Item 09 - Approve the Final Design for Corridor: Seg A Escarpment Trailhead AIPP Project – Yuliya Lanina — original pdf
Backup
• Project: Corridor Seg A : Escarpment Trailhead • Artist(s): Yuliya Lanina • Phase: Final Design • Sponsoring Department: Transportation Public Works • Project Budget: $63,000 • Council District: 8 • Project Manager: Bryana Iglesias ARTS COMMISSON MEETING DATE:9/10/24 Art in Public Places City of Austin Cultural Arts Division 5202 East Ben White Boulevard, Suite 400 Austin, TX 78741 512.974.7700 / aipp@austintexas.gov PROCESS SUMMARY Corridor Construction Program Slaughter Lane Art in Public Places Projects (2) Project Summary The Art in Public Places program seeks to commission works of art of redeeming quality that advance public understanding of visual art and enhance the aesthetic quality of public places through the selection of two (2) artists or artist teams who can innovatively and thoughtfully respond to the design within the context of the Slaughter Lane Construction project. Project Background Slaughter Lane serves as one of the City’s major horizontal throughways and is the southernmost roadway included in the Corridor Construction Program. Similar to its paralleled neighbor William Cannon Drive, Slaughter Lane has seen an explosive amount of development over the years. While some segments of Slaughter Lane have retained its rural roots, much of the roadway now hosts sprawling residential neighborhoods and bustling shopping centers. Historical Context This roadway is named after the nearby Slaughter Creek, which gets its namesake from pioneer Stephen F. Slaughter. One of the earliest white settlers in what is now Travis County, Mr. Slaughter had received a large grant of land in the south Austin area in 1835. Over the years, the land that contains Slaughter Lane has transformed with major residential and commercial development. But not too long ago, Slaughter Lane was still known to Austinites as a quieter part of town that felt more secluded from urban life than it does today. Native Austinite and Corridor Program Project Manager for Slaughter Lane Greg Weems recalls life along Slaughter in the 1980s, when he was in grade school: “Back then it was pretty common for a lot of kids to ride their bikes [along Slaughter Lane], so we grouped up and rode together. The biggest concern we had was crossing the train tracks—but there is an overpass there now…” Culture and Arts of Corridor Similar to William Cannon Drive, Slaughter Lane is regarded by many as a utilitarian roadway that lacks an obvious arts and culture scene. As growth along this corridor continues, there are opportunities to leverage placemaking/keeping projects to celebrate the families and individuals who live, work, learn and play along this roadway. CCP Slaughter Lane Process Summary Some of the most frequented destinations along Slaughter Lane include but are not limited to the Southpark Meadows Shopping Center along I-35, Alamo Drafthouse, Circle C Metropolitan Park and Mary Moore Searight Metropolitan Park. About the Corridor Construction Program In 2016, Austin voters approved $720 million in bonds for transportation and mobility improvements throughout the city. These approved funds are handled by both regional and local transportation authorities. Through 2024, a dedicated team of planners, engineers, data analysts, and construction teams will be delivering these improvements for a safer and more mobile Austin. These efforts are guided by Austin City Council’s Contract With Voters. $482 million of the 2016 Mobility Bond has been dedicated to the City of Austin’s Corridor Construction Program. Used for getting around, corridors are destinations for residents and visitors, as well as, home to many businesses and Austinites. The Corridor Construction Program is tasked with development, design, and construction for improvements along nine key Austin corridors. These construction projects are focused on improving mobility, safety, and connectivity for all users—whether driving, walking, biking, or taking public transit. By investing in corridors, the City of Austin seeks to positively affect both mobility and community use of these roadways. By leveraging the Mobility Bond dollars through partnerships and grants, the Corridor Program will provide additional enhancements like pocket green spaces, public artwork, and creative signage. These enhancements offer an opportunity to amplify and celebrate the communities and cultures that already exist in and around the corridors. Corridors are primary roadways that affect the overall transportation network of a city. For further information, about the Contract with the Voters and all the work of the Corridor Mobility Program, please see more information: https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/Corridor-Mobility- Program/gukj-e8fh/ AIPP Opportunities through the Corridor Construction Program The Art in Public Places Program will commission works of art for corridors, sidewalks and/or right-of- ways in each corridor. There will be thirteen Art in Public Places commissions funded through the Corridor Construction Program, for transportation and mobility enhancements along nine corridors covering 50 miles of roadway throughout Austin. Selected artists will be commissioned to create artwork which innovatively and thoughtfully responds to the space and community of the corridor, as well as to the overall purpose and goals of the Corridor Construction Program. Budget The funds for these projects are derived from pooling 2% AIPP public art portion of the estimated construction budget of the Slaughter Lane Corridor Construction Project budget. The total award for each of the two (2) artist contracts is $63,000, inclusive of design, fabrication and installation, including permitting fees, travel and shipping expenses, insurance and other project related costs. Public Art Intent & Goals The goals of these two (2) opportunities are to select an artist, in collaboration with project stakeholders and City staff, who will design an artwork that: » Helps connects people to nature; » Supports the vitality of the small business community; » Encourages participation of families and youths; CCP Slaughter Lane Process Summary Integrates seamlessly into the construction of the corridor; » » Enhances the dialogue surrounding mobility and the experience of pedestrian, car, and bike travelers; Is made from durable and low maintenance materials; and » » Enriches or adds to the depth/breadth of the City of Austin’s public art collection. Selection Process A Request for Opt-in was distributed on July 16, 2021, to 115 artists in the Corridor Construction Program AIPP Artist Pool. An Artist Information Meeting was held via Zoom on July 22, 2021. 32 artists opted-in via a Microsoft Forms application by the close date of August 3, 2021. 27 of the artists who opted in were eligible. 5 artists were deemed ineligible due to currently being under contract with AIPP for a permanent commission. On June 27, 2022, city staff and the Jury met via an online Zoom meeting and reviewed applications for artists in the Pool that opted-into the two (2) Slaughter opportunities. Upon review of the applicants, the Jury recommended Yuliya Lanina to be commissioned for the Segment A (Barstow to Loop 1) Slaughter Lane opportunity, and Calder Kamin as the alternate; and Matthew Rodriguez to be commissioned for the Segment B (Menchaca Rd to West of S. Congress) Slaughter Lane opportunity, and Christine Rojek as the alternate. The selection of the artists and artist teams was based on whose qualifications best met the requirements for the project. Self-Identifying Demographics Information: Corridor Pool (114) Corridor Pool Slaughter Opt-In (32) Slaughter Finalists (4) Slaughter Finalists 16 13 2 1 2 15 42 23 47 44 2 21 2 87 25 Hispanic Black Asian Arabic Native American Mixed Race White Unknown Male Only Female or Team w/ Female Gender Queer Unknown Veteran Non-Veteran Unknown CCP Slaughter Lane Process Summary 14% 11% 2% 1% 2% 13% 37% 20% 41% 39% 2% 18% 2% 76% 22% Slaught er Opt- In 19% 3% 0% 0% 0% 13% 47% 19% 53% 41% 0% 6% 0% 97% 3% 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 3 0 0 0 4 0 6 1 0 0 0 4 15 6 17 13 0 2 0 31 1 25% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 50% 25% 25% 75% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% LGBTQIA Not-LGBTQIA Unknown Disability Not-Disability Unknown 7 81 26 3 52 59 6% 71% 23% 3% 46% 52% 1 24 7 1 24 7 3% 75% 22% 3% 75% 22% 1 2 1 0 3 1 25% 50% 25% 0% 75% 25% The Jury was made up of community stakeholders, city staff and subject matter experts. The Jury included: 1. Armin Salek, Community Member Juror 2. Dawn Hewitt, Community Member Juror 3. Tara Barton, Community Member Juror 4. 5. Kathleen Rubin, Corridor Program Office Jaime Castillo, District 2 Arts Commissioner The Jury was supported by staff Marjorie Flanagan, AIPP Acting Program Manager & Sr. Project Manager, and Alex Irrera, AIPP Project Manager. Jury Comments Slaughter Ln Segment A: Recommended Artist Yuliya Lanina: “Unique, whimsical, and captivating physical features that would bring attention to the park and enjoyment to passersby.” “They jury selected Yuliya Lanina for the western segment of Slaughter Lane because their work is playful and draws influence from nature - 2 qualities we felt were valuable given the context of the roadway and the many young families living there.” “I think this artist will be a great fit for the area. Her portfolio showed work that was colorful, whimsical and engaging, and I could see users of the corridor of all ages being intrigued by it! Her characters' unusual forms play with gender and the natural imagery they seem to be rooted in, personifying it as well, which may bring extra fun for guests of the park, who are about to go explore the local flora and fauna. Her use of a variety of media seems like a strength for this project, and I am excited to see what might result!” “Lanina's work is whimsical, and her previous work was successful in attracting families & young children. I am interested in seeing how the artist will approach the challenge of a larger budget and requirement of permanency.” “Yuliya's sense of whimsy and connection to nature through her art will work well in these green spaces. She is also an accomplished video artist and perhaps this could add an interesting element to the work if feasible in the space.” Slaughter Ln Segment A: Recommended Alternate CCP Slaughter Lane Process Summary Calder Kamin: “Connection to the nature and rural history of South Austin.” “Like Yulila, Calder's work is playful and references the natural world. We felt she was the best alternate for this segment based on those similarities.” “This artist's use of color and connection to nature stands out. Her use of recycled materials is exciting at a time we find ourselves battling our own trash as a human species, and the fact that it is collected locally makes this artist feel rooted in Austin in a unique way. Her works' comments on the health of our waterways seem particularly appropriate for this part of the corridor, where viewers of the work will be engaging directly with the Edward's aquifer. Her colorful 3D creations seem like they would charm people of all ages.” “Kamin's work is family friendly and inspires exploration of the environment through its nature imagery and use of recycled materials.” “I believe Calder's work speaks to the environmental issues that surround this area of Austin because of springs and aquifers that are directly impacted by trash and chemicals on the surface. This work certainly address those concerns in a colorful and engaging way.” Slaughter Ln Segment B: Recommended Artist Matthew Rodriguez: “Beautiful work with steel/aluminum that captured stories with cultural references and experiences of residents in Austin.” “Matthew was selected for the eastern segment of the roadway because of his connection to that community. His work, in particular several laser cut panels, paired historical references with very Austin-specific imagery that the group felt made him the perfect fit for our east side project.” “The presence of this artist's work throughout the city and long reputation as a local artist make him a great representative for Austin culture and deserving of an opportunity to make work that lots of users will interact with at this rather busy and central part of the corridor. His work both in monochrome steel as well as in color in bold and eye catching and playful as well as recognizable and at this point maybe a bit iconic of the city. I think it will fit in this busy area and perhaps slow people down as well to take in the art as well as the easily overlooked Mary Moore Searight Park.” “Rodriguez's storytelling capabilities & playful iconography are appropriate for the neighborhoods. Excited to see what he creates.” “Matthew's work reflects Austin through its use of color and shapes. His portfolio also reflects a real thoughtfulness to creating site specific work with the metal work representing the Montopolis Rec Center nicely.” Slaughter Ln Segment B: Recommended Alternate Christine Rojek: CCP Slaughter Lane Process Summary “Powerful aluminum structures that were interactive and visually captivating.” “Christine's sculpture work showed movement in a way that the jury felt captured the goals of the projects.” “This artist is obviously well practiced at creating art that responds to public sites, with several impressive examples in her portfolio. Her animated sculptures would, I think, manage to catch attention and draw users towards the park in this busy segment of the corridor. The kinetic element in her work seems fun and engaging for passersby traveling by various means. And I imagine this element might particularly appeal to the many young people around, with several schools in the area, and give them a great experience with public art.” “Rojeck's work is visually engaging in its mechanical properties. Her portfolio demonstrates work that is adapted to its environment.” “Christine's work is engaging through the articulation of these aluminum pieces and would hold strong presence in the space. Her eye to site specificity is exampled through her portfolio, which shows a high-level of consistent work.” ART IN PUBLIC PLACES PANEL (Comprehensive Prospectus for all Corridor Projects) On June 8, 2020, the AIPP Panel approved the Prospectus for the Comprehensive Corridor Construction Program AIPP projects. Panel Member Villanueva motioned for approval and Arts Commission Liaison Barnes seconded. (5-0-0). Panel Member Carr was absent and there was one vacancy. AUSTIN ARTS COMMISSION (Comprehensive Prospectus for all Corridor Projects) On July 20, 2020, the Arts Commission approved the Prospectus for Comprehensive Corridor Construction Program AIPP projects on consent (10-0-0). ART IN PUBLIC PLACES PANEL (Artist Selection) On July 11, 2022, Alex Irrera presented the artist selection process recommendation for the Corridor Construction Program Slaughter Lane AIPP Projects. Panel Member Carr made a motion to approve the selection process recommendation of Yuliya Lanina as the commissioned artist for the Segment A (Barstow to Loop 1) Slaughter Lane opportunity, and Calder Kamin as the alternate; and Matthew Rodriguez as the commissioned artist for the Segment B (Menchaca Rd to West of S. Congress) Slaughter Lane opportunity, and Christine Rojek as the alternate. Panel Member Muzacz seconded the motion. Motion approved (5-0-0). Panel Members Lemmo and Nolan were absent. AUSTIN ARTS COMMISSION (Artist Selection) On July 18, 2022, the Arts Commission On consent, all AIPP items, 12-16, Motion Polgar 2nd Castillo. All approved. Barnes, Garza, Flores, and Keeton were absent (check with minutes once approved) ART IN PUBLIC PLACES PANEL (Mid-Design Review) On January 8, 2024, Artist Yuliya Lanina presented their Mid-Design to the Art in Public Places Panel via Zoom. The Panel gave feedback. No action was taken. CCP Slaughter Lane Process Summary Blossom Gazes Yuliya Lanina Final Design Slaughter Lane Corridor AIPP project at Escarpment Blvd Community Engagement Community engagement included interviewing in person and online Circle C homeowners association, WFC visitors and Employees, neighborhood facebook group. We received around 100 answers total in person and online Upon review of all collected surveys and responses, results included that people were excited about public art and wanted to see pleasant to look at, kid friendly artwork that would incorporate vibrant colors and relate to native flora. Some people also wanted to see work created out of metal. All of these desires were incorporated into the final project design of Blossom Gazes. Narrative "Blossom Gazes" aims to foster a deeper connection with nature, offering a visual treat to pedestrians, drivers, and cyclists alike. In response to community feedback, I've envisioned steel flowers, drawing inspiration from our local flora. These sculptures encapsulate playfulness, vibrancy, and appeal to all ages, while maintaining a strong connection to native plants. "Blossom Gazes" is not merely a static art installation; it's a living testament to our symbiotic relationship with the environment. As each steel flower stands tall, it beckons passersby to pause and reflect on the beauty and fragility of nature. In designing these sculptures, I meticulously selected elements inspired by the intricate patterns and vibrant hues of local flora. Each flower is a homage to the diverse ecosystem that surrounds us, inviting viewers to immerse themselves in its splendor. But beyond their aesthetic appeal, these steel blossoms serve as ambassadors for ecological awareness. They whisper tales of resilience and adaptation, mirroring the unwavering spirit of the natural world in the face of adversity. As sunlight dances upon their metallic surfaces, these sculptures become a canvas for contemplation. They remind us of our interconnectedness with all living things and urge us to tread lightly upon the earth, mindful of the impact of our actions. Through "Blossom Gazes," I hope to spark conversations about conservation and stewardship, inspiring communities to embrace a more harmonious coexistence with the world around us. After all, in nurturing nature, we ultimately nurture ourselves. Materials/Process Flowers are made out of durable and low maintenance materials. Steel aspects of construction will last for 40-50 years, longer if paint is maintained. The engineering of the mild steel sculpture ensures that it can withstand its own weight and external forces, such as wind or accidental impacts. The combination of mild steel and epoxy paint provides a strong and durable structure that can resist corrosion, rust, and degradation caused by environmental factors. Epoxy paint acts as a protective barrier, preventing moisture penetration and reducing the risk of corrosion, which can weaken the steel structure over time. CNC’d mild steel flower pedals out of 16 gauge sheet metal, 3” Grade 50 Solid Round Bar. Spherical steel eye ball with steel eye lashes. Cut, fabricated ( including welding,) primed, finish painted. Installed on a 1” thick steel base plate that is structurally connected to the concrete footer. Mild Steel: - Mild steel, also known as low carbon steel, is a widely used type of steel due to its affordability, versatility, and ease of fabrication. It has a lower carbon content compared to other types of steel, which makes it more malleable and easier to work with during the sculpture's construction process. Mild steel offers good strength and durability, making it suitable for outdoor sculptures that are exposed to different weather conditions. Materials/Paint Epoxy paint is a type of coating that consists of epoxy resin and a curing agent. It offers excellent adhesion, hardness, and chemical resistance, making it a popular choice for protecting metal surfaces. This type of paint creates a strong and durable protective layer on the surface of the steel, shielding it from moisture, oxidation, and other environmental factors. Epoxy paint is available in various colors and finishes, allowing for customization and aesthetic appeal in sculptures and other metal structures. Inspiration. Texas flowers Site Location: 0 2 L I A R T K E E R C R E T H G U A L S N O H C N A R C R I C 36'' - RCP 89-0030 C I R C R A N C H O N S L A U G H T E R C R E E K T R A I L 1 8 PROPOSED LOCATION FOR FLOWER ART PIECE NORTHING: 10045393.1147 EASTING: 3071945.3894 ' 2 1 1 2 ' 121444 FH 197720 W 6'' - DI 197735 E 6'' - DI E 16273 8 3 9 6 - '' 0 0 - 3 0 R C P 16331 E A y m h a F l r.tb lo o c _ e tim e m a n 9 1 L I A R T R E T H G U A L S K E E R C 18'' - PV C 97-0683 N O H C N A R C R I C 24'' - DI 86-0812 16283 E 16282 E 8 7 - 0 5 6 3 6 '' - D I 8 7 - 0 5 6 3 2 ' ' - D I 3 0 + 0 0 16309 E 16310 E 16311 E FH 1 9 7 4 3 8 W W 1 9 7 4 4 7 16312 E 16322 16323 E 16324 E 16325 E 16326 E 16327 E D V L B T N E M P R A C S E W O R T S I X E E 16328 16329 E E 16330 W O R T S I X E 16281 16280 E 16279 E 16278 E 16277 E 16276 16275 E 16274 N O I T P I R C S E D N O I S I V E R E T A D Y B V E R . O N T C E J O R P T N E M E V O R P IM E N A L R E T H G U A L S D A E H IL A R T T N E M P R A C S E G IN W A R D IC T A M E H C S T R A R E W O L F n g .d T R A _ R E W O L F _ L P D R _ B 1 -C T G L \S 9 5 0 0 8 5 0 \d a n _ 6 1 s d _ m o c e \a g in rk o w w :\p c M A 1 :1 7 :2 8 4 2 0 /2 9 /2 8 121458 AECOM Technical Services Inc. F- 3580 13640 Briarwick Drive, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78729 512-454-4797 0' 25' 50' SCALE IN FEET Site Location: 0 2 L I A R T K E E R C R E T H G U A L S N O H C N A R C R I C 36'' - RCP 89-0030 C I R C R A N C H O N S L A U G H T E R C R E E K T R A I L 1 8 PROPOSED LOCATION FOR FLOWER ART PIECE NORTHING: 10045393.1147 EASTING: 3071945.3894 ' 2 1 1 2 ' 121444 FH 197720 W 6'' - DI 197735 E 6'' - DI E 16273 8 3 9 6 - '' 0 0 - 3 0 R C P 16331 E A y m h a F l r.tb lo o c _ e tim e m a n 9 1 L I A R T K E E R C R E T H 18'' - PV C 97-0683 G U A L S N O H C N A R C R I C 24'' - DI 86-0812 16283 E 16282 E 8 7 - 0 5 6 3 6 '' - D I 8 7 - 0 5 6 3 2 ' ' - D I 3 0 + 0 0 16309 E 16310 E 16311 E FH 1 9 7 4 3 8 W W 1 9 7 4 4 7 16312 E 16322 16323 E 16324 E 16325 E 16326 E 16327 E D V L B T N E M P R A C S E W O R T S I X E E 16328 16329 E E 16330 W O R T S I X E 16281 16280 E 16279 E 16278 E 16277 E 16276 16275 E 16274 N O I T P I R C S E D N O I S I V E R E T A D Y B V E R . O N T C E J O R P T N E M E V O R P IM E N A L R E T H G U A L S D A E H IL A R T T N E M P R A C S E G IN W A R D IC T A M E H C S T R A R E W O L F n g .d T R A _ R E W O L F _ L P D R _ B 1 -C T G L \S 9 5 0 0 8 5 0 \d a n _ 6 1 s d _ m o c e \a g in rk o w w :\p c M A 0 :3 6 :2 8 4 2 0 /2 9 /2 8 121458 AECOM Technical Services Inc. F- 3580 13640 Briarwick Drive, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78729 512-454-4797 0' 25' 50' SCALE IN FEET Artist Mock Up's/ Renderings Fabricator Drawing A 557 8 A 333 8 2053 4 eyeball bolted to back plate 1791 2 leaves welded to stem 3 SECTION A-A SCALE 1 / 6 peddles and "eyelash" welded to back plate DWG BY: SCALE: npetr LIVEWIRE FABRICATION 76 YORK CREEK ROAD. DRIFTWOOD, TX, 78619 281-974-0223 ben@livewirefabrication.com livewirefabrication.net r t e p n : T C E T I H C R A r t e p n : E T I S B O J CREATED DATE: REVISION #: REVISION DATE: Colors Prototype Conservation concerns Grout: There will be a leveling gap between the base plate and the top of concrete and that gap will be grouted. Grout should be shrinkage-compensating or non-shrink Portland cement grout conforming to ASTM C1107. Acceptable products include Master Builders "Masterflow 713 Grout," Dayton Superior "Sure-Grip High Performance Grout," or approved equal. The installer will place one or two small overflow holes in the base plate to ensure that the 1.5" leveling gap is completely filled. The grout will have adequate long-term stability and will not hold moisture. Flat Nylon Washer: It would sit between the top of the steel base plate and the steel washer (red below). It should not be visible, and will just protect the paint on the base plate from being scratched by the steel anchor's hardware. Flat Nylon washer will help seat the nuts more securely, and will prevent the nuts from scratching the primer layer during installation Maintenance The sculpture needs to be repainted If colors fade more than 20 percent The sculpture needs to be repaired If there is visible deformation of any kind If there is graffiti on the sculpture, especially derogatory and offensive The sculpture would need to be de-installed only in case the engineer deems it unsafe due to irreparable structural damage It’s okay to use similar colors if exact ones are not available. It is also okay to place sculpture in a different location or separate the flowers. After the colors start fading in 10-12 years, please use DTM from PPG product in the field which will bring the color back Schedule Final design review September , 2024 Fabrication October-November, 2024 Installation December 2024 Live Wire Fabrication $16,500 (two flowers) Cost Description Drawing/CAD/Modeling Rbhu Engineering Imagination Cement foundation 20% $150 per gallon/20 gallons Item Prototyping Fabrication Engineer Foundation Insurance Contigency Artist fee Paint (PPG) Painters fee Total Installation/Transport Live Wire Fabrication D&D Insurance Cost $4,500 $6,500 $7,000* $2,000 $1000 $7,000 $13,000 $3,000 $2,500 $63,000 Pre-fabrication Review: Blossom Gazes, Yuliya Lanina Report Date: June 11, 2024 Note: These comments are based on proposal documents. Certain components of the design were not finalized at the time of this report; accordingly, these should not be considered final or comprehensive recommendations. Project Overview: Blossom Gazes by Yuliya Lanina is a proposed painted steel sculptural installation for the Slaughter Lane Corridor at Escarpment Boulevard. The sculpture consists of two oversized, colorful, anthropomorphic flowers, intended to emphasize the relationship between the viewer and the surrounding nature. The tallest flower will be approximately 17 feet high; the second flower, slightly less. Materials and fabrication: The flowers will be constructed of primed and painted steel. The steel component of each flower will be fabricated by Livewire Fabrication, LLC, from (possibly CNC-routed) 16-gauge mild steel sheet, 3” mild steel bar, and steel (type unspecified) spheres, welded to shape. The construction includes round bases welded to the “stems,” outfitted with either 4 or 8 bolt holes (not yet determined) to receive installation bolts. The steel components will be primed with PPG Multiprime 4160 Red Primer, an alkyd1 coating formulated for marine applications, and specifically formulated for corrosion resistance. The sculptures will then be painted with PPG 7-Line LV Alkyd Gloss paint in several colors, a one-component oil alkyd. The exact colors for all components were not provided for this review, but two of the color lines may be “Deep Rustic Tint” and “Pastel Tint.” Materials and fabrication comments and recommendations: • The two main factors that will impact the sculptures’ longevity are corrosion resistance of the mild steel and the durability of the alkyd primer and paint. These factors are related. Corrosion resistance will be determined by the lifespan of the protective primer and paint system. The lifespan of the primer and paint is dependent on surface preparation of the steel. Meticulous mild steel surface preparation and meticulous application of the primer and paint will improve the lifespan of the sculpture. Refer to the PPG Multiprime 4160 Product Data Sheet for more information about surface preparation. Abrasive blast cleaning is recommended.2 Refer to the PPG 7-Line product data sheet for more information about preparation of a primed surface prior to painting.3 • Mild steel has good structural and tensile strength, an appropriate choice. • The types of welds to be used were not specified. Depending on the exact construction, welds can be a point at which a primer coat is discontinuous. Even small gaps or pinholes in the coat allows water vapor to reach uncoated mild steel, resulting in corrosion development under the primer layer. Where possible, use continuous bead 1 Note that PPG Multiprime 4160 Red Primer is not a two-part epoxy as described by the artist in the proposal documents. 2 The product data sheet emphasizes, “Coating performance is, in general, proportional to the degree of surface preparation.” https://max.ppg.com/adaptivemedia/rendition?id=d5d3a2742259cb1fc8963deefd301267d75170b5 3 https://buyat.ppg.com/rep_pafpainttools_files/Pghpaints/tdb/7-282.pdf PO Box 6803 Austin, TX 78762 ( +1) 512.843.2123 j.unruh@outlook.com welds: a weld without gaps will make it easier to form a primer coat that completely protects all exposed welds and mild steel. • For corrosion resistance, all surfaces must be primed, including all corners and edges of eyelashes, the interior of the installation bolt holes, and the underside of the bases. At the base, there is great potential for the metal to be exposed both to trapped moisture in any small airspace between the base and footing, and to groundwater rising through the footing (“rising damp”). A primer coating on all surfaces is a defense against exposure to those sources of moisture. • Both the PPG Multiprime 4160 alkyd primer and the PPG 7-Line LV Alkyd Gloss paint should exhibit acceptable durability. The exact lifespans of both components will depend on factors such as surface preparation for both primer and paint, the durability of the overlying paint layer, fluctuating temperatures or freeze/thaw cycles that cause dimensional changes to the metal (with resulting cracking and delamination), and physical disruption of continuous coatings through abrasion. Depending on conditions experienced, primer and paint failure, peeling, and corrosion of the underlying mild steel may develop earlier than the 40 – 50-year lifespan estimated by the artist. Maintenance of the primer and paint systems will extend the lifespan of the sculpture. • Alkyd paints will shift color towards a more yellow hue with age. The timescale on which that shift will occur is dependent on environmental conditions, and is unknown. • Exact colors of paint to be used are not yet determined. Be aware that certain colors may fade or otherwise shift color slightly due to UV exposure. • Both alkyd primer and paint will become more brittle over time. The timescale on which that will occur is unknown. Installation: An inverted T-shaped footing will be cast of rebar-reinforced concrete, per the engineer’s specifications, with the plinth extending 6” past grade. Cast in place into that plinth will be 4 12” stainless steel bolts, projecting slightly past the height of the sculpture base plate. The sculptures will be lowered over the bolts, and secured with nuts. Installation comments and recommendations: • The engineer’s review has vetted the design to withstand 108 mph wind. While the • petals have the potential to catch wind, in light of the engineer’s review, damage would not be expected unless there is an extreme wind event. Installation drawings specify an optional ½” levelling grout bed. Specifications for a levelling grout were not provided for this review. If a levelling grout is used, confirm that the grout has adequate long-term stability and will not hold moisture, as it will be in direct contact with the underside of the steel bases. Depending on the exact installation configuration, a leveling grout may have the added benefit of raising the sculpture slightly from the footing, assisting with improving rainwater run-off away from the steel bases. Pooling rainwater at the bases will accelerate corrosion. • Consider using tamper-proof nuts for installation, as the nuts will be easily accessible to the public. • No washers or separators were specified with the installation hardware. Consider a nylon or other synthetic washer; that may help seat the nuts more securely, and will prevent the nuts from scratching the primer layer during installation. • Depending on site conditions, because the footing is in contact with groundwater, the footing may eventually exhibit visible “rising damp” damage in the form of salts efflorescence or algal growth. Excessive rising damp may accelerate corrosion at the sculpture bases. The likelihood of “rising damp” depends on site conditions and is unknown. Prefabrication review: Blossom Gazes, Yuliya Lanina June 11, 2024 J. Unruh Page 2 of 4 • No landscaping was specified. Note that any landscaping sprinklers should not hit the concrete plinths or bases of the sculpture; repeated exposure to water will accelerate corrosion. Maintenance: The artist recommends “possible touch up paint due to graffiti, or aging of materials over time. Materials used should last several years before requiring touch up.”4 The artist defines damage as defacement with graffiti. Maintenance comments and recommendations: • The height of the petals and arms ensures that most taggers will not have easy access to those elements. However, the lower stems will be vulnerable to stickers, scratched graffiti, and ink and paint tagging. Common sticker, paint, and ink graffiti removal methods include power washing, solvent poulticing, and cleaning with chemical agents. All of these methods may damage the paint and primer layers. In the event of graffiti accumulation, consult a qualified conservator as needed. Scratched graffiti will require immediate attention; unprotected mild steel can corrode in high humidity in a very short time. • As noted by the artist, the paint would be expected to require touch-up over the lifetime of the sculpture. Identify the person who will be responsible for touching up paint as needed. • Be aware that if paint colors have shifted, touch-up paint may not match the original • Consult with the paint manufacturer to determine how to best prepare the aged paint paint exactly. surface to receive touch-up paint. • Note that certain additional coatings – including acrylic touch-up paints, acrylic topcoats, or water-based anti-graffiti coatings – should not be applied over alkyd paint. • All outdoor sculpture surfaces accumulate bird droppings, airborne dust and grime, and chewing gum and other food. Additionally, webbing insects and possibly birds may colonize the interstices of the eyes/petal construction. Periodic inspection and cleaning should be scheduled and budgeted. • No landscaping was specified. If nearby landscaping watering results in regular wetting of the reinforced concrete footings or painted steel components, the wet/dry cycles will increase the likelihood of corrosion and paint failure. General recommendations: • Information that should be retained in the AIPP file includes: • Dimensions and specifications for all materials used in final design, including exact final design and placement of all steel components, and exact paint colors. • Contact information for Livewire Fabrication, LLC. • Contact information for the installation crane company. • Contact information for the person authorized to perform re-painting. • Detailed installation diagrams, including all dimensions, specifications for the footing, specifications for any grout used, exact specifications for and placement of mounting hardware and separators, sub-surface site features, grade, and landscaping. • Artist's statement re: 4 The artist additionally states that “car painted steel without defacement should weather for 20 years.” As a point of clarification, auto paint is a different paint system, and is normally formulated to last 7 – 12 years (the average period of ownership of a car). Prefabrication review: Blossom Gazes, Yuliya Lanina June 11, 2024 J. Unruh Page 3 of 4 • intended appearance: the degree of abrasion or scratches, paint loss, paint discoloration, graffiti, deformation, or other alterations that would be considered acceptable before the alteration would need to be addressed, or before the sculpture would need to be de-installed. • How to proceed if the painted steel elements require re-painting. • How to proceed if the exact paint brand and colors specified become unavailable for repainting. • Whether or not it would be permissible to re-site the artwork in the future, and if so, the degree of change that would be permissible, including whether it would be permissible to install flowers individually. Prefabrication review: Blossom Gazes, Yuliya Lanina June 11, 2024 J. Unruh Page 4 of 4 Thank you for reviewing my project. Here are the answers to your questions. Dear Julie, Installation Specifications: 1. Your Comments : 1. If a levelling grout is used, confirm that the grout has adequate long-term stability and will not hold moisture, as it will be in direct contact with the underside of the steel bases. Add in separate document and presentation Answer: Grout: There will be a leveling gap between the base plate and the top of concrete and that gap will be grouted. Grout should be shrinkage- compensating or non-shrink Portland cement grout conforming to ASTM C1107. Acceptable products include Master Builders "Masterflow 713 Grout," Dayton Superior "Sure-Grip High Performance Grout," or approved equal. The installer will place one or two small overflow holes in the base plate to ensure that the 1.5" leveling gap is completely filled. The grout will have adequate long-term stability and will not hold moisture. I've updated the presentation and added this information to the conservator's review 2. No washers or separators were specified with the installation hardware. Consider a nylon or other synthetic washer; that may help seat the nuts more securely, and will prevent the nuts from scratching the primer layer during installation . Add in separate document and presentation AnswerFlat Nylon Washer: It would sit between the top of the steel base plate and the steel washer (red below). It should not be visible, and will just protect the paint on the base plate from being scratched by the steel anchor's hardware. Flat Nylon washer will help seat the nuts more securely, and will prevent the nuts from scratching the primer layer during installation I've updated the presentation and added this information to the conservator's review Please add the following to your final design: 1. 1. Dimensions and specifications for all materials used in final design, including exact final design and placement of all steel components, and exact paint colors. – Add in separate document and presentation 2. Placement of steel components A 557 8 A 333 8 2053 4 eyeball bolted to back plate 1791 2 leaves welded to stem 3 SECTION A-A SCALE 1 / 6 peddles and "eyelash" welded to back plate DWG BY: SCALE: npetr LIVEWIRE FABRICATION 76 YORK CREEK ROAD. DRIFTWOOD, TX, 78619 281-974-0223 ben@livewirefabrication.com livewirefabrication.net r t e p n : T C E T I H C R A r t e p n : E T I S B O J CREATED DATE: REVISION #: REVISION DATE: 3. Colors Below is the MSDS for all of the colors. I will be using DURETHANE DTM NEUTRAL BASE - A. Product code 00338125. Created by PPG Industries, Inc. Based on my color samples, the company lasers and creates the colors SAFETY DATA SHEET Date of issue/Date of revision 10 May 2024 Version 33 Section 1. Identification Product name Product code Other means of identification Product type : : 00338125 : Not available. : Liquid. DURETHANE DTM NEUTRAL BASE - A Relevant identified uses of the substance or mixture and uses advised against Product use Industrial applications. Use of the substance/ mixture Uses advised against : Coating. Not applicable. Manufacturer Emergency telephone number PPG Industries, Inc. One PPG Place Pittsburgh, PA 15272 (412) 434-4515 (U.S.) (514) 645-1320 (Canada) SETIQ Interior de la República: 800-00-214-00 (México) SETIQ Ciudad de México: (55) 5559-1588 (México) Technical Phone Number : 888-977-4762 : : : : : : Section 2. Hazards identification OSHA/HCS status : This material is considered hazardous by the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200). FLAMMABLE LIQUIDS - Category 3 SKIN IRRITATION - Category 2 EYE IRRITATION - Category 2A CARCINOGENICITY - Category 2 TOXIC TO REPRODUCTION - Category 2 Percentage of the mixture consisting of ingredient(s) of unknown acute toxicity: 47.6% (oral), 56.2% (dermal), 48.8% (inhalation) Classification of the substance or mixture GHS label elements Hazard pictograms Signal word : Warning United States Page: 1/15 4. 2. Contact information for Livewire Fabrication, LLC. – Add in Maintenance Report Ben McCullough Livewire Fabrication Ben@livewirefabrication.com 281-974-0223 5. 2.1 Contact information for the installation crane company. – Add in Maintenance Report Ben McCullough Livewire Fabrication Ben@livewirefabrication.com 281-974-0223 2.2Contact information for the person authorized to perform re-painting. – Add in Maintenance ReportBen McCullough Livewire Fabrication Ben@livewirefabrication.com 281-974-0223 2.3 Detailed installation diagrams, including all dimensions, specifications for the footing, specifications for any grout used, exact specifications for and placement of mounting hardware and separators, sub-surface site features, grade, and landscaping This is based on placement on site, and otherwise can be explained by a set of shops. 3. intended appearance: the degree of abrasion or scratches, paint loss, paint discoloration, graffiti, deformation, or other alterations that would be considered acceptable before the alteration would need to be addressed, or before the sculpture would need to be de-installed. – Add as separate document and presentation The sculpture needs to be repainted If colors fade more than 20 percent If there is graffiti on the sculpture, especially derogatory and offensive The sculpture needs to be repaired If there is visible deformation of any kind 6. 7. 8. Answer Answer: Answer: The sculpture would need to be de-installed only in case the engineer deems it unsafe due to irreparable structural damage 9. 4.How to proceed if the painted steel elements require re-painting. – Add in Maintenance Report It is very important to inspect for coating loss that exposes steel. Losses over aluminum may be ignored or treated as if for steel, but do not use rust converters on aluminum. For other metals, if the area of coating loss is small, apply a rust converter to any rust that has formed (many brands available in auto supply stores). After the rust converter is dry, apply alkyd paint in a similar color, keeping the new paint confined to the area of loss as much as possible. Rustoleum is a good choice as long as there is no risk of the public touching the repair, as this coating takes a long time to dry. This long drying time relates to its effectiveness in corrosion control. When these simple mends accumulate to the point of unsightly appearance, then recoating or overcoating is needed and a sculpture conservator must be consulted. Drainage. If weep holes for drainage exist at the lower parts of forms, clear them of clogging by carefully inserting a wire or stick into the holes. Report any clogged weep holes that can not be cleared. Do not: ■ Do not wash with a pressure washer. ■ Do not use graffiti-removal products. ■ Do not use all-purpose household cleaners. ■ Do not use Naval Jelly on corrosion. ■ Do not use cleaning solvents other than mineral spirits or naphtha. ■ Do not use Prosoco maintenance products (1) without clearing their use with a supervisor, (2) without testing, and (3) without prior experience in the use of the product. Prosoco products are often very effective but can damage materials not specifically within their range of application. Assume that art falls outside the range of application even though it may be made from the same materials the Prosoco product was meant to treat. 10. 5. How to proceed if the exact paint brand and colors specified become unavailable for repainting. Whether or not it would be permissible to re-site the artwork in the future, and if so, the degree of change that would be permissible, including whether it would be permissible to install flowers individually.- Add in Maintenance Report Similar colors are okay to use It is okay to separate the flowers or move them to another location. After the colors start fading in 10-12 years, please use DTM from PPG product in the field which will bring the color back Final updated presentation is attached. Thank you, Yuliya CITY OF AUSTIN ART IN PUBLIC PLACES PROGRAM/CULTURAL ARTS DIVISION USER DEPARTMENT PUBLIC ART EVALUATION FORM FOR TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY AND MAINTENANCE As per Section IX.A of the AIPP Guidelines, the user and managing departments responsible for housing the artwork are requested to review the artist’s final design (attached) for technical feasibility and maintenance considerations. Please provide a response on this form, or on letterhead signed by a representative in your department. Thank you! Department Artwork Title/Description City of Austin- Transportation and Public Works Blossom Gazes by Yuliya Lanina Evaluation Date Evaluator’s Name August 23, 2024 Tyler Farrar EVALUATOR’S COMMENTS Title Capital Program Consultant SITE TPW supports the site location on the Slaughter Lane Corridor project. The site is consistent with preliminary work done in determining the placemaking location within the Corridor Program. This area is managed and maintained by the Circle C HOA and not PARD. Circle C HOA has agreed to landscape maintenance. INSTALLATION The contractor will access the site by driving over the curb along the west side of Escarpment Blvd. and account for the slope perpendicular to the proposed location. Work anticipated complete four days from Notice to Proceed. The sidewalk and bike lane on the west side of Escarpment Blvd. will be closed down and potential detours will be coordinated with TPW. Excess soil will be removed from the premise by the contractor to their yard. No work shall occur within the critical root zone of the adjacent tree. SAFETY / LIABILITY The property owner, PARD, will not be responsible for damages of site during installation. Safety fence will be used to keep the public out of the construction area. TPW will repair any damage to the existing landscape area to the satisfaction of Circle C HOA. MAINTENANCE PARD is not responsible for maintenance of the area or the artwork. Circle C HOA has agreed to landscape maintenance of the site. The works of art acquired through the AIPP ordinance become the property of the City of Austin and are held in trust by the User Department (TPW). Therefore, the expenses associated with the routine maintenance and potential repair of artwork shall be incurred by TPW. OTHER COMMENTS DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION (Attach additional sheets as necessary) X Support artwork as proposed Support artwork with the following modification(s): Signature: User Department Director or designee Date: August 23, 2024