOUT THE VARIANCE) FOR REVIEW AND APPROVED BY CITY STAFF. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: the shoreline setback is measured 25’ from all points along both the shoreline of Lake Austin and the canal, making this property unreasonably limited for its intended purpose of residential use. 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: …
YYCITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet G-4 CASE NUMBER: C15-2020-0083 DATE: Monday February 8, 2021 ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Ada Corral ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___-____VACANT ___Y____Don Leighton-Burwell ___Y____Rahm McDaniel ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Veronica Rivera ___Y____Yasmine Smith ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___-____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____Vacant (Alternate) ___-____Donny Hamilton (Alternate) APPLICANT: Daniel Salazar OWNER: Enez Salinas ADDRESS: 2810 GONZALES ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-774 (Two-Family Residential Use) (C) (2) (a) for a Two- Family Residential use location at least 10 feet to the rear or side of the principal structure (required) to 5 feet (requested) in order to erect a Secondary Dwelling Unit in an “SF-3-NP”, Single-Family Residence-Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (Govalle Neighborhood Plan) Note: Per LDC the second Dwelling Unit must be contained in a structure other than the principal structure and must be located at least 10 feet to the rear or side of the principal structure BOARD’S DECISION: BOA MEETING JAN 11, 2021 Board Member Jessica Cohen motions to postpone to February 8, 2021 due to technical difficulties, Board member Michael Von Ohlen seconds on a 9-0 vote; POSTPONED TO February 8, 2021 DUE TO TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES. February 8, 2021 The public hearing was closed by Chair Don Leighton-Burwell, Board Member Brooke Bailey motions to postpone to March 8, 2021; Board Member Darryl Pruett seconds on a 10-0 vote; POSTPONED TO MARCH 8, 2021. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison Don Leighton-Burwell ____________________________ Chairman Diana Ramirez for
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet G-5 CASE NUMBER: C15-2021-0008 DATE: Monday February 8, 2021 ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Ada Corral ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___-____VACANT ___Y____Don Leighton-Burwell ___Y____Rahm McDaniel ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Veronica Rivera ___Y____Yasmine Smith ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___-____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____Vacant (Alternate) ___-____Donny Hamilton (Alternate) APPLICANT: Joel Nolan OWNER: Sarah Haynie ADDRESS: 3708 ROBINSON AVE VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) to amend existing Granted variance C15-2020-0065, to remove the condition related to STR’s BOARD’S DECISION: BOA MEETING JAN 11, 2021 Board Member Jessica Cohen motions to postpone to February 8, 2021 due to technical difficulties, Board member Michael Von Ohlen seconds on a 9-0 vote; POSTPONED TO February 8, 2021 DUE TO TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES. February 8, 2021 The public hearing was closed by Chair Don Leighton-Burwell, Board Member Darryl Pruett motions to deny request; Board Member Brooke Bailey seconds on a 10-0 vote; DENIED. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison ____________________________ Don Leighton-Burwell Chairman Diana Ramirez for
Versión en español a continuación. Board of Adjustment Meeting February 8, 2021 Board of Adjustment to be held February 8, 2021 with Social Distancing Modifications Public comment will be allowed via telephone; no in-person input will be allowed. All speakers must register in advance (February 7, 2021 by noon). All public comment will occur at the beginning of the meeting. To speak remotely at the February 8, 2021 Board of Adjustment Meeting, members of the public must: •Call or email the board liaison at 512-974-2202 or elaine.ramirez@austintexas.gov no later than noon, (February 7, 2021 the day before the meeting). The following information is required: speaker name, item number(s) they wish to speak on, whether they are for/against/neutral, email address and telephone number (must be the same number that will be used to call into the meeting). •Once a request to speak has been made to the board liaison, the information to call on the day of the scheduled meeting will be provided either by email or phone call. •Speakers must call in at least 15 minutes prior to meeting start time in order to speak, late callers will not be accepted and will not be able to speak. •Speakers will be placed in a queue until their time to speak. •Handouts or other information may be emailed to elaine.ramirez@austintexas.gov by noon the day before the scheduled meeting. This information will be provided to Board and Commission members in advance of the meeting. •If the meeting is broadcast live, it may be viewed here: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Reunión del Board of Adjustment la FECHA de la reunion (February 8, 2021) La junta se llevará con modificaciones de distanciamiento social Se permitirán comentarios públicos por teléfono; no se permitirá ninguna entrada en persona. Todos los oradores deben registrarse con anticipación (February 7, 2021 antes del mediodía). Todos los comentarios públicos se producirán al comienzo de la reunión. Para hablar de forma remota en la reunion February 8, 2021, los miembros del público deben: junta en 512-974-2202 o • Llame o envíe un correo electrónico al enlace de elaine.ramirez@austintexas.gov a más tardar al mediodía (February 7, 2021 el día antes de la reunión). Se requiere la siguiente información: nombre del orador, número (s) de artículo sobre el que desean hablar, si están a favor / en contra / neutral, dirección de correo electrónico (opcional) y un número de teléfono (debe ser el número que se …
